Well it's not pasty white ashkenazi jews for sure. They are the least semitic looking people you'll meet.
Ioan Ratiu wrote about that in his book The Millner-Fabian conspiracy.
Modern jews are descendants of the Khazarian khaganate, they are not even semitic. Meanwhile 80% of Palestinians are semitic. Who's the antisemite then?
Let's see what Revelation has to say about that:
I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
Sound familiar?
I'm sure it's a coincidence. Stop noticing now.
More GMO fake foods, that's what we need. Are those the same scientists who say men can be women and the clotshot is safe and effective?
So you have to know that laws is not enough to make things real. In the best case laws just mirror reality of society values. If they are not, then people will ignore them.
Depends on how strong the government is and how people feel about the government. I agree we did ignore many covid rules here in the east because people didn't trust them but also because the government couldn't enforce them.
In the west the governments managed to convince people that they have the best interest of its citizens, even if they sometimes fail to do a good job because of inadequacy and individual bad apples. People are conditioned to have faith in the system. Societal values are not constant and they can be influenced through media, education, culture and religion. That's the Soros/Rockefeller method we talked about. For example, people were very much skeptical of vaccines until the tide turned during the fake polio epidemic. The Overton window has shifted. The same happened to LGBT, abortions, decency laws etc. If we look at the US, most people don't support the current government policies. They still can't ignore them because they're being enforced even if it's on local and not federal level. Like you can't enroll in some unis if you haven't got the jabby-jab.
Kind of. But issuing a law that 2+2=3 does not really make 2+2=3. It's a manifestation of power that they could force something, but if it does not agree with reality, then such law is just void.
This is exactly what 1984 is about. Anyone who's not a relativist knows power doesn't dictate reality and that truth is objective and absolute, but many people today believe it the opposite. Karl Marx believed it's all power dynamics and reality is a social construct which is one of the greatest psy ops ever. That's why they get to claim men can be women and they even have the fake science apparatus on their side. Legislative laws don't have to express truth to be enforced - they are just the rules of the game we all play as subjects to the state. They are not the same as moral laws although that's what they're supposedly based on.
As for coronahoax, you could find a lot of fuckups despite the laws and enforcement. It was not grounded in reality, so it was not sustainable.
True, it was not as successful in our countries but I'd say having people locked down at home on government endowments (test run for social credit CBDC) and surveilled for months and having over 80-90% of the people take the genetic therapies in the west through various means of manipulation and coercion was very much a success. Sure, some people got wise to all the bs and there was loss of trust but people forget and they will fall for it again the next cooked crisis (provided it's not exactly the same, but tptb are not that stupid - they have already gamed it and can predict the results as with event 201).
This could sound easy on paper, but couldn't be really done properly. Take all that elites controlled social media for example. Even on that simple level, elites are far from total control and reservations. Real life implementation will be even more pathetic.
The coof demonstrated it can happen in times of crisis even in the US which is much better shielded against overreach than the rest of the world (on account of people bein armed). Government enforces martial law, sets up the FEMA camps and it's over. Bill Cooper warned about that in the 90's and they killed him.
There can't be any real ownership even of land, without personal participation of owner in developing and using it. Some paper in safe does not mean ownership of some land where "owner" never even been.
Sure, but those entities make use of the property and land by developing their technological infrastructure. Maybe it's not Blackrock doing it (although they buy lots of property) but other corporations that are involved in that WEF network. They act as one and are ultimately governed by the same few people. Just look at how Ukraine is being transformed into a smart-grid social credit state governed from abroad. Ukraine already lost their sovereignty because of this war.
May be it's kind of cultural difference between us, it always wonder me why western people account laws as something significant. Laws is just some rules created by your enemy to control you. Why account them as something worthwhile?
I'm not westerner myself - I'm a balkan guy. Laws are an expression of power. Тhose in power get to make the laws. How do you get in power? Through force - be it because you control the army (or some armed forces) or the majority of people is adequately armed and supports you. Rights don't exist outside the law. There are no natural unalienable rights - this is freemasonic enlightenment bs. A right that is given can be taken away. Same goes for all the freedoms.
It's a bad boss. But at least he participate in his enterprise directing it. Will you tell the same if it will be just some paper in the safe of unknown person? Will you account him as your boss?
Exactly. The technocratic elite will run the whole world as a giant corporation. They will be in the business of governing and making decisions. They are the inner party or the top of the pyramid. Then there's the managerial class who get to communicate with both the inner party and with the wagecucks that do the actual work, but they are still initiated to a degree. This mode of organization is used by various organizations throughout history because it works - be it secret societies, the mafia, corporations and totalitarian governments.
The plandemic was an example proving it's not just paper - they indeed have control over the global economy and have the ability to lock down the entire world. They also have control over government institutions and most of the media. If it were just paper with numbers on it they wouldn't be able to pull that off. They printed $3 trillion in the span of 2 weeks in April 2020 to get the money needed for that operation. As in the life of any person, it's not just about having money, it's about being well connected (and they have integrated themselves everywhere) - this is where true power lies.
According to freemason founding fathers it is though. Hedonism ftw.
Sure, send him to prison and let WEF poster boy Lula be president.
It's the same with Trump - he fucked up with the clotshots and cannot be trusted, and yet I'd still prefer him over Biden. That is if I voted but let's face it - both serve the same masters.
Yes, our current situation is transitory so it bears the marks of the future NWO. The major difference will be the extent of control and ability to dissent. We still have a lot of freedom, property and access to technology and information but as we saw things can quickly change in times of crisis. A more reasonable prediction is having smart-grid credit score megacities inhabited by the NPCs, while people who opt out could be sent to live off grid in sort of rural reservations. Either this or labor camps.
Anyway, these are not my ideas - famous Royal Society propagandist, fabian socialist, transhumanist and depop supporter Bertrand Russel wrote about such a "science based society" back in the 1950's along with other people. Here's a famous quote of his:
Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.
And there is one interesting thing coming to mind - all that stuff with BlackRock, Vanguard and so on. "They own everything" is a plain bullshit. Huge distraction. They have shares of everything, yes, but this shares are small, largest share that shady organizations have is 15% in Apple. Combined. It is not enough even to have noticeable influence on company's roadmap. In other compaines their shares are lower. And that BlackRoks and Vanguards know nothing about things they "own".
No, those shares are not negligible and give them leverage over those corporations. Combined, they own a sizable chunk of the companies and most of the times it's greater than the rest of the shareholders. It's obvious the top industries are being consolidated and the corporations are following a common agenda of wokism, ESG, climate hoax, coof hoax, globalism, etc. Just look at their marketing and media presence - they are willing to alienate their customers and tank their profits for the sake of the agenda. This is the smoking gun right there. I'm not saying it's just Larry Fink's Blackrock and Vanguard but they have a huge influence.
I will question that. Their "control" over land, resources and infrastructure in reality is just some papers, nothing more. Just like fiat or paper gold or oil, this papers backed with nothing. Having some paper is obviously not enough to be an owner.
Well, what else can it be? All land and property ownership is just papers. Their papers are backed by the law and the threat of force against anyone who crosses it. The ultimate control lies in those who control the military and since the military is part of the government and the government is controlled by those fuckers, where does that leave us? Sure, some people may rise and rebel but they won't be enough so they can be dealt with quietly (while convincing the masses they are the bad guys through the captured media) and I doubt tptb will leave it to that (we'll likely see a jan 6 "domestic terrorist" psy op but not a real uprising).
Also, owning a paper without any clue about manufacturing process, knowledge of how things really work and how enterprise make money is kind of senseless. And financial elites have no any clue about that matters at all. Middle-age feoudals at least knew how to ride the horse and how food grows on their land. New "owners" know absolutely nothing about their assets.
Let's say my boss knows nothing about the work I do for him and yet he owns the business and I'm his wagecuck. Even demented communist Karl Marx realized the power in such a system is within the capitalist propertied class and not within the workers and their labor and called for his version of a NWO. In the future NWO highly-qualified wagecucks will still do the heavy lifting when it comes to manufacturing and infrastructure. Again, very reminiscent of THX-1138 and Brave New World. I give the example of wagecucking because as I said the system will be organized in a manner similar to transnational megacorporations today.
"You will own nothing" is not only about regular people. It is about everyone, including elites. Then who will become real owner?
I don't think all so called elites are the real deal. Some are just fronts, useful idiots and paper tigers. They don't hold real power indeed but a small inner group does. Besides, there sure will be infighting between different factions as always happens historically.
It's dEmOcRaCy! If you don't like it go to Russia, chud!1!!
In his case everyone knew he didn't take it. He was vocal about the clotshot, that's why they deposed him and why he is banned from the 2026 elections.
They are neither. They transcend the dialectic and will support both ideologies based on their usefulness in context.
I'd say the financial elites won't loose their position because their money will translate to control - they will be the technocratic elite who runs the one world government. At least I imagine that's how it's sold to them. Maybe they will be get rid off eventually, who knows. Money will cease to be perceived as it is today. They won't have profit per se but they will own everything either way so profit becomes useless. People will be allotted digital tokens and wouldn't be allowed to own anything of value like real estate or business everything will be rented and concessional. Public and private ownership will collapse into one category since the government will be in effect a corporation and the citizens will have contractual obligations to it. State ran contraband and drug dealing may be allowed to serve as escapism mechanisms and vents in such a sterile and highly controlled society (as they are today). That's pretty much THX-1138 and Brave New World scenario.
The crux of the matter is the financial elites believe they will still be at the top even when the NWO government emerges because they not only have money but control of the land, resources and infrastructure. We see an analogical situation with the oil giants pushing for transitioning to green energy which wouldn't make sense at first, but makes sense when you keep in mind they can extend their influence and gradually transition to the green energy market themselves - they are not entirely dependent on the current system. They are in the business of controlling energy regardless of its source, not oil and coal in particular.
But yeah, independent players may not be stoked about that future. Too bad for them because they will be dealt with eventually if they're causing any trouble (here's looking at you John McAfee).
This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.
Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule) and fulfills its function (in the distancing case: atomizing and isolating people; creating constant paranoia about the invisible enemy; everyone is a potential vector of disease/enemy agent; an exercise of restructuring society and everyday life because the experts told us so). Note that none of those model-generated figures are falsifiable.
Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).
It seems to me the 400ppm is based on some idiotic mathematical model they propagate in their studies. It just has stuck and there's no need to modify it for now since it does the work of justifying policy.
They come up with random figures out of thin air. The Royal Society class has been doing this schtick since the 19c at least when Thomas Malthus declared the world cannot sustain more than a billion people because he observed flies in a jar and extrapolated that to a model. The problem with those models is they are not based on the real concrete system of variables, but on an abstract synthetic one which is always incomplete. There is also confirmation bias due to scientists setting up experiments so that their hypotheses would be confirmed.
Depop and zero growth won't have a negative effect on the financial elite. All the negatives will be covered by the proles (the middle class will cease to exist). Besides, technology makes it possible to manufacture goods, govern and support infrastructure with limited human input. Supporting a large population of "useless eaters" using up finite resources is not justified in any way in their worldview. People can't grasp that because they're used to viewing the world through the lens of free market capitalism where the purpose of a society is creating larger markets to promote economic growth and prosperity for everyone. This system is gone, we're in the process of transitioning away from it and the WEF as the mouthpiece of the NWO affirms that every chance they get (marketing it as the Great Reset where "you'll own nothing and you'll be happy").
I'm surprised they haven't scrubbed that off wikipedia.
Lol heard it right away. I'm one of them Bruno Mars folks.
I recently watched the Pfizer whistleblower video on the unreleased footage he has of the laboratory. He showed a video where the mRNA vials were obviously glowing because the liquid contained luminescent protein called luciferase (they're not into subtlety - remember when the first Apple sold for $666 https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-78939c803b84a20b571399d067830ad2.webp).
I enjoyed that. Nice melody too. Here's one more, not necessarily about conspiracy although I view the rejection of God and spiritual death as the ultimate conspiracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy4u4GUMq70
The specific markers are mostly bs pseudoscience made up by the technocratic class. It's like the 6 feet distance covid rule which they officially admitted to have made up on the spot. That's how the Rockefeller ran scientific research grift goes - you have a policy you want to enact but you need some scientific papers to back it and you get exactly that - bad methodology, cooked data, stupid models. Any scientifically literate person would detect the paper is full of shit but they gaslight people that the dissenters are a bunch of kooks and quaks who spread dangerous misinformation and are grifting for fame and money. The masses have been primed for such propaganda and they eat it up no questions asked.
We don't know all of the figures in the financial business. Remember that no one knows who actually owns the Fed. Sometimes leaders get exterminated when they step over their line or go off script. That's what happened to JFK, Khadafi and Saddam. But most of the times that's too much on the nose and they manage to depose them through other methods.
Here's a good one too - starts like a cover of Weird Al's Foil but is extended with great rabbit hole material https://www.bitchute.com/video/lRtPUJD7wFTz/
Yes, that seems fair but I think it's a multipronged approach that employs ideas from multiple angles. For example Kissinger was head of CFR, which is a Rockefeller institution. He was big on depop and worked along the CIA to interfere with foreign countries' governments - things we would attribute to the Soros approach. There are many intersections between those systems and they will use whatever means are most practical in a given situation to achieve their long term goals. That's the grand chessboard (inevitable masonic symbolism) Machiavellian approach to geopolitics Brzezinski and Kissinger popularized that all globalists love.
It's safe to say who their masters are, at least as far as we are allowed to see. Those would be the financial elite who prints and regulates the money - the big banking houses.
You kept demanding proof of who was there first. That's your proof, idiot. It's the jews. The jews were there first.
I conceded that. But it doesn't matter who was there first, although you and idiot zionists seem to think it does.
Then it's also right of Israel to defend their home and to kill the people trying to take it from them...
It wasn't their home 70 years ago. Is it right for someone to break in your house and kill your family because they now decided it's their house? Oh, but your ancestors some hundred years ago killed their ancestors who owned it initially, so it's justified. Try passing that in court.
You can't seem to realize if every nation decided they should get their historic territories back the civilized world will quickly cease to exist. Such policy reduces ad absurdum. War is not what it used to be.
Yeah right. Only if you mistook the romans for the jews.
Do you realize both jews and arabs are semites and they share a common ancestor in the face of Abraham? Uh oh, turns out arabs have a Biblical claim on the land after all.