At the time of last Polish-Russian war in 1792 there was no such thing as propaganda, only historic paintings and may be pamphlets.

Then, I can't remember any anti-Polish propaganda in Russian Empire, hardly it existed since Poland was part of Russian Empire at the time when such thing as propaganda had become a thing.

Russian Empire war propaganda looked like this: https://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2010-10/1287974763_951e010810.jpg

There was only Soviet caricatures mostly anti-capitalist, not really anti-Polish. Something like this - http://redavantgarde.com/content/placard/1276/1276.jpg Factual, but poor graphically.

Then, after WWII Poland become part of Warsaw Treaty, so there again was no sense in anti-Polish propaganda.

iT wAS AlWaYs PaRt oF RuSsSia!!!

None of countries except Ukraine, Transnistria and North Kazakhstan was always part or Russia.

Belarus was part of Great Lithuania, Finland was part of Sweden and so on.

Half of that "invaded" countries exist only because of Russia's actions in the past.

Also, fun to point out, every country in the vicinity of Russia, minus Belarus, mf-in' hates the Russians to death.

Really you have to separate people from political leadership of that countries. People also divided as sheeple who blindly follow leadership and those who have their own thoughts.

Shortly, on average, countries where native population really hate Russia - Hungary and Baltic states. Interesting, that Hungary political leadership does not hate Russia even now.

Countries where population mostly neutral to Russia - Germany, Poland, Czhech Republic, Slovakia, former Yugoslavia except Serbia, Finland, Bulgaria and suddenly, Georgia.

Countries where population like Russia - Serbia (for unknown reason, really, In the past, Russian Empire liberated Serbia from Turks, but that was long ago, but Serbs still account Russia as closest friend), Moldova, Armenia, Belarus, Transnistria and Slovenia.

Slovenia, Slovakia and Serbia still have national flags made from civilian Russian Empire flag.

Transnistria that is marked on the map as "invaded", really is a political joke, consequence of mistake that Moldova government did on the top of USSR fall. When other USSR respublics declare independence by exiting USSR, Moldova denounced its joining in USSR. But, suddenly, at the moment of joining USSR, Moldova didn't include Transnistria. So, Transistria appeared to be the only part of USSR that does not leave it. Theoretically, Transnistria today could be accounted as the only existing remnant of USSR. And it's not Russia invaded Transnistria, it was Moldova, that suddenly found that they fucked themselves up with denouncing joining USSR instead of exiting, tried to invade Transnistria, but completely failed. Transnistria was always part of Russia along with Ukraine.

History of invading, liberating, acquiring and so on of that countries into Russian Empire or Soviet Union was very different. F.e. Finland was liberated from Sweden by Russian Army, and become knd of protectorate of Russian Emprie with own government and all that stuff. All that monuments to Russian Tzar Alexander they build by themselves, not by orders from metropoly. Poland... fuck, who didn't invade Poland, really? Funny that in all that cases, Poland government agressive actions was the reason for subsequent invasion.

Russia also invaaded France, Switzerland and Austria. Also, there was a story with military support of one of sides of civil war in Spain.

Unfortunately, Russia never invaded Britain. I think it is the greatest mistakes Russia did in its history.

So, you missed again with your assumption.

Just remember - everything you know about Russia, you know from its worst enemies.

I bet nanotech looks like sci-fi to you.

I just know how it works, there are no need for me to believe in it like in sci-fi as you obviously do. So, no, nanotech is not a sci-fi for me, it is more like boring and barely interesting old stuff.

Stop seeking validation for your nonsense from online users.

I'm seeking only validation of things others post here. Your posts rarely pass that validation.

Half of that shitty video is some cuts from old sci-fi. Other half of that video is micromachines activated by laser light by targeting laser beam to different photovoltaic cells on surface of micromachine.

How that is connected with 5G, graphene and vaccines?

Laser light is not 5G, need to target laser beam to specific part of micromachine to make it do something is not useable in something that is injected into human body. That micromachines was not made from graphene oxide.

Micromachines you see in that video is fully described in that paper - https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2020-08-26/f8/[email protected]?download=true

Only mention of graphene is in description of possible way of making surface electrochemical actuators -

using atomic layer deposition (ALD), cap the exposed surface with an inactive material, either graphene or sputtered titanium, and pattern them using lithography

But no graphene or graphene oxide was used.

Their manufacturing process fully described in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343901461_Fabrication_of_Electronically_integrated_mass-manufactured_microscopic_robots/fulltext/5f471000a6fdcc14c5ca4188/Fabrication-of-Electronically-integrated-mass-manufactured-microscopic-robots.pdf

They choose titanium for SEAs, not that overhyped graphene.

And they are even can't be named "nanobots" - authors describe them as "sub-hundred-micrometre walking robots".

I posted already proof of nanotech and RFID

No. You posted a paper about how some guys made centimeter antenna for a centimeter band from graphene. Centimeter sized antenna in no way could be named "nanotech". That graphene particles they use to make antenna is just a conducting material. With the same result they could make that centimeter antenna from any conductive paint or powder, f.e.

In other of your posts you insist that there is graphene oxide particles in not-a-vaccines.

But graphene and graphene oxide is different substances.

In video you posted about nanomachines clearly visible that they got power and activited by laser light directed to one or another photovoltaic cell of the nanomachine. Laser light band is no way close to 5G bands, so your video have no any connection to your topic except word "nano".

Looks like you just find similar words here and there and without any thoughts and understanding trying to create something that does not exist.

It is actually showing how little you know.

I already forgot more than you will ever know. If you can't even read and understand what is written in paper you share, there is no hope you ever be able to compete with me on knowledge.

Your opinions NEVER include any source or proof

What proof do you need to read about the size of 5G antenna in paper you cited? Or you need a proof that centimeter sized object is no way a "nanotech"?

Now find a map of Russian Empire. :) You will hate Russia even more.

You could also draw some borders of more imaginary countries inside Russia like Ukraine to make things look more suitable for your purpose.

Also interesting why Belarus and Kazakhstan parts are not painted as "invaded"? It's not fair! :)

Dates are mostly wrong, looks like one who make this meme do not know history at all. Really, those dates looks more like dates when NWO elites instigate different anti-Russian coups, moves, actions of different kind in that countries, not when Russia invaded. May be it was another meme picture where correct text "countries where West instigate something anti-Russian" was replaced with what propagandists need now without bothering to change dates?

It's a pity to see how everything that political elites touch degrades to complete shit. Even propaganda. I didn't saw any more or less quality propaganda since, IDK, mid-90s.... And it was not even political, but something about health and benefits of healthy food.

I would be glad to see any high-quality anti-Russian propaganda, if you have any, please post it here. It is very interesting phenomena, but I want to collect best of it, not some garbage made by woke dumbfucks without any enthusiasm and effort.

Sorry, you never met nanotech

I meeting with nanotech every single second, even right now typing that post. Just like most of people on the Earth. Nanotech is surrounding us for a long time, if you are not aware.

Apart from very close relations with nanotech, I have an advanced skills in electronics and all that radiowaves stuff, including microwave tech. I know how all that RF things works and how they not, instead of believing in some "nanotech magic".

I don't care if you disagree with anything I post

So what is real purpose of your posts then? If you don't need feedback, questioning and discussion on what you are posting here, then how are you differ from MSM and other propaganda?

1.) flying too low in fog, clipped building? wtf?

That top bureacrats too afraid of Russian AA strike that forced pilot to fly as low as possible.

2.) Air defense hit them and on the way down clipped the building, this seems most likely given what has been happening with all the friendly fire for the past year.

Possible too, but they was too deep in Ukrainian territory and helicopter definitely does not look like Mi-28 or Ka-52 visually or on radar. So, if it was hit by AD, with high probability it was intentional, not by mistake.

Nothing funny, really. There could be much more casualities.

There is rumors that helicopter crush was a retaliation to Internal Affairs tops for trying to interfere with Defence Ministry business of selling NATO weapons to third parties. Ministry os Internal Affairs began investigation on ways NATO weapons flee to third-party countries and suddenly collided with Ministry of Defence tops. Presumably, parties had not come to agreement on price. So, AD do the job by the order of Ministry of Defence.

Other versions:

• That Eurocopter Pumas are not the best and most reliable helicopters and have a bad record of accidents, without proper service that bird could break by itself.

• Trying to command pilots is not rare thing among elites. That top dumbfucks think that they know everything better and could easily force pilots do stupid things. Flying over towns at low altitude is not something pilots will do by their will. May be some could remember similar accident with Poland president Kachinsky, who ordered pilots to land in unacceptable weather conditions and crushed his plane near Smolensk. All died.

That "natural resources" question looks pretty strange. US have Canada right at the border, with amounts of resources pretty similar to Russia. But somehow there is a lack of resources for West. I'll never believe that Canada somehow resist West resources demand and don't allow research and extraction.

So, hardly it is the question of resources, really, there is something else, political, spiritual, whatever.

I didn't tell anything about gloriosity of Russian technology. If you want to think out shit to dispute about, than it's up to you, I'm pass.

How many has Russia destroyed yet? 100? 500?

Destroyed what? Nobody count that stupid HIMARS separately from other MLRS, because they are not somehow special or exclusive. Russian MoD publish only totals, for now it is 984 pieces of MLRS launchers if you are curious.

And how do you suppose to receive any 5G band on the antenna of 50μm size? Size of antenna should correspond to wavelength. You need at least two 1/4-wavelength segments to get something decent. If your object is magnitude orders smaller than wavelength, it just can't be used as antenna, you will not get any significant potential difference to be somehow useful from object of that size.

When some business offer you something for free, that means you are not a customer, you are a commodity they will sell.

Why are you obsessed with that HIMARS junk? It is a system inferior to old soviet Smerch/Tornado kind systems, and Ukraine had at least 80 Smerch systems and who knows now many Tornadoes at the start of war.

HIMARS is unuseable without satellite support and when the weather is bad and could hit only fixed stationary targets with relatively small warhead. And could not carry nuclear warheads. It is also insanely slow for rocket and barely could maneuver that makes it wulnerable for AD.

All (I mean literally all) of Ukrainian successful strikes in that war was achieved with soviet weapons, not western ones. TU-141/143 drones (at the time of manufacturing, of course, there was no "drone" term), Tochka-U, S-300, Neptun and so on. Where is Western weapons in that list? Why? How is it possible that Western "wonderweapons" and "game-changers" are inferior to not even Russian, but old Soviet weapons?

HIMARS is just another overpriced crap specifically designed to launder tax money and make MIC elite rich.

Seems that elites thoroughly destroying US MIC, creating economy conditions to force MIC to produce as expensive weapons as possible to launder tax money and hike stock prices now, but they absolutely don't care what will MIC do when the war ends. Who in sane mind will want to buy all that overpriced and inferior crap?

US and EU MIC is just used to drain state budgets and then will be thrown out, as elites decide that this milking round is over, leaving millions of educated and skilled people without job and perspectives.

So, it is better not to care about degenerate us, but to take a close look at the current state of US engineering and manufacturing and what elites really try to do with them. We already passed that stage, and fortunately stopped just at the moment when damage almost become critical, so I have full rights to issue a warning. I see exactly same pattern in US now - huge rising the profits of MIC owners with simultaneous destruction of engineering traditions and real manufacturing, hence you have now all that B-21, F35 and other overpriced non-functional MSM-targeted crap rising.

Globalists don't care about Americans at all, just like they don't care about anybody except themselves. And the destruction of advanced nations are among their primary goals. You could be glad of stock prices of Lockheed-Martin or Raytheon now, may be, but hardly you will be happy with the results, when the last old guy who remember the tricky nuances of correct jet turbine blade tempering will be replaced with gender-tolerant zoomer who care more about satisfying manager with ESG, KPI and other bullshit than about making real things working.

I think it's like why people buy advertising bullshit. "It's modern and cool, using it will make you modern and cool".

In telegram.

Just as a start - https://t.me/s/intelslava https://t.me/s/Rybar https://t.me/s/DonbassDevushka and so on, follow the links to others. Tons of videos. Not all of them are available in web-interface, so if you really need all of them, you need telegram account.

JFYI

Something is weird with allergies, at least with food ones.

In Russia, peanut allergy among children measured as ~0.09% - 0.1% F.e. on the sample size of 13000 children in Tomsk region: https://www.lsgeotar.ru/kharakteristika-evolokumaba-yego-effektivnost-lechenii-giperlipidemii.html - in Russian, use online translator, it's not the only paper with that estimates).

AFAIK on the West 1-2% vulnerable to peanuts.

So, 10 times difference out of nothing.

Peanuts in Rusia and USSR was not delicacy at all, peanuts imported from South America, India and Africa in huge amounts. Russia is one of the largest importers of peanuts. It is a part of many products and I doubt that we eat less peanuts than Americans. Peanut butter as separate product is not very popular, but a lot of cookies and snacks. Even in distant village grocery, you will find salted peanuts and cookies/cakes with them.

So, there is definitely some unknown factor. I'm in doubt that Russian food corporations and authorities somehow care about citizens health, and hardly climate plays so significant role.

I also never heard about high level of peanut allergy in Asia or any other place except West. Also interesting that US/Canada is not significantly differ from West Europe.

What could be the reason of 10 times more peanuts allergy that is very specific exclusively for West? Nutrition? Medicine?

Also found a map of allergies rise from Nature, 2006 - https://germguy.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/allergy-rise.jpg but not shure about validity, since Nature usually paywalled and it is hard to search through it to find a source.

Or there could be another explanation - BigPharma want to sell more anti-allergic drugs so inflating allergyhoax, just like they do with coronahoax, but sloper.

So, to find out what is really happening fist you need to find out does that allergy rise real, and then, if it does, find out what is significantly different between countries wil low and high allergy that could be connected with allergy.

You can't use all available bandwidth of 4G and often even 3G, because bandwidth is limited not by bandwidth of mobile - base station link, but by base station - internet link.

For an ISP that's nice as they can service more people with less equipment

They can't. Because the bottleneck is between base station and internet, not between mobile and BS. People don't need faster connetion to BS, they need faster connection to internet.

little spy crap will not be running 5g in the foreseeable future

Nearly everybody have spy crap in pocket. Powerful enough crap. But you can't stream all data continously from that devices, first - bottleneck from BS to server and second - power consumption. 5G with local storage and lower power consumtion solves that surveillance problem perfectly.

Basically it's an over blown slight upgrade over existing technology.

Senseless for customer upgrade. Customer will prefer more base stations with thick fiber uplinks, not adding 5G modules to base stations without any upgrade of infrastructure.

So the threat is surveillance not physical health?

I think so. 4g network as it was build do not allow streaming sirveillance video/audio/data and storing it. Upgrading BS uplinks and building giant datacenters is insanely expensive, you need a fiber to every single BS and huge upgrade of backbone to withstand all that new datastreams to datacenters. Adding distributed storage to BS and enhancing client capacity with 5G looks like best solution. And all payments could be placed on clients through buying new devices and dataplans.

From the health view 5G is not different from 4G. Difference only in modulation, basically, all other parameters are the same, including frequencies and TX power. So, those who are very concerned about 5G health issues but somehow don't care about 3G/4G are definitely doing something suspicious.

Do you have any concerns about 5g?

Of course. It is definitely some conspiracy with 5G, but not one they try to push.

If so, what are they?

Shortly: 5G main official advantage over 4G is higher bandwidth and more clients for one BS. But significantly higher bandwidth you could get only in Frequesncy Range 2 (27GHz and 38GHz bands). But that bands barely works inside buildings, not even talking about outside - they are easily muted even by rain or fog. And even inside you need antennas in sight of each other to get some Gbit speeds. So, in reality, 5G gives slightly wider bandwidth and more clients for Base Station.

And now the most interesting thing - Base Station is definitely not the endpoint of your high bandwidth connection. You need thick fiber channels from BS - uplinks to some backbone. But nobody upgrade that uplinks. And that uplinks are the bottleneck of cellular networks.

4G hardly utilise 30% of it's possible capacity because uplinks can't provide necessary bandwidth. Even in towns. Situation in suburban and rural areas much worse, because even 1Gb radiolink is often a luxury for rural base station. And nobody want to bury fiber under all that fields and forests. So, 1000 clients who have 1Gb connection to base station will fight for that 1Gb uplink with all consequences. Changing 4G to 5G gives nothing in terms of real bandwith and number of clients.

So the question is - why they need 5G, when they can't even utilize 4G?

They often tell us about IoT crap in connection with 5G. Here the larger number of clients will be a significant advantage. But more spying devices will need much more bandwidth. So, all IoT traffic should be terminated on the base station. And here comes my theory - they will collect all surveillance from 5G IoT devices right on the BS. When they will need an info about you they will just downloand only data recorded from your devices using that narrow uplink.

So, 5G is a prerequisite for total surveillance network with local storage of all raw surveillance on BS with access to it provided to agencies and businesses.

Pretty logical scheme - you turn every base station into local network storage without any need to buld giant datacenters and upgrading uplinks and backbone. 4G base stations don't have large enough storages, and have lower maximum number of clients. So, add 5G modules to the base stations, and you get state wide surveillance storage that could hold data on every single person who use any smartphone, IoT device or use cellular network for internet access.

That concerns about creation of country-wide distributed storage surveillance network with enormous capacity was rised in the early days of 5G rollout. "What the fuck, we can't even utilize 4G, why roll out 5G instead of upgrading all BS uplinks?" Even Apple founder (real one) Stieven Wozniak rised that concern at the time, but all that was quickly buried under the insane "5G health issues" storm.

Hardly today any questions about 5G will be heard and answered.

For example:

That have nothing to do with 5G. that MDLEDs will light up with any microwave radiation, 5G, 4G, 3G, WiFi, microwave oven and so on. And you need 65W of microwave for 30 minutes on 14 25x7mm capsules to kill E.Coli in 350ml per minute flow. Seriously?

You can't make something that gather microwaves that is much smaller than 1/4 microwave length. And lower the length of microwaves, the lower penetration they have into conducting body. If you make any device small enough to be able to hide in some jab, than you will have no way to get to them with microwaves because human body will effectively shield them from your microwaves.

Also, something tell me that 65W of 2.4Mhz will perfectly kill E.Coli without any MDLEDs at all. They "forgot" to do control experiment without their capsules. :)

you can't dismiss the connection between the expensive 5G network rollout and things like neural link,

I perfectly can. Because 5G gives absolutely nothing better than 4G without upgrading backbone of cellular network. You can't utilise 4G yet, not because your device can't and not because base station can't, but because connections between base stations and upstream can't, especially in suburban and rural areas. Replacing 4G wihth 5G gives absolutely nothing that could be somehow connected with all that brain chips.

That IS the Norm.

I know that, you know that. But most sheeple already don't. So, no, average western sheeple think that it is underground cult today.

How to make it back to norm from underground?

How do we know they are ignorant bastards and not glowies just muddying the waters

We don't. They could be both - ignorant glowies. I would not be surprised at all, if a shit of paper with something like "grant payments of project 1234-XYZ" stored in some file on some shelf in some state building. We saw similar papers about different hoaxes numerous times, and while we don't know if they are exist in that case, it is more than valid theory.

Looking at all consiracists scene, I see two distinct groups of participants - one group are those who question everything, try to find the answers by themselves, generate some theories and trying to connect the dots, and others who just copypasting some narratives round and round without adding anything or questioning anything at all. Latter could look wery interested in what they share, looking closely it is obvious, that they are not interested in what they share at all. They are more interested in sharing and protecting what they share than about digging deeper or questioning what they share.

F.e., if you are really interested in that 5G stuff, why not to try to find out what that 5G is, how it works, how it differ from 4G and so on?

F.e. a picture in that article is a cut out from frame from infamous hoax video with "cell company worker" with some board in hands who tells that they was ordered to put that board on cell towers. However, the board is from old DVB set top box Cisco 4585DVB with typical SCART TV connector that had never used in anything cellular. IIRC that set top box production was canceled even before 5G become adopted standard. You could even see the case of 4585DVB on the hood of "workers" car in that video. https://skelbiu-img.dgn.lt/1_5_3514572942/cisco-4585dvb-virgin-media-kabelinis-imtuvas.jpg

Who and for what purpose will spend time to shoot and spread the completely fake video that could be (and AFAIK was, with following scream in MSM about "banning misinformation") easily debunked?

Who will spend time 2 years later and write insane article about 5G and vaccines and use a frame from already widely debunked video?

There is definitely some game ongoing, and I think it is well paid by those who want to silence any reasonable questions about 5G, coronahoax, vaccinehoax and other shit.

The question really is only about those who post that crap here. Are they doing that because of ignorance, or is it their job?

What is once considered unacceptable and insane is introduced to the general public and normalized by wearing the people down gradually through attrition so they accept it as a norm.

Today, normal family, existence of only two genders, disregard of Mammon, denial of lies and hoaxes of elites and so on are considered unacceptable and insane. According to your logic all that should not be normalized and accepted as a norm.

You miss an important thing about Christianity. Church as institution and Christianity as faith are different things. That difference was the real main reason for Great Schism. West church completely subdued faith, while East didn't. That is why Western christianity as a rebellion against dying gay-pedo Roman Empire ended with becoming what they rebel against. If you do not separate faith and church, than there are a lot of those who wish to infitrate the church and rule over, declaring himself as speaking from God's mouth.

Bible is telling a story about exactly same thing. Jews was given a chance to become better people, by living by their own free will, but they eventually replaced God with idolatry and turn into complete bastards, so evil, that God had to send His Son to them, in attempt to bring them to the reason, but they just set Him up and voted to kill Him. That story is exactly about how to not fall into that shit. Don't make yourself an idol. Jews made one and become a children of Satan. Catholics made and become Vatican. and so on. All history you described is exactly creating an idol.

Today's idols are "freedom and democracy", with MSM as priests and NWO as highest hierarchy, and their cultists are rushing to exterminate those who don't want to praise their idols and sacrifice to them.

And suddenly, sane Christians, who don't sell their faith to bureacracy, represent the huge part among those who do not want to obey that idols.

5G light-emitting diode (LED) network and planned neural connection to the 5G grid

Looks like all that turning into pure clown show now.

Congratulations, ignorant bastards, who don't bother to learn anything, you successfully muted all really important questions about 5G with your stupid clown crap.