who has been behind every single feminist movement? Go look them up and their early lives.
the god he claims to be from, is.
I dont know how god thinks either, but I'm not trusting a book written by kikes that has demonic pedophile bullshit in it to be the word of god.
Exactly. Just look up who was behind every single liberal movement.
The god that wrote the new contract is the same as the god that wrote the old contract.
lol Abram is one of the easiest ways to tell that the bible is jewish nonsense. Just read genesis 17 and that should tell you all you need to know about that pedophile blood contract making devil worshipper.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2017&version=KJV
oh my god so based !!!!!!1!!!! now just wait 2 more weeks and surely things will change!!!!
If there was an actual hack it wouldn't be this tame shit.
You confuse stupidity with conscious maliciousness. They are not stupid, they are evil and they know exactly what they are doing.
Pretty sure eric dubay has named them
mentions other planets and evolution
pure bullshit larp
nice b8 m8 i r8 8/8
why is the thumbnail a mtg card lol?
One might find them selves asking a question.. how could this even be? how could our best and brightest simply not know?
Money is the root of all evil. Well, the people that control the money, really. Scientists are finically invested in their work. They spent their whole lives on this career, they have families to feed, that sort of thing. Also, and probably a bigger problem, is that education is basically an "appeal to authority" training camp. Issac Newton couldn't have possibly been lying, right guys?!?! My textbook totally says theres proof that mass attracts mass!! They never bother to actually look into the basics of the major scientific beliefs because they believe others already have and they dont get funded for those sorts of things.
I can't help you, but I would try asking on geatawakening or the donald if no one here knows.
"Quality of life" is nowadays judged in how much cheap plastic shit you can buy and how much you can consoom. You didn't even touch the things I mentioned about forethought and empathy and the ramifications that not being able to produce mental images has on ones ability to empathize with others.
You can Webster the fuck out on me, and quote every sentence all you want, but i cant think of a better word than "imagine" to explain how you could envision without seeing in your minds eye
And thats the thing, they don't imagine, they dont envision. If you think they can magically somehow you're just making shit up. The very phenomena that were talking about is the non-ability to imagine, yet you keep trying to cope and say "nu uh they can somehow but theres not a word for it!!11!!!" At this point you're not making any sense and just trying to cope.
If you think that not being able to visualize scenarios doesn't impact your life, how you are able to interpret others, how your actions effect others, your empathy, then I dont know what to tell you man. We'll just have to agree to disagree. And the no internal monologue thing is more common than you think. Like I said in the other comment, you're giving people the benefit of the doubt due to naivety.
And I was never sure why you brought up the VR thing anyways. You can just look outside and see that the world flat, you don't need a computer program to do it.
People from all walks of life experience this phenomenon, including successful doctorate students, engineers, and other professionals.
I've met successful people that are NPCs. How much money you make doesn't make you "awake". I'm not saying that all NPCs cannot visualize, I'm saying that all people who cannot visualize are NPCs.
The computer program does not want to show you anything, its just that it make a strait AR line that is 50 miles long, and then you see the same, uninterrupted line on the otherside, and its still at your eye level. or whatever level you made the line in the first place. that means earth didnt curve, right?
Like I said before, the computer program will show you whatever you program it to show you. Its not the same thing as the outer world. You can use a "flat earth" program to show how the laws of perspective work though, if thats what you're trying to get at.
JUST WAIT 2 MORE WEEKS!!!
excuse me sir, prepare your anus for the following argument of the century:
no u
Don't worry, only true intellectuals can give themselves shit and call themselves retarded.
If you cannot visualize, what word would you use to describe how someone who cannot visualize can still use their "imagination"
I understand people cannot visualize a line, but they are able to imagine a line. how else could someone operate unless they know that a theoretical line would connect things that are not actually connected by a line?
You are vastly overestimating the brainpower of people who cannot visualize/imagine a line, trying to separate the terms goes to show that. You're giving them the benefit of the doubt, but thats not reality. I know that its hard to imagine that people cannot imagine because its so easy for you, but it's true. They are literal npcs basically on autopilot. Some people literally cannot have forethought, they cant connect cause and effect, can't draw a mental line between two things.
So you think the Mindcraft AR thing would work to prove earth does not curve?
Sure, why not. Its just a computer program it can show you whatever you want it too.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imagine
imagine
1: to form a mental image of (something not present)
2: SUPPOSE, GUESS
3: to form a notion of without sufficient basis : FANCY
4archaic : PLAN, SCHEME
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/visualization
visualization
1: formation of mental visual images
2: the act or process of interpreting in visual terms or of putting into visible form
3: the process of making an internal organ or part visible by the introduction (as by swallowing) of a radiopaque substance followed by radiography
"Imagining" a line is just another word for "visualizing". Some people literally cannot imagine, cannot visualize a line.
So if the line is still at the same level, how would that be possible if the earth curved?
Earths Flat, yo.
I can still imagine a line without visualizing it.
Imagining the line is visualizing the line.
Would the AR line still be at the same height? On the far end of the line.
Of course it would?