Half of that shitty video is some cuts from old sci-fi. Other half of that video is micromachines activated by laser light by targeting laser beam to different photovoltaic cells on surface of micromachine.
How that is connected with 5G, graphene and vaccines?
Laser light is not 5G, need to target laser beam to specific part of micromachine to make it do something is not useable in something that is injected into human body. That micromachines was not made from graphene oxide.
Only mention of graphene is in description of possible way of making surface electrochemical actuators -
using atomic layer deposition (ALD), cap the exposed surface with an inactive material, either graphene or sputtered titanium, and pattern them using lithography
Of course, you won't agree. I bet nanotech looks like sci-fi to you.
Stop seeking validation for your nonsense from online users. I am done with you shills hijacking every post that I make. Thanks and never bother me again. I already blocked you.
I just know how it works, there are no need for me to believe in it like in sci-fi as you obviously do. So, no, nanotech is not a sci-fi for me, it is more like boring and barely interesting old stuff.
Stop seeking validation for your nonsense from online users.
I'm seeking only validation of things others post here. Your posts rarely pass that validation.
Half of that shitty video is some cuts from old sci-fi. Other half of that video is micromachines activated by laser light by targeting laser beam to different photovoltaic cells on surface of micromachine.
How that is connected with 5G, graphene and vaccines?
Laser light is not 5G, need to target laser beam to specific part of micromachine to make it do something is not useable in something that is injected into human body. That micromachines was not made from graphene oxide.
Micromachines you see in that video is fully described in that paper - https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2020-08-26/f8/[email protected]?download=true
Only mention of graphene is in description of possible way of making surface electrochemical actuators -
But no graphene or graphene oxide was used.
Their manufacturing process fully described in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343901461_Fabrication_of_Electronically_integrated_mass-manufactured_microscopic_robots/fulltext/5f471000a6fdcc14c5ca4188/Fabrication-of-Electronically-integrated-mass-manufactured-microscopic-robots.pdf
They choose titanium for SEAs, not that overhyped graphene.
And they are even can't be named "nanobots" - authors describe them as "sub-hundred-micrometre walking robots".
Of course, you won't agree. I bet nanotech looks like sci-fi to you.
Stop seeking validation for your nonsense from online users. I am done with you shills hijacking every post that I make. Thanks and never bother me again. I already blocked you.
I just know how it works, there are no need for me to believe in it like in sci-fi as you obviously do. So, no, nanotech is not a sci-fi for me, it is more like boring and barely interesting old stuff.
I'm seeking only validation of things others post here. Your posts rarely pass that validation.