12%of Russians Experience Panic Attack
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
It seems to me the 400ppm is based on some idiotic mathematical model they propagate in their studies. It just has stuck and there's no need to modify it for now since it does the work of justifying policy.
They come up with random figures out of thin air. The Royal Society class has been doing this schtick since the 19c at least when Thomas Malthus declared the world cannot sustain more than a billion people because he observed flies in a jar and extrapolated that to a model. The problem with those models is they are not based on the real concrete system of variables, but on an abstract synthetic one which is always incomplete. There is also confirmation bias due to scientists setting up experiments so that their hypotheses would be confirmed.
Depop and zero growth won't have a negative effect on the financial elite. All the negatives will be covered by the proles (the middle class will cease to exist). Besides, technology makes it possible to manufacture goods, govern and support infrastructure with limited human input. Supporting a large population of "useless eaters" using up finite resources is not justified in any way in their worldview. People can't grasp that because they're used to viewing the world through the lens of free market capitalism where the purpose of a society is creating larger markets to promote economic growth and prosperity for everyone. This system is gone, we're in the process of transitioning away from it and the WEF as the mouthpiece of the NWO affirms that every chance they get (marketing it as the Great Reset where "you'll own nothing and you'll be happy").
It's not the models eventually suddenly output that numbers. This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.
Even if you will expropriate all the wealth created by 10M slaves leaving absolutely nothing to them, it still be less profit than expropriating only 20% from 100M.
Either game is not about profits at all, so financial elites is irrelevant and could not play significant roles in game, either there is something else.
I think finances really just a tool of manipulation for elites, not the goal. So financial elite (basically just manufacturers of hammers or screwdrivers for higher level process) should have low significance for the figures.
Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule) and fulfills its function (in the distancing case: atomizing and isolating people; creating constant paranoia about the invisible enemy; everyone is a potential vector of disease/enemy agent; an exercise of restructuring society and everyday life because the experts told us so). Note that none of those model-generated figures are falsifiable.
Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).
Interesting. Then the usefullness of all financial institutes and so financial elites will end. And all that ex-financail figures will become useless for the player and will be removed from the game. So it is not in interests of financial circles to rush for the goal of total control.
Also, most profits made by financial elite through parasitizing on different criminal activities. If there will be total control, then criminal activity, including financial aspect will be seriously lowered. So financial circles will lose larger part of their profits. And, this means that financial circles, if they are some independent player, should be against total control over the people.
I'd say the financial elites won't loose their position because their money will translate to control - they will be the technocratic elite who runs the one world government. At least I imagine that's how it's sold to them. Maybe they will be get rid off eventually, who knows. Money will cease to be perceived as it is today. They won't have profit per se but they will own everything either way so profit becomes useless. People will be allotted digital tokens and wouldn't be allowed to own anything of value like real estate or business everything will be rented and concessional. Public and private ownership will collapse into one category since the government will be in effect a corporation and the citizens will have contractual obligations to it. State ran contraband and drug dealing may be allowed to serve as escapism mechanisms and vents in such a sterile and highly controlled society (as they are today). That's pretty much THX-1138 and Brave New World scenario.
The crux of the matter is the financial elites believe they will still be at the top even when the NWO government emerges because they not only have money but control of the land, resources and infrastructure. We see an analogical situation with the oil giants pushing for transitioning to green energy which wouldn't make sense at first, but makes sense when you keep in mind they can extend their influence and gradually transition to the green energy market themselves - they are not entirely dependent on the current system. They are in the business of controlling energy regardless of its source, not oil and coal in particular.
But yeah, independent players may not be stoked about that future. Too bad for them because they will be dealt with eventually if they're causing any trouble (here's looking at you John McAfee).