I find the effect on ordinary people frightening also.
I've said, "You know, most every war ends up with the disputing parties sitting around the negotiating table. I wish they could just end the war and go the negotiating table now, where they could work out whatever differences they have. It would save the lives of countless soldiers and civilians caught up in it, and all the destruction of property and disruption of society."
I get blank looks, like they literally have no idea what I'm talking about.
I take as my example the experience of Native Americans. I suppose one could say they live "in peaceful harmony, with no war, just with disruptions in global economic activity". Not really how I would describe it, though.
TBH, I would have to beg to differ on that point. There's a lot to be said, but the Gaza War has brought a certain dynamic into the light. Virtually no one is seeing this correctly, as everyone sees only what they expect to see. I'm sure there are more but I've only found a single article highlighting it:
As Jews join Pro-Palestinian Protests, the most united supporters of the Zionist State in the US are Christian Evangelicals (VT Foreign Policy 6/16/2024)
See how this pulls back the curtain? Jews--no matter who and how many--that aren't going along with the real program can STFU and GTFO. Meanwhile, a bunch of Christian Republicans who are supporting the real program are suddenly not democracy-killing HyperNazis.
In the words of Rage Against the Machine: "The front line is everywhere, there be no shelter here." They're coming for us all eventually, so we may as well just stand and fight.
(The lyrics still apply, even though they shamefully ended up Raging On Behalf of the Machine.)
Yeah, that's true, they really get stuck defending their delusions against all comers. Of course, once you have discovered the "truth", the first person who should question it is yourself.
Regrettably, I don't think it's courage that's the problem, or perhaps it should be said that it's not the root of it. I believe that it actually has to do with the level of consciousness of individuals.
There's a middle level, above the NPCs, where they can break from the accepted authority but end up just selecting another authority. From there, that new "truth" can be rationalized to any extent whatsoever.
I suppose it could look like a failure (or inability) to face up to the idea that, "Any authority could be wrong on any point, as could I." Seems like a simple thing but, as you say, few do it.
This is one of those places where "They" draw the line.
It's nothing specifically about Biden, it's that the general population cannot be allowed to know how things actually work. In the absence of that, everyone's mind will automatically fill in whatever makes them comfortable. If the subject ever comes up, the fact that no contradictory evidence is available is--incorrectly--taken to be confirmation.
Conspiracy theorists nearly universally consider the "Information War" to be something based entirely around "lies vs truth", but it actually includes numerous methodologies and techniques all aimed at keeping us away from the truth. The number is limited only by the imagination.
(Notice I didn't say "the human imagination"?)
The bigger problem is that a number of nations are being geared up as Fifth-Generation Warfare states for WW3.
The UK is one of them, but there are even bigger initiatives underway in Poland, Germany, the Baltic states, Finland, Moldova, and Romania. They just tried and failed to overthrow Georgia, right on Russia's doorstep.
The populations are awakening and struggling against this, but there's a different battle in every country. The end of the war in Ukraine and the reelection of Trump will certainly change the scenario significantly--and hopefully for the better--but the situation is chaotic and thus unpredictable.
Very little of this has anything to do with Jews. "They" use whatever agents and puppets are convenient. This is a business plan, for which religious or ethnic supremacy or anything other nonsense like that is used simply as a lever of power.
The issues about the income tax were brought up in "America: Freedom to Fascism" when (somehow) Aaron Russo got an interview with the IRS Director.
Before the guy just ran away, he was reduced to saying something like, "Just try not paying your taxes and see what happens." When people say the government is the largest criminal organization ever to have existed, there's your proof.
Here's one where I was surprised they didn't just invent some lie about:
Usermontu's Knee Screw Baffles Experts: 2,600-Year-Old Medical Marvel (Ancient Origins 6/17/2024)
I even went so far as to check his wiki page and, yes, they admit it there too.
Their spin, though, is that it was inserted after death by the mummifiers to preserve the integrity of the body. Really? The same people that take out your innards and put them in jars were worried about a prosthetic pin?
Homicidal ideation is a symptom of psychosis.
I'm not saying that as some sort of clever slam but just pointing out the situation. Millions upon millions of people are literally suffering from psychosis but the "medical establishment" has never noticed.
This actually highlights the way the vast majority of human beings think.
The normies have their Truth handed down to them from the pulpit or the TV screen. The next level up, which includes most "conspiracy theorists", selects their Truth like glossy magazines off a rack. As we see here, TPTB even create the magazines and put them on the shelf for our convenience.
In either case, the facts will precisely match what that person already believed they were correct about, so there is never any need to inquire further. That would just make them uncomfortable.
The thing is, here we are a century later and the basic issue still persists, maybe even worse. As Gilad Atzmon pointed out, "Jewishness" is either a religion, an ethnicity, or a nationality... as convenient to the Jewish Power, of course.
Einstein (a Jew of some type or other) said, "No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." When we look around, we can see that virtually zero people ask, "When you say 'Jew', are you referring to a religion, an ethnicity, or a nationality?" We could get a long way by getting people just to ask that question.
I've often wondered how many times "They" have kicked themselves for not just setting off a tactical nuke at Trump's inauguration. Simple enough and think of all the trouble They would have saved. They could blame it on anyone convenient, or change it to anyone inconvenient in the future. Like J6, but not total nonsense.
Actually, even before that, the election results were so hotly contested that I thought the smart move for Osama would have been to say, "Listen, this is too important and we have to get this sorted out, so we're going to do it again next November." Most people would have gone along with it and far, far more out-of-bounds and unprecedented actions have taken place since then.
I believe there are two lessons here:
One is that "They" are not infallible. They do not have a time machine or a crystal ball. They make bad decisions and suffer setbacks all the time, and a priority is that we are never conscious of this.
The other is that "They" have been off-balance for years due to these bad decisions and setbacks. "They" are growing more desperate by the day, and reacting with whatever they can get their hands on.
Such a situation is chaotic, and thus it is literally unpredictable. We should all hope for the best.
If you're interested in the historicity (as they term it) of Noah's Flood, you may be interested in this:
A few years ago I read a book called "Gods of the New Millennium" by Alan Alford, published in 1999. Just as one tiny part of it, he attempts to date the Flood using a genealogy of patriarchs given in the Bible, starting with a generally accepted year of birth for with Abraham and backing up to Noah.
He observed, though, that the ages at which the men had their sons seemed to be off, being in their late 20's or early 30's, which is fairly late even these days. He surmised that over the immense time span, transcribers had monkeyed with the ages in two ways. First, they had misunderstood numbers written in the Sumerian sexagesimal system (base 60) as decimal. Later, others had thought the high numbers unreasonable and "corrected" them by dividing by a factor of what he believed was five.
Alford undoes these "fixes", adds up the ages, and comes up with a date of 10983 BC for the Flood. Sound familiar? That's pretty much exactly the date of the suspected Younger Dryas Impact, causing huge climatic changes and including a sea level rise of 400 feet. Sounds like we have our Flood!
Alford never mentions the Younger Dryas, the associated Impact Hypothesis, or Meltwater Pulse 1B. I think he was entirely ignorant of these and I believe much of the research had not yet been done. Yet there he is hitting the unknown target dead bullseye.
So then you flip it back around and see that the story of Noah's Flood has been handed down for 13,000 years, starting with people that were basically Stone Age. It makes you give that story a lot of leeway considering, you know, maybe some of the fine details might have gotten changed along the way... lol
Oh, I don't at all think it's the inspired word of a divine being.
Nor is it what we might consider the opposite: pure fiction. It's filled with details and holes and bizarre oddities that no one writing a fairy story would ever include. Open it up to a random place, read a few sentences, and ask yourself why the proposed "fiction author" would have put those there.
The Bible--and many other such ancient works--are what they appear to be on the surface: collections of writings considered important enough to be passed down over centuries and millennia.
However, it all comes with the world's biggest asterisk. The narratives were subjected to all manner of forces which would distort them, and it is incredibly difficult to undo that distortion and reveal the information contained and transmitted down to us.
But when you do, I think of this analogy: On one side of town you find a complicated key, and on the other side of town you find a fancy box with an elaborate lock. You find that the key opens the lock. What kind of person says, "Well, this is mere happenstance," and throws away the key and the box without examining it's contents?
It has to be properly decoded, carefully reverse engineering various corruptions, misunderstanding, rewritings, misperceptions, etc. Virtually no one is up to that task.
Those that aren't, though, are completely unaware of that fact and talk loud and with certainty about the Bible anyway.
We're living in an time when all bets are off, but I don't think it will be Newsom. He's been dead since early 2022. Not even kidding!
I've followed the issue very closely since then. He's even been reelected governor in a virtually non-existent campaign. But in all that time they have never--to my knowledge--rolled out a clone or body double or even a dude in a mask. It's all been a light touch with Deepfake and CGI, and what basically amounts to stage magic misdirection. The basic thing is that no one is looking and when they do, they see exactly what they expect to see.
I mean, I get that "Joe Biden" is not Joe Biden, so clearly they could pull it off, but it seems to me that Virtual President Newsom is a bridge too far even at this crazy point..
You know, I've thought along those lines but I've never been able to make a rigorous connection between the longheads and the Nephilim. Consider their typical characteristics:
Longheads: long skulls (obv) and tall but otherwise normal human bodies. Infrequently, the skulls have hair and it appears reddish. Apparently lived freely in community with humans.
Nephilim: giants, six fingers, six toes, double rows of teeth, red hair, often violent and cannibalistic, sometimes lived with humans but more often in separate and often hostile communities.
Not much overlap except for the red hair, which is very intriguing but far from conclusive. In years I've never stumbled across evidence as to what their real relationship might have been.
Also, there's the issue of beauty and it's standards. The Nephilim may have been big and powerful, but I don't think I've ever heard them described as beautiful.
Saul is described as "tov" and "bachur". Translations vary, but in any case I think he is being described as attractive. Well, today as in all times, beauty standards are set by the elites in society. Longheads burials have often indicated they were the elites of the day, so you see how it ties together that Saul had "movie star good looks".
In my view, we still have a mystery on our hands.
What shocking is how almost no one is shocked by any of this drive to WW3. It's really enough to make you think that humanity deserves what it gets. The ultimate irony, of course, is that no individual who gets hurt by war thinks they deserve what they got.