4
clemaneuverers 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't know, but neither does anyone else, beyond assumption. The evidence I see of him being a controlled OP is basically just his past normal-tard opinions. Is that enough to condemn someone as controlled OP? Would brain-washed be a better fit? Black-mailed?

I was just reading last night how even George Bush actually went after the ADL once upon a time; had their offices raided, tried to prosecute the top guys and put the ADL under the foreign state controlled lobby label, which they should be, and which would've cancelled their tax exempt status and relationship with Law enforcement and intelligence agencies - he did it in his last month on the job after he knew it was over.

It could be there is black mail on Tucker that has compelled him to agree to stepdown quietly and maybe sign a non-disclosure about it. Too soon to tell though. I don't believe that every single thing we see such as this is pre-scripted to distract us. But controls will have been put in place in case someone needs to be reigned in.

2
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

So if he's murdered, then you'd support him. That's just great.

1
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +1 / -0

The vast majority of people "support" the virus scam... it's the default setting. You have probably supported it for longer than you haven't.

And why would they murder someone with no power? He's no threat till he gets elected. And the media is the tool of choice these days for controlling such outcomes.

It would be shame if it took RKF's murder for people to come round to supporting him. Because then you know it would be too late.

7
clemaneuverers 7 points ago +7 / -0

Old video. Though he does still seem to believe in CO2= pollution and catastrophic man made climate change. But at the same time, just the other day he quoted James Corbett out of admiration on twitter, and Corbett categorically does not believe in climate bullshit. RFK also believes in viruses, but at the same time quotes and respects Tom Cowan. So what I'm saying is he's not a die hard ideologue - he could probably be reasoned with, and he has said he would listen at least. I think he hasn't dedicated much brain power to CO2 and climate change, most of his environmental work has been dealing with immediate pollution threats, not CO2 at all.

2
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are talking about one thing. The planes. It has been edited out of the clip you linked. That's a fact.

3
clemaneuverers 3 points ago +3 / -0

you didn't find that out. You allowed some fake documentary wanker to convince you of that. And they don't say CGI, they say Chroma Key, which is not CGI.

Simon Shacks September Clues movies are full of holes and deceptive edits - he can't even believe what he states in the films, since he had to deceptively edit footage and audio to support his apparent discoveries. It's fiction. He doesn't care what the actual truth is. We don't know his motivations for making these films, but they are not honest.

Ace Baker is similarly and equally full of shit.

It doesn't mean that there isn't something suspicious with the planes. There is. it remains unproven what that is though.

Any conclusions you may have drawn from such "documentaries" as September Clues and The Key are unreliable and should be discarded.

If you are willing to take that onboard I can provide a play list of videos upon request, made by other more honest 9/11 truth people who have carefully dissected those movies over the years and revealed they are worthless deceptions. These truthers come from various different schools of contrary thought on 9/11, even from the "no planes" camp; but the one thing they agree on is that Simon Shack and Ace Baker are intentionally misleading.

These clips with the planes edited out do nothing positive; at least when you present them the way people do, like they are some kind of found original footage.

2
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

in this footage there was. And then some anon edited it out.

4
clemaneuverers 4 points ago +4 / -0

9/11 with the plane edited out

4
clemaneuverers 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's interesting that there are lots of convenient edits and jumping around between cameras in the live footage today.

3
clemaneuverers [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have no idea why they are not there anymore, but the emails exist on many computers and servers still around the world. Here they are on Archive.org, Nov 2022:

https://web.archive.org/web/20221101225442/https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774

Edit: You will have to click the link at the bottom, and then select an earlier date to download the arcived file - 2.81gb

By March 28th of 2023 there is the following message: "Error: The page you are requesting is currently being rebuilt, it will be back online soon. Thanks for your patience."

https://web.archive.org/web/20230328033650/https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774

If they were trying to scrub them, they are doing an exceptionally poor job. Despite the stupidity of this post though, Wikileaks and Assange are indeed sus for many reasons. There is an interesting book that compiles many of those reasons published by Trine Day:

https://www.trineday.com/products/deconstructing-wikileaks?_pos=1&_sid=6a6bad4ec&_ss=r

I have a digital copy I can share if anyone wants it.

5
clemaneuverers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Those numbers were mostly The Donald users welcoming the new community and people from reddit who quickly went back to reddit. Those kinds of high upvotes dropped off fairly quickly after. Plus it was the 2020 election so things were kind of fever pitch.

1
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know he was vaxxed to the max, working in LA on TV shows. They probably insist their staff get each new booster as soon as available.

3
clemaneuverers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Zion bros look out for each other

3
clemaneuverers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nyeresting. Zerohedge is run by a euro guy if I remember correctly? Hungarian? And they mostly republish rather than produce original content. Might explain a delay or seeming lack of coverage. Maybe later today.

1
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +1 / -0

A stunning retarded meme, with zero evidence or rational argument? From a flattie? I can't believe it...

2
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I only use it for the free fringe stuff, I would never read a book from the website UI except just to search for a reference. They don't have an app do they?

It's relatively straightforward to rip loaned books from the IA too - if you can't remove the drm you can just download each individual page scan and recompile.

If the court sanctioned IA’s digitization practices and thousands of libraries started digitizing the books in their collections, the entire e-book licensing market would collapse

Sounds great, some of those libraries might scan some of the stuff that Google and IA wont. There's still plenty of books out of copyright with no digital scan, mostly stuff that doesn't give the current politically correct spin on history or science. But then maybe publishers would stop producing ebooks? Or develop some new technology 10 times harder than DRM to crack.

If you own a physical book, you can scan it, just with a phone and an app, very well and efficiently these days - and distribute it how you like. That would be a difficult thing to eliminate.

EDIT there does appear to be an app for reading IA books:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.openlibrary.testing.twa

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›