3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, it's wild how pretty much all of Covid can be explained by state-induced hypochondria.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting hypothesis. One thing I don't get:

Yet BOTH theories have the same endpoint: the sustenance of the “Pandemic Preparedness Industry” which, flush with a hugely successful “Covid” episode will no doubt delight in the prospect of lucrative reruns.

The Covid response obviously wasn't successful and, if it were an actual pandemic, would justify firing everyome involved.

The only reason that heads aren't currently rolling is because people don't actually care about Covid spreading when the news is off, because it still is by their measures.

It's also pretty odd that the Wuhan lab was creating a super-infectious coronavirus from a bat virus, and then a super-infectious corona virus emenated fron Wuhan, if that didn't actually happen. If that's not what they did, what were they doing there?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't mean there aren't people who don't actually take it seriously.

Mass formation psychosis is real, why not fringe formation psychosis?

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not so equal now, are ya?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

In a world tyrannized by Pride, Meekness is more important than ever.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I prefer "real Jordan Peterso " videos.

As opposed to whatever they turned him into in "rehab".

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I always like to bring up the point that, in Canada, we have close to the highest number of trees per capita, in the world. But we don't count the carbon until they are cut down!

We're taxing ourselves to death with increasing "carbon taxes" but we're actually net negative if the carbon sequestration of the trees is counted.

It was never about the environment, it was always about fear.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

I support kicking these kids of social media (and, really, the Internet in general) but the question is, as always, how?

I mean "How, without ushuring in a nightmarish police state?"

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got a one day ban from KIA2 because I advocated for nuking Israel and they called it "genocidal language".

Maybe I should have framed it as a tactical policy?

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just train an AI on legal records. You take the information from clients, give it to your computer, and it spits back the letter/affadavit/court argument.

I don't really get why we even still have lawyers at this point.

12
WeedleTLiar 12 points ago +12 / -0

For her own protection, surely. Wouldn't want her to end up like the Boeing whistleblower...

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's not a story, it'd a test proving the Earth spins. If the Earth didn't spin, the arc of the pendulum wouldn't rotate, duh.

To be fair, this experiment doesn't prove the Earth is a globe and a spinning disc Earth would do the same, except that the arc would still rotate at the equator because.

But if definitely proves that the Earth spins and it's been reviewed (and recreated; the more important consideration) thousands of times, which is what your meme is asking.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +2 / -1

Beat me to it, lol

An interesting side note:

Google has scrubbed all mention of "black people and smoke detectors" because the powers that be don't want those ideas spreading.

If I search "spinning Earth experiment", there are literally hundreds of sites claiming that the Earth is flat.

If TPTB don't want people to hear about FE, they're doing an uncharacteristically shitty job.

-2
WeedleTLiar -2 points ago +2 / -4

All airplanes are required by law to travel in such a way as to simulate globe distances, lol

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a coincidence, didn't a Chinese spy steal Ebola samples from the biolab in Winnipeg in 2021? And then the Canadian government covered it up, then called a snap election which the Chinese government alledgedly helped them win?

Nothing to see here...

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +7 / -4

What are you even talking about?

The Japanese were religious fanatics who beleived they followed the will of a living God. They literally thought it was impossible for them to lose and that their enemies weren't even human. They also have hundreds of years of Bushido culture that shaped their mindset such that sacrificing their lives for their Lord was the highest ambition, and that personal honour trumped human life.

The Japanese government sure didn't do anything to help their own people, as Hitler did when he super-charged the German economy. Rather, the people were simply expected to sacrifice for the Emperor. Further, Japan was under no real threat, but was acting from a place of pure expansionism, again, much different from Germany's situation.

About the only thing the two have in common is nationalism (and even then, drawing from ver different places) and fighting Russia. If Japan was physically located in Europe, they would have been rivals, if not enemies.

You could just as easily argue the "Britain were the real Nazis" because they bombed Dresden, starved out the German people towards the end of the war, clandestinely murdered the Polish leadership, and used nationalist sentiment to keep their people together during the Blitz.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a far more important question:

When will Trump admit that the man he trusted on not just the vax, but on lockdowns and mandates, was directly responsible for funding the lab that created covid-19?

This is no longer conjecture; the funding proposal obtained via FOIA request clearly shows that the Wuhan lab explicitely set out to create what we now know as Covid-19 from existing bat coronaviruses. They were funded by Peter Daszic's EcoHealth Alliance, which was funded by Anthony Fauci, the same man in whom Trump entrusted the health of the American people.

Fauci is responsible not just for every single vax death, and for every single suicide, overdose, or other preventable death ignored due to the healthcare crisis he inspired, but every single covid death, GLOBALLY.

Trump made this man his health czar.

When is he going to own up to that horrific lapse in judgement?

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Interesting point about AI thought police.

Do we really think companies are releasing these AIs to the public as toys?

Isn't it more likely that this is a training exercise for the AIs?

They've got their AI setup to detect thought crime and they're putting them on the internet to see if people can find loopholes that cause the AI to allow or accept wrong think.

Once that's sorted out, these are the AIs that will police your speech and adjust your social credit score accordingly.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I made a pot of noodle soup with vegetables yesterday for under $10. Fed us and we've got leftovers.

Packaged food is the most expensive way to go.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speaking of 1989:

In Canada, (not the states but often affected by laws there) the first Meningicoccal vaccine was introduced in 1987. Before that, cases had fluctuated by year but, since the 20s, had never gone above 350.

In the five years following the introduction of the shot, yearly cases exceeded 350; in '89 there were over 800 recorded cases.

These vaccines only targetted one of the possible six strains ("B" I believe) and, over the next decade, the "C" strain became prevalent. I got the "B" shot in '87, but both my kids got the "C" shot instead (not in addition to).

While the vaccines do seem to reduce carriage of specific strains, they also seem to cause an increase in carriage (non-symptomatic infection) in the other strains, so much so that the reduction in one is more than offset by increases in the others.

The current schedule calls for a vaccine that covers the "ACYW" strains, not "B". Further, there is a strain called "X" that doesn't have any vaccine and just happens to be the one that increases the most in the presence of vaccines.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Really goes to show what these people think is important.

Your little "vaccine injury" is paltry compared to the damage you could do to Rachel Maddows credibility by trying to get help and warn others.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›