I am sorry but the committee of 300 is a disinformation book. Eustace Mullins exposed the author. If my memory serves me right the author of the committee of 300 stole from LaRouche's work and then shifted all blame to the British monarchy completely skirting around the Jew. The author also I think completely bankrupted a publisher who published valuable books for Istvan Bakony. It was u/clemaneuverers who thankfully pointed that out for me.
That's interesting. I've red Mullins and he seems legit.
The thing is the drama around Coleman himself doesn't change the things written in his book. Even if he borrowed a lot of it from other sources. I've already known about most of the things in the book from other books which further verifies the claims made. So what exactly is the disinfo part? All I can see is the Committee of 300 is among the best known books about the NWO conspiracy and it made many people aware of the organizations and names behind it and what the agenda is. He doesn't concentrate on the jews as much as other authors but he talks about zionism and its institutions like the ADL. His writings are consistent with what Quigley and Sutton wrote about.
The only thing that raised a red flag for me was the claim that the elites wanted to shut down NASA which contradicts the very origin of the agency. What, we are to believe they control all agencies concerned with military technology except this one?
Look, elites use money for exraction of wealth from people to keep them below the level of independence not even talking about any competition.
Then they need to somehow utilize that money to prove their value. If they wouldn't spend them somehow, then, their money value will be lost quickly. What's the point of their money if even those who have them in billions can't find any real use for them?
Today they throw money they steal into military industry creating illusion that money worth something and at the same time converting them into their real wealth, control and power.
Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.
So, it is reasonable for them to get rid of any alternative to MIC and so reasonable questions about spending preferences. NASA is useless, since military could easily handle their space needs without any civilian structure.
Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.
It's not just about extracting wealth and resources but also about indoctrination and propaganda. Fifth generation warfare is about control of information and waging war against civil populations because people are viewed as a resource too as well as potential disruptors of the central planning. NASA is a military agency and it always has been since the time it was JPL ran by batshit crazy thelemite Jack Parsons and his fellow scientists they snagged from Germany.
NASA has huge cultural significance, especially in pop culture making it a vehicle for pushing certain messages and agendas (can you name another govt institution that sells as many T-shirts?) NASA promotes a certain worldview in society that places trust in The Science and sanctioned experts above anything else - it promotes scientism and materialism along with all Royal Society-bred institutions.
I am sorry but the committee of 300 is a disinformation book. Eustace Mullins exposed the author. If my memory serves me right the author of the committee of 300 stole from LaRouche's work and then shifted all blame to the British monarchy completely skirting around the Jew. The author also I think completely bankrupted a publisher who published valuable books for Istvan Bakony. It was u/clemaneuverers who thankfully pointed that out for me.
Look up: Eustace Mullins Exposed Dr. John Coleman In 1992
That's interesting. I've red Mullins and he seems legit.
The thing is the drama around Coleman himself doesn't change the things written in his book. Even if he borrowed a lot of it from other sources. I've already known about most of the things in the book from other books which further verifies the claims made. So what exactly is the disinfo part? All I can see is the Committee of 300 is among the best known books about the NWO conspiracy and it made many people aware of the organizations and names behind it and what the agenda is. He doesn't concentrate on the jews as much as other authors but he talks about zionism and its institutions like the ADL. His writings are consistent with what Quigley and Sutton wrote about.
The only thing that raised a red flag for me was the claim that the elites wanted to shut down NASA which contradicts the very origin of the agency. What, we are to believe they control all agencies concerned with military technology except this one?
I think it could be legit.
Look, elites use money for exraction of wealth from people to keep them below the level of independence not even talking about any competition.
Then they need to somehow utilize that money to prove their value. If they wouldn't spend them somehow, then, their money value will be lost quickly. What's the point of their money if even those who have them in billions can't find any real use for them?
Today they throw money they steal into military industry creating illusion that money worth something and at the same time converting them into their real wealth, control and power.
Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.
So, it is reasonable for them to get rid of any alternative to MIC and so reasonable questions about spending preferences. NASA is useless, since military could easily handle their space needs without any civilian structure.
It's not just about extracting wealth and resources but also about indoctrination and propaganda. Fifth generation warfare is about control of information and waging war against civil populations because people are viewed as a resource too as well as potential disruptors of the central planning. NASA is a military agency and it always has been since the time it was JPL ran by batshit crazy thelemite Jack Parsons and his fellow scientists they snagged from Germany.
NASA has huge cultural significance, especially in pop culture making it a vehicle for pushing certain messages and agendas (can you name another govt institution that sells as many T-shirts?) NASA promotes a certain worldview in society that places trust in The Science and sanctioned experts above anything else - it promotes scientism and materialism along with all Royal Society-bred institutions.