This is why the jews are banning TikTok.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (92)
sorted by:
Well it's not pasty white ashkenazi jews for sure. They are the least semitic looking people you'll meet.
Yeah right. Only if you mistook the romans for the jews.
Do you realize both jews and arabs are semites and they share a common ancestor in the face of Abraham? Uh oh, turns out arabs have a Biblical claim on the land after all.
You idiot, arabs WERE NOT muslim before Islam was created in 7th century. Cut the Quran bs and stop strawmaning everything I say. Regardless of whether you believe arabs have their origin from Abraham's son Ishmael, both arabs and jews belong to the semitic group of peoples and both use semitic languages common to the region.
Possibly, I don't claim they're the same. You're the one making claims about jewish ancestry. I'd like to see your proof that modern khazarian jews are descendent from the jews 2000 years ago.
Are you that skeptical of other historical figures of that time or is it something particular that irks you about Christ and the possibility He was indeed who He was as described in the Bible? By attestation I mean other non-Christian documents too. Here's a jewpedia article about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sources_for_the_historicity_of_Jesus
Not a single person wrote about Plato while he was alive too. The first attestation we get for him come 500 years after he died. People back then didn't write everything down immediately and even if they did, much of what they did write down was lost through the ages.
So it doesn't count if it was sourced a few decades after the events? What is your claim? That Tacitus and other non-Christian Roman historians made the whole thing up? If that's your standard just concede you can't know anything about ancient and early medieval history at all.
You're a sophist. Multiple non-Christian historians wrote about Him and their account confirms the account of the evangelists (not including supernatural claims).
As I said - if you don't accept the historic attestation of Jesus as a historical figure because it was written 60 years after His death, you should reevaluate almost everything you assume to know about the distant past. And yet here you are arguing about the jews having historical claim on the land as if the account supporting that is not problematic.