Nobody can enforce free speech Rights whether we say something nice, mean, true or untrue.
Why? Because the moment you allow the Gov to criminalize 1 word or phrase, they will use that as an excuse to criminalize many other words and phrases especially those that go against their own self interests.
Although there are certain things that should not be said to another human being, we the People enforce that through social norms. If someone crosses a social norm, we chin check them either verbally or even sometimes it can get physical but the law has no business in policing words. Take that shit to the Communist Country you so admire you Communist pig.
Even if someone says "fire" in a movie theatre as a joke would get his ass kicked by us but cannot be prosecuted because that is free speech unless a stampede caused people to get hurt or die. Then that would have to go up before a Jury trial to see if the Jury finds the person guilty for the victims that were created out of the scene. But the word "fire" is not enough to arrest anyone as that is his free speech Rights. But knowing that he would get his ass kicked by the audience is enough to shut such rascals down. There aren't many rascals that bad anyway so it doesn't happen most of the time. I've never heard of it.
Even in Court, if the Judge say you cannot say this or that, or speak about the case, etc.., he is violating your Rights and shrugging that off makes these tyrants even worst.
The solution that many are doing now is suing the shit out of any gov official that farts sideways with free speech Rights violations. They often make $5,000,000 per lawsuit and the lawsuit takes about 1-2 years max. A probono attorney will work for free as long as you give him a large portion of the profits (ie go 50/50 on the $5,000,000).
This technique can be used on any Constitutional Rights violations like the 4th amendment, 2nd amendment, etc..
It's like a new fad that is picking up because people are getting paid to defend freedom. It's not even hard. The lawyer does most of the work and by the time it's over, you become a millionaire hero.
I've red Paine's Common Sense. He was a degenerate liberal living in a menage a trois in Paris (source: Fire in the Minds of Men: Origin of the revolutionary faith by J. Billington). But so were most of the founding daddies who were influenced by both the girondin and jacobin faction of the French revolutionaries. I'm not saying the US never had good people as leaders (I think Andrew Jackson is a great example), but it's wrong from the outset due to foundational philosophical problems of the project.
The joke is that those leaders are the logical consequence of the system you support. These types of globalist technocratic goblins aren't to be found in the monarchy I described. But either way, having a bad leader or a monarch doesn't invalidate the system. Sure there were weak and corrupted monarchs and still it's a better system than a secular freemasonic republic or a democracy.
The aristocracy and contenders to the throne. Still much easier done than removing a psychopathic and tyrannical technocratic Big Brother government that's been institutionalized and cemented in all spheres of society. We've been under the control of that system for centuries now (or at least since WWII). When was the last time a despotic monarch ruled for 80 years?
Lol sure. This is why they toppled the monarchies with their masonic talmudic revolutions and we're constantly force fed propaganda about how great democracy is and how bad absolute power is (your arguments are textbook examples of that propaganda). We surely live in an evil monarchist world and not in a "Liberty, equality, fraternity" freemasonic NWO. The very idea of it being called a new world order is to set it in opposition to the old world order which was based ruled by the Church and the monarchy.
But don't let common sense, countless books on the topic (at least read the Protocols maybe) and history get in the way of your narrative - we all just need to double down on the thing that got us in this clown world in the first place, which is revolutionary emancipation, liberalism and individualism, and we'll get there!
You should rename yourself 2EyesWideShut
Paine's royalist detractors took his staying at a couple's residence while in Paris as opportunity to slander him. You fall prey to their machinations. Have you read his personal letters to his wife? No you have not.
You were stumping for kings last post, and now you praise emancipation, a word that Paine popularized, you 'wide shut' oxymoron. Propaganda is a helluva drug.
The cabal toppled some royals and not others to usurp the power as their own. It was a cabalist who told me they were monarchists, not that I needed him to say it.
Napolean toppled the monarchy and yesterday's jewel theft was an attempt to steal his legacy, just to keep you up with current events and how they pertain to TRUE history you don't get from your propagandists.
I'm of the line of VonHaderschot, who were orignators of the so-called Bavarian Illuminatti (Home base for the cabal of the past) nd know its history well.
Blow it out your ass.
Either way, the fact he was very close to Bonneville is much worse than the supposed debauchery. Bonneville was a revolutionary proto-socialist, a freemason and an illuminist (his Cercle Social and Amis de la Verite).
Sure, there's black aristocracy left from the old world. Don't let me defend them - they have betrayed their people and serve Satan along with the transhumanist technocrats. They operate within the framework of the NWO and aren't monarchists at all. They are very happy as internationalists, globalists and socialists. In fact they're it's opposite and make a mockery of the monarchical institution just like modern skittles churches make a mockery of Christianity.
You have no idea of the history of the revolutionary ideas that have led to today's NWO (or you do and you are pleased with how things are going). I recommend you read Billington's book who's a librarian of congress and an Ivy league prof. - he's a supporter of the revolutionary new world order, so he's on your side and has no monarchist bias.
Makes sense. You espouse their ideas too. The irony of saying I have no place here when you're of illuminati lineage...
I espouse their ideas?
I haven't espoused my ideas or the cabal's. I espouse opposition to the wrongheaded ideas posited by you....idiot. Putting words into the mouths of your upbraider to make yourself right won't work here. If an enlightened democratic republic was their idea, who opposed that, and why was secrecy necessary?
Jacobins: The english translation of 'ladder' demeans the orignial essence of the original writing's meaning of the word 'ladder' to mean a 'means by which to raise to a higher level' which the original word meant, and lost in the translation to 'a ladder' for the profane to understand on their lower level. Hence 'Jacobins'. The Great Awakening would be a literal ladder to 'the profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. You offer erroneous sophomoric assumptions. Raise Up.
These groups were all co-opted and made into systems of black magic. But you'd know that if you'd done a deeper dive. You use a snorkel to see the bottom and hold your breath.
You're the one who has no fucking idea and I've been doing this since before you were born, chump. Ivy league profs are the cabal, idiot. So you refer to one as a defender of YOUR wrong opinion, while feigning distance.
The Great Awakening is exactly the attempt to RAISE UP the consciousness of the informed voter in order to make it a truly democratic republic that works of, for and by the people, you royalist scumbag. Why do you come to the land of Trump and Q to shit on the floor of the temple? I knew you were a snake when I first 'met' your lying words.
'Close to Bonneville'.....
He wrote two books on the subject, the "Jesuits Expelled from Masonry", now tell me why......and "Dagger Shattered by the Masons", both in 1788, in which he accuses the Jesuits of having introduced into the symbolic degrees of freemasonry, the myths of the Templars and their doctrine of revenge, based on the "crime" of their destruction, and the four vows of the Templars included in their higher degrees. Earlier, in 1787, the leading Bavarian illuminist and freemason, Johann Joachim Christoph Bode, is said to have converted the German-speaking Bonneville to a faith that combined esoteric symbolism with radical ideas of popular sovereignty bordering on direct democracy.
You mistake the co-opting royalist Jesuits for the cabal. But you're stupid that way.
Now go look at one of my most recent replies concerning ESOTERIC symbolism and how it differs from the profane sophomoric ramblings of oxymorons like yourself.
You project your ignorance onto me. Won't work. You're words are like spittle from a fish stranded on dry land.
Because their idea of an enlightened democratic republic is satanic and revolutionary. Those people were degenerate psychopaths, communists and occultist luciferians. They opposed the Christian world order that ruled the West since the fall of pagan Rome. Naturally, the status quo of the old world order wasn't pleased with those plans and prosecuted the conspirators.
There we go. I thought with all your sophistication you'd see right to the cabal's psy ops but alas you fell for it. I've never been to the US and I don't need to go to Babylon, thank you. Temple, really? Can you be even more freemasonic than this?
Let's see what the Protocols say about democracy, liberalism and republicanism and the revolutions that toppled the old monarchies brought the NWO about.
All of the above has come to pass, proving this was indeed the plan of the cabal. Yet here you are defending republicanism and democracy while admitting you are descended from illuminists. I think I know where you stand.