Yes but the actual actions they took are not congruent with that goal
Number three really throws a wrench into it by claiming their goal was the extermination of the Hebrews. They acted completely illogically if that was one of their main goals
Just goes to show how harmful exercise is
You're absolutely right. I see it everywhere, in work, extended family, various social circles which span numerous states and city/country strata, overwhelmingly the men just let their women behave like this. My wife no longer entertains these kinds of things, in fact since she's been with me for so long she's become so anti-globalism she actually hopes for interaction like these so she can pull the reverse uno woman card.
Where we are is the fault of both men and women but the way men let women walk all over them is actually repulsive to me, it's made me unconsciously distance myself from otherwise very close friends
No he's definitely a based awake patriot now it has nothing to do with corralling dissent by repeating conspiracy talking points which have long been mainstream
Building 7 has reached critical mass so it's time for some of con Inc to acknowledge it and continue the containment scam
Thankfully Trump helped force that through around the start of the lockdowns with some EOs
There are plenty of LGBT for Trump people and what not. Many of these people have already made the concession that a man can be a woman, saying we just have to leave the kids out of it. The slope has already been slipped down. You cannot unite with people who have a fundamentally different understanding of reality
The problem is they have been dividing us over bullshit for so long that people can no longer even agree on what reality is
In general it seems to me most people would rather lurk than participate, so it makes sense that you can achieve great feats of social engineering with simple botnets
The victim is everyone, the people who watched this, including the man who made it (who is also the perpetrator) because watching sick things even if they are fake is damaging.
On top of that the rest of us are victims because the precedent this sets will most certainly be abused to go after people for all sorts of other things
Oh is THAT why I'm here
Still waiting on those stats u/Ok_Pragmatism_7926
To be fair wouldn't decreased immune system activity make it better? When I was younger my allergies were always better if I got wasted the night before
Right like a person would in communication it will tell you it doesn't know what you mean. I am not a fan of these bots and find that they're nothing more than glorified parlor tricks but their ability to parse language is the most impressive thing about them
I disagree, if you ask it classification questions it can figure things out based on pulling other definitions. The results are again that of a glorified search engine but it is able to meaningfully parse the question and the datasets in order to draw a conclusion. The conclusion drawn is very surface level because it's not actually intelligent but the language parsing may be better than you're giving it credit for
The language parsing/analysis of the chatbots is actually more impressive than the AI. Even that can be fooled but the "intelligence" aspect is just a glorified web crawler with a couple extra features
Those same normies are trying to bury your comment
My guess would be you're right. The COVID narrative was always going to fall apart, it was wargamed in the SPARS docs. The media has to still have people they control who are on the "right side" of the collapse, conveniently forgetting he was actually pushing all this shit initially
People should pay a fair price for a good or service. To forcibly subsidize arbitrarily (and yes how much money someone has IS arbitrary to a specific transaction) is theft.
While mostly irrelevant questions are being asked, how much have you gotten from the government in your life?
The law has not mattered for many generations but now they openly show us in a direct fashion they don't care one iota and still people believe in checking wether or not something is "legal"
There is no material difference between those two based on the words presented here it's just buzzwords which is really all they have (the cbdc website is just a mass of buzzwords). That's just another way to know this is some bad news
Climate change is a grift for increased control, what else is new
Those deaths are greatly exaggerated. Besides that, supposedly the allies didn't even know about the "death camps" (with technology to this day still unmatched in lethality and efficiency while fighting a war on multiple fronts) until they got there so if that were a goal wouldn't the regime have wanted to kill them BEFORE starting a war?