you're going to need to go back to the word
Only within sound can a word be shaped, hence sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all". Shaping words implies the articulation of natural sound aka spell-craft.
Sound implies need; word tempts want vs not want.
if you want to dissect what...means
Meaning implies a measure taken by ones mind while ignoring all given. Sharing meaning tempts one to ignore dissection (analysis) for combination (synthesis) aka natural for artificial.
Nature dissects want (life) within need (inception towards death)...artifice tempts want vs not want into combined conflict.
personal interpretation
- Per (by) son (sound) al (all)
- Inter (internal) pret (pass over) ation (action)
Personal interpretation implies the status quo of each being "by all sound" and "internally passing over action"...not about information shared with one another.
Words are utilized to hide how sound moves in-stru-ment (within structured mind). Sound moves through ones mind and cannot be held onto...words tempt ones mind to hold onto meaning, while ignoring sound.
The word changed
Sound implies change...only within natural change can a word be articulated. Holding onto the meaning of any word tempts one to ignore the change of all sound.
during the time
Time implies a measurement taken while ignoring all given. Notice how form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot perceive its beginning or end...yet suggested time can affix any date into ones mind if consented to.
Notice that during/durare/deru - "be firm, solid" implies being formed within a liquid flow.
Great Vowel Shift
VOW (to promise; pledge; wish; desire) EL (God)...it's God the greatest who pro (forwards) mise (to release) each shift (partition) within.
That's how sound works...releasing forwards each partitioned instrument. The suggested "great vowel shift" hides this within language/lingua (tongue) by forking the tongue within natural sound with the articulation of words.
That's also why there's an oral torah before the written torah.
Middle English
What's the middle of an engl/angle? A vertex from vertere/wer - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vertex
Nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life)...artifice turns beings against each other mentally (logic) and physically (reason).
animals (opposed to man)
Animal aka all (light) animating each hue (color) of man (ray) within...that's how animal delineates human aka OP (in the direction of) POSE (to place)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/oppose
Only within animal (animation) can there be human (appearance)...using the labels animal and human upon one another distracts from animation while distorting appearance.
The lie and deception is claiming the etymology of BEAST is BEing ASTute.
One cannot be astute (discerning) by claiming; lying or deceiving...each of which implies a synthesis aka artificially putting together what nature sets apart for analysis.
I didn't claim that beast means being astute...I used implication (if > then) to show how only after being astute can one brand another discernible being as a beast.
One cannot make the discernment between man and beast without BEING ASTUTE (discerning) before.
Start with self discernment...BEast aka BEING. What's a beast? A lowered animal aka the lowering animation (inception towards death) of each rising being (life).
Now what's astute? Being keen in discernment of one's self-interest. So before one can call one another "beast" one has to BE AST(ute).
You're making crap up.
Make/macian - "to give being to"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/make implies nature giving being to native aka low (inception towards death) making up (life).
Where's the contradiction in anything I'm saying? Where's the lie? Where's the hidden agenda? Where's the deception?
you're arguing
The circular mind (agree vs disagree) argues...the linear mind (if > then) doesn't have a side to hold onto and argue from.
about "almost"
Few (jew) tempting most (gentile) together to distract from all...that's what "almost" implies. It's abrahamism aka abh (father) raham (multitude) which represents the conspiracy by few against many.
How does it benefit free will of choice to ignore the implication of "almost"? Or to bring it back to the topic....MOST represents a surrogate (substitute) of ALL if one consents to it.
The problem is that you're too retarded to understand that you're retarded.
a) Solution (inception towards death) > problem (life)...retardation implies problem ignoring solution.
b) Understanding implies ones choice to "stand-under" the suggestion of another. Knowledge implies ones choice balancing on the edge of all known...not under or over one another, but in-between.
c) What if I'm fully aware of what I'm doing and how "most" react to it?
everything that you say is retarded.
Is there a lie in what I wrote? Also...nature cannot be retarded (delayed); it's the ignorance of nature which retards the perception of a native.
almost everything that you say
What about you holding a contradiction together like AL+MOST? Most can never be all. How am I retarded for seeing this?
Di (apart) latus (wide). To make wider.
TO implies "towards" aka nature moving towards native, which allows each departed native to lessen or widen the distance among one another.
Pro (professional) anti (against)
Pro implies "forwards"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*per-#etymonline_v_52721 Only while being forwarded can one profess to another a pro vs anti stance.
In reality against implies "a gain" aka nature moving forward (pro) each native gain (anti)...which aren't in conflict with one another but opposites of one another.
move (motion) ment (moment)
The MO in moment implies "motion"...hence nature moving (mo) the mind (ment) of each native.
surro (surround) gate (entrance)
Surrogate aka surrogare/subrogare aka sub (under) + reg (to move in a straight line) aka sub (life) reg (inception towards death).
A gate btw implies both entrance (inception) and exit (death) for each one (life) passing through...
Consent aka con (to deceive) sent (the act of going)
a) Con implies "together"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/com- aka ones consent and any suggestion of another coming together in contract.
Nature doesn't deceive...ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) by consent establishes the deception.
b) Going isn't an act...it's a reaction (life) to being enacted upon (inception towards death). Nature acts; native reacts. Only while nature moves can each native within choose where to go.
deceiving someone
Some (plural) one (singular) implies a deception if held together.
Inverts aka in (within) verts (vertical structures at a skate park).
a) In (within) vert/vertere (to turn)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/invert
b) Only within horizontal (line) can vertical (circle) be shaped...a skate-park tries to deceive ones perception from discerning that with a suggested quarter or half-pipe instead of a full loop.
Implies aka imp (small mythical demon) lies (to lay down)
Im (within) plica (to fold) tion (action) aka action unfolding each reaction within. Your description of imp + lies ignores action aka that which allows imps and lies to be shaped.
Now look at the etymology of imp/impotus (implant) from im (within) + phyein (to bring forth)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/imp
Action bringing forth each implanted reaction...that's what the word "imp" implies.
a demon resting
Demon aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide)...natures provided division into each native cannot rest since it implies motion. A native can be tricked to ignore motion when holding onto matter mentally (ideal) or physically (idol). Taking hold of implies demonic possession...
Judgement aka judge (to give) ment (gift).
The issue is taking the gift into possession to become the judge, while ignoring "don't judge lest ye be judged".
When you pass the resting
Resting (cessation of motion) contradicts passing (moving forwards)...only within passing can one "rest" by ignoring the passage aka by wandering/wondering of.
The way you talk is so fucking annoying
You view the world as a circle (good vs evil); I view the world as a line (if > then)...the circular view is based on holding onto a side, which makes the linear view annoying because it moves and cannot be held onto.
A jew shapes the moving nature (line), while tempting gentiles to hold onto fiction (circle)...this is called transmogrification or in terms of letters; transliteration. The study of Torah through Zohar is based on that.
is never the less evil
That implies taking judgement upon self and passing it onto another while ignoring "judge not; lest ye be judged".
Evil implies the inversion of "live"...nature passes each native forwards, which is why taking hold of anything turns one around.
are just trying to incite them into giving it up
Before another can try to incite ones mind (incitement) to want or not want...there's each ones trial within given aka needing to resist wanted temptation.
Incite/incitare - "to put into rapid motion" implies wanting more out needed motion. Nature moves with the same speed...it's each native within whose perception of speed differs.
The merchant offering the incitement doesn't put one into rapid motion...it's taking the artificial offer over the natural offer which puts oneself into rapid perception of motion.
Notice that rape and rapid imply the same origin...suggestion represents the instigator of mind rape, while consent represents the rape of ones mind by another.
the act was evil
Nature acts; native reacts...evil represents ones reaction to one another, while ignoring nature.
The point is that it is the evil part and not the concept of a business contract.
As soon as one makes a contract with another one turns LIVE into EVIL. Why? Because turning against one another inverts being set apart from one another.
The opposite of contraction implies expansion aka the growth of life.
if we have a business contract with a clause in it that says you have to give me your soul, that isn't proof that business is evil, but trying to take human soul is.
Suggested we, contract, and clause tempts ones consent to take part in it...doing so inverts live/evil.
In nature...each being represents a singular (one); not a plural (we). Being represents an expression; not a contraction. Coming into being represents an opening; not a closing clause.
take soul
Soul/sole cannot be taken...only given up to one another.
- Surrogate implies the opposite of being... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/surrogate.html
- Custody implies the opposite of freedom... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/custody.html
Nature implies the dominance that sets each being free from one another; few suggest artificial surrogacy and custody to bind many together, which destroys the essence of being...if consented to.
pro-life movement
A label deliberately designed to tempt the ignorance of movement. Life needs to resist the wanted temptation of being pro aka being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pro-
Furthermore...pro vs anti implies a circle, while movement implies linear procession.
it isn't "framerates", it's gravity
Framing ones mind by rating (framerate) or mentally holding onto a measure like weight (gravity) represent different descriptions for the same self inflicted burden.
dilation
Aka DI (to divide) LAT (to extend) ION (action)...action divides into reaction while allowing the extension and restriction thereof by free will of choice...few suggest time (length) and gravity (weight) to tempt many to bind free will of choice into a burden by consensus.
Nature has neither length; nor weight...it's natives who choose to attribute length and weight to one another for artificial comparison aka com (together) par (equal).
"Among the ancient iconologists, students of likenesses, equality was symbolized by a female figure holding in one hand a pair of scales equipoised and in the other a nest of swallows. The moderns have substituted a level for the scales. And this is the Masonic idea. In Freemasonry, the level is the symbol of that equality which, as Godfrey Higgins (.Anacalypsis i, 790) says, is the very essence of Freemasonry." ~ https://www.universalfreemasonry.org/en/encyclopedia/equality
the universe is expanding
Uni (one) verse (to turn)...one cannot expand; it remains singular. Turning against one another by holding the beginning and end of singularity together like ouroboros contracts anyone within, while making everything else feel like expansion.
fundamental forces
There's only one foundational force (motion) for each mind (momentum) and body (matter) within...few suggest pluralism to tempt impotency among many who ignore the force within for forces without.
I can't say that I know why, but I have feelings.
Knowledge moves forwards (motion); feelings tempt one from one side to the other (emotion)...ignoring motion for emotion establishes a conflict like can vs can't.
I believe it is and lots and lots of other people would agree
To believe implies holding onto lots and lots of ideals in agreement with other people...that reduces a natives resistance within the ongoing velocity of nature, hence making it look faster.
In reality...slower and faster represent measurements taken by a destabilized (imbalance) native who chooses to ignore the stability (balance) of nature.
Let's take video games.
Gaming implies gambling aka taking a chance, while ignoring given choice. It's balance which gives choice, while chance tempts imbalance.
run at certain framerate
It's ones minds which ascertains a frame by rating anything, while ignoring how nature runs everything through each thing within.
every action
What you describe as action represents RE-action aka an artificial response (framerate) to natural action (ongoing flow).
Keep in mind
Doing so establishes the theory of why time is speeding up because keeping slows the mind down.
The framerate of our simulation is slowing down
Framing ones mind with ratings represents the simulation few run within many to occupy a mental consensus.
we are indeed living in a simulation
Living implies singularity; not plurality (we) and indeed implies within (life) dead (inception towards death)...mentally holding onto pluralism (we) and factionalism (indeed) represents the simulation to distract life from living.
It's just an idea
Nature implies just (balance); being implies at odds (choice)...few distract many from that with physical idols and mental ideals. Holding onto either imbalances a beings choice.
Wisdom aka wise (to discern) dom (dominance) implies dominance (inception towards death) giving the power to discern (life).
Wisdom implies a process setting potential free....keeping and greed imply possession.
what is a...?
- What/hwæt - "thing in abstraction" aka each thing drawn (stract) from (ab) everything.
- Is implies a suggestion about what was perceivable.
- A implies one part of whole.
hybrid genetics
- Hybrid/ibrida - "mongrel"
Genetic refers to the natural abstraction of each part within whole, while hybrid refers to the artificial concretion of many things mixed together.
human hybrid
Human implies each abstracted being within nature, while hybrid implies the mongrelization of beings mixed together.
Mongrel implies mingling (mongr) all (el) together, while ignoring that all divides each one within apart from one another.
"Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the MIXED multitude." ~Nehemiah 13:3
"For in the hand of the Lord there is a cup, and the wine is red; it is full of MIXTURE; and he poureth out of the same: but the dregs thereof, all the wicked of the earth shall wring them out, and drink them." ~Psalm 75:8
"The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without MIXTURE into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb." ~ Revelation 14:10
Cash is the only payment technology that does not require permission from a third party to function.
a) Before one consents to cash or digital one consents to money representing value...which permits few to set artificial values for many.
b) 1st (all perceivable) > 2nd (ones perception) > 3rd (suggestion by another)...any suggestion tempts ones consent to a parasitic 3rd party.
will use the new
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun" ~Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
Few suggest "new" to distort the will of many into ignoring perceivable "now".
the system being built around you
Nature delineates (inception towards death) each native (life)...few tempt many mentally (logic) and physically (reason) into a binding ring aka circular logic and turning against one another reasoning.
Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
payment
Paying another implies selling out ones FREE will of choice...a mental deception.
they hope
Both hope (want) and fear (not want) represent suggested outcomes few shape to distract many from perceivable origin (need).
What's coming is worse
Because ignoring where one came from for what another suggests is coming worsens ones position.
recession
Only during recession (inception towards death) can expansion (life) come into being.
they need massive amounts of computing power
Few realize that nature offers all needed to each native within, hence redirecting the massive amount of computing power among many towards artifice instead.
AI Data Centers
Artificial data decentralizes each native of nature who chooses to hold onto it. Nature demands adaption; artifice tempts stagnation. Few utilize AI to regurgitate data to many, which distracts from natural adaption with artificial stagnation.
The thief
The (theos; God) doesn't steal...only bestows. It's taking (possession) what was given (procession) which makes one (potential) a thief.
Mystery = musterion = secret
- 1st... all revealing
- 2nd... each one being revealed
- 3rd... one keeping secrets from one another
The origin of any word implies sound/sanus (whole; entire; all)...shaping words into mysteries to distract from sound is based on ones willing ignorance of sound.
The word "mystery" as applied to
There's the issue...applying aka artificially joining together what nature divides apart from one another. Doing that represents the shaping of a mystery.
carries the idea of silence
On the contrary...carrying a word represents noise shaped idealism tempting one to ignore the sound of silence.
The root word ów (Muo) means to shut the mouth.
The foundation of shutting the mouth implies being given a mouth to open or shut. Articulating words uproot the tongue from natural sound by forking it.
Meaning implies a measurement taken...which ignores God given.
accumulate enough power to rule over the rulers of the world
Gentiles represent that accumulation of power aka the consent of each gentile permitting each jew to rule the consensus of accumulated gentile power.
the mysteries appear to have circled around
Nature delineates (inception towards death) native (life)...circling around each other mentally (logic) and physically (reason) makes nature a mystery for natives.
Ancient...was the the place
There can be only one place...at the center (perception) of all (perceivable). Any "other" place represents a measurement taken among beings, while ignoring ones God given place.
Here's a sleight of hand for the only place to be... https://genius.com/Jesus-jones-right-here-right-now-lyrics
from the earliest times groups of initiates or wise men have existed
Before a group can be formed...all divides each one from one another. It's forming groups (plurality) which mystifies being (singularity).
As for initiation...that's the inception of life, not ones consent to any suggestion by another.
the life of the soul after death
Soul/sole (one and only) implies the whole process of dying for each living potential within...it's the suggestion of "after" which tempts one to ignore before aka "being forwarded".
persuade not only individuals
Persuasion (suggestion tempting consent) implies individual (within division of two).
Mapping (drawing upon a plane surface representing a part or whole) tempts one to ignore being a part within whole.
Map/mundi - "of the world" hence not God given, but taken from one another.
Mystery Babylon
- Mystery/myein (to close; shut)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mystery
- Babylon aka bab (gate) lyon (gods)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Babylon
Nature opens all to each one within. Ignoring the singularity of nature for plurality shuts ones discernment of all.
The natural gate implies the inception of life as the opening; the passage of life as the gateway, and the death of life as the exit...the artificial gate implies gatekeeping aka ignoring the process inception > life > death by keeping hold of anything within it.
Greater Israel is Mystery Babylon
Greater israel implies the growth of each one who chooses to struggle within all aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God)...mystery babylon tempts many to burden each other, while ignoring the struggle to set oneself free from one another.
Each jew utilizes mystery babylon (selling self out to one another like a whore) to distract gentiles from greater israel (growing self by not buying into the temptations of one another).
the modern counterfeit
a) Anything suggested counterfeits everything perceivable...if consented to.
b) Modern/med (to take appropriate measures) represents a counterfeit suggestion, which tempts one to ignore that everything perceivable moves and cannot be taken into possession.
A jew suggests past, present, and future to tempt gentiles to take measurements, while ignoring that motion > momentum > matter happens at the same moment to each different perception within.
One who ignores thinks the past is gone; one who discerns knows motion cannot stop moving forwards. Gentiles lose touch with the past because they are holding onto an artificial measurement, while ignoring the continuity of nature. A jew supplies a substitute for past aka "history" to trick generations of gentiles to waste power on trying to hold onto the measurement of the past.
if only EVERYONE would just tell ai to f off.
Only EACH ONE can tell AI to fuck off...everyone (plural) represents an artifice tempting each natural one (singular) to fuck around.
outfront... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outfront_Media
a) Outfront Media implies mediating the outer towards the front of the inner aka using suggestion to mediate all outwardly perceivable towards the front of each ones perception.
In reality...inner (perception) implies media of outer (perceivable).
b) Outfront Media was formerly called TDI (Transportation Displays Incorporated) implying the transfer of incorporated displays within action.
In reality...reaction (life) implies the display (allow to be seen) of action (inception towards death). Incorporation implies the inversion of the living body into a dead body (corpus ) during action by turning reactions against one another when allowing others to mediate what can be seen.
In short...gentiles instead of displaying natural reactions are turning against each other while reacting to what a jew puts on display aka on a screen.
pharisaic rabbinism
Pharisee/perish (to separate)...if one consents to a suggested -ism; then one becomes slave to a rabbi (master) aka the opposite of separation.
critical
Aka all (al) distinguishing (critic) each one within by separation from one another. The issue with critic...criticism aka applying critic to another to shape a consensus about.
By criticizing each other...gentiles make themselves slaves to each separated jewish master of consensus.
Notice that a jew has an issue with accepting any critic from gentiles...
You used etymology as a synthesis of etymo (actual) + logy (logic) which shaped circular conflicts within your mind (agree vs disagree + is vs isn't).
I analyzed etymo+logy in a linear sense (if > then), therefore without choosing a side within a conflict, which allows me to see that one has to be astute to be able to shape the word "beast".
Logos (word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (turning against one another) tempts one to ignore foundation (sound) for surface (word).
Notice also logos/leg - "to collect; gather"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*leg-#etymonline_v_52572 Sound moves and cannot be gathered...gathering words represents a distortion within sound.
The twist is within your view of etymo (actual) + logy (logic) as a synthesis. Logic implies circular thinking, which contradicts the actual linear procession of nature and it's implication (if > then).
I take words apart to try to dissolve the circle (contradiction) within the minds of those who cannot think straight.
Sound moves and cannot be grasped...few shaping artificial words within natural sound to tempt many to grasp; seize; take possession of implies spell-craft for spell-binding.
I resist the temptation of grasping, which allows me to see how what was said besmirches the surface of the sound foundation underneath.
Vowel/wekw - "to speak"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vowel implies ones articulation within "the great vowel shift" of nature.
Stuffing implies synthesis (together); implicating implies analysis (apart)...nature sets each native apart from one another; few artificially stuff many together.
Perceivable inspiration moves through ones mind...suggested information stuffs ones mind if held onto.
Stuffing drags one down with burden; implicating lifts one up by unburdening stuff.