2
monkeymagic 2 points ago +2 / -0

that’s like trusting the same casino that you work for

5
monkeymagic 5 points ago +5 / -0

i lived in the attic apartment of a very old house for awhile. the activity there, which was mostly loud noises like stomping and whatnot, drove my girlfriend at the time to move out.

3
monkeymagic 3 points ago +3 / -0

just like this other thing that is very arguably fictitious in nature.

do not pass go. go back to “doctor”.

1
monkeymagic 1 point ago +3 / -2

these platforms were established on a mountain of false pretense. if the average person had the upward mobility to actually sue twitter (or facebook for that matter) for all the egregiously illegal shit they do directly to their constituency, said platforms would cease to exist in a heartbeat 💓

there shouldn’t even be an argument about free speech in regards to major social media platforms. the argument should be centered on their business practices. they need to be shut down. anyone that willingly uses them at this point is a god damn moron.

1
monkeymagic 1 point ago +3 / -2

there is very clearly zero fucking demand for proof of any kind.

1
monkeymagic 1 point ago +1 / -0

you seriously believe that alex jones is being sued for 15 thousand dollars?

-4
monkeymagic -4 points ago +1 / -5

you’re referring to the 1912 presidential election. i’m fully aware of the fact that you think you are referring to the 2020 election though. it’s comical

1
monkeymagic 1 point ago +2 / -1

russia is kinda regressing in those terms a little right? disolving/resolving the USSR out of outright necessity for example.

totalitarianism doesn’t work. everyone knows it doesn’t work. these attempts at a global authoritarian state (in my opinion) are literally designed to fail and be pilfered by profiteers. no offense to anyone living in wumao land currently….but my guess is the ppl i’m apologizing to out of human capacity would be some of the first to agree with what i’m saying.

2
monkeymagic 2 points ago +3 / -1

the shit you write doesn’t really make much sense.

1
monkeymagic 1 point ago +1 / -0

why doesn’t the headline of this article you attached reflect the title of your post?

4
monkeymagic 4 points ago +4 / -0

so whistleblowers are gonna out big pharma using media outlets that big pharma ostensibly owns?

let me know how that turns out

1
monkeymagic 1 point ago +2 / -1

i work with a retarded guy that’s smarter than dice

5
monkeymagic 5 points ago +6 / -1

there’s a shitload of sites like this one in similar stages of development. right now i’m here because nothing extremely stupid and shortsighted has been done to limit speech here yet. if that changes i move. there’s plenty of competition

4
monkeymagic 4 points ago +5 / -1

is this the same dude that defected to belarus?

-1
monkeymagic -1 points ago +1 / -2

what a vague, poorly written article.

view more: Next ›