I think I've found the dumbest application of Special Relativity
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
General relativity is dumb. It deals with subjective perception and not objective states and universals as if reality is ultimately relative and not absolute. But if that's true, then general relativity itself is subjective and not always the case, i.e. it's not a universal natural law like Newtonian mechanics. It's just as stupid as all relativism like saying "All truth is relative", which is a performative contradiction.
Do objects behave differently when you observe them and does your observation change the actual physical reality (whatup Schrodinger)? This is some magical kabbalah thinking for ya. There's a small bridge to cross between this and the troons making up their own reality because everything is relative to their subjective perception. Is it any wonder the jew Einstein came up with such nonsense? Jewed-up physics par excellence and normies (even high IQ science spergs) fall for it.
"Your truth" is the truth. Because, spacetime.
Spacetime is the fabric of the universe that somehow knows your relative velocity to something stationary and then changes reality only for you.
Imagine how many academia nerds believe this. And normies talk about the medieval period as the "Dark ages" of superstition and ignorance. People are too stupid and degenerate now to understand the vast knowledge and wisdom their predecessors possessed. Once again Christianity is proven correct - rejection of God makes one an irrational fool who falls for absurdities. We're the retarded children of kings. This is the ultimate Dunning-Kruger effect.'
Btw, wtf is "spacetime" made of? It has to be some material to make sense in a materialist worldview? It is claimed to have all the properties of material and it's always demonstrated by some piece of fabric that bends when a heavy object is placed on it. Is it something like magical fairy dust? It's all myth building and stupid ass rhetoric which has nothing to do with true science.
Time is relative, just not to man. Relativity's dumbness is idolatry followed to its logical end.
By the same logic, Newtonian mechanics is wrong for taking reason and the material world as the only givens. It inevitably leads to a kind of relativity.
The problem I'm getting at is: How can we know there isn't some way of placing relativity in the right context? If it makes accurate, testable predictions, unlike evolution and psychology, what is wrong with it? Every physical science confined to its own domain is tautologically relative. What makes the theory of relativity uniquely problematic?
What is time relative to then?
Newtonian mechanics is limited to the natural world obviously and Newton doesn't make claims about metaphysics. The problem with relativity and any modern "theory of everything" is that it rejects metaphysics on one hand but delves deep into it and tries to explain metaphysical concepts through physics (dark matter, ultimate nature of reality, the nature of time and space, causality beginning and ending of the universe, black holes). It has transgressed its limitations and went into philosophy and religion territory. This explains why much of modern science is tied to occult practices and movements like Thelema and theosophy (look at the origins of NASA and what Jack Parsons did).
Most scientismo spergs don't even realize this because they have zero knowledge of anything outside their field and think philosophy is a bunch of gobbledygook.
But I agree that general relativity can have some application. It's usefulness and profundity is vastly overstated though.