In addition to what others mention, if you are using an android device like a chromecast, Google tv or Android phone look at using a different app. I really like smarttube. It blocks ads as well as in video sponsor segments. Makes quality of life much more tolerable on youtube.
Ideally though support non youtube sites.
I somewhat agree, somewhat disagree.
Forgetting the past and our roots has caused us to abandon traditions and culture. Both are markers of a strong civilization, thus ours is currently weak. Also the reason communism wants to erase or modify history.
Without progression, we do not move forward and remain locked in time, a la undiscovered tribes in parts of Africa and S America.
Progress does not necessarily mean progressivism, unless it also includes political ideology.
I agree there probably around a million active users, so I have heard.
The point I was making was the guy in the video makes a lot of assumptions, such as assuming many of the users of the site are also financially invested in it. I feel like this is a big leap. He makes other assumptions in the video I find suspect also, without providing anything to back up those assumptions, therefore my remark "no data".
You should try turning that last sentence around on yourself....
Either you've gone too deep or your arrogance is overtaking you. I get what you are trying to say. I've had virall pneumonia before, and while some symptoms are similar, I do not believe them to be the same.
Also, pneumonia is far more deadly to children. It affects them more. Yet they were less sick? How does that work? We didn't mask. Certainly the children didn't, however I will admit complying at the grocery store.....ugh.
Personal experience:. Whole family is unvaxxed.
We got omicron. Hit me n the wife kinda hard, worst flu ive had for a while and loss of energy for about 2 weeks after. Still manageable and not deathly sick. Just a bad flu.
2 kids under 5 both seemed to just get a slight fever, no cough, congestion etc. It was basically nothing to them. They still played and had near normal energy.
Id tend to agree with the article based on experience.
When we finally understand this in a public sense, we will have mastered the ability to travel among the stars at high speed.
We need to change our fundamental concepts and understanding about magnetism, electromagnetism and gravity.
If they had done their due diligence they would have found as indicated in the paper I posted that the simulation was missing critical structural elements, that, had they been included would have shown via the simulation that their theory on the collapse was incorrect. It was physically impossible for the tower to drop into it's own footprint at near free fall speed with the anti walk pins in place.
While I agree that at times the truthers as you call them are motivated by emotion or a need to be right,and this can be problematic in terms of credibility, I don't really understand this need to 'prove' this in some way toeither yourself or others. It's obvious you already hold this belief and it would seem you cannot be persuaded otherwise, so why even bother.
Beyond this, it does seem like you are trolling the community. You can take our conversation here in this thread as evidence of this. You committed 2 logical fallacies that I can think of for the moment, appeal to authority and failure to address the arguement, I.e. you dismiss the paper out of hand despite it being a university level peer reviewed and published paper with a very specific point, that the simulation was technically incomplete. Just because you don't like the author, doesn't mean you can outright dismiss the substance of the arguement.
So i didnt post a video, it was a paper. Good to know you are reading this accurately.
The engineers that backed the NIST report didnt do their due dilligence if they endorsed a flawed simulation
Why do you keep posting this thread every month if you dont like the answers you get?
Sounds shilly to be honest.
Ok, if it's shit, then explain why NIST needed to remove the key structural elements outlined in this paper in order for their simulation to match what happened in reality?
Why were the anti walk pins not included in the simulation?
This peer reviewed university study refutes your NIST report.
Hasn't yet for me on my googletv (I know, I know)
I think because it's 3rd party and you have to sideload it, they have less visibility and control as compared to an app store app.