In all the coverage I've heard on this issue, no matter what the descriptions and characterizations and justifications for any part of it, not a single person has ever mentioned that all of it began with someone, somewhere, sometime willingly and consciously accepting money and promising to pay it back. All discussion erases the fundamental character of the issue, which has become par for the course.
My point is that they have as a consequence also annihilated the concept of personal responsibility. Actually, though, it's more subtle: personal responsibility overtly is still as vital and important as it ever was, but certain people in certain situations have any number of excuses none of which are worth mentioning.
But the really nefarious part takes place in the minds of the purported "victims". They will accept whatever excuse is handed over to absolve them, and the excuse is silently transformed into "justice".
So in the final analysis, the most important part of the whole affair is not abuse of the public treasury or extraconstitutional actions by the executive branch or any such thing. It's the loss of integrity in a whole generation.
In my view, yes, that's exactly what the Devil would most desire.
For anyone trying to figure out what's really going on (rather than reiterating how all new evidence means that they were "really right all along"), anomalies are as a rule the most important evidence for which to account. I remind everyone of this anomaly:
“Strong and Fearless” – Trump Endorses Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy Despite Boos at Wyoming Rally (TGP 6/5/2022)
Trump endorses a guy that seemed to have stabbed him in the back over January 6th and probably on other occasions? An anomaly indeed.
As an aside, I completely dispense with the notion many hold that "tYeY'rE aLl iN iT tOgEtHeR!" as a wild card people deal to themselves who could not otherwise research and reason their way out of a paper bag. I find them to be overconfident in their abilities, to put it mildly.
I believe this is simply more "Blue Beam" propaganda for an event that I can pretty much guarantee never happened. The red flags and holes all over the entire story are too numerous to go into.
Really, one has to flip around the thought process and ask, "How hard would it be for some Intelligence creative writer to concoct a half blacked out 'secret memo' and then arrange for it to be FOIAed to a Mockingbird/Establishment media outlet?"
Everyone can come up with their own answer, but to me it seems like the work of an afternoon.
The Monica Lewinsky Scandal was faked (3/5/2016 25-page PDF)
Caveat: Mathis is a disinfo agent, but the evidence for the basic thesis seems solid and may be independently validated.
Mathis leaves out some things which are "too hot", such as this spicy little nugget:
That's the way disinformation works, of course.
I think it's enlightening to note the diametrically opposed approaches the Cultural Controllers take between Coral Castle and the pyramids of Egypt.
They'll talk to you literally all day and night about the pyramids and how "science" tells us they were built, but yet there's a deafening silence surrounding Coral Castle. Being millennia more recent, we should certainly know infinitely more about Coral Castle. But what does good old Neil deGrasse Tyson have to tell us about it? Nothing whatsoever, of course. (Side observation: modern "scientists" are absolutely repelled by actual mysteries.)
The reason Coral Castle is treated differently is that the conditions of early 20th Century America sill exist within living memory. There are still people around to call bullshit on their bullshit "theories". Give it another century or two and they'll be telling us all about Ed Leedskalnin and his earthen ramps and copper chisels.
I find the related arithmetic interesting:
For example, 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. Then Auschwitz revises their number from 4 million down to 1.5 million, a difference of 2.5 million.
Then we can calculate the revised number that 6 million - 2.5 million = 6 million Jews killed in the Holocaust.
Everyone that disagrees is an anti-Semite. Actually, everyone is an anti-Semite.
You have to wonder whether, lurking deep within Eric Adams' secret heart of hearts (and those of similar progressives), is the terrifying and shameful realization, "Goddammit, the Republicans were right all along, but I can never ever admit that."
Canaanite culture was dominant in the Southern Levant during the Bronze Age (3,500-1,200 B.C.E.) As Iron Age I began, the Canaanite city-states faded.
This caught my eye as possible intentional misdirection, or perhaps just indication of a prevalent lack of understanding about the region during that period. (Actually, I believe the lack of understanding was deliberately created.)
Ask yourself if this sounds like "fading":
The Late Bronze Age collapse was a time of widespread societal collapse during the 12th century BC, between c. 1200 and 1150. The collapse affected a large area of the Eastern Mediterranean (North Africa and Southeast Europe) and the Near East, in particular Egypt, eastern Libya, the Balkans, the Aegean, Anatolia, and the Caucasus. It was sudden, violent, and culturally disruptive for many Bronze Age civilizations, and it brought a sharp economic decline to regional powers, notably ushering in the Greek Dark Ages.
In short, it seems like what They are hiding is an invasion and widespread devastation all over the region. I recall hearing that something like 50 cities were stomped on so hard they were never rebuilt.
I've never sorted it all out, but the best lead on the culprits seemed to be that the Egyptians said they were attacked by the "Sea People", among whom were the "Peleset". These "Peleset" settled in the area and became what were called the "Philistines", and from which we later get the place name "Palestine".
The potential for fraud in tech companies is inestimable. In a conventional company, most anyone could tell you from casual observation whether the level of activity was twice what it was a year ago, or half. This is not true for tech firms, particularly software companies.
Richard Grove tipped me to this idea when he was talking about his experiences as a software salesman way back before 911. It's quite a fascinating story to look up and is related to the perpetration of the crime of 911 itself.
He inadvertently came across record of millions in software license sales in his name for which he should have been owed a commission but was never paid. They didn't want to pay him because the users did not exist and the sales were just part of a larger fraud.
So such fraud could easily go on right under the nose of a salesman a quarter century ago. How much more fraud is going on now? It's incalculable. If Google reports sales for ad impressions for a client, is there anyone auditing that eyeballs actually saw those ads? Of course not.
Frankly, Alphabet (and the alphabet agencies) could not only create the ad revenue, it could create thousands of strawmen clients and launder unlimited amounts of money right into SkyNet. Who would be in a position to casually detect such activity? No one at all.
The mind boggles trying to imagine what's going on in that little corner of the world.
You ever notice how aristocrats love equestrianism? Somebody once pointed out that it's not just an ostentatious, expensive hobby for people with too much money and free time, it's a spillover from their obsession with breeding and bloodlines. Point is, God only knows what they get up to when it's time to breed themselves.
The thing that really struck me about Will & Kate & their spawn was when Kate came out with the newborn wearing that "Rosemary's Baby" dress. I mean, if there was ever an instance of them "putting it in out faces", that was it.
Someone (I think on The Higherside Chats) was going over all the occult ritual and symbolism associated with John McCain's funeral. It was incredibly elaborate, and I can only imagine what they did for the Head Reptile.
The funny thing was, that podcast was the only place I ever heard McCain's occult funeral discussed. No one else seemed to pick up on it. It made me wonder just how big a fraction of all this occult stuff flies under the radar.
I guess that's why they call it "occult", huh? lol
Fuck me. Well, if they're going to go ahead with Project Blue Beam, they can just hit us with whatever this was and say it came from the hologram mothership. And given the anomalies from this event, it makes you wonder if the name "Blue" Beam was not entirely an accident.
Personally, I take this as consistent with the theory that QE2 was dead long before they publicly announced it. That is, when she actually died they made up a poorly researched reason which was definitely something other than the true reason.
As a refresher, here's the source of the original rumor and circumstances, along with their own "self-debunking":
Fact Check: 10 Reasons We Believed Queen Elizabeth Was Dead (Hollywood Unlocked 2/25/2022)
Tuesday, February 22nd Hollywood Unlocked CEO, Jason Lee was contacted directly from a source who was in attendance at the wedding of British Vogue editor-in-chief Edward Enninful. The source claimed they witnessed a call in which news of the Queen’s death had been confirmed to a high-profile attendee. They went on to outline the dismay that news created at the star-studded event.
There followed a string of unusual events concerning Elizardbeast, ending with a very odd voiceover during the funeral itself.
The "blue object" anomaly indicates this was among the first times--if not the very first time--this particular DEW was used. That leads to this hypothesis: The specific DEW used in the attack on Maui was known to cause changes to the sky in the region where it was activated that would be picked up as anomalies by normal observatory operations. Astronomers not in on the gag might have started wondering aloud what was going on in the sky at the some time "wildfires" broke out.
For once, I don't think this signifies the "Black Eye Club". I think representatives of Germany's real owners came to him and said, "Listen up, Reichkanzler, it's been decided that we're going alllll the way on this Ukraine thing, and you're going to be right out in front showing your enthusiasm."
And then, y'know, the next thing out of his mouth was something other than, "Ja wohl!"
I just recently found out that there is virtually no structure to BRICS. It's just countries getting together to discuss issues and work out shared problems. This is what the entire Neo-Imperialist Establishment is shitting their collective pants over.
Clearly, the West has a lot of fake money and a lot of weapons increasingly shown to be crappy, but not much beyond that. They understand even mild organized resistance to be a dire threat, and that's why They're flipping farther out every day.
Fyodor Lukyanov: Contrary to Western claims, BRICS has an ideology and here’s what it is (RT 8/30/2023)
The structure is deliberately informal, with no charter, procedures or coordinating bodies. Thus, classic diplomacy has been at work – with direct negotiations, without the involvement of international institutions – to reconcile national interests. The only platform where decisions are taken is at meetings of the leaders of the member states, and if they agree amicably it works. This is how the new states were invited — it was discussed and decided.
Beyond the ADL is the perennial JQ. I find it regrettable that "civilized society" full of "civilized people" has not yet found a civilized way to deal it, but here we are.
Then again, perhaps what we should be questioning is our suppositions on the precise nature of our society and it's people.
I think it's real. Anyone who's interested in doing the work can get a copy of the referenced book and look up the quote to confirm. No one constructs a lie that easily debunked.
I think what we have is an instance of, "If you can't cover it up, turn it up." I will explain....
Trump is a smart guy moving widely in the highest circles, while also seeming quite down-to-earth. By all accounts he's engaging and personable in private. Thus, he's the kind of guy people end up confiding in.
The 911 attacks were surely "in the air" in the late 90's for anyone paying attention (which almost no one was). Intelligence operations always leak to some extent, and a big one like this certainly would.
No one but Trump himself could say how much he picked up on. Bill Cooper picked up on a lot from far outside the sphere where it was taking place. So Trump, being a patriot, expresses either as much as he knows, or as much as he thinks people can handle.
As an instructive parallel, one should examine John O'Neill. He may have been the last honest FBI agent, and his story was covered by PBS in what may have been their last honest reporting:
An Update: John O’Neill and the 9/11 Commission (PBS 4/26/2004)
So O'Neill also knew it was "in the air", but you see how they spin it there at the end.
I will spoil the ending to John story: he is driven from the FBI and becomes (get this) security director for the WTC. Shortly thereafter he's killed in the 911 attacks. That wraps up the story of what happens to honest people who try to prevent "terrorism" and find the perpetrators of "terrorist acts".
And finally, back to Mika and Joe: they can't have normies knowing even the little I just wrote, so to avoid all that they "turn up the volume" and are attempting to sell it as, "wAs tRuMp WaS iN oN iT?! (yEs)" As I've said many times, "They" are desperate and nothing is off the table.