▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I call bullshit...if that meeting happened in-between 1996 and 2001, then how could Bert be arrested for the murder of Abby Cadabby, who was introduced to Sesame Street in 2006? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_Cadabby

Singed...Agent Max Walker

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Camera aka CHIMERA - "a vain or idle fancy; a creature of the imagination, composed of contradictions or absurdities, that can have no existence except in thought".

A distraction from FACIAL (face to face) RE (response to) COGNI (perceivable) TION (action).

Suggested facial aka face to face aka mano a mano implies a conflict, which distracts one from perceivable "interface", hence being within (perception) while facing outwards (perceivable).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the Bible, the end of days is an awful time

a) Binding self to others keeps one bound within a DAZE of WEAK; embracing the end of daze implies ones moment of self discernment to be free will of choice.

b) Awful aka being full of AWE (fear, terror, great reverence) implies ones consent to suggested terror-ism...a binding contract.

Please hear me out...Please dig into

Aka pleading ignorance (digging into) to distract from self discernment (growing out).

  • "Pleased to meet you; hope you guess my name (jew; jew)"
  • "But what's puzzling you; is the nature of my game (jew; jew)"
▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

a) Trillion aka TRI (three) LION... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_England#/media/File:Royal_arms_of_England.svg

b) If Lion of Judah represents the patriarch; then who's the matriarch and who's the child?

c) Who's the lion king (king of lying)?

Sleight of hand: "It's coming home, it's coming home, it's coming...three lions on the shirt" Notice the "lighting seeds"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzxMjBEazas

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • Trust - "an obligation upon a person, arising out of a confidence reposed in him" (from Black's Law Dictionary; 3rd Edition)

Ones consent permits others to posit suggested information within ones mind/memory, which confines ones mind (confinement) to suggested (information) while ignoring perceivable (inspiration).

Ones consent binds (obligates) self to suggestions by others, hence binding ones choice to chosen ones, who in return are being permitted to pause (reposit) ones position (posit).

How to rebuild such lucrative trust-bondage? By rebuilding consent through increased frequency of suggestions.

  • jew: "This choice will make everything better; while that choice will make everything worse...trust me"
  • Goy: "This or that...which choice do I choose to ignore my choice for?"
▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

for the last few thousand years

a) January, 2024 for gentiles or Tevet (10th month) to Shevat (11th month), 5784 for a jew.

b) September (septem; seven; sieben) - October (octo; eight; acht) - November (novem; nine; neun) - December (decem; ten; zehn)

c) If January (11) and February (12); then March (1) aka spring aka aequus (equal) noctis (night) aka spring equinox.

a targeted attack

What if mass ignorance implies a target so big few can't possible miss hitting it? What if ones ignorance implies a willing attack against ones self discernment?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's designed to cover up something

a) Alien (alienus; alius; another) + Space (spatium; spatior; to wander)

b) One among other ones implies among insiders, and only inside can one wander within surrounding...suggested outsiders from outer space tempts one to ignore that.

Not sure

Nothing (not) isn't an assurance (sure), but ones denial (affirmation to the contrary) of perceivable, when consenting to suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing).

what

Energy. What else?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are wiping out Christianity across...

a) Putting A CROSS down tempts one to ignore being (life) carried (inception towards death) ACROSS.

b) Whole (inception towards death) cleanses (wipes) partial impurities (life). One needs to resist wanted temptations to besmirch self within ones cleansing rite of passage.

Consider being chaos (life) in (inception) and out (death) of natural order instead of seeking order out of chaos (ordo ab chao) as others are suggesting.

Bonus for those with eyes to see: order out of chaos aka the rising of the phoenix from the ashes implies a burned offering of DEAF PHONETICIANS (definitions aka those who consent to suggested words) for the rise of the PHONETICIANS (phonics/phoenix aka those who adapt to perceivable sound).

Words (suggested fiction) make one deaf to sound (perceivable reality)...so burn to rise out of the ashes before others (ash-ken-azi) do.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Religion is the new thing

Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies a binding contract, hence RELIGION (Latin religo; to bind anew) aka RE (respond to) LEG (to collect; gather) aka many consenting to suggested collectivism permitting few to gather.

  • IS...suggesting what is tempts others to ignore what was perceivable.
  • THE...suggested the-ism tempts others to authorize others by submission of self.
  • NEW...suggested new tempts others to ignore perceivable now.

A suggestion cannot be new, since it implies being shaped within already perceivable, nor can one authorize another without shirking response-ability (choice) over self onto others, and if one could define what is (life), then one wouldn't struggle to sustain self in-between what was (inception) and will be (death).

As for "thing"...consider thingamajig aka THING (coming to be) + MAGIC (being operated by). Ones perception came to be within all perceivable, while ones consent to suggested can permit others to operate ones perception.

Sleight of hand: Carpenter's "The Thing"...a carpenter builds within (suggestion) to conceal from outside (perceivable); the thing conceals itself inside the host before bursting outwards. All those who consented to suggested truth are bursting out suggested lies, hence perpetuating the infection. How to get rid of infection? Through a burned (life) offering (inception towards death).

In short...assimilate (suggested) to imitate (perceivable). Shifting shapes.

religion has a tendency to cause previously sane people to act crazy

Perceivable implies enacting cause; anything suggested implies reacting effects. Ignoring cause (inspiration) for effect (information) permits others control over special (particular) effects (reactions).

Affecting effects tempts ignorance of cause. Distraction from perceivable by suggested affection.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

roman catholic

  • Cathode (Greek kathodos) aka KATA (down) HODOS (way)
  • Anode (Greek anodos) aka ANA (up) HODOS (way)

Does one (life) go up or down the way (inception towards death)? Does one resist (need) or fall for temptation (want)? What if the path of least resistance (life) implies falling for temptation (inception towards death)?

Does a man who romes/roams carry the HEART (German Herz) aka Hertz (Hz) to resist?

Sleight of hand: All roads (inception towards death) lead to rome/roam (life)

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

suits against...corporations

Aka dressing (suit) + addressing (oration) a body before burial (corpse)...a burial rite.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

changed

Change (perceivable sound) commands ment/mind...suggested words tempts one to ignore that, because oneself chooses to hold onto definitions (definite; affixed).

shall not add to the word

a) Words (suggested information) are added to sound (perceivable inspiration) by ones consent to the suggestions of others.

b) One (perception) cannot add to all (perceivable)...only draw from to shape within.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you're a bot, you had to have been programmed

a) Why is it that when I write BOT; ROBOT (Latin roboro; robur) - "strength" that others ignore being programmed with suggested revisionism into ignoring "strength" for "artificial intelligence"?

Why is "bot" now used to dehumanize each other; while beforehand it described each others strength?

b) What if reason (are a bot vs aren't a bot) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then)?

you should really look up his work

Let's go with his bibliography...

  • Artificial Intelligence...artifice (suggested) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable).
  • The Psychology of Computer Vision...logic (reasoning over suggested) tempts one to ignore psyche (being within perceivable).
  • Lisp...ignoring natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) develops articulation issues. See "mumble-rap"...
  • On to C; C++; Java...consenting to suggested permits those suggesting to program ones language aka spell-craft.
  • On to Smalltalk...using suggested words within perceivable sound implies smalltalk within bigthink.
  • Make It Clear: Speak and Write to Persuade and Inform...does nature speak or write to persuade and inform or does nature move sound symmetrically by forcing adaptation through inspiration?

Did I miss anything else?

MIT aka Massachusetts Institute of Technology

a) Ones consent to suggested words institutes artifice into ones mind/memory.

b) Considering the above...how out there is it for me to notice massachusetts aka CHU (you/jew) SETTS (sets) MASSA (master)?

syllabus was available

No shit. Syllabus aka Abstract (Latin abstraho) - "to draw from or separate". It's perceivable cause which separates into each partial perception, which only then allows perception to draw from perceivable.

Any suggested syllabus distracts one from that.

if you looked hard enough...

...at suggested information; then you still ignore being within perceivable inspiration. Focusing on suggested narrows ones perspective within perceivable.

▲ 19 ▼
free-will-of-choice 19 points ago +19 / -0

JesusTaughtLove: "Please ban"

Teaching banishment? Tough love!

break down words, in a schizo fashion

SCHIZO - "division" aka taking apart aka breaking down... https://www.etymonline.com/word/schizo-#etymonline_v_48392

makes no sense

How could "no; not; nothing; nothingness" make SENSE; noun (Latin sensus) - "perception"?

it's a bot

Human verification: "nigger; kike; cunt; fuck; slavery implies choice"

▲ 4 ▼
free-will-of-choice 4 points ago +4 / -0

a) Suggested (appetite) tempts one to ignore perceivable (hunger).

b) Consumption (inception towards death) generates preservation (life)...an all-consuming existence.

c) Instead of reasoning over what to devour, try adapting to being (life) devoured (inception towards death). Resistance is not only fertile; it resists APPETITE; noun (Latin appetere) - "to long for, desire; strive for, grasp at"

werone (lower right of picture)

Suggested pluralism (we) distracts perceiving singular (one) from discerning self.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) EXECUTE; verb - "to carry (inception towards death) into effect (life)"

b) ROBOT; noun (Latin roboro; robur) - "strength" aka effect (life) wielding free will of choice to strengthen self within cause (inception towards death)...or to weaken self (student) by consenting to what others (teachers) suggest.

c) LOVE / EVOL (evil)...evolution or revolution?

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

worshippers

Worth (inception towards death) generates ships (life) aka perceivable (value) generating perception (evaluation)...others tempt one to ignore that for suggested values.

Steering (one's choice) or trailing (chosen one)...it's ones free will of choice.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

news

a) Center of N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) implies... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compass_rose

b) Being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...consenting to suggested NEWS sets one off-center aka destabilization of self by submitting to another.

c) Rose of the wind implies solid (life) rising within liquid (inception towards death).

d) Cycle implies perpetual; being implies temporal. Being can be distracted by suggested KIKE; noun (Yiddish kikel) - "circle".

The jews therefore buried

a) Chosen one implies chosen by one's choice. Ones consent (slave) to suggested (master) buries self underneath another.

b) Ones consent to suggested THE-ism implies ones submission to authority of another.

c) Others tempt YOU to bury JEW aka to bury self, by permitting others to operate in the name of YOU/JEW like for example your representative govern (to control) ment (mind/memory) or your ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice".

▲ 4 ▼
free-will-of-choice 4 points ago +4 / -0

dear zionists; you dominate...

-ist (zionist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (zionism) aka a submission of self to another. It's that submission of self which enables others to dominate.

enslave

Slave (consent) generates master (suggestion). Suggestion cannot enslave consent for consent has to be given by ones free will of choice.

Master (chosen one) implies slave (one's choice). Without one's choice another couldn't be a chosen one.

cull

CULL, verb - "to separate one or more things from others"...being implies one separated from one another. Whole (inception towards death) culls partials (life).

poison (deadly potion)

POI (to drink) TION (action)...action (inception towards death) generates thirst for reactions (life) to adapt to by drinking.

Edit: thirst (poison) forces drinking (remedy). Sleight of hand: "I got the poison; I got the remedy; the rhythmical remedy; the pressure"... https://genius.com/The-prodigy-poison-lyrics

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's deeper than that...

KNOWLEDGE; noun - "perception of that which exists", hence everyone's perception knows everything perceivable.

That's what "everyone knows" implies, while "what happened" implies HAPPEN; noun "to come by chance". Chance implies without direction; while coming to be (life) implies within direction (inception towards death).

The trick...a jew operates within perceivable while tempting gentiles into suggested happenstance. Ones consent to any suggestion by another about what's happening, changes ones stance within perceivable into the confinement of suggested.

Ones consent permits others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) suggested within perceivable, while enslaving self into suggested, while ignoring perceivable.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

how they plan to pay for this

a) Payment aka PACARE (to please, pacify, satisfy) MENT (mind; memory).

b) Few are utilizing payment as suggested pacifism for consenting many. Each one of the many consenting to the temptation of suggested (fiction) over perceivable (reality) pacifies ones resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death).

From a different perspective...fluid value (inception towards death) generates solid evaluation (life). If one evaluates the suggested values by others (payment of currency), then one devalues self.

Now guess what the few are suggesting to distract one from devaluation of self? Devaluation of others aka rich vs poor; first world vs third world; local vs foreign; wholesale vs retail; expensive vs cheap.

Do those people have free healthcare?

Like ones FREE will of choice to take care of sickness (life) within health (inception towards death)?

Being implies partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) aka effect (life) within cause (inception towards death). Health goes through one; sickness implies one chasing after suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.

Fluid (inception towards death) generates solid resistance (life), while the path of least resistance implies ones ignorance of fluid (perceivable inspiration) for solid (suggested information).

Ease (inception towards death) generates dis-ease (life), hence each ones struggle to sustain self.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Voting is clearly corrupted.

a) Nature offers enacting balance towards each ones reacting choice within.

b) VOTE; noun - "formal expression of one's choice with regard to a proposal" aka ones consent to the suggestions of another, while ignoring perceivable.

Self discernment (clear) or ignorance (obscure) implies ones free will of choice.

c) To cast a vote aka CAST; verb - "to form in a mold" implies consent casting itself into the form of suggested, which represents spell-craft, hence others crafting suggestions to bind ones consent into self-imposed casts/molds.

No, we do not.

a) Both nihilism (no; not) and pluralism (we) represents suggested molds tempting ones consent to cast itself into.

b) Pluralism (we) tempts singular (one) to ignore self for others; hence speaking in the name of others instead of expressing self.

c) Nihilism (no; not) tempts one into denial of everything (perceivable) for suggested (nothing), hence wielding denial (no; not) against others.

the way things are being run...

...is being ignored by things (life) within way (inception towards death) for the suggested ways of others aka mainstream; currency; party-line; chain of command; progressivism; adherence to current thing; climbing career ladders; push it to the limit; in it to win it; just do it; fear/hope towards outcomes; seeking relief; choosing want (temptation) over need (resistance) etc.

they do not know how to change...

....because they choose to ignore being (life) within change (inception towards death).

selectees...

Aka chosen ones are chosen by ones choice, when consenting to their suggestions... ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice".

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are the main reasons the degeneracy escalated so quickly?

a) Generation (inception towards death) degenerates each one within (life) unless resisted.

b) Escalation aka scale (escala) motion (tion) implies momentum of motion aka balance (inception/death) for each ones choice (life).

c) Reasoning implies conflicts among degenerates, hence imbalancing each other while ignoring being choice within balance of generation.

d) Perception implies main; suggestion implies minor. All reasoning implies over minor suggestions.

(((leaders)))

...are tempting others to follow. Direction (inception towards death) generates resistance (life). The path of least resistance implies ones choice to ignore resisting, when choosing to follow temptations by others.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are told something and they simply trust it.

Spell-craft. Life exists inside perceivable sound, other life tempts one with suggested words to ignore that. Nature moves sound; those within hold onto words; labels; brands; definitions; meanings etc. while ignoring natural (inspiration) for artificial (information).

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Consider that you are the one rationalizing aka reasoning aka engaging in "good vs evil", while charging others with engaging in evil activity.

The suggested brand "cern" implies ones own discernment, and others are tempting one to reason/rationalize about suggested, as to corrupt ones self discernment.

How could one discern self when rationalizing over or against others?

Notice a pattern here...others suggest "cern" to distract from self discernment. Others suggest "chosen one" to distract from one's choice. Others suggest "elite" to distract from ones selection; choice. Others suggest "jew" to distract for you. Others suggest government to distract from governing ones mind. Others suggest representatives to distract from responding to presented etc.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›