Consider the source of this tech. We had zero computers crunching predictive tensors, then we invent the radio, listen to the cosmos, and here we are 100 years later.
It's gotta be aliens, and as such, it has to be aimed toward extincting us to steal the resources.
Yep, that aligns, the citizen prediction (and manipulation) model.
But you're thinking this is new technology when it's almost 80 years old.
Public AI is meant to make the citizens believe that it can't accurately model entire populations of individuals. It is to disarm the concerns, to feign incapability, and to create ways to legislate access away.
The governments have very powerful AI. The governments want to be sure your AI isn't as strong. They poison data (are a lot of social media posts that aren't logically correct? It's ruining a model'straining data.)
They harvested good data then salt the earth to prevent new growth.
Yes about data centers.
I really don't have much opinion on it. I think my original comment said maybe.
I don't concede that your debunking was rational: it must be new and official statement, yet not on the front page of Google search.
Whether or not it's true, your methodology won't help move the needle.
Things that are 3 months old are no longer true? You have no substance to your argument.
Why do you think that being "first search result" delegitimizes anything?
Your own video that you linked is years old. You're being hypocritical.
You're asking for the Iranian State to announce that they are gaslighting their citizens, and that it all must happen in one day? And that it not be indexed on Google.... Preposterous.
You need to leave c/conspiracies and join c/officialpublicrecord
It's literally exactly both of those things in precisely the context i described.
A viral clip purportedly showing a U.S. B-52 bomber shot down and paraded through Iranian streets cannot be accepted at face value: U.S. Central Command has been publishing footage of B-52s striking Iranian targets as part of Operation Epic Fury [1][2], while independent fact-checkers have already identified visually similar viral clips of U.S. bombers — specifically a B-2 clip — as 100% likely AI-generated using detection tools and scale/geometry anomalies [3]. The available reporting does not supply conclusive forensic proof that the specific B-52 “shot-down” clip is genuine, and precedent plus technical red flags strongly indicate it is propaganda or AI-manipulated, not authentic battlefield footage [3].
Try again. Iran never claimed anything about the B52 and never will
I guess https://factually.co/topics/b-52-shot-down-claim never happened?
Part of the conditions of surrender, maybe, includes a false heroic story told internally of the Iranians taking down a B52.
US has to wipe the inventory so the story can't be debunked.
Top brass willing to pay 8 men.
I guess so.
One thing, as we put more AI- generated content online, new models being trained that rely on webscraping will get more and more skewed/burned/overtuned.
In the end, the noise will overtake the information and we'll get convergence:
The literal opposite is happening: companies are being forced to use AI to keep up, but tokens are expensive.
So, now AI is trading tokens in exchange for equity in the customer's company.
The businesses that don't use AI are developing slower, and those who are using AI are becoming the property of the AI companies.
Soon, every new and successful company will be owned primarily by AI. You will own nothing and...
Nothing in my arsenal is registered in any way, but I'm sure they tracked each credit card purchase so they know i have a little something.
"Half the fun is showing off all the chemistry you practiced while squirreled away." - Uncle Ted's LLM
TIL u/Free-will-of-choice is Adrian P Cooper
Just a Cohencidence