Speculation implies "particular within action" aka a setting apart...labeling others implies a putting together. That's the underlying issue many ignore; which in return permits few the opportunity for exploitation.
What gets you going in life?
Whole (inception towards death) generating partials (life)...others suggest progressivism to distract one from being within procession.
Consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow; discerning self within perceivable procession inspires one to resist by adaptation to being moved.
Adam-equivalents
a) Adam (motion) generates Eve (momentum) for descendants (matter).
b) Equal (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...few suggest equality through diversity to destroy differences among many.
Aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkum olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union aka miscegenation; mass migration; mongrelization; melting pot; multiculturalism aka university; uniformity; unicode; unicef; universal basic income; universal pictures aka "there comes a time when we need to heed a certain call...when the world has to come together as one" aka one world order etc.
Why do few tempt many together? So that few can remain apart within whole.
misery
To mise (a tribute paid) implies ones consent buying into another ones suggestions sold, hence "misery seeking company".
In reality...all perceivable (value) generates each ones perception (evaluation) by setting FREE will of choice. Consenting by ones choice to chosen ones suggestion implies submission to another aka to buy into another sells self out aka those suggesting are voted masters by and over those consenting to be slaves.
Visionaries want to
a) Perception within perceivable implies want within need; hence each ones struggle to resist (need) temptations (want).
b) Ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) establishes a conflict called "reason" aka want vs not want. Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many into conflicts of reason against one another, while ignoring perceivable need, and while permitting the suggesting few to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information from both sides of every conflict of reason.
c) Want corrupts vision with suggested information from perceivable inspiration. For example...one perceives sound; while others suggest words to label ones vision within sound. Consenting to such labels; brands; idols permits others to craft the spelling (spell-craft) of ones vision.
Speculation implies "particular within action" aka a setting apart...labeling others implies a putting together. That's the underlying issue many ignore; which in return permits few the opportunity for exploitation.
Whole (inception towards death) generating partials (life)...others suggest progressivism to distract one from being within procession.
Consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow; discerning self within perceivable procession inspires one to resist by adaptation to being moved.
a) Adam (motion) generates Eve (momentum) for descendants (matter).
b) Equal (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...few suggest equality through diversity to destroy differences among many.
Aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkum olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union aka miscegenation; mass migration; mongrelization; melting pot; multiculturalism aka university; uniformity; unicode; unicef; universal basic income; universal pictures aka "there comes a time when we need to heed a certain call...when the world has to come together as one" aka one world order etc.
Why do few tempt many together? So that few can remain apart within whole.
To mise (a tribute paid) implies ones consent buying into another ones suggestions sold, hence "misery seeking company".
In reality...all perceivable (value) generates each ones perception (evaluation) by setting FREE will of choice. Consenting by ones choice to chosen ones suggestion implies submission to another aka to buy into another sells self out aka those suggesting are voted masters by and over those consenting to be slaves.
a) Perception within perceivable implies want within need; hence each ones struggle to resist (need) temptations (want).
b) Ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) establishes a conflict called "reason" aka want vs not want. Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many into conflicts of reason against one another, while ignoring perceivable need, and while permitting the suggesting few to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information from both sides of every conflict of reason.
c) Want corrupts vision with suggested information from perceivable inspiration. For example...one perceives sound; while others suggest words to label ones vision within sound. Consenting to such labels; brands; idols permits others to craft the spelling (spell-craft) of ones vision.