Nobody can enforce free speech Rights whether we say something nice, mean, true or untrue.
Why? Because the moment you allow the Gov to criminalize 1 word or phrase, they will use that as an excuse to criminalize many other words and phrases especially those that go against their own self interests.
Although there are certain things that should not be said to another human being, we the People enforce that through social norms. If someone crosses a social norm, we chin check them either verbally or even sometimes it can get physical but the law has no business in policing words. Take that shit to the Communist Country you so admire you Communist pig.
Even if someone says "fire" in a movie theatre as a joke would get his ass kicked by us but cannot be prosecuted because that is free speech unless a stampede caused people to get hurt or die. Then that would have to go up before a Jury trial to see if the Jury finds the person guilty for the victims that were created out of the scene. But the word "fire" is not enough to arrest anyone as that is his free speech Rights. But knowing that he would get his ass kicked by the audience is enough to shut such rascals down. There aren't many rascals that bad anyway so it doesn't happen most of the time. I've never heard of it.
Even in Court, if the Judge say you cannot say this or that, or speak about the case, etc.., he is violating your Rights and shrugging that off makes these tyrants even worst.
The solution that many are doing now is suing the shit out of any gov official that farts sideways with free speech Rights violations. They often make $5,000,000 per lawsuit and the lawsuit takes about 1-2 years max. A probono attorney will work for free as long as you give him a large portion of the profits (ie go 50/50 on the $5,000,000).
This technique can be used on any Constitutional Rights violations like the 4th amendment, 2nd amendment, etc..
It's like a new fad that is picking up because people are getting paid to defend freedom. It's not even hard. The lawyer does most of the work and by the time it's over, you become a millionaire hero.
Because their idea of an enlightened democratic republic is satanic and revolutionary. Those people were degenerate psychopaths, communists and occultist luciferians. They opposed the Christian world order that ruled the West since the fall of pagan Rome. Naturally, the status quo of the old world order wasn't pleased with those plans and prosecuted the conspirators.
There we go. I thought with all your sophistication you'd see right to the cabal's psy ops but alas you fell for it. I've never been to the US and I don't need to go to Babylon, thank you. Temple, really? Can you be even more freemasonic than this?
Let's see what the Protocols say about democracy, liberalism and republicanism and the revolutions that toppled the old monarchies brought the NWO about.
All of the above has come to pass, proving this was indeed the plan of the cabal. Yet here you are defending republicanism and democracy while admitting you are descended from illuminists. I think I know where you stand.
You return like a dog to its own vomit.
You're descended from people who've committed all sorts of ridiculous acts. Are you ready to take on the responsibility of their actions? Should you? Or is that moronic? You're dad's calling, he just beat your mom and now you have to pay for it.
What a royal fool you are. You have no clew as to my understanding and it isn't what you guess.
An enlightened public wouldn't have need for kings or be divided between two parties. The goal being enlightenment, not how to best set a ruling class over a 'lower' class of sheeple.
You mistake me for someone who believes that 'democracy', as a voting system for rulers is a guarantee against oppression. It isnt. But until the day that enlightenment reaches its 5:5 as The Optic, liberty is the only way towards that goal.
Yes, the cabal is clever enough to have created a RIGGED democratic republic to give the illusion of choice. But that's illusion based from ignorance, isn't it. Division based on ignorance. Ignorance allows all sorts of control mechanisms. The cabal's hope and understanding is that this false creation will break down until they can re-establish the monarchy they truly want. Until then, they trade children and intermarry and so on, to hide their pedigrees from the public's eye. The original eternal principles were twisted by a later infiltration of luciferian theosophist blackhat magicians. So no, I'm not responsible for stepdad when he beats mom either and he's no father of mine.
A rigged democracy is a fake democracy with the intent to PLACE leaders over the public and the longer they can rig it (by media mind control - wake up), the longer they can rule LIKE KINGS and queen Nancy Pelosi, ruling a lifetime. Again showing their real wish for a monarchy you can't influence.
This concept is continued in the chosen 'Social Influencers' of the internet, who pretend to be one of you little common people voicing opinion, when it isn't. It's directed. The cabal is clever this way. Controlled opposition.
You'll note that once the Great Awakening occurred, the cabal had to STEAL the election...DIDN'T they? They couldn't allow a REAL democracy with REAL vote tallies or the people would become loosed from their grip. This again proves that the cabal has no desire for an ENLIGHTENED public or its vote unless it can be controlled by fakery. Enlightenment is the goal, not voting in division. There is no such choice in kingships. And no chance for enlightenment as then, there would be no need for kings. But that's operating on a higher level, as higher minds understand (like Paine). Lady Liberty holds a book and a torch for reasons, and liberty has no king. Libertarianism as 'no government' will become chaos if implemented to an ignorant public. This false 'government of the people (oops we mean our people governing you people) is a facade for fascism, their current system of choice, where corporations and entities act in the stead of the king, hiding behind the facade of a republic. Anarchy in ignorance is chaos. It's opposite, Philosophical anarchy has no need for kings or chaos. Everything taken to its extreme becomes it's opposite. Things to know. Where is the middle ground? Enlightenment. Until then, it's rule or be ruled and morons continue to take 'sides' in continuation. You hope to wrongly place me on one side in order to 'win' stupid prizes, like belief in monarchism. Prince Andrew has some swampland in England he'd like to sell you.
This is a pipe dream. There has never been such a thing in the history of mankind. You are like the commies who always say "this time it will be different - we will establish utopia on earth" and always lead to the most insane tyrannical and satanic form of government. This is the problem - a secular republic will always go down that route because a power grab of a small "enlightened" elite is inevitable due to fallen human nature. In a might makes right secular universe why wouldn't they usurp the power and enslave the people?
The difference is, that in monarchy the power to rule over the people is recognized to be from God and the good monarch follows the morality of the Church which is not decided by the whims of the small elite but is transcendent and not subject to change.
Read the quotes from the Protocols and look around the society you live in. I have nothing more to say.
Why co-opt democracies as the protocols suggested? Because IT IS THE largest threat. Which side are you on then, with your matching goals with the cabal. They give the illusion of democracy. If you believe TPTB want an enlightened voter, you're an idiot aren't you?
You cry about some 'small group of elite' and equate that with the enlightened. You also defame the word enlightenment as you have none.
King of Kings means No more need for kings. Past histories lay claim that their god demanded sacrifice of animals and bounties of foreskins, but hey....times change and enlightenment brings it. Then suddenly god is said to counter what was claimed to be his command. You misread in your literalist way.
When in history did a free election create the most insane tyrannical satanic government? Free elections. When. Really? I don't think so. The people as tyrant over their self. Babbling oxymoron. Kings are tyrants, and fake elections create falsely elected kings. Again...and again......wise up to stop the steal. Neither a monarchy (see myriad of historic examples) nor a democracy is a guarantee of 'utopia', nor should it attempt any such thing. A wise man would know why.
The people of the United States wised up to the problem with monarchies over 200 years ago.....before that, the Enlightenment era did the same for Europe. Just because the monarchic cabal attempts to co-opt and usurp doesn't mean improvements weren't made and are about to be made again with another raising up of consciousness about sovereignty and freedom from oppression. All fine examples of what you claim has never existed. So you believe every despotic monarch was given power by God, huh? How about the pope instead? The black popes were put there by God too? This is why Napolean crowned himself and why they steal his legacy. Learn things. But then you're a forum-sliding royalist idiot who's on the wrong side of this entire movement. Do you always go to your enemy's camp and shit in their tent? The Deep State acts as royalists by stealing the elections. But then in your book, that gets a pass from your twisted God. If you won't join, then go to the royalist sites and fawn over the next generation of reprobates they will unsuccessfully attempt to foist. Disney has Disneyfied all the little girls into supporting princes and princess as solution like the fairy tale IT is. We the people won't realize our potential until the royalist foot has been removed from our neck. Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.
They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.
Hitler maybe? How about the current global technocratic regime which is still upheld by "free elections"? Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself.
Have you heard of the concept of public opinion creation and social engineering? Read Bernays' Propaganda, Lipman's Public opinion, Le Bon's the Crowd, read about the Tavistock Institute, read about how the current system works. People can be made to vote for their own enslavement and vote in tyrants to rule over them - where have you been living the past decades?
Pharoah was bad so all kings are bad. Didn't Israel have kings after that? Oh, that doesn't count. Come on dude, this is retarded. All your arguments are ridiculous fallacies.
You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.