a) Electric motion (inception towards death) generates magnetic matter (life).
b) Electric aka elect (to choose) aka origin of each ones free will of choice...choosing to hold onto implies the magnetic part within electric whole.
c) Others suggest -ism (magnetism) to tempt ones consent to hold onto aka few tempting attraction among many to collectivize them...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union etc.
d) Perceivable (-) generates perception (+)...hence ones struggle to rise (life) during fall (inception towards death) by re-generating self.
Edit: electric reveals magnetic. Others suggest occultism to conceal revelation. The suggested word "secret" implies applied occultism, hence distracting one from Latin SECO (to separate)...as in...electric whole separating internally into magnetic partials.
Being set apart from one another within whole implies revelation...revealed (life) by action (inception towards death).
they say started a business in a basement
Aka suggested heroism...from zero to hero aka build from scratch aka pulled up by bootstraps etc. Heroism is utilized to obscure creationism (out of nothing) by offering an idol's journey.
Masonry's origin
Masonic implies "to make sound"...suggested words are a distortion within perceivable sound IF one consents to ignore latter for former by "free" will of choice.
Example: Suggested "insane person" distorts perceivable...in-sanus (within sound) + per-sonos (by sound). Consenting to former distorts ones discernment within latter.
Suggestion tempting consent implies masonic tempting free to bind itself.
freemasonry is judaism
a) A mason of free (will of choice) shapes within the mind of others.
b) Suggested -ism (judaism) tempts ones consent to -ist (judaist)...-ism implies masonry (suggested information) applied to free (consenting free will of choice).
c) Everything perceivable WAS; before one can suggest what it IS...hence -ISms tempting one to ignore what was.
known axiom
Axiom (suggestion) tempts paradox (consent) to ignore knowledge (perceivable).
Plasma (Greek plassein) - "to mold; to spread" aka motion molding momentum (inception towards death) to spread matter (life).
actually knew words
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...words are suggested over perceivable sound.
b) Sound implies action; word implies reaction.
mean
Meaning implies having in mind; hence suggested information by another held within ones mind/memory by consent. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; since it moves...
Nature doesn't offer meaning; signs; tokens; idols; REPRESENTATIONS...it's each one within that re-sponds to what is presented by ac-tion.
What if...
What implies energy, because what else could sustain being? Energy moves, and motion implicates (if/then) towards matter within, hence IF matter; THEN within motion. That's how energy comes to be internally/inherently discernible.
cloning
a) Duplication cannot exist within energy...only differentiation; separation; fragmentation etc. On the other hand...one can be duped to believe in two.
b) Cloning implies "transplanted part of one original" aka each partial (life) within whole (inception towards death).
your thought process is really fragmented
All perceivable implies a whole process; each ones perception within implies a fragment (separated mind) thereof.
In other words...process implies real (perceivable) product tempts fiction (suggested).
need to get a hold of
a) What if need implies letting go; while want tempts to hold onto? Holding breath...does one need to get a hold of it or does one need to let go of it?
b) What if few suggest collectivism to tempt each one of "many" to hold onto suggested, while ignoring to be fragmented from one another?
no sense
Can one sense nothing? Can one describe the origin of "nonsense"...was it perceivable or is it suggested?
little to
Aka little (life) within towards (inception towards death) aka partial within whole...a fragmentation, separation; differentiation etc.
you...your...you
Only if one claims self as "me; myself or I" are all other ones branded as "you". Can there exist a you without a me?
The devil needs your consent
a) THE implies suggested the-ism, and using it implies ones consent, which permits others to brand one a the-ist.
A clearer example...Latin terror/terreo - "to frighten". Others suggest terror-ism, and if one consents by being afraid; then one permits others to brand one a terror-ist, hence "war on terror" against all those who are afraid.
b) Devil (Greek diaballein) implies DIA (across; through) + BALLEIN (to throw) aka being thrown (life) across (inception towards death).
Personifying "the devil" tempts one to ignore being part (ballein) within whole (dia) of it...and personification requires ones consent to a suggested brand/idol/title/name/noun/definition etc.
consent and cooperation
a) CO implies "together; with"; being implies "apart; within"...consenting to anything suggested by another tempts together, hence a CON-tract or religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
b) If one resists suggested CO (con; cooperate); then perceivable "sent" + "tion" implies being send (life) by action (inception towards death).
Nature can only be hidden by whatever is shaped within...not overruled. It's always there for those with eyes to see.
You have to give...
...which then tempts one to ignore that only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) from each one (life) within.
As for haveing...that implies "to own; to posses"; which those within nature cannot do; while being done by nature. Matter can hold onto each other; but cannot own or posses motion...holding onto matter (suggested) tempts one to ignore motion (perceivable).
the inversion of good vs evil
Reason (versus) inverts implication (if/then)...there's no conflict within implication, only IF balance THEN choice etc. It's choosing to hold onto a side; which imbalances choice.
Few suggest both sides; many choose either and then fight each other.
rejected the one true
a) True implies versus false reasoning aka ones conflict against another.
b) The implies suggested the-ism aka ones consent to authorize another, while submitting self.
c) If ONE; then ONLY...so neither acceptance (want) nor rejection (not want) are needed.
In other words...perceivable implies oneness (whole); perception implies ones (partial). If one ignores this for the suggestions by another one; then one ignores only for multiple.
which they worship
THEY aka suggested pluralism tempting ones singular perception against another...which ignores ONE and ONLY.
There's no "they" in nature unless ONE counts other ones as they.
people who are seduced
People (suggested pluralism) over person (perceiving singular) implies the seduction of oneself by another.; and person (per sonos; by sound) implies origin of being, which one can only discern for self; not give or take from others.
Now the Spirit speaketh expressly,
a) If one and only; then spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies impressing (inhale) and expressing (exhale).
b) If one and only; then now implies in-between (life) before (inception) and after (death), hence perceivable moment-um of motion for each perceiving matter within.
c) If one and only; then speech wouldn't require suggestion and consent. Speaking a word implies shaping letters aka a suggested shape and ones consent "letting" others shape.
Oneself becomes the letter of any suggested word shaped by another....if one consents.
Only within sound can there be resonance (need) and dissonance (want)...based on how each person (per sonos; by sound) within chooses to respond.
evils of Freemasonry
a) A mason can only shape (suggested) if free (consent) is given.
b) Moralism (good vs evil) implies a masonic shape; held by free will of choice within ones mind/memory.
satanic mindset
Ones satanic (adversary, one who plots against another) mind/memory is set within a conflict of reason against another.
Those who hold the debt (creditors) control those who need to issue it (debtors)...
a) What if one who gives credit/creed/faith (consent) takes on debt (suggested) as burden upon self?
b) Does one need to give credit to another or take debt from another?
biological entity
Entity/ens/es - "to be" implies towards being aka zoe (inception towards death) animating bios (life)...logic/reason tempts one to ignore that, while arguing against others.
the NSA is exempt from all laws...a completely lawless organization
a) How could anything within nature be exempt from natural law? How could any partial within whole be complete?
b) National/native implies withing foreign; Security/seco implies divided within whole; Agency implies acting upon regents aka action (inception towards death) generating reactions (life).
Each one is native within all, while foreign to one another; each one is partial divided within whole, and all enacts upon each ones reactions...that's what NSA implies.
answering to no one
If one asks a question, then does another one need to answer? If nature does "naturing"; then do natives need to respond?
Thanks for the inspiration.
Coming (inception towards death) in the flesh (life) implies a setting apart from one another...confession implies letting in (fateri) together (con). The latter tempts one to ignore former.
- CANDIDATE, noun - "one who offers himself"
- CHRIST; noun - "anointed one"
Each one implies anointed, and consent offers oneself to another. Antichrist implies one turning against self by choosing another over self.
Idiot (separate) aka idiom (peculiar to one's self)...being implies separate from one another, hence peculiar to one's self, and peculiar aka pecus implies "cattle"...
isn't
What is nothing? Where is nothing? Who is nothing? Why is nothing? How did nothing came to be?
How could one thing (ones perception) within everything (all perceivable) discern nothing?
What is the significance of the flat earth?
a) Those who ignore perceivable aka knowledge...ignore "edge" of known world, hence can be tricked into circular reasoning. In other words...choice at the edge of balance can be tempted towards sides, which then establishes a conflict of reason among those sides.
b) Earth/hearth/heart implies internal combustion (life) within external implosion (inception towards death).
c) Flat (inception towards death) generates odd; uneven; inconsistent; broken; different (life)...round implies the inversion of that aka "circular in outline".
d) Significance implies "importance; momentous"...ones perception exists within the momentum of all perceivable, while the suggestions by others tempt one to ignore momentum for holding onto matter.
Adapting to momentum allows one to discern self as matter within motion, while consenting to matter tempts one to ignore that.
Import/export implies IM (inception) PORT (life) EX (death); yet its one each vessel to utilize port as passage within perceivable or storage for suggested.
You need all people coming together against them
a) Tikkun olam - "healing the world by bringing together"...that implies jew tempting gentiles together. Meanwhile; gentiles are desperately trying to come together to defeat jew...this inversion of thought continues until each gentile chooses to resist the temptation of ignorance.
b) People (plural) implies an aggregation of each person (singular) and person (Latin per sonos; by sound) implies sound setting itself apart...not coming together.
white movement
White implies "pure light"; black implies "absence of light"...neither can exist within a visible spectrum of light. A human aka hue (color) of man can only exist within/inside/in-between a visible spectrum.
A jew suggests white and black (masonic checkerboard) to tempt gentiles in-between to choose a side, hence ignoring the visible spectrum of light. A distortion of spectrum by mixing fragments together.
- Take anything "white"...if you can see it; then it isn't pure.
- Take anything "black"...if you can see it; then there can't be an absence of light.
Gentiles willingly ignore this; which permits a jew to ruthlessly exploit ignorance.
killing the lesser races
RACE, noun (Latin radix) - "radius; rod; ray; radiate"...a radius grows from center; killing others tempts one off-center and into circumference.
Convergence (against others) or divergence (for self)...a jew diverges while suggesting gentiles to converge. A jew erects self at center; while cutting gentiles off circumference aka circumcision.
how can we take...
Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death)...those living within are tempted to give (suggestion) and take (consent) from one another, while ignoring nature.
A jew suggests pluralism (we) to tempt each singular (one) gentile to consent to take part within a group. Nature doesn't group together; it sets each unit (Latin unitas; unus, one) apart from one another.
"We" doesn't exist in nature; it implies "one" holding onto other ones, while calling it we. It's collectivism...a deceit; a trick; an amassing of consent; an aggregation of power within the hands of few who suggest many to follow orders etc.
In short...one (life) needs to adapt to what nature gives (inception), while nature takes it (death).
Blocking the account u/free-will-of-choice is a good idea for just about everyone here.
a) Free will of choice cannot be blocked by another...only ignored as oneself.
How could suicide work if ones free will of choice could be banned by another?
b) Using suggested idealism (a good idea) in the name of others (for just about everyone) tempts each consenting ones free will of choice to respond "alike".
filler words
Suggested words fill mind/memory if one consents to hold onto them. Perceivable sound cannot be held onto; hence me taking words (aka spell-craft) apart.
speaking as authorities
Ones consent authorizes the suggested speech of another. Without authorizing suggested speech, one perceives sound.
What is the meaning of sound without authorized speech?
They just speak as if everything that came out of their mouths was undisputed...
Because unless disputing...the listener gives consent to everything spoken.
Furthermore; the dispute about suggested speech is called "reasoning". All perceivable doesn't reason with ones perception...it implicates (if/then). Knowledge derives implication...standing-under (understanding) suggested tempts reason.
Everything (matter) changes (motion)...the cave implies ones consenting mind/memory, which affixes suggested information aka allegory by another. Those outside the cave operate within perceivable inspiration...which cannot be held onto, since it moves/changes.
As for Plato...platonic implies "affection between the sexes, unmixed with desires" aka affected by division (Latin seco, sex; to divide); while resisting the temptation to hold onto and thereby put together.
Affected (life) by division (inception towards death); tempted to put together... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2SJ8G6Jr.jpg
...failing, not intellectual
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand)...standing under implies failing to stand up.
Line (inception towards death) inspires resistance (life)...others suggest progressivism (guidelines) to tempt one to follow along instead of resisting.
As for apparitions...appearance (perceivable) can be deceptive (suggested).