It's always the same - people who lack basic understanding of something are the most vocal in their opposition to it. It's something to do with Dunning-Kruger.
But Savannah wrote an online article about it so it must be true I guess. Savannah?Never take financial advice from strippers btw.
But the "raised as an evangelical and this thing got drilled into his head" is quite at the heart of the necessary paradigm change. That applies to everyone in the human race. It's where they get their worldview and morality: from the "authorities".
About 80% are stuck there. Their worldview and morality will change only if the authorities they accept tell them so, or if those who they perceive as the authorities are changed.
It's only bad if the authority is corrupted. God is the ultimate authority and His true historic Church is the authority here on Earth. The Church's teaching about the jews is unchanged for 2000 years and those who were raised within it and submitted to its authority, don't face the delusions of those outside of it (like evangelicals or unbelievers).
Yes, we need to put the correct authorities where they belong but that won't happen until people are willing to change themselves and repent first. I don't see this happening in our post-enlightenment freemasonic degenerate society. Society is too far gone, too prideful and spiritually deluded. It's all about getting to individual people who have an open heart to the truth.
Yes, G stands for the Grand Architect of the masonic luciferian religion. It's never used by Christians.
True. But just because the left-right dialectic is fake and gay, that doesn't mean there is no real struggle between the forces of good and evil here on Earth.
You're too harsh on him. He was raised as an evangelical and this thing got drilled into his head. But he was beginning to question it in the past few months it seems. A lot of people testify to this. I believe he was on the path to truth and that he was decent. Explains why he got gunned down like that.
It's kinda strange that his wife was a freemason, don't ya think?
I think he was in the process but not there publicly. They sensed he was slipping but he definitely was no Candace Owens. At most he was neutral and didn't like Israel meddling in the US - this is a moderate patriotic position. I bet he had nothing against the jews and would hate being called an anti-semite. He still supported the state of Israel and believed jews are God's chosen people.
(Biden's voice) Come on, man.
Christian cosmology and Logocentrism. God as the absolute uncreated being behind everything that exists, who grounds reality, regularity in nature and abstract universals.
Not really. Charlie never turned heel (maybe eventually) and the patsy was a libtard.
It's implications spill outside of science and physics. It's a philosophical paradigm. Einstein did to physics what Kant (foremost enlightenment/freemasonic thinker) did to philosophy.
Kant posited that reality is constructed by each individual mind, which interprets it via universal categories (which he grants himself because convenience I guess), and there is no way of knowing what the objective truth (the thing in itself) is.
Einstein's relativity says that there is no privileged vantage point from which space and time are "really" measured. Instead, every point (or observer) can set up coordinates, and the laws of physics will hold consistently in that frame.
Many will argue that the synagogue of satan fraud jews today have no blood relation to St. Paul.
The jews who crucified Jesus, making them antichrists and servants of Satan, were most certainly of the tribes and related to the pharisee Saul, even if most of today's jews have a different origin. Rabbinical judaism originated from the pharisaical tradition after the Temple.
They and their followers (be it khazars or other gentiles) are the true synagogue of Satan regardless of their bloodline just like Christians are the true seed of Abraham and God's chosen people regardless of them being jews or not. This is the core of the Christian teaching - your heart and free choice, and not your blood or circumstances, either saves or condemns you.
Also, St. Paul was complicit in the arrest and persecution of hundreds and possibly thousands of Christians before he claims he saw Jesus in the desert. Quite a claim.
"Quite a claim" is not an argument. Jesus rising from the death is quite a claim too. Paul was received into the Church and met with Peter. Cutting him off from the rest of the NT (which is divinely inspired in its entirety) is arbitrary. If you're skeptical of his letters why not be skeptical about everything else?
St. Paul's letters are the worst books in the New Testament.
I didn't know there's a Top 10 list in the NT. Sounds very authoritative.
You cannot name a wonderful great jew today who is such a great and wonderful person?
It doesn't matter. It is possible for a jew, even a pharisee who has prosecuted and killed Christians and hated Christ, to repent and become a saint and pillar of His Church. This proves my point and no further examples are required. I believe God made the same point when He revealed Himself to Paul and converted him (a point Jesus also made on the cross in Luke 23:43).
Funny how they are Republicans' greatest allies until Republicans have to name jews who are actually Christian who aren't subversive zionist hypocrites. Then they cannot name any of their greatest allies by name, specifically.
Agreed on that.
Based and Orthopilled.
This sums up perfectly the true Christian position towards the jews. Notice how it is the exact opposite of what most Protestants and modern Catholics teach about judaism and zionism. This alone should be enough to tell you what the true Church of Christ is.
St. Paul is a good example. Many jews converted to Christianity in the past. Christ preached to jews after all and many followed Him.
If they repented, then they are not larping. That's why I put it this way.
Can you name a single jew who deserves to NOT be impaled? I can't
How about the guy who exposed the Holocaust hoax on his trip to Auschwitz pretending to be a practicing jew - David Cole?
Normies don't care about truth. They've been instructed that objective truth, even if it exists, can't be known and all we have is subjective takes on it. The kabbalistic kike Einstein was instrumental to this with "his" theory of relativity which conceived of everything as being relative to everything else with no absolute position to ground them. Thus everything became a matter of perspective. Ironically it rehabilitated the heliocentric model as equally valid to the geocentric one which sure rubs the "muh science and muh progress" crowd wrong.
Yes, this is in line with the Protocols.
I believe Rothschild is their commander in chief, their world emperor (as Cherep-Spiridovich calls him). But just like Christian monarchs are crowned by the Church, so the Elders (rabbis) crown their emperor, which makes sense since they always emulate Christianity (much like how their master Satan is impotent and can't create but can only emulate and corrupt).
Satanist are under Jewish Rabbis.
The higher ups are indeed. But like with the freemasons, most of them have no clue what they participate in and how fucked they are. They are marching into the abyss like the Gadarene swine.
Satanism does not depend on Judaism. It doesn't need a third temple. It doesn't even need the state of Israel. They want you under their one world system one way or another. Noahide laws, Technocratic communism or a Catholic fascist state will all lead you into the same place.
Revelation teaches us otherwise. Judaism is satanism and vice versa. You either serve God or Satan and whoever rejects Christ is a satanist and an antichrist no matter how he describes himself - satanist, jew, atheist, agnostic, freemason, jesuit, theosophist, new ager, pagan, etc. The one world technocratic government that is coming is none other than the Antichrist's Beast system described in Revelation. There may be something similar before he comes - a forerunner (like the covid regime) - but still we know it is part of the same agenda.
The coming of the Antichrist will occur in Israel after the rebuilding of the Temple and it will be made known to everyone in real time (through TV and internet or any future media there is).
It's a meta-ethical and meta-epistemological question. I can give an account from my worldview. I asked you for how you justify it in yours?
Does universal objective truth exist?
How does it exist (in what way/mode)?
Is it knowable by man's limited mind and to what extent?
How does one come to that knowledge and how can one verify it's not a delusion of the mind?
Why ought we choose truth over falsehood?
A gnostic of your caliber should be able to answer those questions easily.
Yes this should be common knowledge. There were also a lot of black african slavers who sold their fellow niggas to the jews.
But it's somehow always the white man's fault.
I'm not competing dude. If you don't want to reply, don't. I'm fine with it.
You asked why they would mix AI and practical effects. And then claim that doesn't make sense...but there are very good reasons why. I'm sure if you tried, you could think of them. I just kinda sick of this getting no where Convo. You shut everything down.
That sounds like a cop out. I argued that good SFX don't require AI to be believable. What's the counter to this?
But looks like you believe in the satanists theory, but have you researched Kirks satanic symbols and connections? He is one of them, that's why this could be faked.
He could be. He and his wife are part of secret societies and both could be gov't agents. But we don't know the details - maybe he got uncooperative and became a liability. Maybe he has done his part and they backstabbed him. Or maybe he was coerced into sacrificing himself in order to protect his family. There are many reasons why they may have killed him even if he was one of them.
None of your arguments proves it was staged and he wasn't killed but you assume it's what happened and get confirmation bias from every detail around it, disregarding other possible explanations.
Alright, let's cut to the chase: Why ought we value truth and knowledge at all?
What is this supposed to be?
Yes, this is the correct Christian teaching. We have a duty to condemn sin both in ourselves and in others. Why? Because sin is death and God is life. If we love our neighbor we will not tolerate his sin. The "you shouldn't judge" libtard false Christians (influenced by jews obviously) are wrong.
This is why the freemasonic (jewish) idolization of individual rights and freedom of speech or libertarian NAP is incompatible with Christianity. "You do what you want, as long as you let me do what I want to do" is jewed up philosophy that appeals to human pride and base desires.
Or maybe Patel is a weird pagan.