a) Indigo aka in-dico aka within (life) division (inception/death)
b) Incubate aka in-cubare aka within (sight) cube (left/right + up/down + front/back)
c) Cabbage Patch aka cabba/quibbel (to receive, admit, accept) patch (to mend with pieces; to repair clumsily)...that implies ones consent to suggested cabbalism.
Look into... amending (tikkun) by concealing (olam).
a) https://archive.org/details/hoshinokirbyhebrewdub
b) KIRB/CURB - "to restrain; to check; to hold back; to confine; to keep in subjection"...hence to kirb (to restrain) your enthusiasm (divine inspiration) by sucking in divisive information.
a) Few suggest "chance" to tempt many to ignore "choice".
b) CHANCE; noun (Latin cadere) - "to fall" tempts one to ignore being rise (life) within fall (inception towards death).
c) Casting lots implies suggestion offered; drawing lots implies ones consent to suggested.
d) LOTTO implies to allot (lot) towards (to) aka suggested progressivism, which inverts being (life) progressed (inception towards death) within perceivable.
Drawing a lot permits those casting it to define; redefine and contradict ones lot in life, hence gaining control over destiny; providence; fortune; circumstance; fate; doom; predestination etc....each very effective when wielded by few to devastate many.
Edit: While the topic is at gambling....LET RULE (roulette) BA'AL (ball)
Free Houses - https://files.catbox.moe/p72b28.mp4
free technology
Technology aka TEKS (to weave) LOGY (logic)...suggested technology binds ones free will of choice into conflicts of reason weaved by others.
gravity-free
a) To gravitate implies "exert weight"...being implies inert weight expressed outwards.
b) Gravity implies "a natural tendency toward"...nature implies inception towards death, which inspires resistance from each one living within.
Others suggest progressivism to tempt ones consent to tend towards outcomes, while ignoring origin.
c) The suggested conflict of reason "heavy vs light" tempts one to ignore to heave (raise) within radiant energy.
magnet
MAG - "to knead, fashion, fit", hence amass; among; macerate; magma; make; mason; mass; mingle; mongrel... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag-#etymonline_v_52644
What happens if few MAG many within a NET?
To me, it only changes if I understand why the door is being opened
a) You understand "game show" aka you willingly chose to stand-under a shown game, which implies to gamble - "risk something of value on a game of chance"...that something of value implies your evaluating free will of choice, which you shirk onto a merchant; who suggested you to "lets make a deal".
b) Change is the origin of implication (if/then)...you are being tricked to ignore it for reasoning about which door to choose from.
c) "to me" implies towards (inception towards death) generating me (life) aka change as the origin of being.
truthful logic
Logic implies truth versus lie...always a conflict within self and against others. Reasoning binds self to a conflict against others; no matter which side one chooses within.
I am being told to accept
a) Suggestion tempts ones consent; perception inspires ones resistance.
b) Any tale implies suggested information tempting one to consent to hold onto it; like for example...if I tell you something with words; then you are tempted to consent to the words used to shape what I'm telling you.
For the happy merchant it's irrelevant what he shapes (sells) only what others accept (buy)...cause that's when the deal is made.
concealing a fundamental
Suggestion conceals the foundation of perception...IF one consents to it. Ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested implies self concealment.
Nature cannot be hidden by those within; those within wield the free will of choice to hide from natural (inspiration) within artificial (information).
a) Counter (suggestion) intuitive (perception)...reasoning about suggested implies the fight one is being tempted to counter with arguments (arguing mind).
b) Whatever one tries to counter with reason tempts one to ignore ones consent given to participate within a conflict of reason.
c) Offense vs defense destroys presence...no matter the side. A boxer doesn't win anything within a ring; his skills are used to diminish loss while in the ring. Versus implies which one loses more than the other.
Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of
a) One supposes (to imagine; to believe) the suggestion by another by ones free will of choice.
b) Free will of choice was already given/bestowed/passed/transferred to each being...using it to consent to another ones free will of choice implies ignoring/denying/shirking ones free will of choice onto another.
Monty Hall...given the choice of three doors
A rebranding of "Three Card Monte"...instead of watching the cards being switched; one is being tricked to switch choices within ones mind/memory.
A more fascinating trick...transmuting a short-con like three card monte into a long-con like "lets make a deal" by a happy merchant of temptation called Monte Halparin; an orthodox jew.
a) Praying implies asking for; spelling implies offering to.
b) Those who suggest spells tempt others to pray in spells for suggested.
c) Asking implies a suggested spell...a request; petition; counsel; claim; inquiry; an invite etc.
Look into the origin of "be it as it is axed"...
d) In reality...for (forward) and to (toward) imply motion aka origin (inception towards death) of being (forwards life).
a jewish business aimed at subverting
Aka a suggested sale tempting others to subvert self by buying into it. Consumption sustains the smut-peddler.
Morality...
...the foundation for immorality. Furthermore; moral vs immoral implies reasoning about the suggestions from others, while ignoring perceivable. Whichever side one chooses...one consents to a conflict against another.
The smut peddler are the ones suggesting moralism; redefining it with immorality, while contradicting both sides within every conflict of reason at will to keep the consumption going.
a) Ones consent to watch implies the contagion for the virulent suggestions by another.
b) Psychological implies psyche (animating power) and logic (reasoning about suggested)...the former moves; while the latter tempts one to fight over something affixed.
Logic contradicts psyche...that's the operation.
c) Anything feces related implies ones want to hold onto; while ignoring need to let go off.
d) A way more effective promotion on this subject was the rhetoric "eat shit" and "shit-eating grin"; as pushed through the entertainment (enter-tame-mind) industries.
e) As for extreme porn...choosing want over need tempts one to want more. Whatever the many choose to want or not want...the few provide for a price.
f) Consenting to any suggestion wounds (traumatizes) one. Why? Because suggestion (fiction) tempts one to ignore perception (reality) and reality (inception towards death) hurts those living within more if ignored.
g) Consider "shock value"...suggestion implies an "offered value" aka a value offending the one consenting to it.
Bio implies life; logic/reason and logos/words implies a conflict among life over each others suggestions. Living implies ones struggle to sustain self; not fighting other life.
In short...logic/reason/versus/contra. Logic implies contradiction.
Logic (logy) contradicts life (bio)...hence all the conflicts of reason.
don't know
The former (doing nothing) implies suggested; the latter perceivable (knowledge)...why build a statement on a contradiction?
you
Only if one claims self as "me; myself and I" do other ones get branded as "you". Letting go of claims (to ask or seek to obtain) makes it way easier to discern that nature already offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception).
have
How could there be possession (have) within procession (inception towards death)?
blood
Blood in blood out...do I sound like a chi-vato loco?
pump
a) HYDRO (water) DRAULIC (drastic; forceful, vigorous) aka forcing (inception towards death) vigor (life).
b) Consider "pump up the JAM; noun - "a tight pressing between two surfaces" and being impressed (living off-spring) within a single surface (inception towards death)...
Could it be that few are suggesting "pump" to "jam" up consenting many within a moving system?
Why? Self sustenance! Why else?
no grand saga, no end dance scene
a) Living implies within origin...others suggest "end dance scene" to tempt ones mind/memory to focus on outcome, while ignoring origin.
b) Saga/sagu - "a saying" implies the suggested words by others; which tempt one to ignore perceivable sound.
Sound implies origin for all words shaped within...
our own script
Nature doesn't write...it implies a rite of passage (inception towards death) for each one within (life).
Ones consent to suggested scripture implies spell-craft.
Presented before us are tales
Tale/talu - "piece of information, story, narrative, fable"...before suggested information exists perceivable inspiration.
rendition of the same
Rendition implies "yielding"....perceivable sameness (inception towards death) inspires perceiving differences (life) to resist temptation. Consenting to suggested implies yielding of self to another.
None of what we see around us seems at all connected
Choosing to hold onto suggested pluralism (we; us) tempts singular (one) to ignore self for others.
The ruins we live amongst...nobody knows who made them
a) Loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life)...growth shapes within loss.
b) RUIN; noun "act of giving away"...action gives a way (inception towards death) for reactions (life). Ruin implies foundation for erection.
nobody can give a half-decent explanation.
EX (life) within PLANE (inception towards death) of TION (action) aka matter within momentum of motion.
As far back as we can go
Back (inception) and front (death) implies the same origin, each life within comes in and out of.
our own, veritable, visual, history
a) HE-BREW HIS-STORY to make JEW/YOU fall for it.
b) Nature isn't a store/story, but implies the ongoing process of whole-sale (inception towards death) for each temporary retail (life) within.
photographed as part of a grand plan, to get things going
Opposite thereof...nature goes (motion to momentum); those within (matter) can be tricked to ignore movement when holding onto captured moments (pictures) or moving pictures (movies) within mind/memory, hence being tricked to re-member (respond to memory) instead of adapting as memory to motion.
Suggested information tempts one to hold onto it; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; only adapted to, while it moves through ones mind/memory.
The stories we may hear...all end in some hazy origin
Perceivable origin moves; suggested stories tempt one to hold onto them, while ignoring that origin moves. Ones ignorance implies the haze within self, which others exploit to conceal ones mind/memory with it.
Within perceivable nature one doesn't hear "once upon a time...", instead all that was; now is, and instead of what "will be" it's oneself "being will".
destruction of one's inheritance
Each one (perception) implies inheritor of all (perceivable)...matter implies heir of motion.
bullshit genealogy
Suggested LOGY (logic; reason aka logos; words) tempts one to ignore perceivable GEN (generation; generated by action).
Being implies reaction/reactor (life) within generation/generator (inception towards death)...choosing to react to suggested "bullshit genealogy" prevents reactor from re-generating.
the beginning of
a) Beginning (inception) and end (death) of temporary matter (life) can only exist within ongoing motion.
b) Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (within everything).
c) Motion to momentum to matter implies internal/inherent separation of whole into partials.
In short...everything was before each thing within came to be.
All seems like a counterfeit
Aka all (perceivable) seems like a counterfeit (suggestion)...if one ignores former (reality) for latter (fiction).
SEEM (to become) tempts one to ignore coming (inception towards death) to be (life); hence "thou art not what thou seems't"
Nobody has ever been to the edge
Each one (perception) exists within all perceivable knowLEDGE aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
lest we test what appears around us
Being partial within whole implies as center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...suggested pluralism (we; us) tempts one off-center.
Purpose-bred
a) Purpose implies suggested outcomes; being implies response-ability (free will of choice) within perceivable origin.
b) Breeding implies intercourse for off-spring, hence springing off origin into being responsive...
c) Cattle/chattel/property implies propelled forwards aka ones consent to follow suggested progressivism towards outcomes; while ignoring to be resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
Consenting to suggested implies buying into what another sells aka selling self as property to another.
tales of Phoenicians
Those who ignore perceivable sound (Latin phonics) for suggested definitions imply DEAF PHONETICIANS. Few trick many with suggested words like "insane person" to ignore perceivable in-sanus (within sound) + per-sonos (by sound).
Self discernment cannot be gained by consenting to suggestions by another, it needs to be grown by adaption as self (perception) to origin (perceivable).
Supposed cathedrals
Proposition of anode (anno) and cathode (catholic/cathedral) to distract hearts/hertz/Hz/resistance (life) from velocity (inception towards death).
a big joke
Comedy (life) within drama (inception towards death)...
believe
Believing implies ones consent to the suggested information by another. In other words...to believe implies holding onto; to be implies within need to let go off wanting to hold onto.
what do
Only energy can do...each thing within can re-do aka respond to being (life) done by (inception towards death).
will be fun
Fun implies "that which diverts and makes merry"...being will implies ones response-ability (free will of choice) within a balance based system. Fun tempts one to ignore response-ability...which in return increases sorrows (soros).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see:
- All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
- All play and no work makes Jack a mere toy
Work (need) or play (want)...free will of choice.
show me...eclipse
Suggestion eclipses (obscures) perception...if one consents to it.
to predict...
...a suggested outcome tempts others to ignore perceivable origin.
calculation
Action (tion) calculates (to add, subtract, multiply or divide) as follows...addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being partial reaction within whole action).
That's how oneness (action) calculates ones (reactions)...any suggested calculations tempts ONE to ignore self for others.
a) Alexis (Greek alexein) - "to ward off, keep, protect"...it's ones free will of choice to ignore self sustenance.
b) "what is your name" (a sold suggestion) + "my name is..." (consent buying into) = a contract establishing slave and master.
c) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies that (motion) which "just is" (justice)...not whatsoever what those within want or not want anything to be.
Being within that which just is implies "IN-JUSTICE"...
d) FAIR, adjective - "open; direct, as a way or passage" implies those alive being moved from inception towards death.
UN (negation) FAIR (process of dying) implies those alive choosing to ignore/deny being within the process of dying.
e) "You weren't effected yourself"...by the suggestions of another, are now being tricked to feel effected by more suggestions, and are meanwhile willingly ignoring to be effects (life) within a cause (inception towards death) affecting every moment of your existence.
f) "it wasn't your business"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxiT30N6ti4
g) "we often live next to each other, but not with each other"...so we (that means you) have to come together like good mongrels and ignore that nature sets each one within apart from one another.
h) "we have to speak for those who cannot speak"...so that those who suggest words control those who ignore perceivable sound. The nature of reality doesn't speak; so we must use the fiction of words to bring justice to those who speak out of line.
i) "I want you to learn critical thinking"...so that you ignore what your masters told you a million times before..."everyone is a critic" aka CRITIC/CRIME - "to separate; discern; distinguish" within natural law.
- LAW aka justice...inception towards death
- CRIME aka being with-in-justice...life
j) "even if it means going AGAINST what everyone else is doing"...aka against another, while ignoring that which moves self FORwards aka the wanted temptation one needs to resist.
k) Dr. David...here to slay Hebrew Golyath...goyim.
a) https://img.gvid.tv/i/23eXSUjK.jpg
b) Natural implies exposed to ones view (open); artificial implies disclosed to ones view (close)...artificial (suggestion) opposes natural (perception).
a) SANS - "without"...both an inversion of being within and a sleight of hand for being WITHin OUTside.
b) SONS/SANS of anarchy...notice the double negation of sans (without) and an (without).
c) SANSKRIT aka sans (without) krta (to make, form). Notice also that sanskrit is being derived from samskrtam aka SAM (together with).
d) Consider....SANS Institute (information security)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SANS_Institute
a guy who went on a killing spree
Before the "supreme gentleman" sought revenge on society for ostracizing and ignoring him, he tried to distinguish himself financially by winning the powerball, for which he traveled the states, while investing the rest of his finances into buying up tickets...
How is this related, if at all?
If one empowers ba'al, then...others have to suffer.
delayed prior to drawing and ONE winner
His name was Elliot Rodger...
speculation of...sadists; narcissists; smart
Speculation implies "particular within action" aka a setting apart...labeling others implies a putting together. That's the underlying issue many ignore; which in return permits few the opportunity for exploitation.
What gets you going in life?
Whole (inception towards death) generating partials (life)...others suggest progressivism to distract one from being within procession.
Consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow; discerning self within perceivable procession inspires one to resist by adaptation to being moved.
Adam-equivalents
a) Adam (motion) generates Eve (momentum) for descendants (matter).
b) Equal (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...few suggest equality through diversity to destroy differences among many.
Aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkum olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union aka miscegenation; mass migration; mongrelization; melting pot; multiculturalism aka university; uniformity; unicode; unicef; universal basic income; universal pictures aka "there comes a time when we need to heed a certain call...when the world has to come together as one" aka one world order etc.
Why do few tempt many together? So that few can remain apart within whole.
misery
To mise (a tribute paid) implies ones consent buying into another ones suggestions sold, hence "misery seeking company".
In reality...all perceivable (value) generates each ones perception (evaluation) by setting FREE will of choice. Consenting by ones choice to chosen ones suggestion implies submission to another aka to buy into another sells self out aka those suggesting are voted masters by and over those consenting to be slaves.
Visionaries want to
a) Perception within perceivable implies want within need; hence each ones struggle to resist (need) temptations (want).
b) Ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) establishes a conflict called "reason" aka want vs not want. Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many into conflicts of reason against one another, while ignoring perceivable need, and while permitting the suggesting few to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information from both sides of every conflict of reason.
c) Want corrupts vision with suggested information from perceivable inspiration. For example...one perceives sound; while others suggest words to label ones vision within sound. Consenting to such labels; brands; idols permits others to craft the spelling (spell-craft) of ones vision.
a) PROB'LEM, noun (Latin problema) - "to throw forward"...solution (inception towards death) throws forwards (life). Few suggest many to solve problems as the inversion thereof.
b) Explain implies expression (life) within plain impression (inception towards death) hence PLAIN (Latin planus) - "flat, even, level".
Few suggest ex (out) planus (flat) to flatten out the expressions of consenting many...living within a-way (inception towards death).