▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what?

What would have changed if it was not pyramids, but dodecahedrons?

Ancient people of Egypt somehow built large buildings and bury mummies of their elite in them. Great, they was expirienced builders and had a lot of workforce. We could be proud of them or whatever. We are not sure how exactly they do that. How answering that question could help us to resolve our current problems with insane inbred elites who want to enslave humanity and control everything? Or even simplier - if we find out how exactly they build pyraminds - how it could be useful for anything today? Are we have to build genune original pyramide for Soros or Schwab? Or what?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could make concrete of any quality, it only depends on price. Concrete used, f.e. in building NPP reactor zones is magnitude orders better than any roman concrete you could find out. It will last for hundreds of millenia if not thousands.

Really, concrete checmistry is much more interesting and, what is more important, useful mystery than all pyramides of the Earth together. It is really still only partially studied, and not all processes going in concrete have explanation, despite our use of concrete for millenias.

Rebar does not rust inside concrete, because it is protected by alkaline environment of concrete. If you follow guidelines and do not allow rebar to stick out and keep at least 5cm between rebar and concrete surface it will last forever even in underwater constructions.

Egyptian astronomer need only to find directions to the sunrise and sunset of any day, then find a middle. Today we will name it vector algebra and sum of two vercotrs pointing to sunrise and sunset will be vector directed precisely to the axis of earth rotation, we don't really have to. People learned to precisely half things long before Egypt.

In any case, all that pyramides things is undoubtely fascinating, but I can't imagine that anybody here never heard about pyramides and didn't read similar posts thousands of times already.

Funny, that this constant repeating that Egyptians build pyramides with assumption that we could not do that now is even more puzzling then pyramides themselves. Like some cult that demands constant praising pyramids. IDK, choose some date (may be "encoded" in pyramides), make that day a "Egyptian pyramides day" and celebrate it. Would be a nice archeological holiday.

Our ancestors did a tons of interesting and amazing things and we don't know how exactly they did it. But all that things have no any relevance today, and nobody need to repeat them. They without a doubt have significance in historical sense, and deserve place in books and articles, but it is just senseless to repeat them again and again like they are something in line with current conspiracies.

I'm all for discussing anything weird and strange from bigfoot and UFO to pyramids and greek fire, but only in presense of some new information. Repeating all that old and well-known stuff everybody already read in hundreds of books and thousands of posts is extremely weird and looks like some strange conspiracism cult. We assemble together and tell each other exactly same old stories round and round. And it is even do not bring anything for soul or thought, unlike, say, church service or just listening beloved music. It's fucking weird.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like I never do that. They are simple. Very simple buildings. Large ones, but very simple.

Stupid shit is to post same senseless narrative for decades without any attempt to find anything that really intersting.

What is the real purpose of making same posts about pyramids, how they "could not be built today" and all that shit? You guys do that for decades in internet. Same fucking phrases without any new information at all. What's the point?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

using jackhammers to remove the stone

Large stone blocks from natural stone is cuted out from rock using rope saw, not with jackhammers. It is self-aligning thing, so you get precise flat cut out of the box. Just modern ones use polymer ropes and modern abrasives. Oh, and electrical/diesel power instead of slaves.

Perfectly lined up with the north star,

What could be a problem with that? It is not a rocket science to find axis of Earth roatation at all.

Hidden rooms and tunnels

Occupying a very small part of whole volume. IDK, did you ever saw a smoke-duct path inside a traditional Russian stove? That's the pinnacle of ancient topology of internal cavities, not that pyramid tunnels.

Could we do it?

Easily. And it will be much better pyramid then Egyptian ones. The question is only in an idiot who will agree to finance building of such useless thing.

What the fuck with you, people? Yes, pyramids are cool monuments of ancient architects and builders. Nice. We will never find out exact methods used to build them. You could endlessly guess what exact fiber they use for ropes of rope saws or what configuration or levers and how many slaves exactly they needed to move stones. We could never find out. But what's the point of that, seriously? Do we urgently need to build a pyramid for some Soros or Rothshild mummy? Or is it have to be built using exact ancient tech now just because?

I don't see any use for pyramid itself and its building tech details unless you are an archeologist whose job to study that monument.

As for conspiracy part of pyramids "mystery". If there was some "advanced" "alien" "lost" technology used to build pyramids, then I have to make you sad.

No advanced technology exists by itself. There are always enormous amount of things in line to make that technology exist. Even if it is a magic wand, there should be whole industry to mass produce them. Not even talking about something not from fairy tales. But no any traces of tha found.

If you are looking for mystery in pyramids, then why you stuck on their properties, instead of searching and studying archeological artifacts with unimaginable purpose? Remnants of some unknown technology or something like. That should be the main direction of research, not that endless dancing around pyramids and posting already rotten shit about "how they did it"/"today it is impossible" round and round.

Bring here some obviously technological archeological artifact found somwhere in Egypt that is clearly out-of-time, too advaced for ancient Egypt and having unknown purpose. Well, even ancient Egyptian screw with cross head will be much more interesting than this endless "they build them, now we can't do the same". Not even talking about some more interesting and puzzling things that could really be a part of that "lost advanced ancient techology". That would be cool and interesting, not yet another standard post with standard phrases and deceit about regular things.

It is really doesn't fit in my head, how someone could wonder about pyramids technology, but have no any real intent to look for that techology.

Or I got all that wrong and real goal is just to sow a narrative "ancient Egyptians had a technology we don't have"? Then it is even more weird. What is the real purpose of pushing such narrative?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ancient people was pretty competent, really. Especially in questions of protecting themselves from natural disasters. Othewise humanity wouldn't had survived.

However, pyramid shape is just simpliest to build and most stable shape possible. Most stable is tetraeder, but it is more complex to build - you have to do more math and use not only bricks with right angles. You could build pyramid of any size without any complex math. Easy to design, easy to calculate necessary material, easy to explain what to do to slaves. So, that pyramid shape.

Ancient people loved to follow KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupd!) principle. Meanwhile, this is a sign of high level of competence too.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, yeah, probably, but wouldn't you agree that it is kind of strange that so much of our classics are written by members of one single particular bored gentleman's club?

It depends on what you mean under "our classic". I see freemasons as a purely European phenomena. Masons seems to be a part of Western elite cultural and spiritual life, so there is no wonder that elite members participated in that thing. May be even other elite members forced others to join masonry, just like modern users of shitty social networks force their buddies who are not really interested in that shit to join.

The thing that forces me to not accept that masonic thing seriously is too wide spreading of it among Western elites. You can't have secret organisation when every second elite or around individual is in it. It is not a secret society anymore, it is more like political party or just yet another virtue signalling. Secret society could not be so widespread.

Of course masonry was used to influence elites and push narratives, but that doesn't make them something special. Not any different form modern political parties, really.

IDK, but in Russia, since Russian Empire time masonry is inseparable from jewry, and defautt term for that phenomena that once existed in Russian Empire until was prohibited and prosecuted was "judeo-masonry", not free-masonry or whatever. May be Jews was those who control narratives in masonry.

It does not look unbelievable, really. Jews being significant player in the West, does not have kind of official ways of influencing elite. Lobbying interests, if you want. So they create and made that masonry popular among elites and get what they want. Just like modern AIPAC/ADL in USA and NGOs and clubs controlled by them, including Hollywood and whatever writers associations that exists in USA. Same with Europe.

Is it all just a coincidence?

Of course not. It is a direct depiction of brain contents of elite and their leaders of that time.

whether those cultural codes were manufactured artificially or did it all happen without any delibarate guidance and were driven by popularity and talent alone?

Manufactured cultural codes could be presented with great talent too.

Even occasionally looking at commercial ads, you will find some of them are really great and obviously created by a talented person. There even was collections of best ads that was interesting to see. Well, today, seems that culture is nearly lost, but sometimes you still could find something decent.

I think that masonry, in whole, was more kind of political party of the time. May be there was some lodges with real secret and malicious shit, but hardly they had many members and expose their existence and membership. Like political party and deep state today. Pretty good method to hide real shit in the clear sight. "Yes, of course, I'm mason like many other celebrities - look, Mark Twain is a mason, so why shouldn't I be mason too?" And do shit in some really secret organisation. Even if some questions appear, then it is just "well, we just do our secret masonic things, you know, like Mark Twain and others". Perfect coverup and ability to manipulate influencers of the time if necessary.

▲ 7 ▼
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

Of course this disgusting Jew never meant his own religious cult of YHWH saying this. :)

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is not much know how in pyramids. And I can't imagine what use of their technologies could be useful today for anything.

You know, tech of making wooden wheels for a wagon is pretty interesting and sophisticated (more than pyraminds, IMO), but who the fuck could need it today?

Same with pyramids. Humanity built a lot of things much bigger and sophisticated than pyramids. Take an average HPP dam f.e. or starting table of a cosmodrome. I could not think out not only why anybody will want to build a pyramid, but even if he want, why whould he use that ancient and ineffective tech?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sir Walter Scott, author of numerous historical novels, including Ivanhoe, Rob Roy

Ivan Hoe? Hmmm... Not only freemason, but also Russian shill. :)

Ontopic:

Wasn't Masonic lodges turned to kind of clubs for bored elite? Kind of LARP of the time with the goal to connect and influence different circles of elite, barely intersected in real life.

What about Rotary clubs? Quite popular thing, as far as I know.

Elite Golf clubs also used as a place of interaction of individuals from different elite circles.

Even if masonic rithuals really have some technical purpose, I see no problems do them in Golf clubs or even prvate fitness.

Would those books even be considered classics, if not for the mason membership of those authors?

At least Mark Twain is good and interesting for me and I think deserve title of classic regardless of masonic membership.

It is more Jewish shit - to declare some Jewish dulls as classics and geniuses. Jews, being talentless in everything except chutzpa and usury, always do that.

As for Hollywood, I think it is much more Jewish thing than masonic.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no any building problem of the past that could not be resolved with enough slaves.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don't buy cryptocurrecy. You mine it. Especially at the beginning.

If somebody announce cryptocurrency that can not be mined out of the box, it's a scam.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is really weird when people who work with all that complex astrophysics stuff suddenly fall to Karen's level of assuming some basic things.

Current understanding of Universe is that it expands everywhere more or less evenly and everything moves in addition. So, if you began to measure this expansion from some point using, say, red shift or whatever, you will suddenly find that you are in the center of expansion. :) Adding to that overall movement of Earth around Sun, Sun around center of Milki Way, Milky Way in local galaxy cluster, cluster in respect to other clusters and background, you will easily get weird, irregular and unpredictable, but pretty obvious results.

Somehow that irregularities in CBM and impossibility to account for all possible forming components of movement went to that Axis of Evil thing.

BigBang theory is based on few unproven dogmas - that speed of light is a constant, nothing could move faster than light, photon could not lose energy while traveling, metric of space have exactly 3 dimentions everywhere, current expansion is one-way process and few other. And on top o that it all covered with that Karen's impression of that presumable BigBang as regular explosion when everything expands from single point. So, astrophysicist looking into the skies think that they see this CBM as remnants of flash from their BigBang, far away from distant past running much faster than closer objects, so light from flash turned into microwaves due to red shift they observe. Things could be completely different if only one of their holy dogmas turn out to be false for a little bit. And with high probability all of them are false and some in huge. So, when you try to rig your observations to fit some beloved theory with its dogmas, all kind of shit will pop up. :)

Interesting, when amount of inconsistencies in attempts to preserve current set of dogmas will overhelm the obedience of scientists who already looks bored in current dogmatism that hinder scientific progress almost for century.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not my business, really, but sholdn't the first question to that ad be "With what exactly you could guarantee that you really will do all that stuff and how will you pay to those who elected you if you break your promises?"?

IDK, but may be it is possible to make a flash-mob or whatever to push that question to the modern mainstream of social interactivity those polticians love today....

Or at least make that question floating on the top of that pre-election political theater.

I never heard that any politician ever discussed his own real responsibility and accountability for fulfilling his electoral promises. At least it will be interesting if it will be possible to rise that question to the target and force him to answer somehow.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

When someone make an art a "storage of financial value" he doesn't devalue art to the level of money or other financial surrogate, he just show his own inability to understand the purpose of art.

At the same time you could observe "art" that is created for the sole purpose of storing financial value like that Banksy daub or Malevich "paintings". But that things have no any relations to the real art.

So your analogy of art and crypto is perfectly valid. You could account any technology as kind of art. None of them have a purpose of storing someone's financial value.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will appreciate this, but in no way would insist on that if it could somehow harm your privacy or create any problems.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its a number assigned at birth that represents our identity.

Mostly in financial sphere including to identify you to different private financial institutions like banks, funds and all that, as I get. It is private businesses who are satisfied with SSN as client ID, so there is wide fiield for shit of all sorts.

That's why it was not very obvious for me how SSN is really used from official docs about it.

Something like that?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will never get tired of this.

Yep. Until you will be transferred by your masters to another direction of their western propaganda. :)

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

So it is a critical document that mostly used in financial life of American citizen, so it could be used in various cheats in financial sphere. Am I right?

Does that clear it up :) No? Yeah well welcome to America.

There are tons of weird things of that type in every country you could find. F.e. we have "pension insurance number", "individual taxpaying number", "mandatory medical unsurance number" and it's not easy to explain to a foreigner what they are in real life and how they really used.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you for explanation and example.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you!.

So, it is kind of internal passport/ID but without photo?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just don't know what exactly SSN is and how it used.

We have something that probably similar to that named СНИЛС (pension insurance number), but it could be used ony to pay some money to pension fund and so enlarge pension paymenst of some individual. This number is not used for pension payment (they are in person by cash or to bank account). So, I just asking what SSN really is.

It's not easy to find an info where and how SSN is really used. If you try to search for SSN you will find only definitions, that it is Social Security Number.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reality is that vice-premier of "ukraine" Vereschuk proposed to take less than two dozen civilians (mostly eldery who was unable to evacuate) who was found by "ukrainian" terrorist groups in villages near the border as hostages and move them to Sumy to demand something from Russia threating their lives. As this UK PR stunt turning into disaster for Jewish ukrainian government, they seek for ways to save their Jewish faces. In a manner Jews always do it. F.e. use eldery civilians as hostages or human shields. Jews never had any honor, don't you know that?

Also, Ukraine now begging for urgent POW exchange in Kursk, but was denied, since there are no "ukrainian" POWs in Kursk, they are treated as terrorists with all consequences. Only those who was captured in Russian regions of Kharkov, Donets, Lugansk, Zaporozhye and Kherson could be exchanged.

There is proposal circulating in Russian prosecutor office to allow "ukrainians" who want to surrender in Kursk region border to become a POW only if they kill their commander before surrender and show his corpse on surrender. Then, they will have a chance to be treated as POWs. But that bureaucrats still thinking about it, thinking how it could be properly done in paperwork. You know, Russia have that bureaucratic cancer.

Challenger 2 tanks again display their utter crappiness, they can't even get to the line of contact, being easily destroyed with drones and artillery. What could be the better prove of crappiness of western armor? Tank that just can't get to line of contact. :) Why UK make such useless weaponry?

One of the last ukrainian HIMARS with ammunition and stuff was incinerated in Sumy. Still don't look like wonderwaffe at all.

Tons of new videos of exterminated groups of cucksucker fighters for western values. A lot of corpses, many without body parts including heads. Most of them didn't even saw any Russian and died just because they was so stupid to not kill their commander and flee as far from Russia as possible, f.e. to their beloved Western Europe, toward respect for faggots and all other Western shit. Now they are dead.

How far has Russia come with achieving the stated goals for this war?

Exterminating cocksuckers who fight for their LGBT freedoms, destroying Western armour at the rates higher than West could produce them, and so on, taking land in "ukraine" that was bought by BlackRock, Monsanto and other corporations, liberating Russians in "ukraine" who is under opression of Western "values" lovers.

Slowly, but steady. And no, there will be no any stupid "shock and awe" crap, because it never worked on real battlefield. NATO didn't won any single war they started since creation.

You still didn't answer my simple question - Do you understand that "ukraine" literally means "outskirts" in all slavic languages?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

How SSN could be used in malicious way?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›