How could a child even protect himself from such an assault? What do people expect him to do, not sneak into the pool? It only had three signs telling him not to go in there. Only three, people, only three! And not a single one of them showed a little stick figure with a little stick soda getting dumped on him.
This poor child is going to grow up in an insane world where he'll just be shopping one day and--out of nowhere--some racist is going to tell him he has to pay for shit before he walks out with it. Sheer madness.
There are a lot of people that question why Trump did not fight the stolen election even harder in 2020 when he was still President. There's actually quite a lot to say about that particular period of time, but it does seem to appear on the surface that he rolled over at the end.
(As an aside, many conclude from this that he was "controlled opposition" all along. Many of these are shills, of course, but importantly many others are conspiracy theorists that are driven not by a search for the truth through independent research, but a desire for psychological comfort by being "smart" and being "right all along". It's regrettable to see capable people that are prisoners of such a level of consciousness. And no, they cannot see this at work in themselves any more than they can see the back of their heads.)
My whole point here, though, is that Trump leaving the presidency is not quite the mistake some seem certain that it was. If we look back on the last two and a half years, the Deep State/NWO/Establishment/Elites have done far, far more damage to themselves than Trump was ever able to accomplish fighting more directly.
The main strength of the damage is in the consciousness of the people. They may not know have direct awareness of it, but they're getting a good idea that things are fundamentally wrong, and a good idea who is responsible. If we reflect deeply, those changes always were and are where changes really needed to take place.
So for all those who are certain there is no plan and if there is it's not working, well, I do not share that judgement.
Rather that ask for further information, you simply shout about your own conclusions. So stereotypical of the numerous fools around. Yet another illustration, as if we needed one.
How old was this post? What normal person would even care this long after? Are shills that concerned about clouding the issue? Makes me even more sure about my conclusions, as will any astute reader seeing this.
Whatever is shown on your infographic I'm sure falls into the category of "not even wrong". If anyone is so stupid to believe it, they are free to do so as there are no restrictions on gullibility. And on a personal note, I couldn't possibly care less about anything further you have to say on the issue.
But in true shill fashion, you will not be content to leave it at that. Prove me right, will you?
Oh yeah, even beyond that. It's not just that they don't see the illusion, they have no concept that there might be any problem at all with their "reality". If you press them on it, they'll vehemently deny it.
And if you suggest that to any extent things are not as they seem, I always think it sounds to them like you just told them to go research how two and two are not actually four. Hey, I'd have the same reaction if that's what heard.
If you or anyone reading this is at all curious about how fake the "news" is and the way the world really works, this appears to be a completely fake person: Dmitry Utkin
About the only lead we need is this one sentence:
Utkin has not made any public appearances since 2016.[18]
Of course he hasn't. He's just a boogeyman created in Langley and has no physical manifestion to appear after, during or before 2016. That footnote [18] reads in the wiki as this:
Mackinnon, Amy (6 July 2021). "Russia's Wagner Group Doesn't Actually Exist". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 27 September 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2022.
Doesn't actually exist? What is that supposed to mean? I guess it was supposed to blackwash and minimize Wagner back before they did all that damage to the war effort in Ukraine.
But good old reliable Foreign Policy magazine retconned the title of the article, and it's now:
What Is Russia’s Wagner Group? The organization’s murky nature and connections to the Kremlin present an enormous challenge.
Oh, okay, murky nature. So they're admitting they don't know much about the group? Maybe it's not so much not knowing, it's not having decided what lies it's convenient to tell everyone.
Anyway, let's close with a good laugh. I mean, a good laugh at anyone who believes in Dmitry Utkin, or Krampus, or Belsnickel.
Take a look at this lame pic of "Dmitry" in what FP assures us was the "last time he was seen". Then compare it to this scary-looking fellow. There's also his "passport photo" in his wiki, which looks to have been issued in the 1950's, and one other tiny group photo not even worth linking.
We've all seen way better photos of Sasquatch.
For anyone that wants to really get weird, there's this:
On the flip side, I noticed in one of the videos a car that had been completely burnt out, and one of the tires was not burnt away, only deflated.
Is there any shill around to tell me wildfires don't get hot enough to melt rubber?
You know what's funny? I recently came to the conclusion that James Corbett is himself disinfo. I've listened to every one of his audio podcasts and I never, ever noticed until they "activated" him after the Ukraine War started.
His "gag", if you will, is that he thoroughly documents his work. So years and years were spent building up the impression that this guy has a detailed command of all the material and is a disciplined scholar. Which is true, at least until such time and in such way as it needs not to be.
So I heard his Ukraine show and thought, "Good Lord, are the NYT, WaPo and Rachel Maddow his only sources of information on this?" I was quite shocked, and I've actually waited for a "correction" since that time but it's never come.
You can see the technique, though, in the notes for this show:
And then there's the "alternative" media side of the story. Let's call it the "Team BRICS" narrative. In this version of the story, the valiant defender of human liberty, Vladimir Putin, is fighting to protect the free peoples of the world from the globalists and their sinister machinations.
As I say, you've doubtless heard one or another of these stories by now. Or, if you're really paying attention, you might have heard both. But I'm here to tell you today that you've been lied to your whole life. There aren't two sides to every story. There are at least three, maybe more.
"If the bad side is so bad we'll never convince you they're good, then we're going to convince you the good side is in on it with the bad side". This is the same technique you see with the Democrats: "Yes, the Democrats are horrible... just like every single Republican and especially Trump. Right, my friends?"
Corbett actually gets outed right away in the comments:
I notice no mention was made of Putin’s call for de-militarization and de-nazification.
Can any (supposedly) outstanding researcher like Corbett possibly have simply never heard that, or have failed to address it completely? No way, no way at all. That's the tell, where the disciplined scholar needs to miss something.
Right, any disinfo has got to contain some truth, but I always think of it like picking up gold nuggets in a minefield: you have got to know what you're doing, but if you do it can be very profitable.
Frankly, I found Clif High to be particularly bereft of value. I have a very strong interest in the Anunnaki and a good background in that subject, and in one interview he mentioned--as a simple of fact--that Eden was one of ten (?) Anunnaki biodome laboratories. Finally, something to follow up on!
So after like 20 minutes of searching, what did I come up with? Nothing at all. Not "nothing important"--nothing at all. So this "simple matter of fact" had never been written down by anyone, not even Clif High. How much can any serious researcher expect to get from this guy?
On the flip side, I still refer people to disinfo agent Miles Mathis, but only his work before summer 2019, when I feel it completely came off the tracks. I didn't read it but his latest paper on the Maui "wildfires" advances the thesis it was all faked. Jesus.
LOL... I have not, I have not! Really, it's on me. I just made all the same assumptions we all did, but when I actually took the time to look around....
Maybe that's the only standard I wish people would live up to, the same one that at long last I finally did. Please everyone, actually take the time to look around and you'll probably be shocked at what you'll find! I wish I could say "pleasantly surprised", but there's at least a little of that too :)
Not long ago, I listened to two of his shows in a row, like 5 hours of content. By the end, I found it a hellish experience of brain-melting nonsense.
I tried to figure out if he was just delusional and a charlatan, or an actual disinfo agent. He's a disinfo agent, without doubt.
All that Webbot stuff is bullshit and he made a major mistake in the computer science part of it when he was talking about it. I don't recall what it was, but it was something as bad and obvious as someone telling you they wrote a program in C+.
I also tried to figure out what his main mission was. Turns out it's to derail people from study of the Anunnaki. His technique goes something like this:
"Oh, the Anunnaki? Yes, important. But you know what's way more important? The Nommo. The Anunnaki are nothing compared to the Nommo. I remember this one time when I confronted a Nommo scientist in his laboratory in hyperspace and was able to force him to collapse it. Anyway...."
I'm not even kidding about that hyperspace laboratory part. It's instructive to me to find that anyone gives him any credence at all. The big lesson for me is that I have previously and still continue to seriously overestimate the human race.
I think it would be hilarious if Sergei Lavrov went to address the UN and stood up at the podium holding a sealed flask of clear liquid. He says, "Everyone look what we found in those US biolabs in Ukraine!" As he raises the flask, he accidentally knocks it against mike and it drops out of his hand, smashing open on the floor. Lavrov goes bug-eyed, clamps his hand over his mouth and runs full-speed out of the room.
Good bit just to see what happens next, right?
I wonder if they've thought about recruiting ads featuring US soldiers raping and pillaging? That used to really bring 'em in back in the old "sword and sandals" days, amirite?
Whoa, not actually doing it in front of the camera! Just what we're going to say are "DeepFakes".
Another easy and good category of things to look for in the remains of residential fires are large objects that would be impossible to vaporize no matter how much wood you piled up against it: refrigerators, washers and dryers, cast iron bathtubs, porcelain toilets and sinks. Can you imagine trying to burn any of those things away?
Also consider water heaters. Can you imagine a fire burning next to one long enough to boil off 55 gallons of water and then melt the vessel itself? C'mon, man! lol
All those things are standing in plain sight in normal fires. But you look at these suspicious fires and that shit is gone.
Actually, reflection off the window was exactly what I thought.
But I think this fire and all the other similar ones are definitely caused by DEWs. I hypothesize that they're something in the microwave range and thus generally invisible to the naked eye.
The most telling evidence I ever saw of this was the along the metal guardrail of a highway, the kind with wooden posts and those corrugated metal horizontal rails. Those thick-ass wooden posts, which would be so hard to set fire to, were burning on the surface, but only where they attached to the metal rails. A whole line of them like that. An effect of induced current, I would guess.
The post had nothing to do with Korea, per se, which anyone that bothered reading and understanding it would know. So this is how we're supposed to be led off into the woods discussing "the dire threat of North Korea!"
See how it works, everyone? Thanks for the practical example!
In the New Testament when Jesus was talking about Satan, he focused on Satan being a liar. Far be it from me, but if I was to offer any sort of suggestion on the subject, it would be that the hallmark of the Satanic is more particularly "inversion".
The big spinoffs of this is a pervasive "revolt against Nature": that which is natural must be altered or destroyed. We see this everywhere. Genitals must be mutilated in the name of "affirmation", forests must be annihilated and the Sun must be blocked to "save the Earth", and the future of the human race is to become something--anything--other than human. Or dead, They're okay with that too.
Indeed, the more you observe this phenomenon, the more strongly you must conclude that inversion and the Satanic are one and the same.
Swedish statistician Hans Rosling coined the term "peak child" to indicate the time when the highest number of children would be born in a given time period. And when will that happen? It already did, in the early 2000's.
The late Hans thought the population would "fill out" and stabilize at around 10 billion in 2050, but for a number of reasons I don't think it's going to work out that way. As far as peak child, though, he was absolutely certain and I would not doubt it.
Peak child is useful as an illustrative argument against the myth of overpopulation, but I find it far more poignant than that. The way to imagine it is that each year, on your birthday or New Year's or whatever, realize that fewer children had been born into the world that year past than the year before, and that next year at the same time fewer still will come in to the world.
You could even do the calculations for how many fewer children there would be and how many fewer schools they would need, and then imagine going around the world bulldozing or burning down that many schools. But it wouldn't be a crime because no children would ever come back to them. Quite sad, really.
You can see some of Rosling's fascinating and entertaining presentations here:
See, everyone? They just simply cannot help themselves. They have no self-awareness, let alone consideration for the impression they're creating in the minds of others.
The purpose here is not ridicule, but practical demonstration.
Glad you got some value out of it :) Also be sure to read up on Reinhard Gehlen, if you haven't already.
After these kinds of examples, you start to get the thought, "I don't think conventional history has even got the 'sides' drawn correctly for the 20th Century."
How did I know for a fact I wasn't going to get an answer?
We see that the mindset which renders Jews as stereotypically unreasonable and distasteful to deal with is not limited only to Jews. Thus, we should recognize that while it may be more common or more overt among them, it is rather a defect in the psyche among humans of all stripes, even--quite ironically--virulent "anti-Semites". We should recognize it wherever it appears.
Further, we should recognize that they aren't "trying to do it". We see that they simply cannot help themselves, even when they should be on alert not to display it. They cannot help themselves, locked into a base-level consciousness of action/reaction. Upon observation it's sad, in a way.
Thanks for playing. See you next time.
You mentioned a specific Jew that other Jews killed. Benjamin Freedman, a Jew, said, "If Jews are what we call Jews today, then Jesus was not a Jew. And if Jesus was a Jew, then there are no Jews left."
Yes or no question: in your judgment and your judgment alone, no right or wrong answer, do you think your views are more sophisticated and correct, and deserve more attention than those of this Jew?
A reminder to anyone who's into Theosophy/New Age/anything of the like. Alice Bailey and Helena Blavatsky were constructed from the same cloth, and they admit as much in Bailey's wiki:
Did you can notice the attempt at deception with "some similarity" changing to "much in common" by the next sentence? The trick is that you can subconsciously choose either one to key on.
The point is, both were ops. But as with any disinformation campaign, they must include some truth so everyone is free to wade through their respective cesspools looking for half-eaten apples they can rinse off which are still perfectly good.