Nobody can enforce free speech Rights whether we say something nice, mean, true or untrue.
Why? Because the moment you allow the Gov to criminalize 1 word or phrase, they will use that as an excuse to criminalize many other words and phrases especially those that go against their own self interests.
Although there are certain things that should not be said to another human being, we the People enforce that through social norms. If someone crosses a social norm, we chin check them either verbally or even sometimes it can get physical but the law has no business in policing words. Take that shit to the Communist Country you so admire you Communist pig.
Even if someone says "fire" in a movie theatre as a joke would get his ass kicked by us but cannot be prosecuted because that is free speech unless a stampede caused people to get hurt or die. Then that would have to go up before a Jury trial to see if the Jury finds the person guilty for the victims that were created out of the scene. But the word "fire" is not enough to arrest anyone as that is his free speech Rights. But knowing that he would get his ass kicked by the audience is enough to shut such rascals down. There aren't many rascals that bad anyway so it doesn't happen most of the time. I've never heard of it.
Even in Court, if the Judge say you cannot say this or that, or speak about the case, etc.., he is violating your Rights and shrugging that off makes these tyrants even worst.
The solution that many are doing now is suing the shit out of any gov official that farts sideways with free speech Rights violations. They often make $5,000,000 per lawsuit and the lawsuit takes about 1-2 years max. A probono attorney will work for free as long as you give him a large portion of the profits (ie go 50/50 on the $5,000,000).
This technique can be used on any Constitutional Rights violations like the 4th amendment, 2nd amendment, etc..
It's like a new fad that is picking up because people are getting paid to defend freedom. It's not even hard. The lawyer does most of the work and by the time it's over, you become a millionaire hero.
This is a pipe dream. There has never been such a thing in the history of mankind. You are like the commies who always say "this time it will be different - we will establish utopia on earth" and always lead to the most insane tyrannical and satanic form of government. This is the problem - a secular republic will always go down that route because a power grab of a small "enlightened" elite is inevitable due to fallen human nature. In a might makes right secular universe why wouldn't they usurp the power and enslave the people?
The difference is, that in monarchy the power to rule over the people is recognized to be from God and the good monarch follows the morality of the Church which is not decided by the whims of the small elite but is transcendent and not subject to change.
Read the quotes from the Protocols and look around the society you live in. I have nothing more to say.
Why co-opt democracies as the protocols suggested? Because IT IS THE largest threat. Which side are you on then, with your matching goals with the cabal. They give the illusion of democracy. If you believe TPTB want an enlightened voter, you're an idiot aren't you?
You cry about some 'small group of elite' and equate that with the enlightened. You also defame the word enlightenment as you have none.
King of Kings means No more need for kings. Past histories lay claim that their god demanded sacrifice of animals and bounties of foreskins, but hey....times change and enlightenment brings it. Then suddenly god is said to counter what was claimed to be his command. You misread in your literalist way.
When in history did a free election create the most insane tyrannical satanic government? Free elections. When. Really? I don't think so. The people as tyrant over their self. Babbling oxymoron. Kings are tyrants, and fake elections create falsely elected kings. Again...and again......wise up to stop the steal. Neither a monarchy (see myriad of historic examples) nor a democracy is a guarantee of 'utopia', nor should it attempt any such thing. A wise man would know why.
The people of the United States wised up to the problem with monarchies over 200 years ago.....before that, the Enlightenment era did the same for Europe. Just because the monarchic cabal attempts to co-opt and usurp doesn't mean improvements weren't made and are about to be made again with another raising up of consciousness about sovereignty and freedom from oppression. All fine examples of what you claim has never existed. So you believe every despotic monarch was given power by God, huh? How about the pope instead? The black popes were put there by God too? This is why Napolean crowned himself and why they steal his legacy. Learn things. But then you're a forum-sliding royalist idiot who's on the wrong side of this entire movement. Do you always go to your enemy's camp and shit in their tent? The Deep State acts as royalists by stealing the elections. But then in your book, that gets a pass from your twisted God. If you won't join, then go to the royalist sites and fawn over the next generation of reprobates they will unsuccessfully attempt to foist. Disney has Disneyfied all the little girls into supporting princes and princess as solution like the fairy tale IT is. We the people won't realize our potential until the royalist foot has been removed from our neck. Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.
They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.
Hitler maybe? How about the current global technocratic regime which is still upheld by "free elections"? Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself.
Have you heard of the concept of public opinion creation and social engineering? Read Bernays' Propaganda, Lipman's Public opinion, Le Bon's the Crowd, read about the Tavistock Institute, read about how the current system works. People can be made to vote for their own enslavement and vote in tyrants to rule over them - where have you been living the past decades?
Pharoah was bad so all kings are bad. Didn't Israel have kings after that? Oh, that doesn't count. Come on dude, this is retarded. All your arguments are ridiculous fallacies.
You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.
The Iroquois (also known as the Haudenosaunee) Confederacy is a democratic union of six nations, bound by a constitution called the Great Law of Peace, that dates back several centuries. The system has been influential for centuries.
Among the Algonquin people, democratic practices included chiefs who ruled by consensus with a council, with some power decentralized to the village or band level. However, the Algonquian political model differed from the system of the rival Iroquois Confederacy, which is more famously noted for its influence on the U.S. government.
After the scam claim that all monarchs rule 'by God', once enlightened to the trick, they suddenly reversed course and claimed they were ruling by leave of the people. But you'd know that if you weren't a sophmoric oxymoron.
Here, let me put the words into your mouth so two can play your stupid game with stupid prizes. "Installed puppets (fake controlled 'democracy' aka 'deep state' which acts like a monarchy) are bad so all democracy is bad." Back at ya, boomerang.
I read Quigley before you were born I'm guessing. Same with Billington which I schooled you on .....the lying propaganda put out by monarchists who's tit you suck. You'd be shocked to know that Clinton always claimed Quigley as his favorite author.....because the fucker was projecting the programmed future as circuit board. But you don't get that. Why was Bush Sr.'s 'favorite book' "Bonfire of the Vanities"? btw......you know.....Bush who claimed along with many if not most installed puppet dictators that he was one of you.
Most, but not all, U.S. presidents are descendants of King George III, with genealogies tracing their ancestry to British royalty and other European noble houses The claim that all presidents except one are descended from King John of England is a common point in genealogy research
Israel had shitty kings galore.....but then again, they mostly weren't 'kings' in title, but rather fake-ass proconsuls of Greece (Hellenized) or later Rome. Look it up history buff , pronounced with a long 'U'. Lying royalist propaganda is yesterday's wiki snope. I don't peruse books without understanding the author and his agendas. You're like other royalists who are immature babies who need a father they never had. "Help me (become Princess again) Obi-Wan Kenobi."
Trump's admin is hardly a liberal one, now that the scam is revealed and the voter's now 'awake' as opposed to your team's 'woke' who illegally vote and steal for the deep state acting as monarchy. You need to read and learn a LOT of things. You can cry and twist and use borrowed lies all you want. I'm here to kick your shit to the curb along with your team of despotic dictators doing the most dispicable acts in the name of a god they never knew.
Great. You realize they were governed by a political elite in the face of the chieftains and everyday people didn't vote for those, right? It's like having a Party at the top but without a leader or a feudal system without a king (the Scottish clans). This model is weak and it logically led to the disillusionment of that state due to inability to agree to a unified policy when the war with Britain came. You can't have a body with multiple heads (at least by having a temporary appointed leader there's still a head of state present, even if his power is contingent on the system that installed him).
This is the Christian worldview as presented in Scripture you moron - how is that a scam claim? Sure, monarchs were corrupted by freemasonic bs during the enlightenment and caved in. Just like in the OT, they turned away from God and lost their mandate to rule. How is that a contradiction?
It doesn't work both ways because you can't point to a true democracy historically. I have demonstrated to you that your ideal democracy is a pipe dream. Even Plato knew democracy is the weakest form of government because it degenerates to chaos and rule of the passions (muh freedom and muh rights).
Lol, nice ChatGPT skills there, I totally believe you. You obviously know Quigley well because you red that he was Clinton's mentor which is literally printed on the cover of Tragedy and Hope. I'm amazed by your deep knowledge on the topic. I already told you I don't agree with neither of those guys. On the issue of monarchy vs democracy/republic they are on YOUR side, not mine. Still their writings are revelatory about how the system came to be, the ideas behind it and how it operates. And the funny thing is you support those same enlightenment ideas that have materialized as the status quo in today's system. The classic liberal and democratic ideas are everywhere at all times 24/7 - there's a giant ass masonic statue of the goddess of Liberty (Lucifer) at the gate of the US, a masonic cornerstone in front of Congress and a masonic all seeing eye on top of a pyramid on all your fake ass money and you have the nerve to bitch about royalist propaganda? Where do you get off, you illuminist weasel?
How is that relevant? You can call them monarchs if you like but what they rule over is not a monarchy or at least it's not a Christian monarchy but a freemasonic beast system ruled by a technocratic international elite cabal. Do you think I care that the UK has a king? Do you think I support the druid Queen or the fabian globalist Charles III just because they hold the title? If so, you don't even try to understand my position in good faith and you're just strawmanning me.