by B1-66ER
2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know you're not a kid anymore when you understand that Palpatine is a based monarchist fighting the feminized libtard terrorists, led by a weak revolutionary-minded aristocracy, space jews and a cult of new age cucks. Star Wars dialectics.

To top it off, we've seen what happened to the franchise after the libtard revolutionaries won in the gay-ass sequels. It's a life-imitates-art parable.

Lucas: "It's... like poetry - it rhymes".

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

The bigger problem is normalizing anthropomorphic characters and furry degeneracy.

As if being fat and on your phone needs to be normalized through programming when the majority in the US has been like that for years. We're not in the 60's, grandpa.

5
SmithW1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

New age gibberish. Brought to you by Tavistock and SRI.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting, that unlike psychology, Church distiguished human and non-human mind. Priests have some procedure to distinct between posessed and bliss f.e. One is non-human and other is human. So, one needs exorcism to get rid of non-human mind, other need mercy and charity. Psychologist will account both just as diverse human.

Yes, that's an important distinction. Psychology is based on humanism - the subjective human mind (more like brain and senses, because there's no mind/brain distinction in the naturalist view) is at the center of everything. They can't distinguish between a limited subjective human mind, that is made in the image of God, and the universal omniscient mind of God that grounds all knowledge and that is ultimately what our minds correspond to and appeal to when making absolute truth statements about reality (like 2+2=4, laws of logic, laws of physics or "all x are y" propositions).

The scientismo crowd has no grasp of serious philosophy (including philosophy of science) and how their lack of such a universal quantifier ultimately makes all knowledge impossible, leading to epistemological nihilism.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

How can one know what the software of the computer looks like by looking at only the BIOS, or worse observing the computer hardware only. The computer hardware can't show one what software is currently running and how it looks as an interface on a screen, monitor or terminal.

Exactly, that's why a materialist approach to psychology doesn't work. You can't appeal to nature (hardware) to show you what the software (mind, soul) is. This is most evident in the field of ethics - looking at nature can't tell you what's right or wrong - it just is. Only a evaluation by a mind that has conception of morality can do that and concepts are not found in the material world or subject to empirical observation.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean by "we forgot it"? The historical accounts got destroyed? I don't see a good reason to believe in that. I mean some knowledge inevitably got destroyed and lost but I don't think knowledge is the problem but rather its interpretation and evaluation which is done by people and institutions. We supposedly have more knowledge now than any time in known history and yet look how things are going. Man's problem is moral, not rational (by moral I mean having knowledge of the truth and the good and still rejecting it for falsehood and evil; or constantly choosing and worshipping death and nihilism over life and purpose).

Christianity has all the answers on the human condition - man was created in God's image (perfectly good) but fell away from God because he chose to follow Satan who seduced him with lies that man can become "like god" himself if he defied his loving creator. That's how evil and death entered the world and the only way to mend this, to return to Eden and gain back eternal life is to get reunited with God (theosis), because God is the source of the uncreated light, truth, the good and life.

As you can see, all this knowledge is safely kept within the Church and remains unchanged for thousands of years. People have known this and even if they are not well versed in Christian theology have that knowledge in their hearts. And still people jump through hoops not to believe in it, mostly out of pride and rebelliousness (just like Adam). That's how one gets deceived to act against their own interest and against their creator. I was exactly like that too when I was younger.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shrinks are modern-day priests of the secular materialist cult. Just think about it - people go to shrinks and share all their secrets, sins and thoughts. But shrinks are all too human and don't have connection to the transcendental - they are just geeks with a degree who charge by the minute. The whole thing emulates the holy mystery of confession but in a worldly manner.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

And you sound like someone who can't engage with the argument presented, but uses ad homs instead.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are in a simulation.

That's performative contradiction. You just destroyed all possibility of knowledge.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I'm sure they subverted it because psychology was always a thing. The paradigm was different though. As a Christian I'd say the Church has the proper knowledge of the human mind and soul and authors who grounded their philosophy in it like Dostoyevsky were the best psychologists.

But modern jewed up psychology is mostly concerned with trauma induced mind control, hypnosis, manipulation and social engineering. It's satanic in nature because it's goal is the control of the free will and suppression of rational thinking and behavior which ultimately leads to truth, the good and the affirmation of life and existence - it leads to God.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's that?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcsjaSs8u5g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC5CrNslO-Q

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6364311149112

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/trump-s-first-foreign-trip/trump-becomes-first-sitting-u-s-president-visit-western-wall-n762891

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/06/world/middleeast/trump-israel-support.html

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378708737_Donald_Trump's_Unwavering_Support_for_Israel_and_Zionism

He is a self proclaimed supporter of Israel and is proud of it (just like Warp speed and the gmo mystery juice). Him being a zionist has nothing to do with peace or strong economy and I literally argued that he's the better choice. That MAGA hat is too tight and stopping the blood flow to your brain.

Wtf is wrong with people on both sides? Can't you apply some nuance and critical thinking and not go full on board with the socially engineered narrative?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pro censorship and everybody is to some extent. That lolbert free speech absolutist rhetoric is dumb and leads to lack of any moral standard and principles. The "muh individual liberty above all" is perhaps the greatest evil freemasons and their jewish masters did to the US. What matters is who's behind it. I'll gladly censor the promotion of degeneracy through media and the government. I'd argue you can't call yourself a Christian if you tolerate blasphemy in your supposed Christian state under the guise of "free speech". You can't serve the masonic goddess of liberty (Lucifer) and God at the same time.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

So conspiracy theory is being a schizo and making connections that don't exist in reality? This is supposed to be a normie meme, right?

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

It always was. It was founded on the ridiculous pathological ideas of the jew Sigmund Fraud. It presupposes nihilism, atheism, naturalism and evolutionism as a starting point.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Again, I conceded he's a zionist puppet and shilled the WarpSpeed clotshots.

Can you guys think of anything beyond the jews? We've already established everyone selected for the politics bread and circus is their servant. I asked a simple pragmatic question and you glossed over it:

Will state funded aBrotions be legalized under his admin?

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe, I'm not his fanboy but even if you're correct it doesn't matter because Kamala is one too and they both serve Israel so they're tied in terms of zionism. I know he's not Christian and no one can serve two masters, but it's obvious his policies align closer to my Christian worldview. Trump is the pragmatic choice here just because of how demonic the alternative is.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

You claim to be Christian, right? Tell me, which candidate's policies are closer to the policies Christians stand with? Just the matter of abortion settles it.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Still better than Kabbalah H.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly what happens to washed out entertainment industry "stars". Who cares what happens to her in the limited time she has on Earth. It seems like she's going to hell for eternity for being a puppet for the demonic powers waging war against humanity and God.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

We're so far down the line in terms of planning that there are no coincidences. Maybe it was possible 100 years ago but it's all planned now.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The zionist lobby is guaranteed either way. I'd rather have the Zion Don than batshit crazy wine-mom Kamala and her handlers, thanks. No matter how bad the right is, it's still better than what the left stands for.

6
SmithW1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

Malthus, Royal Society, Tavistock, Rockefeller, Club of Rome, Kalergi, P. Erlich, Georgia Guidstones, Kissinger report, Global 2000 report, Brzezinski, J. Attali, Gates, Salk, Sanger, Russel - it's definitely not the best kept secret.

5
SmithW1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly what the social engineers want - more atomization, less families and less children.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.

It's not just about extracting wealth and resources but also about indoctrination and propaganda. Fifth generation warfare is about control of information and waging war against civil populations because people are viewed as a resource too as well as potential disruptors of the central planning. NASA is a military agency and it always has been since the time it was JPL ran by batshit crazy thelemite Jack Parsons and his fellow scientists they snagged from Germany.

NASA has huge cultural significance, especially in pop culture making it a vehicle for pushing certain messages and agendas (can you name another govt institution that sells as many T-shirts?) NASA promotes a certain worldview in society that places trust in The Science and sanctioned experts above anything else - it promotes scientism and materialism along with all Royal Society-bred institutions.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. Did it make anyone aware of who is REALLY behind the agenda? It's the most well known book because it's a planted book by the CIA and you can download it from their website so they can more easily save your IP as well. It gives you unimportant little tids and bits without you understanding the bigger picture. It doesn't focus on the Jews because it was ultimately written by Jews but it gives you a little morsel about the ADL because anyone looking for such a book either already knows about it or will know about it.

It being on .gov archives proves nothing - you can download almost any conspiracy book there including the Protocols. It gives a pretty good overview of the structure of the institutions that support the system and their functions - I'd say that's as big picture as one can get geopolitically (not spiritually though). It destroys the notion of free democratic society normies are indoctrinated with and reveals the level of planning and control behind it, proving there are no coincidences when it comes to social and political change and world events.

This is much more important than "naming the jew". In fact I bet you the jew wants to be named and scapegoated more than anything else so that he then can demonize the opposition and justify his retaliation. People bent on that game play right into their trap and give them the ammo to destroy us while achieving little in terms of countering their death-grip on the system.

So you think if an intelligence agency wants to subvert that it will popularize a book full of lies or nonsense? The poison in the honey is well known tactic.

Again, what are the lies in the book? I can verify most of the info from many different good sources. I red the article and replied having it in mind. It's something to consider and as I said I'm not sure about Coleman as a person but I can asses the information he puts forward. I can see it being plagiarized but still what he writes is common knowledge in the field by now. Different researchers focus on different things - Bill Cooper was basically pro-jewish and believed in the gas chamber fairytales, does that make him a plant? Same goes for Ioan Ratiu who wrote The Milner-Fabian conspiracy. Those are all different perspectives looking at the same phenomena - the NWO conspiracy and one can't get the full picture just by reading one perspective.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›