You can summarize an answer if you have understanding of the matter. I don't tell you "go read the Bible" when I'm arguing about Christianity, right?
I asked you a point blank question that can be answered with one paragraph - how is Christ's name related to the sun or the moon? You can at least quote a passage from the book. Also the book itself won't give me an answer about your epistemology and a justification of your worldview.
Read my edit and engage with it at least - don't just link me a 500 pager on esotericism and gnosticism. It may be a good read but this is not a book club.
That doesn't tell me much except that there were religions and cults that worshipped the sun and the moon as well as other natural objects. I don't disagree with that. You make a logical leap when you equivocate Christianity to those cults because of some superficial resemblance and your conclusion is arbitrary - it could very well be the case that Christianity is the true religion and all the pagan cults tried to explain God using the world around them and mythologizing the celestial objects. You start with a naturalistic presupposition about what religion is and how it came to be, that it evolved and was not revealed since the beginning of time and that no single religion is entirely true (all presuppositions common in perennialism and comparative religion studies). There's no such thing as neutral ground and all evidence is theory laden and viewed through a paradigm. So why is your paradigm the correct one?
How is Christ's name related to the sun or the moon?
He's an illegal. This one is on Biden.
Just when I thought that theory can't get any dumber.
General relativity is dumb. It deals with subjective perception and not objective states and universals as if reality is ultimately relative and not absolute. But if that's true, then general relativity itself is subjective and not always the case, i.e. it's not a universal natural law like Newtonian mechanics. It's just as stupid as all relativism like saying "All truth is relative", which is a performative contradiction.
Do objects behave differently when you observe them and does your observation change the actual physical reality (whatup Schrodinger)? This is some magical kabbalah thinking for ya. There's a small bridge to cross between this and the troons making up their own reality because everything is relative to their subjective perception. Is it any wonder the jew Einstein came up with such nonsense? Jewed-up physics par excellence and normies (even high IQ science spergs) fall for it.
Christ is likened to the sun by some Early Church fathers. Being the second person of the Godhead, He is eternal and the light He brings is also eternal and uncreated. The sun is an astronomical created inanimate object and the light it emits is purely physical.
So no, Christ is not the sun but the fathers liken Him to it as an analogy and a symbol. Christ is a divine person who assumed human nature in order to save humanity from death (the result of Adam's fall) and bring it in communion with God. He is not similar to Ishtar, Osiris, Apollo, Saturn, Mithra or any of those demon gods that pagans worship. Even if other religions had some notion of God their knowledge was incomplete led them to erroneous doctrines. Christianity is not sun worship in any way shape or form. The Christian calendar is cyclical because God made the world that way, so it reflects that basic reality of nature.
Maybe people deserve the punishment or maybe they bring it on them through their own sin and willful ignorance. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah.
He's right though. According to OUR Church Fathers, Christ was born on 25th of December and this has been the Christian tradition since the IVc. I'm not sure who made you the authority on this one and how does your interpretation trump that of the Church Christ established Himself?
Doesn't sound like Christ is the Sun then because He was resurrected in the spring.
Utter bullshit.
Christians have been celebrating the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ on 25th of December since the IVc. (under pope Sylvester). St. John Chrysostom explains how that date was arrived at - John the Baptist was conceived during the Feast of Tabernacles (23 September). According to Luke 1, Annunciation was 6 months after that on 25 of March + 9 months of pregnancy = 25 December.
Jeremiah 10:2-5 is about making idols out of wood and metals, not about decorating a fir tree no matter how hard you weird sectarians try to shoehorn such an interpretation in. Christmas is not rooted in pagan traditions - it coincided with Sol Invictus and incorporated/consecrated it thus making it way easier to convert pagans to Christianity.
I think it's a good thing because more prots will realize how fake and gay their Christianity is. This will incentivize them to seek out actual traditional Christianity within the true historical Church that has kept the faith uncorrupted for 2000 years.
This guys looks like he's working for the jews though. He's the perfect ADL "Look at all the rampant antisemitism in the West - we must do something about it" goon.
Gospels first and foremost.
The Church has declared 25th of December to be Christ's birthday in the IVc. St. John Chrysostom explains how that date was arrived at - John the Baptist was conceived during the Feast of Tabernacles (23 September). According to Luke 1, Annunciation was 6 months after that in 25 of March + 9 months of pregnancy = 25 December.
I don't. All I know is there is a contradiction there and RFK will either abandon his big pharma crusade or Trump's admin will join it. A lot of anti-establishment people (both left and right) support RFK and if he does a 360 on this it will look very bad. That's basic logic.
Tech is the only truthful thing in our world. It can't lie or depend on lies. You can't build working car engine on lies, it will not work regardless of how many money and effort you spent on creating that lies. This is highly disturbing to those who want to thrive on lies, so they thinking out non-existing magical tech and sell it around, at the same time convincing people that they don't have to know how things work.
I hammer on this point all the time. The only true science is engineering - application of math, logic and natural laws for building things that serve a specific function. Everything else is mostly propaganda, ungrounded speculation and myth-creation, aka scientism. Of course I wouldn't say tech is the only truthful thing in this world because God is the standard for truth and the ultimate truthful being and the truthfulness of everything is contingent on Him. But as far as the creation and science goes, I'd agree.
The computer is to AI what engineering and true science is to scientism. The notion of AI is based on some wild unjustified assumptions that have never been demonstrated empirically (and they never will, because those are presuppositions about metaphysics).
Exactly. People have been programmed to entertain the idea that AI is borderline "alive", self aware and employs some quasi free-will kabbalistic thinking and decision making.
They fall for jew magic and transhumanism. It's a program running many simple algorithms at the same time - a conglomeration of algorithms. It has no identity or intelligence and whatever it does, it was programmed and trained to do it.
I get that normies fall for that but thinking people should stop with this nonsense.
That being said AI can be used as a tool for demonic influence, especially when you consider what kind of people are behind it all.
Another proof AI is demonic.
As if your own eyes can't be deceived. This is exactly what Blue Beam is about - people will see the gayliens coming from the sky while looking up.
I don't see how he could go on with the clotshot script now that RFK is head of HHS.
I bet it was a hacked car and not a filthy sand nigger in there.
Who's your God, you retarded heretic? You've made your own religion that has nothing to do with the Christian God who is Trinity, who established His Church which keeps that tradition alive until the end of times.
Can’t find it huh?
You assume just because something isn't spelled out it's not in the text. That's a hermeneutical problem and the problem is yours.
Imagine how many academia nerds believe this. And normies talk about the medieval period as the "Dark ages" of superstition and ignorance. People are too stupid and degenerate now to understand the vast knowledge and wisdom their predecessors possessed. Once again Christianity is proven correct - rejection of God makes one an irrational fool who falls for absurdities. We're the retarded children of kings. This is the ultimate Dunning-Kruger effect.'
Btw, wtf is "spacetime" made of? It has to be some material to make sense in a materialist worldview? It is claimed to have all the properties of material and it's always demonstrated by some piece of fabric that bends when a heavy object is placed on it. Is it something like magical fairy dust? It's all myth building and stupid ass rhetoric which has nothing to do with true science.