OH, it was Russia, over concerns of NATO's continued existence and bio weapons research under the control of the Biden crime family. Were there any other Questions you would like answered?
Anyone knows why Russia has completely given up on the narrative?
Because our opinion on the matter is irrelevant. They will take actions based on the facts, not on the cries and applause from the spectators.
Russia would present evidence for bioweapon manufacture before the UN, Russia would dismantle the
all would be exposed to the world etc etc .
You have no understanding of the U.N. And I have no understanding of what 'ect' could be implying, nor do I care to guess.
Not a word in weeks.
I don't know. You sure are talking about it ad nauseam.
Why is Russia letting Ukraine get away with keeping all those Nazi bioweapon labs?
They aren't.
Right. So they are the crazy ones, for reporting their findings.
What do you want from us here? Because it's not going to happen through mob rule, even if you convince us of it.
This is a different chip shortage than what I am used to, as large companies are buying up silicon for use in their A.I from Intel, AMD and nVidia, along with failing of 10nm, and restraints from TSMC, making it hard for consumers to buy parts for both crypto mining and PCs.
Jesus, that was relentless.
Then, with days remaining, Russia tapped its domestic dollar holdings and announced on Friday that it had transferred the cash to its foreign paying agent. That fits with the goals of the U.S. Treasury, which is allowing the transfer because it forces Russia to fork over local reserves that might otherwise have been used to fund the war effort.
Nothing in that statement is out of the ordinary. Large transactions like this are always performed last minutes, as to keep making interest on the holdings. At this point the only thing that could stop the payment is a refusal to receive it on the lenders end.
When you realize that Bacterial vaccines and viral vaccines are 2 completely different beasts.
Your linked article literally says that they are making the payment.
The 'establishment', 'they'. If you don't have names, you have no claim.
I neither up votes, nor down voted. Yet, I find I must comment.
I found issues with this submissions.
There was a lack of focus in that link, the videos and your title.
Please do better in the future.
Yagh. But I'm up voting this shit post anyways.
There is something really wrong with her. Her mannerisms, and what she is talking about is far off from normal.
That was like nails on a chalk board.
Yes. He even ripped off a better name then M&M, thus making him the more true poser.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Gun_Kelly
2006–present[1]
Never even heard of this poser before. Now that's some impressive posing!
If this isn't based, what do you think based means?
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
You shouldn't trust anything you read online. Period.
Agh! I just read this online! I think I should re-read, since I don't trust my own memories of what I just read...
We're still doing this? Alright... I'm game.
Nobody cares that you are the proud owner of a mirror.
Which is why you chose the most biased article title, added in your own trollish humor, and then proceeded to be a dick about it. Of course.
So why'd you post the article dickless her/them?
Lol yeah I've never defended Brandon.
You just post articles, defending his presidency, and calling the election lawsuits a hoax. Or to say, you are doing it right now with this article YOU posted.
Nice try handshake. Next time, just don't post replies, defending your own decisions is not something you have the mental capacity for.
Which is why you are here in defense of the child molester Biden, and his crime family, throwing shade at someone's past drug use, and not Hunter Biden's current drug abuse and racketeering.
It's amazing how that your bias only seems to come out against past paid for crimes, and shows no care about treason and sedition.
So close to being a legitimate article.
LOLsuit
But just like you OP, they just couldn't keep their bias under wraps.
Crackhead
steady pom pi pi.
OK. Let us examine the Quotes provided by the article.
OK. So that's the full quote is it?
What about this one?
I'm sorry, I'm having a little trouble determining what is, or is not a quote, or what context I am to take the attorney's statement in, which apparently is also not a direct Quote.
So the attorney is asking of a judge if a jury or reasonable people would find the statements to be factual? That would in fact prove the exact opposite of defamation, would it not?
Did the author of that article smoke some crazy pills? Because you are suppose to eat them, not smoke them.