The God hating pro-LGBT asshole died. I don't care who did it really.
It was still godless and unregenerate back in the 2000s (or 90s). So from my point of few, it's left and has many of the issues of the left as a whole.
You're just denying obvious reality at this point. It's completely unreasonable to assume that the plans announced by the FCC and industry for 5G aren't really their plans.
human skin is designed exactly to be fucked with by all possible external dangers
Hah. Skin cancer has entered the chat.
Should I worry about that awful and scary TeraHertz radiation too?
Depending on how fair skinned you are, absolutely yes.
More lefty logic, yes you guys all use that same argument. They can't kill the compliant, they just can't! Oh yes they can, as your daddy Obama said.
I am a 2000s era liberal
So I am correct you're a lefty.
jabs disproportionately affect the compliant over the dissidents
The depopulationists never said "cull the heard, but only the disobedient". They are simply culling the heard.
I'm glad you're not a leftist cuck, but your username and initial arguments did seem to indicate it.
I agree it hasn't been universal, but I think they are setting us up for something. More disease, either cancer, "pandemic 2" or both.
Yes, but you normies and left winger types all use this same argument. "Why did they give the poison to the compliant". Who else will take it? It's an established fact they use jabs to control population, that was shown with previous vaccine campaigns that included sterilizing agents. So why did they do that? To only give them to the non-compliant? By definition they have to give vaccines to the compliant.
Moreover they used every bit of coercion and pressure they could think of, so they showed clearly they wanted it in every person.
thus, my conclusion is that the shot was simply a rushed product that was overhyped, with tons of high-profile people investing a lot of money
Which is an insanely naive take. That is normie thinking 101. "It's all about the money". "Iraq was just about the oil contracts". "They just let 9/11 happen" No, not even close. It was a knowingly dangerous product from the start, not rushed. And you don't get the entire world on board for a simple big pharma cash grab, that's nonsensical.
It's for the bigger agenda, and their big plan is depopulation and global tyranny. Not more money.
I don't observe that here.
Which only goes to show they haven't finished the proposed 5G roll out. The plan as outlined by the former FCC chairman himself was to have many more "small cells" on every street corner.
This bands wulnerable to weather so unuseable here.
You can say that, but it is part of the proposed 5G plans for major carriers. It's on their websites, so how can you say it isn't part of the plan going forward? When did they ever announced otherwise?
its high frequency and skin effect could not penetrate human skin+fat layer, so there is nothing to care about.
It's this kind of hand waiving dismissal that leads to future problems with poorly tested technology. Look how many effects were found for 3G/4G and wifi after the fact that people had never even considered (their excuse then was "if it isn't thermal don't worry about it"). I think you will be surprised once they start finding effects that are more than skin deep.
If 90% is absorbed by the skin, first that's the largest organ in the body, and not something to be fucked around with. Secondly that doesn't account for what chronic exposure to the other 10% penetrating the bloodstream can do. More importantly you're talking about a portion of the higher spectrum, like 60Ghz. It's beyond arrogant to think you understand in detail all the chronic effects of 6-60Ghz, as if that can all be summed up as only pertaining to the skin. It can't.
I see "we toast sample with a dosens of Watts from 10cm distance and got only some damage instead of piece of fried meat"
Which is an absurd mischaracterization of the papers I'm talking about that look at subthermal effects. Like all engineers in this industry you're just believing what you like of the science on health effects
When Albert Einstein held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter
Albert Einstein held no such view. In fact the relativity principle is the exact opposite: in his theory all that matters is relative motion.
His view then suggested that the redistribution of particles was not possible.
Citation sorely need. What is he talking about.
When a molecular structure breaks down there is a transfer of energy to the greatest part which is the attracting force
Said no chemical text book I've ever seen.
The teaching on the conservation of energy, which is that we never get something for nothing is the teaching accepted at the present time. This teaching stems from a statement by Albert Einstein, where he held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter
Uh, not even remotely true. A quick Google search shows that this law was first coined in the 1800s, with some similar ideas about energy even before that.
In January 1985, the Creator of the Universe, the Total Mind and Total Energy of All (this is what the source of our information identified itself as) initiated a process with our small group to pass along a message to the residents of Earth.
That's a little suspect. This is supposed to be a science book not the Bible. It gives me the impression this book is full of woo.
You lose me when you stick to 5G only. Health effects of 3G,4G and 5G are the same, since bands and power are the same. 5G is different only in more sophisticated modulation allowing higher data bandwidth.
That's simply false though. 5G does two things which can impact health more than 3G or 4G.
-
It will add many more towers per square block of residential area increasing the daily exposure of the average person significantly whether or not they use a cell phone.
-
It opens up higher frequency bands to be used for cellular communications in addition to still using the previous microwave bands. They are allowing bands from 6-60Ghz which were not previously used for 3G and 4G.
2b) Wifi is also changing now that you bring that up. They are adding different untested frequencies to wifi beyond simply 2.4Ghz.
All this papers show us, that human body, for whatever reasons, is thoroughly and very competently protected from RF radiation levels never encountered in nature.
We must be reading different papers.
You lose me when you completely deny health effects. That's typical of RF engineers. You guys know so much about the engineering side you feel like you know everything. How many studies have you looked through on the effects of microwaves on human cells and systems? No matter how many you've read there are hundreds more. It's a deep subject area .
The military is on record as using microwaves for various types of weapons and the government admits that such weapons exist to make people sick (see Havana Syndrome).
So you aren't going to get me to let my guard down about 5G, but nice try :)
you are still here defending all these wicked luciferian kabbalistic pedophiles.
Not in the slightest. I just spoke about what I'm perceiving in this audio you presented.
So rather than looking inward you're just attacking me and vilifying me (unjustly). That's the opposite of repentance and of discernment. Think about it.
I can speak to 5G being alarming. It is in part because the push for it was done with such zealotry it raised suspicions. If you look at the way former FCC chairman Tom Wheeler promoted it, you'd think it was the second coming. https://www.bitchute.com/video/9LZph9TJxGrm/
Many of us sense some real dark energy there, and I'm sure as a more rational technology minded person that might seem like woo to you.
But beyond what Mr. Wheeler says himself being creepy and zealtous, the fact an FCC chairman is giving any speeches pushing a technology is bizarre. The FCC is supposed to be a regulatory agency, not a cheerleader for industry.
Beyond that is the skipping of any safety testing for these new frequency bands. Again it is oddly reckless and zealous. And given the fact we know these elites want to depopulate the planet, this apparent recklessness should be a concern.
I see you're well versed on radio transmission technology and I'm learning something. Though I think there are still too many assumptions made about the injected technology to say anything definitively. Can we be sure they are using something ferromagnetic, or is it paramagnetic? Is it iron based or is it something else? Perhaps it is something novel and tuned to a microwave frequency which 5G can interact with. Perhaps not. Too many unknowns in the equations, but I don't discount your theory at all. Maybe they use something people aren't expecting, like AM frequencies.
I'll just assume you guys have autism or something because it's painfully obvious to me this is play acting. As if a Rabbi is calling into a neo-nazi guy's radio show to confirm everything he says about Jews...
Maybe it is a spiritual thing. I turn to God and he's given me discernment.
I imagine it would be something transmitted from a cell phone that everyone carries. Or something in the towers. I don't think a potential voice transmission is limited to the AM frequency bands. For example V2K is microwave frequency. Not that I'm an expert in the subject, but I realize there is a lot that can be done with frequencies.
I can't speak to most of your points, I know very little about the pharmacokinetics of these types of materials or what delivery systems they could be using to bypass normal metabolism. Also the question about interaction with an MRI machine is worth thinking about.
I can't stand this satirical format. I hope they told people it was satire before hand and didn't try to pass this off as real.
I think graphene was a controlled op narrative to distract from what could really be in there.
You mentioned iron. There have been studies on ferritin proteins which attach to targeted regions of the brain to be activated magnetically https://www.theguardian.com/science/neurophilosophy/2016/mar/24/magneto-remotely-controls-brain-and-behaviour. This seems like the most likely approach rather than some futuristic cyborg technology.
She was about ready to jump on Anderson.
My wife is so obnoxiously thin
Is the faggiest damn thing a man could say about his wife.
And then some grifters at the end also trying to get a pool
I'm praying that you get saved. Best of luck.
who, exactly? And where, exactly? They only pop up 1,500 years later.
The early churches are documented in the Bible, and there was no Pope, no icons, no Mary worship, etc. So that was not the "Catholic Church" that manifested later. It's as simple as that.
The idea that Roman Catholicism represented all churches at any point in time is ludicrous. The Bible proves otherwise and that's all the evidence needed. So why reject such a plain and simple truth?
Looking at professional athletes dukey's figure is more correct. In the NBA it was 1 out of about 450 active players who got blood clots. In Pfizer's 12-15 trial 1 out of the 1000 poor kids who got the shot was permanently disabled.