News like this, shows what?
(www.nbcnews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
You missed the part with unanimous voting in NATO. More members, more tensions, less chance of getting unanimous vote. Simple as that.
So you suspicious to moonhoax, may be even don't believe in holocaust, but for completely irrational reasons blindly believe in jewish gulag myth? Do you understand that it is exactly same kind of lies like holocaust purely for profit and shaiming?
There was Finnish POW, during WWII, but far less than tens of thousands. something like 2000, around 500 died. And after peace agreement most of them returned back to Finland. From the other side from 60000 Russians around 15000 died in Finnish concentration camps. Finns also participated in Leningrad blockade. Really, I think, Finland, as a state, still owns a lot to Russians. Once we will come for a favor, in payyment of all debts. And something tell me that Finns will do that favor for us. May be even gladly and willingly.
USSR didn't occupy Finland because Finns had enough brains to make a peace deal with USSR, there was no any occupation of Finland, so no any of that genocide, deportation or other shit you talking about could happen at all.
We have several regions where Ugro-Finn etnicities live, not only Finns. Most live in Russia since ancient times. None was genocided. Moreover, Finns really are from West of Ural mountains. Like Hungarians. We live side-by-side since fucking paleolite.
Etnicies displaced was those who onely and violently support Germans. Like Crimea Tatars or Chechens. Ironically, Stalin saved them from extermination with that displacement. If they was not displaced, that whole etnicities would have sided with enemy, and eventually would have been killed in battles. Since they was not very important for Germans and due to low numbers could not change anything, their faith would have been much worse. Thanks to displacements, their blodlines was saved from meat grinder they so much want to fall to. Suddenly, descendants of that displaced Chechens now fighting on the Russian side.
There was no Finns among displaced.
Do you understand, that Finland exists at all only thanks to Russians? It was part of Russia since the beginning. It is impossible to annex something that you created. Even if all Finland would have been acquired into USSR after WWII it could not be "annexation" just by definition. Karelia was a part of Russian Empire long before liberation and creation of Finland.
Are you an idiot? Like braindead retarded?
Scandinavian treaty is with 3 out 4 Nato members. Denmark, Norway, Finland. Sweden doesn't need to be in Nato to be in Nato. It is also separately aligned with the UK, Germany, possibly France. I think Iceland, obviously Greenland are part of the Scandinavian treaty. USA to some extents is also aligned in there.
The fine print on the Nato treaty is not simply about a defense pact they have through interconnected alliances regardless. It's about directives. Turkish boots alongside Swedes in other global hotspots, Sweden having access to Turkish weapons and security protocols. If in the event of direct warfare who defends it.
Well with Sweden it's Europe, the majority, at least all the larger players having alliances with it. Most are in sworn defense of it outside Nato. Does it require Nato access. It's simply a title, a vote. It through interconnected alliances has almost all but the namesake. It's also hosting, training, arming alongside Nato.
It's like Switzerland isn't in Nato but Nato not all but most would defend it. Maybe Turkey and Hungary won't, who knows. But shots get fired on another member, whoosh.
They did I've provided evidence you're far too dumb to read.