No Sweden wasn't part of a hard nato border. Norway, Finland make. Sweden doesn't even need to be in Nato to be in Nato. It effectively is. Scandinavian treaty.
You missed the part with unanimous voting in NATO. More members, more tensions, less chance of getting unanimous vote. Simple as that.
Sent tens of thousands of Fins to gulag,
So you suspicious to moonhoax, may be even don't believe in holocaust, but for completely irrational reasons blindly believe in jewish gulag myth? Do you understand that it is exactly same kind of lies like holocaust purely for profit and shaiming?
There was Finnish POW, during WWII, but far less than tens of thousands. something like 2000, around 500 died. And after peace agreement most of them returned back to Finland. From the other side from 60000 Russians around 15000 died in Finnish concentration camps. Finns also participated in Leningrad blockade. Really, I think, Finland, as a state, still owns a lot to Russians. Once we will come for a favor, in payyment of all debts. And something tell me that Finns will do that favor for us. May be even gladly and willingly.
USSR didn't occupy Finland because Finns had enough brains to make a peace deal with USSR, there was no any occupation of Finland, so no any of that genocide, deportation or other shit you talking about could happen at all.
genocided others,
We have several regions where Ugro-Finn etnicities live, not only Finns. Most live in Russia since ancient times. None was genocided. Moreover, Finns really are from West of Ural mountains. Like Hungarians. We live side-by-side since fucking paleolite.
displaced so many more
Etnicies displaced was those who onely and violently support Germans. Like Crimea Tatars or Chechens. Ironically, Stalin saved them from extermination with that displacement. If they was not displaced, that whole etnicities would have sided with enemy, and eventually would have been killed in battles. Since they was not very important for Germans and due to low numbers could not change anything, their faith would have been much worse. Thanks to displacements, their blodlines was saved from meat grinder they so much want to fall to. Suddenly, descendants of that displaced Chechens now fighting on the Russian side.
There was no Finns among displaced.
annexed others.
Do you understand, that Finland exists at all only thanks to Russians? It was part of Russia since the beginning. It is impossible to annex something that you created. Even if all Finland would have been acquired into USSR after WWII it could not be "annexation" just by definition. Karelia was a part of Russian Empire long before liberation and creation of Finland.
That naval base was rented after Finland exit WWII and made a peace deal with USSR in 1944. This base was necessary at the time, because WWII was going. It was not necessary when war ended, so the base was removed, so there was no any sense in rent deal, so it was discontinued. What is so hard to understand here? Why you need to believe in fucking gulags bullshit and in some non-existent border tensions?
Finland has joined Nato is the point.
That's good. Sweden have to join too as soon as possible. You might be aware that on most decisions NATO need unanimous vote. So more members with tensions, higher probability of stalling NATO. Sweden and Finland are old enemies, Swedes opressed Finns for millenia. They hate each other and more than suspicious to each other. It will be fun. Like Turkey-Greece discord in NATO was not enough. :)
Svestapol isn't rented somebody else said the Crimea was?
Crimea is Russia. Sevastopol is a town in Crimea. Why would Russia rent anything on Russian territory from Russia?
Crimea was never rented to anybody.
On the USSR fall, Crimea declared independence before Ukraine. At the time Ukraine declared exit from USSR Crimea already was an independent state with own authorities, president and so on. Being water/energy/transport/everything tied to ex-Ukrainian SSR, Crimea agreed to federate with Ukraine in exchange to full autonomy and independence from Ukrainian authorities. But very soon, Ukrainian authorities overthrow Crimea government and install occupation administration. Sevastopol, being an important naval base had a special status in USSR and Crimea, and was part of Russian Federative Republic in USSR and so left part of Russian Federation after USSR fall. Something like Kaliningrad/Koenigsberg region in the Baltic. Ukrainian authorities who seized Crimea, with push from Britain (who have absolutely no any fucking business in that region at all, but for whatever reason still trying to squeeze here getting its ass kicked again and again since Crimean war in 1850s) right after the 2014 coup began to plan to seize Sevastopol from Russian Federation. However, on the top of protests against 2014 coup, Crimeans fuck new Ukrainian authorities out, declared independence, as independent state called for help to Russia and voted to join Russia back. The question of Sevastopol was completely resolved along with question of Crimea. With full support of Crimea population and without a single shot.
Porkkala was returned to Finland in 1956. Meh.
That was that rented naval base far from any USSR borders. It was rented in 1944, when Finland turn his back on Germany in WWII. It was never seized by USSR in the first place, and obviously it is absolutely impossible to return what was never taken. It was rented, then, when there was no need for naval base, rent deal was discontinued. Do you return rented apartment to the owner on the rent term end?
Hillarious. Rented land was "returned" and that is somehow USSR land loss toward Finland.
And this rented naval base was not in Karelia. It was in the Baltic Sea, deep in the territory of Finland. For the God sake, take a map and look, it's not that hard if you know exact name.
In fact the region changed flags repeatedly under communism
No. Karelia region was lost shortly after Bolshevik Revolution and was taken back in 1940. After WWII rest of Karelia lands was returned. So, no, Karelia changed hands once, by Jewish Bolshevik fault, for a ~20 years period is not "repeatedly".
If you for whatever reason need to believe in some border changes in USSR, it is completely up to you. I could not force you to find out all that stuff by yourself.
The only thing happened around 1956 is Karelo-Finn Soviet Socialist Republic was renamed into Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. No any borders with Finland was changed, it was just nice gesture of USSR to please Finland and show that USSR do not have any desires or clains on the Finland even in naming.
USSR had a naval base somewhere on the territory of Finland, on Baltic shore since 1944. Base was rented from Finland. Somewhere in mid 1950s, due to positive evolution of USSR-Finland relations, USSR naval base on the territory of Finland lost any sense, was closed and rent deal discontinued.
That's all possible events I'm aware about, that somehow could be perverted in the insane minds of so-called western "historians" as "USSR surrender territory to Finland after WWII".
Not as simple as that. Areas were returned to Finland in 1956.
Borders between Finland and USSR was completely settled in 1948. Nothing changed since then. Not a sinlge square meter.
It's a hidden topic. Conspiracy.
If you are not aware, state border of USSR was not just a line on a map. It was a noticeable structure along the whole border. If border ever changed later, remnants of previous USSR border will be perfectly visible on satellite images for centuries.
And all that western bullshit about Gulag is really boring annoying. Do you realise, that right now, right today USA have more inmates than was in all USSR Gulag structure at most moments?
All that bullshit picked out from asses of the whining Jewish criminals who was throw out and curtailed from power in USSR by Stalin is just yet another narrative of damned tribe.
No, USSR was not a jail-state, it had quite similar number of inmates in comparison to other countries. And far from USA overall by that parameter. You get that false impression of "Gulag USSR" only because Jews crying 24/7 about their ancestors who was not allowed to mutilate Russia at the time and jailed. Do you know that specific slang that criminals use in Russia is mostly Yddish?
Whatever, if that jewish myths constitue the base of knowledge about Russia and around, I'm perfectly fine with that. Just fascinating that someone who supposed to question everything didn't even tried to question all that Gulag myths or any other thing you think you know about Russia/USSR beforehand.
No, it never continued after 1944. In 1944 Finland, for obvious reasons break with axis and make a deal with Britain and USSR about ceasefire. It even have some fights with ex-ally Germany in Lapalandia in the beginning of 1945. In 1948 full peace deal was signed and everything was settled. In 1950s Finland already sell cheese and furniture to USSR, buying in return wheat, fuel, wood and machinery.
There was no any even verbal tensions between USSR and Finland after 1948.
Fall of USSR was a huge disaster for Finland, population wealth fall significantly at the time. Later, it was kind of restored, but now, it fall down again, because of stupid sanctions forced by Western masters on Finland. Finns fear that this NATO shit will make things even worse, however, nobody asked Finns about all that shit. Interesting, that here we still have a noticeable amount of imported Finland goods, despite all that insane crap. Normal people will always find ways to circumvent or don't give a fuck to stupid decisions or laws of authorities.
I think you'll find Karelia was in conflict. Parts gained and lost by the Finnish.
That was before WWII, in 1920 and 1939-1940 wars.
Russia had an internal conflict. It was against a territory between Finland and Russia.
There was no such thing. 1948 peace agreement settled all questions between Finland and USSR. In 50s Finland already was one of rare western capitalist country friendly to USSR. Finland even often supported USSR in league of nations and later UN on different international questions. Trade between countries was pretty intense in nearly all spheres from groceries and furniture up to nuclear power plants (one of Finland NPPs was built by USSR) and heavy machinery.
Formally, there was three known wars between Finland and USSR/Russia.
Finland was created in 1809 by Alexander I as Great princedom of Finland - region of Ugro-Finnish and Saam people on the territory seized by Russian Empire from Sweden during Britain-Russia clashes. Formally it was part of Russian Empire, but it was pretty autonomous, with own government and kind of sovereignity. Then, Alexander II advanced Finnish statehood even further - Finnish language was made official, authorities was set from locals, and even military duty was optional for Finland. Obviously, no wars at that time. Finns set Alexander I and II statues in their towns and was pretty grateful to Russia, living their own Finnish lives as they want.
First war started right after Bolshevik Revolution when everybody around, including even USA rushed to rob falling Russian Empire. Finland get independence in 1917, had an internal civil war where German and Swedes supported one side that win, and around 1920 during Russian civil war, as many did, Finland invaded Russia trying to seize Karelia. This eneded with Bolshevik gave out some land - islands in Barents sea and Vyborg region.
Second war, when Stalin took over Bolshevik Jews in the battle for power in USSR, was in 1939-1940. Vyborg region and some other land was returned to Russia.
Third war, Finland allied with Germany and participated in WWII against USSR. Lost more lands and paid reparations.
That's all.
I thought there was something later in 1950 or 55? Finland expanded.
No, at that time there already was trade established between USSR and Finland. Peace treaty after WWII was established in 1948. Finland lost some land again and paid a reparations for participating in a war against USSR on the side of Germany, but in exchange got full sovereignty and even was not sovetised in any sense. USSR didn't intervene in internal politics of Finland, however Finland choose to be on side with USSR in international politics.
I thought there was a war with Finland after WW2
No, there was a war before WW2. Started in 1939 after clashes on the USSR-Finland border and ended in 1940 with Findland loss of land critical for USSR defence, especially around Leningrad(S.Petersburg).
After WW2 Finland was defeated along with Axis, and left for themself. Soon, Finland become one of the closest trade partner with USSR among capitalist countries.
Shortly, the narrative of a "Ukrainian" looks like that - "Europe is our best friend and they will give us everything to defeat moskals who do not allow us to thrive on our land". That is since 1991. Just when all MSM and education tell you that West will give everything necessary and the reason of poverty and mess is only Russians, there is nothing strange in current situation at all.
Don't you remember how few years ago majority of people in nearly all countries willingly believed in coronahoax? The same way people of Ukraine believed that they are Ukrainians and if they will hate Russians West will provide everything for them to prosper. They learned to dissociate themselves from and hate Russians, but Western elites just swindled them with prosperity. So now they demand Western part of deal.
Exactly like vaxxed idiots today begin to demand satisfaction.
It is not like they want to steal something, it is like they feel that the West owe them prosperity and defeat over the source of all their problems - Russians. They truly run as refugees to the West and demand luxury hotels and big welfare payments because they think that if they fulfilled their part of deal, then Western promise should be fulfilled without questions.
Of course, Europeans, unaware about that scam deal "Hate Russians in exchange to prosperity", and see just foreigners who wnat to stole everything around and demanding things for free.
So it won in that regard.
Kind of. This happened many times, but eventually always ended in Russia growth in territory.
But aside from this they did win a previous proxy war against Russia. Finland.
It was Russian Empire who liberated Finns from Swedes in the first place. It was Russians who gifted soverenity and statehood to the Finns. Some tensions started only after Bolshevik Revolution, And no, Finland in no way won that war. Finland lost 10% of land to the USSR, including town of Vyborg as a result of that war, if you are not aware, but eventually, after WWII Finland was pretty friendly to the USSR, even regardless of narrative and losses. And again, after USSR fall, some tensions arised between Finland and Russia, but again they was quickly resolved up to the state when there was nearly no border and it was regular weekend entertainment for locals to ride for shopping in each other towns. Got the obvious pattern? Project it to current situation. Finns by themselves, perfectly fine with Russians. It is Western elites trying to use any chance to use Finland against Russia.
The location, the history, the tactics.
Not really. Western elites tribe is extremely conservative in their methods. If you take a look in a history of Finland, especially on how it was influenced to become hostile to Russia, you will find a lot of similarities with everything in Ukraine. Suddenly, you even find representatives of same tribe that infiltrate and began to pull the strings of their victim. Even rethorics of Finland president of the time of Soveit-Finland war was pretty similar to current rethoric of Zelenskiy. Because it is just from the same source, as simple as that.
Ukraine's biggest problem is they're a common thief.
Ukraine's biggest problem is that they have no any real national identity necessary to be a nation state somehow respected by the Western elites. For those who rule the West, Ukrainians will always be same millenia hated Russians who don't respect that elite Jewish families, regardless of how deep "Ukrainians" will swallow Western dick. Even if population completely brainwashed to think they are "Ukrainians, Europeans, whose only difference from Russians is that they are not Russians", all that Nulands/Blinkens will see only severely hated Russians, whose ancestors exterminated Khazarian Kaganate and not allowed Jews to do what they want in that Russian territory until Bolshevik Revolution.
Since the 1991 Western elites heavily used that Ukraine construct only as a tool against their eternal enemy. Again, they do not distinguish between Ukrainians and Russians at all. From their view that was a "smart" move to force one Russians to fight against other Russians. But at the same time they denied to really do something for the Ukrainians at all, even a little bit.
Ukraine, since 1991 always, at every single moment of time, was much poorer than Russia or Belarus. Western masters, along with pushing "not a Russia" propaganda, could easily make Ukraine a rich and prosperous region on a post-USSR territory, and make them an example of choosing their side, but eventually it was Ukrainians who seek a job in Russia and even Belarus in millions, not vice-versa. That single fact tell you everything you need to know about real attitude of the Western elites to their new puppets they successfully brainwashed to use against Russia and Belarus. Western masters just could not do anything good to Ukrainins, just because of that millenia hatred against Russians. It is absolute no-go for them, for purely ethnical, tribal reasons.
There was no any surprise that Eastern Ukraine regions turned to the Russia to get rid of that western dick sucking misery they lived in since 1991. It was inevitable, even without 2014 coup and outlawing Russian language.
So now, when Western elites plan totally failed, they do what they always did with their puppets - throw them under the bus. Arrogance and ignorance of Western elites, blinded with that tribal hatred towards Russians make a fate of their Ukrainian LARP even worse.
Just think a second - What could NATO military teach anybody about fighting with Russians? NATO idiots never ever was in a real battle with Russians since NATO foundation, not even talking about any wins. What could they teach Ukrainians about fighting with Russians? Absolutely nothing. However, at the same time, Ukrainians had full access for necessary knowledge about how Russian military fight from USSR times. But all that knowledge was destroyed during Western pushed "desovetisation" of newborn Ukraine. So, you clearly see how West destroyed all useful knowledge and pushed useless western garbage, even in such important area as military. Along with crappy western weapons designed for sales, not for battles, things gets even more sad for Ukraine LARP project.
Western elites truly hate people of Ukraine no less than Russians and Belorussians. That is why you see what you see now, and that is why the Western elites will lost that war, may be along with leading role they hope for in coming NWO shit. Inability to overcome their own tribal hatred along with arrogance and ignorance is a reason for that sad circus we see.
http://travelingclassroom.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Abbot-in-monument.jpg
Statue in honor of Orthodox Abbot Agathangelos from Crete who lead a monastery, fought against Germans in WWII and saved many allied soldiers.
Of course, it is not a Jesus itself, and there was no AK at the time, but monk with a gun is not something unusual for Orthodox Christians.
Article that I think is closest to the source of that story - https://sibdepo.ru/news/tisulskijj-sarkofag.html (in Russian, use online translator)
Unfortunately, I didn't found original article of 2002 from "Khakasia" paper, but above one have decent quotes from it.
Both, original story and debunking attempts are more than questionable, so it is not enough information to make any definite conclusion.
Meanwhile fairy tales about princesses in crystal sarcophages that are sleepeng eternally are quite common, also Orthodox Christians believe in undecayable bodies of saints that kind of exist really, but not in chrystal sarcophages in liquid, and I heard about same thing, kind of bodies of monks that achieved full nirvana in caves that stay undecayed for centuries, but also not in sarcophages with liquid from buddhists.
So, there is at least some background exists for such phenomena.
How that helps?
IDK, does anybody at least had a thought to step up a little from that zero level and f.e. set a kind of experiment on Musk to find out some real and new information? Something very simple and easy - say get a holy water from some truly apostolic church like Greek/Russian/American Orthodox one or Armenian Apostolic, and then spray Musk with that holy water (or set up him to drink it or to step in it, or to touch something wetted with that holy water or whatever) and share the result.
Either he did not notice it, and that will means that he is just a bad human, either we will get some weird reaction, that will mean he is at least posessed. Repeat it several times, to chek the result is repeatable. Isn't that something that will be pretty helpful to know for shure before going to the next stage?
At least this will be something new, with some unknown yet result, not same old and well-known shit that is out there for centuries.
Seriously, I have a 19 century book printed in pre-Revolution Russian Empire about masons and masonry history in Russian Empire with a chapter about identifying masons with nearly same set of symbols and how they could be found in different places.
More that a century passed, and there is still the same level of knowledge, without any signs of further progress.
Same with other similar things - Zion Elders Protocols, f.e. here for a century too. Nobody added anything significant to them, no new knowledge, no any new information.
Please, understand, that gathering knowledge for the sake of gathering knowledge is absolutely senseless if this knowledge does not mean to be used at least to gather new knowledge or at most do something real using that knowledge.
OK, Musk is mason. Or not, just clown playing mason. Or mindlessly parroting his bosses behaviour. How it does matter? What is it useful for?
Isn't knowledge of how to jam Starlink is much more useful, than knowledge of Musk masonry status? Or directly, practically useful knowledge is not welcomed among masonry researchers at all?
I got it. Finally.
All that searching of masonic/illuminati/jusuits/whatever symbols in everything looks exactly as results that you get from artificial neural networks trained to detect dogs when you force it to find dogs in the image where is no dogs at all, f.e. - https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/DgPaCWJL7XI/maxresdefault.webp
Fascinating. And it's not like we need some additional proof that elites and their puppets are fucking morons, i.e. like Musk not been mason would have been nice guy on our side. Who cares if some moron is mason or not? Not being mason could make him on our side or what? Or it's solely being mason make this good man a moron?
For years I see a lot of such ANN failures with gusetures, numerology and other stuff likely aimed to prove that somebody is a member of some secret cult or society, but I saw nothing about, say, what exact longue Musk visits, with name, exact address and links to street camera streams around, who is his peers in that masonic lounge with names, connections and details and so on. But no. Look - he made a guesture, he is bad! Look, he wear a Rotary club pin, he is bad! So what? Where is information? I mean real information, that add some facts and details not known earlier, not useless garbage or senseless noise.
There are tons of different secret elite societies in the world, many celebrities are members of this cults, clubs. societies and other kagals for whatever reason, that is perfectly known for centuries for anybody who interested in that topic. Bored elites love that shit to feel themselves even more elite. May be it is already time to make next step here and bring something new to the well-known thing, instead of behaving like poorly trained ANN forced to find a dog where it is not?
It's easy - take a science and look if you could replicate experiments that prove or disprove basic theories of given science by yourself. Not necessary you have to do all that things in reality, but just evaluate a possibility of doing it by yourself, say on kitchen or in the garage.
With physics, chemistry and around it is pretty easy. Even if a science don't have absolute correct theory, final truth about our world, but existing theories give good predictions and proved by replicateable experiments, then you could be perfectly safe to accept that knowledge, even if it is incomplete, it is already useful and practical. It works.
Things get complicated when not only you can't replicate science experiment (for whatever reason, it does not matter), but other independent scientists didn't or ccouldn't replicate it, then there you should be careful. Regardless of the reason you or other scientists can't replicate experiment - "too expensive", "it depends on the researcher", "incomplete description", "you don't have to, that experts know better" and so on, it is a place for shenanigans and manipulation.
And the last and worst grade - if it is impossible to set a controlled experiment and get reproduceable results, like in "climate science", "sociology", "economy", "history" or whatever than it is 100%, absolute, total bullshit, and not a science at all.
Yes. Suddenly.
Did you put seals on the ends?
Effectiviness have nothing to do with seals. It has everything to do with principles of working. Blade turbines work by transferring the energy of moving gas/liquid particles to blades via collisions of particles with blades. Tesla turbine have completely different principle - it works because moving particles of gas/liquid transfer its energy via friction with disk in surface layer. And the problem of Tesla turbine is that energy transfer is maximal when gas/liquid flow slowly, without turbulence. As turbulence appear, transfer of kinetic energy become chaotic, particles do not drag disks in one direction, so gas/liquid unable to effectively transfer its kinetic energy to the disks. You have to keep gas/liquid flow slow enough to prevent turbulence. So, if you need something powerful, you need a lot of large disks blowed by slow flows from multiple laminar jets. With blade turbine you just blow on the blades with all power you have and that's fine as soon as blades could sustain pressure and rotation speed. With Tesla turbine, if gas flow come turbulent, efficiency drops significantly, and you can't increase turbine output power just adding more gas/liquid flow, you have to add more disks to turbine.
Also, disks have to be polished as mirror and be very straight, to avoid turbulence creation on the roughness. This make manufacturing Tesla turbine disks a complex task.
So, you have to build a much larger Tesla turbine to have the same efficiency as a bladed one. It is obviously ineffective.
How exactly it proves it? Tesla turbine is perfectly up to the time, there is nothing exceptional and miraclous in it. Turbines as a class of devices are not a modern thing at all, you will find them since ancient times.
Tesla turbine looks (and sounds, meanwhile, I have one, made from HDD plates :) ) cool, but it is overall ineffective compared to conventional turbine design with blades. Unfortunately, it have to be many times bigger than conventional turbine to show similar efficiency, since you have to force a laminar flow of gas/liquid in them to be effective, but making giant high precision polished plates is in no way cheaper and easier than making turbine blades today.
Funny, that Tesla was working on a pump for gas and liquid using centrifugal forces, and no, he was not inventor of that pump type, it was invented by Sargent in 1850 IIRC, but suddenly he noticed that it could work backwards - when gas is delivered into the pump under pressure. Pumps of such design even in mass production for a long time, at least in USSR/Russa ("ЦДН" pump models). They mostly used to pump liquids that could not sustain turbulence. Also, vacuum pumps on that principle is used in labs.
Also interesting, that Tesla had prototype of conventional steam turbine, with blades and all that stuff. Pretty effective, meanwhile, because its design allowed gas to expand also on the blades, adding some thrust.
But again, there is nothing exceptional in Tesla turbine at all.
Yet another bullshit "whisleblower" with his fucking feelings and amasements, instead of hardcore technical details, the only thing that could make any sense in all that "corporations and government study UFO they have in posession" narrative.
You don't make your computer suspectible to anybody turning off corporation manufactured closed source piece of hardware.
There are more than enough sources of entropy in computer to get truly random numbers. Linux kernel itself has a decent random number generator based on external events that could be additionally feed with enthropy from other sources like sound card analog noise.
It is not even clear if that TPM ICes really provide better randomness than Linux kernel itself. Ironically, mathematical methods of evaluating randomness are themselves make randomness selected by that methods less random.
One of the best known source of randomness is a zener diode noise feed to sound card input. It is cheap as dirt (<$0.01) and in no way could be anyhow predicted since it is directly thermal noise of semiconductor junction. Unpredictability of nature in itself.
Those who are superparanoid could follow something like that project, f.e. - https://github.com/nicolacimmino/TRNG. It is better than any corporation made HWRNG by definition.
TL;DR: There is no any need to use TPM modules as source of randomness at all, and with high probability TPM modules are more suspectible to be backdoored than any DIY randomness source, from Linux kernel builtin random number generator to any, even less than cent analog noise source connected to soundcard.
C14 have a limit of ~30k years. You will get similar results with any object older than 30k years. It is like trying to measure single hair width with a school ruler - completely senseless.
Measuring C14 in any object older than ~30k years will just measure inevitable C14 contamination from atmosphere, bacteria, or algae.
Really, C14 dating is not used for dating paleofauna. Paleofauna age is estimated by layer formation time, where the remnants was found.
C14 dating is used mostly for proving antiquity of human artifacts made using wood or other plant materials, with assumption that they was made from fresh material, because C14 show the point when the plant died, not when artifact was made. You could easily make a "1000 year old chest" that will easily pass C14 dating test if you find a 1000 year log. Just don't use screws and aluminium brackets to assemble it. :)