I haven't heard of it being leaked but given the public nature I do want to hear it if available. She's so obviously guilty and he's so obviously innocent but still. Some people (retards and women but I repeat myself) can only be convinced by emotional stuff.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Just remember they had no problem showing you Gage Grosskreutz exploded arm or George Floyd getting snuffed out. They don't mind showing you gore and disturbia.
Just not this evidence.
Oh, I haven't forgotten. It's clearly all bullshit. But I'm more interested in actually getting a copy if it was leaked. Though as far as I can tell, it wasn't.
Typically, 911 audio is FOIA-able, right? Evidenced by the fact it is all over YouTube cop slop videos. Attainable, you'd probably watch the trial, find the date and time of the call, and FOIA the records around that period involving those people.
I don't think I can do that as a non-American but I hope someone does it.
Search around for it and I'm sure you can find it because I heard it somewhere along the line in my research.
The thing which I found odd was that he says something like, "OMG, she killed the kids!" "The kids"? Not "my children" or "our children" or their names?
It was another mark of the phoniness of the whole thing but there's zero way that would count as evidence for anyone that chooses to believe otherwise.
There's nothing weird about the phrase "the kids" but ok thanks.
but ok thanks for your vital insight no one asked for.
No one asked for your comment either and yet you made it. What a stupid non sequitur.
we all appreciate when the forum trolls reveal themselves which they can't seem to help themselves from doing
lolololololol
Let's all be stepping away from ad hominem, non sequitur and any other fallacies please. It's ok to disagree.
u/Standhaft_Garithos
It's not a personal attack to tell someone that what they said makes no sense.
I agree. Nothing has been removed. I just felt like jumping in before things possibly went into violation territory.