nothing will change
What if everything changes, and each thing implies a will within?
against the elite
Elite implies "selection; choice"...what if selecting from another turns one against ones free will of choice?
What benefits ones sustenance of self...one's choice or chosen ones?
hope for
What if hoping for an outcome tempts one to ignore origin?
as one steers a ship
Aka a solid (life) within a fluid (inception towards death).
humans must become parts of that ship...inanimate part
Coming to be implies as partial (life) within animating whole (inception towards death).
So we got from a department store closing to The System of the World.
Department store aka mind/memory departed by storage (of suggested information).
dare I say “occult" meaning
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) isn't hidden/occult; ones consent to understand/stand-under (suggested information) tempts one to "hide" from perceivable.
Holding onto suggested tempts one to ignore that perceivable moves.
He (Carl Jung) worked as a research scientist at the Burghölzli psychiatric hospital, in Zurich, under (((Eugen Bleuler))). Jung established himself as an influential mind, developing a friendship with (((Sigmund Freud))).
It's the jews tho...
God is the creator...We exist in God
a) Being within implies transformation; transmutation; transaction...suggested creationism tempts one to ignore/deny that.
CREATE, verb - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist."
b) Label whole (God) as partials within implies ignoring/denying the transformation; transmutation; transaction; differentiation aka the setting apart of whole into partials internally.
LA'BEL, noun - "annexed to a will by way of addition; as a codicil; a writing by way of supplement to a will"...partial cannot supplement whole without ignoring that being partial implies yielding (supple) mind (ment) to whole.
tl; dr...label implies libel
a) Yes or no aka confirm or deny aka want or not want...what about need?
b) Is being a question or an answer... a quest towards a goal or a fulfillment of an origin?
Poor...doesn't
Poor vs rich + does vs doesn't implies reasoning over the suggestions by another...a conflict established by oneself and wielded against others.
know if his own
Knowledge can't be owned...if ones tries to hold onto it; then one gets owned by others.
pumps
If action (inception towards death) pumps; then reaction (life)...? How would you name the process of inflation (inception) and deflation (death) simultaneously within one body? Is it "pump up the jam" or "push it real good"?
offspring to pay support
Support aka SUB (under) PORTARE (to carry) aka parent carrying child to labor. The foundation for that implies support (inception towards death) generating off-spring (life). Notice that support becomes burden for off-spring...hence parent carrying child to labor becoming child laboring to carry parent.
It's "to pay" which corrupts ones mind (pay-ment) to give what is due for goods or services onto others, while ignoring the sustenance of self through one another.
a) Nuclear aka NUER (to shade) NUE (cloud) + CLEAR (transparent; allowing light to pass through; free from impurities)...
Consider shades (life) within light (inception towards death) aka matter within motion.
b) A nucleus implies "body about which matter is collected; to be surrounded with light" aka center (perception) within circumference (perceivable); able to collect (suggested).
c) Fake implies "of unknown origin"; being (perception) implies originating from knowledge (perceivable)...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies counterfeit aka imitated aka pretend to be.
Information implies fiat currency within inspiration.
d) "It was my imagination, and in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it." ~Herman Rosenblat...that isn't about a jew lying; but about the status quo of each gentile believing suggested truth.
real power is in the infrastructure
Aka within (in) fractured (fra) structure...aka fractal (perception) within structure of whole (perceivable) aka power of resistance (life) within power of velocity (inception towards death) aka fractured matter within structural motion.
The suggested information by others tempts aggregation of fractions; while ignoring perceivable structure, and ignorance diminishes ones power of resistance.
results in real action
Being implies resulting reaction (life) within real action (inception towards death). A reaction cannot act...only respond to being enacted upon. Motion exists before matter can respond to it.
The point is...
...a suggested end (death) to a perceivable sentence (life).
Time and place and purpose....not just one
Motion (time) generating momentum (place) for matter (purpose)...all for one and one for all.
How to corrupt this? By suggesting time (past; present; future) apart from motion; that place differs from ones position at center of all , and that purpose implies outcome, instead of ones response (matter) to origin (motion).
Everyone is in a group..
EVERY one implies ones consent to suggested pluralism; EACH one implies ones self discernment among others. Every implies the group one is being tricked to be a part of, each implies the nature of being a partial within a whole.
all alternate media seems to be related to one another
A chosen few mediate suggested information to a many, who by free will of choice alternate in-between wanting vs not wanting the suggested.
The relation between consent and suggestion implies a bondage aka restraint of a person's liberty by compulsion aka a vow, promise, oath, contract, or a law.
Either they are in sync through parroting or they are being directed either organically or artificially.
a) Same direction (inception towards death) generates different positions (life)...that's how a synchronous whole differs partials internally.
b) Position (life) within direction (inception towards death) implies resistance within velocity...others suggest one to follow directions towards outcomes, while ignoring to resist origin.
This consensual following of suggested orders/directions implies artificial synchronicity.
All the 'good guys' seem to be once again controlled in some way.
Good implies within a conflict of reason against bad. All these conflicts are controlled by those who suggest what others are reasoning about.
Example...few suggest porn; many consent to want (good) or not want (bad) it. This tempts many against one another within a controlled environment called "reason" aka want vs not want or good vs bad or moral vs immoral or hot vs not etc.
Being for or against suggested implies consenting to suggestion (fiction) over perception (reality), and the resulting fight (reason) is only among those consenting to fiction; not against those suggesting fiction within reality.
I don't want to bash the good
Already happening...do vs don't aka want vs not want aka good vs bad. Three conflicts of reason within one sentence uttered, and you're mentally engaged within all of them simultaneously.
Reasoning implies the bashing of self and others within a suggested ring, and it doesn't matter from what side one bashes at; who one bashes at; why one bashes at, or if one wins or looses...only that one willingly consent to remain within those conflicts of reason, where the many are grinding each others resistance to dust, while the few remain outside the ring...outside of reason (fiction); within implication (reality).
Why are the same celebrities always the source of the information
Because celebrating others tempts one to ignore being within source of inspiration...others suggest "always" to distract one from being (life) within way of all (inception towards death).
Information (suggested words) can only be shaped within inspiration (perceivable sound)...perception implies original; suggestion implies remake. Anything others are suggesting implies sloppy seconds to what nature is offering.
As truth fades; lies can be build upon indefinitely.
One is the choice; others tempt with sides...choosing either imbalances self.
Vanguard pump up the BTC
Mutt (Vanguard) vs Jeff (BlackRock)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_cop%2C_bad_cop
testum or small earthen pot, is derived from test
Derivation implies drawn from source of action...those within tempt each other to draw from reactions (suggestion), while ignoring source (perception).
Suggesting testum or small earthen pot as a vessel tempts others to ignore being matter within vessel (momentum) of motion. Meanwhile; ones consent to a suggestion implies ones submission to another, hence becoming a vassal (a subject; a dependant; a servant).
Made from
Made; make implies "to give being to, give form to, bring into existence"...only inception towards death can make life. Few suggest "Made in China" to distract many from being made within nature. It's about obfuscating the origin for those positioned within.
Another word for ground is property
Property; proper; propre - "one's own, particular to itself"...only within whole (oneness) can there be particulars (ones). Few suggest "own" to tempt many to want to posses, and consenting to such a suggestion puts ones choice into possession of a chosen one.
Property was passed on by a will to do so
Aka ones free will of choice consenting (buy) to the suggestion (sell) by the free will of choice of another aka falling for the happy merchant of temptation, while selling oneself out when buying into his schemes.
Others suggest a "will" to tempt one to ignore being free "will" of choice. Using ones choice to sign a will implies ones ignorance of self and willing submission to another.
called a 'will'
Nature doesn't call ones free will of choice...it forces adaptation. Others within nature "cry out; call for, summon, invoke; ask for, demand, order; give a name to, apply by way of designation" to tempt one to ignore adaptation by ones choice by abdication to a chosen ones will.
testor as owner/willer of the property/foundation.
Action (inception towards death) cannot be owned by the reactions (life) within...ignoring this permits others ownership over each ignorant sellout.
Words by relation.
RELA'TE, verb (Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce)...only nature produces (bring forward); those within need to resist (life) forwards momentum (inception towards death).
All suggested words tempt one to follow by consent.
Testi-mony is a foundation of principle.
Only motion implies foundation of principle (beginning) aka inception of matter. Whatever matter declares to each other by suggestion tempts one to ignore perceivable foundation.
To establish the 'ground' of a principle...
Implies others suggesting information as principles to tempt ones consent to hold onto it within ones mind/memory aka "establish-ment"...suggestions by another established within ones mind by consent.
a 'test' is thereby given
Only nature gives all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...those within suggest tests to tempt one to TAKE them. Taking from another gives self (life) away (inception towards death).
ones' own foundation
Ones (living) foundation (process of dying)...how could one own it, while living in it/dying by it?
Compare an infant coming in and an elderly going out...then notice the lack of owned possessions. The many represent the living Gollum in-between; desperately holding onto matter (my precious), while ignoring motion.
Guess who suggests the ring; a visible sign of an invisible bond; a circle; a kikel; a kike...
warning
Aka caution (life) within danger (inception towards death)...looking for warning signs by others tempts one to ignore self sustenance, which few exploit by plastering warning labels everywhere.
Choices
Aka suggested pluralism tempting one to ignore ones singular free will of choice.
arrived in the era
Era implies a fixed point in time...ones arrival (inception) as matter (life) implies into momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
a) Author implies singular (chosen one); readers imply common (each ones choice to ignore self for another).
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes the bond, that permits others to twist (thread) many ones together.
Biggest example...few weaving a world wide web to entangle many into endless threads of contention; argumentation aka conflicts of reason.
everyone...to the concentration camp.
a) CON (together) CENTRA (center within circumference; hence apart) TION (ation).
b) Being implies center (life) of action (inception towards death), hence living apart from one another...few CON (connect) many together.
c) Everyone implies suggested pluralism; each one implies perceivable singular.
Using the word "everyone" implies ignoring singular for a plural aggregation, hence establishing a connection; like RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) between ones consent and another ones suggestion.
Progress requires Chaos
a) Progress implies natural order (inception towards death) for disorder (life) within.
b) Requirement implies mind (ment) responding (re) to a question (quire) suggested by another, which tempts one to seek outcomes, hence progressing along faster within origin.
c) Others suggest chaos (orderless confusion) as the inversion of disorder (divided order). Why? So that few can fuse (fusion) many together (con).
Controlled Opposition
Opposition implies position (life) in front of (inception towards death); hence being moved by. Ignoring this by consenting to stand under the suggestions by another tempts one against others within conflicts of reason, while giving those suggesting control over both sides.
Why control? Because conflict against, while being moved by implies rolling (trol) together (con).
a founder needs only to listen to the community.
a) Foundation implies basis of an edifice; community implies aggregate upon the basis of an edifice...being implies edifice (life) within basis (inception towards death).
Aggregation isn't needed; it's wanted, hence tempting edifice to overburden self within basis.
b) LIST, verb - "to enlist; to lean or incline to a side; to desire"...aka ones choice to want (suggested); while ignoring need (perceivable).
LIST'EN, verb - "to obey; to yield to advice; to follow admonition; to attend"...hear/ear implies center of perceivable sound; which inspires resistance aka shelter from noise; not submission to suggested directions by others.
a) Initiation from above; degrees from below.
b) Suggesting in the name of foundation (founder) that others should climb to reach, will amass upon foundation a pile of those falling over each other climbing.
c) GAB - "to talk much; loquacity" aka babble/babel aka building those towers of confusion (babel) with idle chatter (babble) until they collapse upon foundation.
Foundation (mishnah) for towers (gemara) aka perceivable foundation (inspiration) for suggested towers (information) aka building (solid) while ignoring foundation (liquid).
Anyway...Fee for Vieh (German cattle).
Your probably right
That implies a right vs wrong conflict of reason; established by ones consent to suggested information.
NWO ideology
Consenting to suggested idealism and then reasoning (logic) about it; tempts one to ignore that there can be only one natural order aka one vault/world for each one within, and being within implies "now"...not "new".
destroy the current world order
Current (inception towards death) implies natural order for those being (life) destroyed within.
Nothing has changed
What if nothing implies ones denial of everything changing?
Form implies apart from one another; unless holding onto other form...the former is what you are, the latter what others suggest you to do.
If you seek something to agree with; to believe in; to consent to; to confirm as truth etc. then you are choosing to hold onto suggested in-FORM-ation.
Context implies the suggested words mankind weaves together...perceivable sound implies the ever changing system underneath. Affixed words are being used to label a moving nature...and ones consent to suggested words affixes them.
The trick is that few utilize affixed language (words; information) to distract many from moving language (sound; inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter can't be held onto.
Definite implies affixed, and ones consent to suggested ideal-ism affixes them within ones mind/memory. This consent is being sold as belief; faith; creed; ideal; dogma; laws etc. while tricking one to sell self out to those suggesting it.
From a different angle...adapting to perceivable sound implies being a PHONETICIAN (from phonics; sound); while consenting to a suggested word aka definition implies being a DEAF PHONETICIAN.
Only nature infers perceivable sound...those within suggest words to trick one to abstain willingly from what nature infers. Why? So that those suggesting gain ones permission to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the words; labels; brands; idols etc.
Origin (inception towards death) differentiates (life)...others suggest similar structures to tempt consenting ones to react alike. Hence all the order followers...
a) Ones choice establishes chosen one...consenting to suggested implies ignoring ones choice for another ones choice. The label "chosen one" is used to distract from "ones choice"...hence tempting one to ask "chosen by whom"?
b) Elite (from French élite) - "selection, choice" puts both ones choice and the selected choice by another one into one word. Why? So that one views others as elite; while ignoring to be the selecting choice establishing others.
c) To vote for any representatives makes oneself disposable. Within nature there's no disposition of self for others; only ignoring self, while being exploited by others.
It's the consent of the underling to a suggestion, which puts another into the position of overlord. Many seek to understand; which tempts them to "stand-under" what few are suggesting them.
Few suggest a label to tempt many to consent by either loving or hating it...either side tempts many in conflicts of reason (love vs hate) against one another.
If one resists giving consent to another, then one can discern self as the "lite within el" aka one within all aka partial within whole.
Knowledge implies perceivable, and all perceivable is offered to each ones perception. As in...nature doesn't hide anything; it offers everything to each one within.
It's ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction); which a) hides self from it, and b) permits others to wield "hidden knowledge".
The deceit by others only works because one gives willing consent to their suggestions...starting with words. Teach a dog to respond to words and it's called domestication; do it to a child and it's called civilization...guess what?
Where was your father? Will you be the man choosing otherwise, when others suggest your child to be mutilated? This is all it takes. Don't blame your father either; learn your lesson from it and as soon as you hold your "intact" child it was worth it.
Ones consent (slave) to another ones suggestion (master) permits another to wash ones brain. The master sells suggestion; the slave buying into it, sells self out.
Hope implies suggested outcome; being implies within (life) perceivable origin (inception towards death). Others suggest hope/fear to distract one from foundation.
Nature isn't gone...it keeps everyone within going; no matter how ignorant their choices made them.
Each one implies seed (temporary growth) within soil (ongoing loss)...others suggest a great tree to distract ones seed from growing pains. Few suggest greatness; then break it down to discourage many from trying to grow.
By choice of those within who shirk response-ability (choice) onto others.
That implies your choice to hold onto suggested "it" aka a slave world. Nature implies freedom aka free will of choice within dom-inance of balance aka FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
Only within loss can there be growth, and loss implies the ongoing change for anything temporary grown within. You holding onto suggested "it" implies holding onto the temporary growth; while ignoring the ongoing loss.