I'd add this one:
RING OF POWER EMPIRE OF THE CITY
As I watched it, I was surprised at the number of items that had fallen out of the conversation and I had not heard mentioned in many years
Long ago I thought something like this was a good idea. It's not. At all. It's just another psyop to buy time or distract or give false hope or--finger crossed!--cement Their fascism.
The proof is this: if TPTB don't give a shit about the current Constitution, why would anyone think They would give a shit about any revision?
The key practical observation is this: the Constitution was fundamentally to restrain the government, but TPTB only talk about it when it empowers them or restrains others. They never ever ever mention it when it restrains their own power. The sole exception to that is when it serves as an alibi ("Well, I sure would have done that for you but, you know, the Constitution and all, amirite?")
Looking deeper, the situation is this: constitutions are fine and all so everyone can have some idea of what was explicitly agreed on, but in the end, honorable men will do honorable things, and dishonorable men will do dishonorable things. There is no piece of parchment with ink splattered on it that alters that.
In the classic Western, "The Outlaw Josey Wales":, the character of Ten Bears sums it up eloquently: "No signed paper can hold the iron. It must come from men."
PS: The one instance that comes to mind of a politician candidly acknowledging that the Constitution restrained his actions was--you guessed it--DJT. During the pandemic, some dumbshit reporter asked him if it wasn't "irresponsible" or whatever that he didn't lock down the country. He said it was not a good idea, and besides, he was not empowered to do so (his words) "by something called the Constitution".
How bad is it when people have to be reminded of such things?
This is an important discovery so we are handed a fundamental diversion from what it implies. How could we expect otherwise?
They pass off the implication as an "Assyrian influence". All the smart people already know that, since Assyria was right next door. But of course it's Assyrian! Is that all? No.
A more detailed description of the item and it's context is in this article:
‘Extremely rare, beautiful’ First Temple-era ‘genie’ seal discovered in Jerusalem 2,700-year-old stone seal is inscribed with the words ‘Yehoʼezer son of Hoshʼayahu’; its image of a protective winged demon or genie betrays Assyrian influence (Times of Israel 8/29/2024)
It is likely that the owner was a senior official during the Kingdom of Judah and used the seal to sign documents or certificates, the IAA said.
But think about that: a top-level Jew is using the image of a pagan deity to seal official documentation. Does that make sense? It should draw our attention as much as seeing an bishop wave bye-bye with the mano cornuto (and no, he's not at the rock show).
Also, two names are inscribed on the seal: Yehoʼezer and Hoshʼayahu. They describe the importance as being that these names are very similar to names of characters in the Bible. Sure, okay, but that's not the important part. Another diversion.
The "yeho" and the "yahu" in those names are variants of Yahweh. The first name means something like "Yahweh is preeminent" and the second "Yahweh has helped". So clearly, father and son thought Yahweh was a great guy, didn't they?
That's a big problem: the Bible says the Juden slipped back and forth from paganism, but here we have both Yahweh, paganism, and official Jewdom combined in a single object. Can the circle be squared?
The answer is yes, but this post has gone on long enough. Such a thing as discussed here is far from the only instance. Another one--also entirely ignored--concerns the very city of Jerusalem.
The Jews had a millennium to name the city whatever they wanted. They could do so now, if they so pleased. Nor is it all that strange an idea, since the Muslims already refer to it as Al Quds ("The Holy").
It turns out the name Jerusalem comes originally from "uru shalem", which means something like "the city of Shalim". And who is Shalim? A pagan deity, of the Ugarit pantheon to be precise. Is the city named after a pagan god when it should be named after Yahweh?
Well, maybe it already is.
I haven't watched Suspicious0bservers in a long time, but the current channel I'm very slowly trying to make my way through is Sylvie Ivanowa's NewEarth. I had considered myself familiar with her work but I went back to the very beginning of her channel and found some things that were entirely new to me and quite startling.
One of those subjects came in a four part series called "Ruins of Old Earth, a Gary Schoenung Documentary" posted 10/3/2015:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExzeKeJQ_lI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtlfvK37LZs&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9HRVUrmkgs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alLm9YVneBg
Interestingly, there's no narration and the long videos just zoom from site to site on Google Earth. It's far beyond any compilation of documented ancient sites and it seems like it goes on forever.
What I personally gathered from it is that most of the Earth was covered by innumerable ancient sacred structures, connected to one another by sacred geometry. There's no trace of this in the historical record and no researchers are pursuing the topic. In fact, I think the popular researchers were put forth to divert and keep us away form the topic.
I thought we knew little about the ancient history of the planet, and I flattered myself that I knew more than most about that little. Then I came to find out how little I really know.
Learning how ignorant you are becomes a real theme!... lol
To be honest, it's a peek into how truly bizarre things are and how far the whole world has gone beyond the looking glass. This is aside from any outrage or other reaction.
The admitted pretext is that one single baby got paralyzed, and this was less than a week previously. Just a tiny point among all other "ongoing circumstances" is: do any governments--let alone ones at war--ever move that fast? You end up having to ask yourself the question, "How could anyone possibly believe this, let alone virtually everyone?"
When you focus on this simple question, the inevitable conclusion is that human "rationality" is nothing at all like what we we're all supposed to think it is.
No, never heard of that site, but that's really the theme of this kind of research: when you think you have a handle on how strange the story of the world really is, you stumble on something new that forces you to believe it must be even stranger than that.
The workmanship on the granite in those caves is strikingly similar to that of certain of the these sarcophagi:
Lighting Up Saqqara: An Electrifying Theory for the Serapeum Sarcophagi (Ancient Origins 1/28/2022)
Scroll around or watch one of the videos and you'll see the ones I'm referring to: absolutely smooth black granite and corners it looks like you could cut yourself on.
And one thing I forgot to mention in the pole shift material is that it seems clear to me that the whole event was trigger by a comet impact about 13,000 years ago:
Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
You'll see they work extremely hard to tell you it's all BS. But if we accept it and start to put together what really happened, you'll find a lot of history can be tied to it, everything from the pole shift to the Great Flood to Gobekli Tepe.
It's been years and years since I looked at the subject, so the links I have may no longer work. I'm sorry to do it this way but let me just dump the list on you, and if they aren't live or archived the titles may be enough to track them down. (Also, sometimes when you search on the titles, you stumble across things equally or even more interesting!):
Pole shift hypothesis The Equator 12,500 Years Ago?
Ancient Equator 12,500 years ago and Richat Structure Atlantis
PART I - GEOGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIPS
Update – The Only Writings Left by the True Builders of the Pyramid Decoded.
Keep in mind I didn't save the links because they were God's honest truth, but only, "Hm, I'll have to sort through this one of these days." Good hunting!
It's pretty hazy, but as I've put it together there was a crustal displacement and a pole shift in the not too distant past. The big anomalies that come up are:
-
There's more ice in Greenland than there should be, according to mainstream history.
-
There's too little ice in the Antarctic, according to mainstream history.
-
The Piri Reis map shows Antarctica connected to South America.
-
There's evidence of extremely rapid cooling at certain sites.
-
A collection of ancient sites are located along a great circle, which seems to have been the former Equator.
It goes on with various other strange evidence, including that "They" do not want anyone talking about any of this. It's possible that other topics like Atlantis, Gobekli Tepe, and the Great Flood were just angles on this same event.
Since you're clearly "on the case", there's one other angle I'd add to it all that I heard along the way (and that no one talks about). There used to be a YT video on this from a man named Kevin Boyle posted during the "pandemic", but last time I searched for it to archive it, it had been vaporized. This is what he explained....
Many know that "flu" is short for "influenza" and refers to the illness (supposedly) caused by "influenza viruses", but few know anything beyond that. I'll assume you're already up to speed on the idea that "viruses are tiny living creatures that travel via infection and cause illness" is entirely bullshit.
Boyle explained that as far back as the 1500's, there were pandemics and scientists of the day in Italy studied them to find out WTH was happening. They soon figured out that it was no form of infectious transmission because the pandemics would outrun ships traveling between different cities that had outbreaks
They actually came up empty. Just could not figure it out. The only thing they could correlate pandemics to--as crazy as it sounds then and now--was the number of sunspots. They ended up referring to it as "influenza della stella", or "the influence of the star". That loony (?) idea is where we get the very word for it.
So what the shit is going on, and has been going on for centuries, apparently? Something big, but I've as yet to crack it.
Funny you mention that, because there's a phenomenon that just preceded COVID that has yet to be explained:
In about October 2019-January 2020, before anyone was talking about COVID getting out of Wuhan, you may remember that tons of people got "the flu". They all described it as the worst flu they ever had and were sick as a dog, confined to bed for a week or so. It was so prevalent that I've heard it mentioned two dozen times in podcasts from that time frame.
I heard one guy on THC saying that he was living at the time in a very rural, isolated area, and there's no way he caught a communicable disease. I've never tried to study the pattern, but it covered Maine to Texas to California. As it stands it's an enigma, and a significant one. What the hell happened?
Conspiracy theorists have forgotten all about this.
The video doesn't delve this deep, but the Kingdom of Hawaii was infiltrated and dominated by members of a small group of families, a Hidden Elite, that have been behind and orchestrated many important events in American history. I touched on this particular incident in a post a few months ago:
It’s a (very) Small World 3x3: 3 Elite Families working together in 3 locations (and no one ever noticed) (3/31/2024)
Just to take a moment to amplify a bit on how you have to have the proper context to read the mainstream histories of these Elites, many things you read take on a new light under the framework that nefarious characters were at work. We can examine the wiki of the main (hidden) actor, Charles Coffin Harris:
Harris also was appointed a member of the Privy Council on December 7, 1863, by King Kamehameha V, the former Prince Lot. In 1864 he was appointed to the upper House of Nobles in the legislature. Kamehameha V insisted on a new 1864 Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaii, restoring some of the power to the monarchy that had been lost through the years. Harris issued his legal opinion that the king had such a right, and produced an early draft. A constitutional convention failed to reach agreement, so Harris got the cabinet to negotiate directly with Kamehameha V who accepted the result which lasted 23 years.
So Harris sidelines a new constitution and keeps Kamehameha under his thumb for over two decades. Not too bad. How about this?
On the death of Kamehameha V at the end of 1872 without naming an heir, the constitution specified an election of a new ruler by the legislature. Harris backed David Kalākaua, who lost the election. The new liberal King Lunalilo had no use for Harris in his cabinet, but died just a year later. On February 18, 1874, King Kalākaua won the next election and appointed Harris to the supreme court of the Kingdom.
Well, well, Harris FTW once more thanks to "died suddenly". Harris is supposed to come off as just a helpful servant to the people of the Kingdom, but details of his importance are glossed over:
His first wife died in March 1870; they had a son Frank Hervey Harris (1845–1875) and a daughter Nannie Roberta Harris, who married John Dominis Brewer (1845–1879) in 1872 and after his death, David Rice of Boston. Her first husband was a son of the namesake company C. Brewer & Co.
First, "David Rice of Boston" was assuredly a member of the Rice Family of the Boston Brahmins. Ever hear of Rice University? Founded by one of them: William Marsh Rice. Their mascot is "Sammy the Owl", and one may make of that what one will.
They also hotlink to C. Brewer & Co., and admit that it was part of the oligarchy known as the "Big Five", but it goes deeper. The company was taken over by Henry Augustus Pierce. I didn't bother to do the legwork on this because it gets dismaying to find out you were right, but I can guarantee that this Pierce is related to: President Franklin Pierce, Thomas Percy of the Gunpowder Psyop, and Pauline Pierce, reputed to have been knocked up by Aleister Crowley to bless us all with Barbara (Pierce) Bush.
Didn't mean to write all this, but one thing leads to another.
I personally think we're way beyond such facts having a practical impact, and it brings up a story from the long ago days of Osama's birth certificate.
There was a court case, in Maryland IIRC, where the plaintiffs were trying to get him disqualified from the ballot in that state. The counterargument from his attorney was that the birth certificate was indeed fake, but--get this--it was soooo fake that no one would have ever reasonably presented it as evidence of his qualification for the office of President. Thus, it could not be used evidence of his ineligibility.
A compelling and successful argument, obviously!
There's hope, there's hope.
I remember, probably about 15 years ago, there being many days when I'd walk down the street and there were so many that the disturbing thought wasn't, "Jesus, WTF is raining down all over us?" it was, "How in TF are people not noticing this?"
Personally, I almost never see chemtrails any more. They slowed down tremendously under Trump then sort of bounced around off the bottom of the charts, most days without any. Now they're rare. Assuming that observation can be generalized, my point is that this promise doesn't cost anything.
Wouldn't a more meaningful promise be to track down and prosecute everyone associated with what he himself refers to as a crime? It reminds me of the report on torture that came out under Obama. "It was all in the past," he told us.
The RFK assassination was faked. You can tell by an examination of the photos. Well, the photos that remain in existence, that is, because they've been trying to annihilate them.
Digging this out of the thread of stirred up mud clouding the waters, we find:
These photos you're about to see are from Scott Enyart. He took these photos on the night of the assassination. The LAPD later confiscated these photos and refused to give them back. After six months he got them back, but only got 26 out of 36 photos. He believed he didn't get the full set. Scott later learned that the LAPD destroyed 2400 pieces of evidence and his photographs before the trial.
Suspicious, right? Then you can add what we find in this article:
New Twist in Kennedy Mystery : Photo Negatives of Robert F. Kennedy’s Assassination Disappear (LA Times 1/18/1996)
The negatives of some photographs taken in the moments surrounding the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy are missing.
“Somebody, for some reason, is making sure those photos do not reach public view,” Greenwald said. Louis “Skip” Miller, an attorney for the city, conceded that the incident in Inglewood was strange, but he scoffed at Greenwald’s suggestion. “What happened here is just a petty theft,” Miller said. “A run of bad luck.”
Okay then, Skip! But I still suggest that everyone take a close look at the photos for themselves, and while doing so simply asking yourself the question, "Are these real?" A gallery of the Bill Eppridge photos are here. You'll note how incredible shitty the "forensic value" is in the first place. Great job, Bill.
I have a writeup somewhere on the flaws if anyone needs the hints. It's best, though, that anyone interested do it for themselves because otherwise it's all too easy to accept or reject the evidence of your own eyes when someone else has told you what you're seeing.
PS: Does Bobby Jr know about this? Hard to believe he doesn't, but it's possible and there is no evidence either way. There are significant negative implications in either case, though.
It's just perspective, but it's more like, "The Harris-Walz campaign cares about the needs of hobbits, America's most neglected minority."
I take it as a sign anyone with a shred of talent, enough to not use a crappy photo, has been driven away from the campaign by these abusive freaks.
Reddit is horrible, to be sure. When he died, I couldn't post a short, pure-text post about Colin Powell and his key role in the coverup of the My Lai Massacre. That's mainstream, Wikipedia-level history, and that was three years ago.
More annoying than that--and I believe this to be absolutely purposeful--is that it has been absolutely flooded with annoying shills. It's sort of the inverse of the homeless situation: you're one of the few normal people trying to live in a town populated by loud, smelly, ignorant, aggressive, mentally-unstable people.
The bad drives out the good. The plan is simplicity itself.
One of the most iconic montages in cinema history: Louis Armstrong - What a Wonderful World (Good Morning, Vietnam's Soundtrack)
I hope everyone puts this in the proper overall perspective: a pedo human trafficker thought federal prosecutors were too dirty to deal with--even to help himself and screw a guy who didn't like him--and an accused quadruple murderer puts himself at risk because thinks people need to know the story about how gross these feds really are.
And I think to myself, "What a wonderful world."
A psychological trick used by tech companies back in the day was the "one-time charge". They'd save up their losses then write them off all at once against a single bad earnings report, which would soon fade from memory. Then it was right back to, "Look how great everything's going!"
The technique became so refined that they would do it in advance and sell it as good news. They'd set up a grand new initiative with huge funding and much fanfare. Over the course of time, they'd shuffle losses off to that venture, which would eventually go kaput. Then in paragraph 14 of a story in the weekend financial pages, they'd say, "Can't win 'em all, but we'll keep trying!"
Worked every time.
I feel that this is vital intel for those who like to game out potential Big Igloo scenarios. And keep in mind that this is the reaction with relatively mild political protesters are who are upset about things happening thousands of miles away to people they've never met.
When the Russian leadership is asked, from time to time, who they might prefer as US president, they invariably say that it's inappropriate to even comment on another country's internal political matter. Of course, the Biden Administration could cite this as proof of the Rooskies' utter deviousness but they never mention it.
I give them credit for being smart enough not to Streisand the hell out of the issue and just go with pure fabrication.