The pathogen is nothing. The terrain is everything
- Pathogen aka path of generation (inception towards death)
- Terrain aka terra; earth aka land (life) opposed to sea (inception towards death).
Others utilize suggested (nothing) to distract one from perceivable (everything).
dress in red
DRESS, verb - "To make straight or a straight line; to adjust to a right line; to put into order"...
RED (life) within DRESS (inception towards death).
lady in red
LA'DY, noun - "woman of distinction"
Aka womb (momentum) of man (motion) establishing distinct reactions (life) within action (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Chris-de-burgh-the-lady-in-red-lyrics
how things have not changed is beyond me
Beings (life) within change (inception towards death) are ignoring perceivable for holding onto suggested. Afterwards they blame each other for the consequences.
Blaming another implies shirking ones response-ability (free will of choice). If one wields free will of choice, then one cannot blame others for consequences.
concepts that corrupt
Concept aka "that which can be framed within mind"...ones consent permits others to frame suggested information within ones mind/memory.
authorities
Ones consent authorizes the suggestions of others.
rulers of the darkness
Ignoring (dark) perceivable (bright) permits others to rule by suggestion, which exploits ones ignorance, while obfuscating ones perception.
king
German König; from kuning aka CUNNING (possessing knowledge). Perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto; hence others tempting one to claim (consent) possession over suggested (information).
the high place
Intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies ones consent to "stand under" the suggestions of another, hence elevating others onto a higher place than the submissive self.
An allegory...if one puts others onto a pedestal; then one digs self into a pit.
forces of iniquity (hostile)
If audience (life) ignores host (inception towards death), then shit gets hostile. On the other hand...if audience adapts to host; then it remains hospitable.
joi
JOI aka JOY (passion of emotion)...emotion tempts one to ignore being (life) within motion (inception towards death).
K not having a name by suggesting his name be Joe
a) Aka JOE K...phonetic "joke". Others suggest jokes to distract with comedy (life) from tragedy (inception towards death)...TRAGIC, adjective (Latin tragicus) - "fatal to life".
"JOE K" on itself implies a suggested temptation for oneself; while ones consent to suggested "JOI" implies one falling for the suggested temptation.
b) perceivable doesn't suggest names; it designates units (unus; ones) by setting itself apart from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception).
Does this mean that Joi was never truly emotionally attached to K?
K's consent to suggested Joi implies K's mind attaching itself to the temptation of emotion.
Was she just following her task as an ai companion?
Consenting to suggested implies following another, while ignoring ones position within perceivable...suggested "task"; "ai" and "companion" are utilized to tempt ones consent to ignore perceivable for suggested.
blade runner
BLADE (inception towards death aka "known ledge") RUNNER (life) aka ones free will of choice balancing within momentum of motion.
Sleight of hand: "living on the edge" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nqcL0mjMjw
The truth of being and the truth of knowing is another expression of the Double Truth.
One can only be (temporary) within known (ongoing)...others suggest "truth" to tempt temporary to hold onto, while ignoring ongoing. Ones consent to suggestions by another one establishes "double" aka dualism, hence binding oneself to another one.
PDF incoming
Thanks.
now that I know that viruses don't fucking exist
a) VI'RUS, noun (Latin Virulent) - "poison" + POISON, noun (Latin pus) - "any thing infectious, malignant, or noxious to health".
b) ones consent implies vector; the suggestions by others implies virus.
c) taking your sentence as an example...NOW (implies existence); KNOW (knowledge; perceivable; implies confines of existence) and DON'T (doing nothing; implies suggested poison). Ones consent to use all these words together implies the vector exploited by others to poison one with.
"DON'T" implies a malignant suggestion (temptation); something that can infect ones mind/memory if consented to (information) and thereby a noxious risk (ignorance of perceivable) to ones health.
a) VIRUS (poison) + CORONA (crown; ornament; head-covering)...ones consent crowns self with the suggested poison by others.
b) ENGLISH, adjective (Latin ango, from the sense of pressing, depression, laying, which gives the sense of level)...adding angles (anglo) to the articulation of sound (languages) makes the spreading of suggested poison worse.
Perceivable sound implies flat; suggested noise implies perpendicular; being instrument in-between resonance/dissonance implies wavelength.
we do our best to set them apart
VS (versus) implies friction by putting things together. Reasoning over suggested implies friction within self before friction against others.
all the same...
...each one within different.
once and for all
"all for ones/once and ones/once for all".
suddenly worthless
SUD'DEN, adjective (Latin subitaneus) - "happening without previous notice"...suggested money implies promissory notes (notices).
Furthermore; NOTICE (observation by senses) implies NOTE (to know aka to perceive). Binding oneself by promise (consent) to suggested notes/notices contradicts; inverts; ignores this.
Being implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable)...contradicting; inverting and ignoring this makes oneself worthless.
fiat
Aka fieri - "let it be done". Suggested information implies fiat; ones consent to any of it implies "let it be done to me".
Meanwhile in reality...if life consents to let inception towards death be done, then life dies.
their greatest weapon (technology)
Aka reasoning (logy) over artificial (techno) by utilizing ones weapon of choice (consent).
herded very easily thanks to modern pollution (amenities)
AME'NITY, noun (Latin amanitas; amanus) - "agreeableness of situation" aka ones consent given to whatever others situate as suggestion "into" one.
expanding outward with the promise of
a) Nature doesn't promise those within outward expansion...it generates center (life) within surrounding (inception towards death) aka inwards (loss) expansion (growth).
b) ones consent to suggested promises implies PROM'ISSORY, adjective - "binding declaration of something to be done". Consenting implies by ones "free" will of choice, which one then binds to a chosen one, when consenting to suggested.
Now you in the good spirit of power and wealth believe...
Why would those within power and wealth need to believe in anything? BELIE'VE, verb - "to credit upon the authority or testimony of another".
Consent implies testimonial creed of many AND authorized credit of few.
Now imagine you are a lineaged oligarch
a) government by few (oligarchy) implies consent by many to permit few to govern their minds with suggested information.
b) there can be only one line (inception towards death) for each life drawn within.
empire
Aka EN (in) PERE (production) aka being within (life) production (inception towards death).
Being implies temporary EM within ongoing PIRE, and sustaining temporary within ongoing implies yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
all empires follow the same methodology
a) EM (difference) PIRE (sameness)...one can be tempted with suggestions to ignore self for following others, hence ignoring to express differently for being suppressed in the same manner.
b) methodlogy aka META (between) HODOS (way), which implies being (life) in-between way (inception towards death)...suggested LOGY (logic; reasoning over suggested) tempts one to ignore that.
weakness
Only within strong (inception towards death) can weak (life) grow stronger, while simultaneously succumbing.
- A (artificial) I (intelligence; intelligo; to understand)
Standing under artificial (suggested) kills one within natural (perceivable), because being (life) within natural order (inception towards death) can't be ignored for long...
- CYBER aka cipher - "0, which, standing by itself, expresses nothing, but increases or diminishes the value of other figures, according to its position"
- DYNE - "unit of force" aka unitas; unus - "one".
Being implies one (life) by force (inception towards death)...adding zero diminishes ones value.
Edit:
a) Terminator (inception towards death) saying I'll be back (life).
b) JOHN (to be fixed) CONNOR (to know)...holding onto suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable. John kills Connor while being terminated.
c) T-800 (solid); T-1000 (liquid)...solid (life) dies within liquid (inception towards death).
netflix
a) NET (to ensnare) FLIX (to flicker)
b) Flicker implies - "onomatopoeic and suggestive of quick motion" aka onomatopoeia - "formation of words or names by imitation of natural sounds; the naming of something by a reproduction of the sound made by it or a sound associated with it".
In short...suggested fiction to ensnare those who ignore perceivable reality.
no going back to normal
Norms imply suggested outcomes, being implies within perceivable origin. The former tempts one to follow along; while the latter inspires one to resist temptation. Choosing to hold onto a suggested temptation destroys the status quo of being.
In other words...to be alive implies within degradation (inception towards death), hence needing to resist wanted temptations. All suggested norms tempt one to progress along degradation while ignoring to grow ones resistance.
leave the world behind
Being (life) within a world/vault (inception towards death) hinders (to harm, injure, impair, check, repress) one...unless resisted. Watching a "movie" implies looking at suggested motion, while ignoring to resist being moved, hence movies tempting ones emotion (Latin emoveo; to move from).
disinfo agents
a) There can be only one agent (inception towards death) for each regent (life) within.
b) Consenting to suggested regent (information) tempts one to ignore perceivable agent (inspiration).
c) RE'GENT, adjective (Latin regens, from rego, to rule)...consenting to suggested permits those suggesting to rule over those consenting.
cut from the same
Each difference (life) implies cut from same (inception towards death).
zionist cloth
a) Consenting (-ist) to suggested (-ism) puts the cloth of ignorance over ones perceiving eyes within perceivable.
b) ZION (Hebrew; צִיּוֹן) aka Tsiyyon (Phonetic tsee-yone) - "to see one".
- TER'ROR, noun (Latin terreo) - "to frighten".
a) terrorism implies others suggesting fear; terrorist implies ones consent to be afraid thereof.
b) "fear is the mind-killer". Why? Because being afraid implies mentally focusing on suggested outcome over perceivable origin.
c) suggested FRIGHT (passion excited by the sudden appearance of danger) + DANGER (exposure to injury; loss) tempts one to ignore being exposed growth (life) within injurious loss (inception towards death).
Expose aka EX (outwards) PO (potential)...being afraid implies shrinking inwards, away from a perceived outwards potential, which in return destabilizes ones POSE (position).
your simple mind must be so cozy all the time, without having to deal with the complexity of the world
a) COMPLEX, adjective - "composed of two or more parts or things; composite; not simple; including two or more particulars connected"
b) ones consent to any suggestion by another connects particulars aka choice (consent) binding itself to choice (suggestion).
c) simple (being one) or complex (being submissive to another one).
d) if one ignores self for another, then one fell for suggested dualism (two).
no one is causing all those things to happen at the same time; right?
a) cause (inception towards death) generates effects (life).
b) everything (whole) generates things (partials).
c) same (ongoing loss) generates differences (temporary growth).
d) others suggest imbalance (right vs wrong); chance (happenstance) and part of duration (past; present; future aka time) to distract one from discerning self as effect (reaction) within cause (action).
controlling the world
a) CONTROL; noun - "restraint; to act without control"...a distraction from being reaction within action.
b) world/vault can only exist confined (momentum) within motion....being implies free (choice) within confine (balance aka momentum) of motion.
the first step in alchemy is breaking it down
Being implies CHEM (life) broken apart within ALL (inception towards death) aka transmuted ingredient within base.
Few suggest amalgamation aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka equality (same) through diversity (differences) aka mass migration; multiculturalism; melting pot; miscegenation aka collectivism; debt; contracts aka united states; united nations; european union; university; uniformity; unicode; universal basic income and so on.
Why? To exploit mass ignorance of nature continuously setting everything within apart from one another. Status quo of being implies apartheid within wholeness, hence ones struggle to sustain self withing perceivable, while resisting to hold onto the suggested temptations by others.
- TREAT, verb (Latin tracto) - "to entertain without expense to the guest; to negotiate"
a) Negotiating (consent) with others (suggestion) comes at the expense of self (perception).
b) being implies temporary expanse (life) within ongoing whole (inception towards death) aka guest (life) entering (inception) and leaving (death) host inwards/internally.
surrounded by darkness than the jews
Notice that jews are surrounded by gentiles...mostly ignorant gentiles.
No one can bring their activities to light
Notice that "bringing to light" implies reacting to dark...
jews who follow
What if the jewish revolutionary spirit implies choosing to resist following others?
loving only their own and hating everyone else.
What if a jew suggests moralism to tempt consenting gentiles into a conflict of reason (love vs hate)?
knowledge is power
What if holding onto a side (love or hate) conceals exerted power in-between (choice)? Choosing either side establishes a conflict between both.
to resist or fight for yourself or protect your beloved ones
a) What if one needs to resist what another suggests? What if temptation isn't a fight one can win, but a momentum one balances in? What if growing resistance is the only protection for solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)?
b) "be-loved ones"...what comes first? Being one or loving another?
exclude
Ex implies expression outwards; clude aka claudere (to close) implies inwards.Meanwhile...natural order (inception towards death) opens up expressions inwards (life).
a) LOVE (evol/evil) EN-MI (within me)
b) EVOL aka EVOLVE, verb - "to open itself; to disclose itself"...if only one could wield the free will of choice to open (need) or disclose (want) self. Notice that want implies from another, hence disclosing self (consent) to another (suggestion)...
arise from the dead
If one resists suggested the-ism, then arising (temporary growth) from the dead (ongoing loss) implies ones inception.
Christ will shine on you
a) Light (god) emitting (shine) beacons (christ).
b) Will (want) implies reaction to enacting need.
c) Branding others (you) implies claiming self (me; myself or I)...letting go of claims, prevents burning others, while discerning ONE-self.
a) Is there another path of generation (path-o-gen) for life then being moved from inception towards death?
b) Is being alive opposed to being moved from inception towards death?
c) Could fluid (inception towards death) generate solid (life)?
d) Can one sense ZERO, noun - "cipher; nothing"?
e) How is "nothing" being communicated to ones perception?
f) "This...is nothing". What would you write on the dots?