I thought this was weird when it took place:
I remember there were so many predictions that this was evidence The Event was upon us. In the years since, I can't recall a single post saying, "Member what I said about predicting The Event? I was totally wrong just like every fucking other prediction!"
No conspiracy theorists (since virtually all the theory has been diluted out of conspiracy theory these days) ever discuss the next logical question, so I'll bring it up: why did he assassinate her?
And yes, an assassination it was. As pointed out, he lay in wait, there were no exigent circumstances, there was no previous connection between the two, etc. He also seemed to have no fear of legal repercussions for this very public act, Note that the sponsors barely covered their asses with lame and staged legal repercussions.
There's another tell-tale sign in the incident which I will also bring up. In this high stress and chaotic situation, when the gunshot--which must have been deafening in the tight space--rings out... no one reacts. No one hits the deck, or ducks, or runs off, or even looks around.
Do I think this means the gunshot and the murder were fake? Absolutely not. A real event took place in the context of a larger scene. If you see Torvald knock out Nora's teeth during "A Doll's House", that doesn't prove it's fake even though it's up on a stage in a theater.
Much more to be said, of course, but there's not much point since the discussion has been totally derailed long before this point.
Elon Musk said he wanted to "authenticate all real humans" on Twitter. That sounds like a lot of work, so maybe we should all get behind him just authenticating "Enterprising Desert Raven".
After all, the exposure of a million bots and psyops begins with a single truth bomb.
In wondering whether Ghislaine was a Jewess to begin with, I looked up her mother, Elisabeth Maxwell, and found this regarding Ghislaine's maternal grandparents::
Paul Meynard was a descendant of Protestant Huguenot aristocracy whose distant lineage included kings of France, while Colombe Meynard was a Roman Catholic whose marriage to a Protestant resulted in her excommunication. Her father Paul owned a silk-weaving factory and was the mayor of the village.
I found this passage notable for a couple of reasons, but both are consistent with Ghislaine being another Simulant. That being the case, nothing about her life should be taken at face value or as "something they wouldn't lie about".
First, for centuries, Jews have been extremely heavily tied up in the textile and related industries like clothing. I think Paul may have been a Jew and not a Protestant as they tell us.
Second, excommunication is as serious a punishment as the Church can deal out in the modern world, and there's nothing whatsoever about "marrying a Protestant" in the very long list of excommunicable offences in the Catholic Church.
Even as it stands today, the big restriction is that to be married by a priest in a Catholic church, both bride and groom must be Catholic. I suppose we have to add that one must be male and the other female. By birth. Thus, I don't believe this "excommunication" nonsense.
So what does this latest "news" mean? Fuck if I know.
Personally, hearing that the Hebrew year is 5784 makes me wonder exactly what the hell was so special about the year 2024 - 5784 = -3760.
It seems to me that there may be more to be learned from figuring that out than from any of the multitudinous forms and results of "divination". I guess anyone with even the slightest interest senses that would be a lot of work and suddenly loses that slightest interest.
For anyone wishing to be conversant on the specific topic of documentation for this "well-documented historical event", you should be ready to discuss the Wannsee Protocol.
That document is put forward by non-revisionists as the primary documentary proof of the "Final Solution", of which all other documentation would be considered supplementary or secondary.
Do your own research but (spoiler alert), it's quite an obvious forgery.
I think anyone that really claims to understand money in any form should be conversant with rai stones and their properties.
What that understanding has shown me is the single fundamental problem with money of any sort, that which enables all the various frauds and shenanigans of all types, is that people do not understand the money they have, and they may thusly be controlled with it.
One of my favorites was this one:
The guy just evaporates and two months later they say, "Looks like he's not coming back so I guess we'll get someone else." That's more lax than if he was a clerk at a GameStop.
As to the interpretation of the purge, Xi is cleaning house on the Chinese Deep State. If he was really Ming the Merciless--as we are all instructed to believe--we should be hearing all about this and so much more that they just make up. We are not.
Rule #1 of Deep State Fight Club is that you do not talk about your losses. Rule #2 of Deep State Fight Club is that you do not talk about your losses.
Ah, sorry, I never saved the link. It was just a throwaway comment on a throwaway Reddit post long after I had been personally convinced.
If I had to show someone just one clip, I'd show them Bill Hicks doing "Goat Boy". For Chrissakes, it's Alex Jones' very characteristic voice! Make sure you have that in your collection.
The other one to try to look up is a clip from JRE, and I think it was just after the time Rogan moved to Austin. Right at the top, Rogan says something like, "Hey Alex, all these people are saying you're Bill Hicks. Look in that camera right there and tell them you're not Bill Hicks."
So AJ lol's and blabs and lol's for five minutes about the whole controversy, but he never says he's not Bill Hicks.
What you're seeing, though, is this: there is a certain subset of "conspiracy theorists" (actually the biggest part these days) that aren't really seekers after the truth. Rather, they choose alternate "authorities" the same way normies just accept the default "authorities".
So if one of these people has accepted AJ in that way, they just don't want to hear about it. It's precisely like telling normies that Rachel Maddow and the witches on "The View" are not their friends, they're just a bunch of lying corporate stooges. It makes that person feel extremely uncomfortable.
That's what you're up against and it's not a matter of evidence.
The finer point I would put on it is that what we are presented with as "the occult" is like believing the idea that pirates and conquistadors with swords are floating around the seas on sailing ships. No, those don't exist.
Real pirates and conquistadors wear suits and go around the world with banks and media organizations doing far, far more damage than the other kind ever did. Everyone recognized the old kind but few recognize the new kind. As long as people keep talking about dudes with eye patches and parrots, they have an effective cloak of invisibility.
And there, to my way of thinking, is about the only kind of magic we need to be worried about at this time.
Yeah, Crowley is definitely another one. You have to sort of mentally step back from what's shoved in your face about him and evaluate, "Behind all the smoke and mirrors, exactly what 'powers' did he ever exhibit? Did this guy ever even pull a rabbit out of a hat?" You start to conclude he was just a dissolute, drug-addicted, serial abuser of women that Intelligence rolled out and told us was Voldemort. Then everyone tries to read meaning in to what he wrote, instead of recognizing the nonsense that was written.
But I do believe the bit about Barbara Bush. When you realize it's a very small club and They like to keep it all in the family, the world starts to make a lot more sense.
You can add the warmongering jerks of Estonia to the list:
And it looks like they're gunning for the pole position, because they'll even stomp on what were very recently the Golden People:
But with the war winding down to the final destruction of Ukraine, I guess we all knew that chorus was on it's way from the West: "The only reason we--ehem--Ukraine didn't win any bigger was because the Ukrainians are weak-ass faggots."
For those who suspect there is something deeper at work here than is ever suggested even by conspiracy theorists, well, I think so too. Just as food for your own thought and in greatly simplified form, here's the theory I've been working on....
Normies are normies because of the way they think. That is, they have a different way of processing the world than you suppose. Whether you agree with them on any particular point is not relevant, it's how you got there.
Primarily, they believe what they are told to believe by those they consider in authority. Did you ever notice that many normies are just out of touch with straightforward elements of reality? This is the reason.
This disconnection from reality is the main feature of what is called "psychosis":
Psychosis is a condition of the mind that results in difficulties determining what is real and what is not real.
They go on to say it's something wrong with your brain or whatever, but this is a misunderstanding (which may be intentional at the highest levels). But how do we get from there to what we see in the OP? It's another aspect which is misunderstood by the mainstream, but they do know it exists and we find the strong link described under "homicidal ideation":
Homicidal ideation is not a disease itself, but may result from other illnesses such as delirium and psychosis. Psychosis, which accounts for 89% of admissions with homicidal ideation in one US study....
So to recap, these people have a totally different mode of thinking leading to what appears as psychosis, which then easily spills over to homicidal thoughts about those they have been told to hate and who are the cause of their troubles.
I don't even know why I'm writing this because everyone seems a lot more content with, "These people are dumb assholes." Hey, but who knows who might stumble on this?
That it was a warning, yes, I believe that can be safely said: no casualties, dead of night, not an accident (if you know what you're looking at). And it came from enemies of the Cabal because the profile is that They sweep Their "L"s right out of your consciousness as quickly as possible.
I think your guess of China is the correct one, and I would correlate it (in hindsight) with this event from a month earlier:
‘Not feeling well’: China’s ex-leader led out of party congress: The 79-year-old Hu Jintao seemed reluctant to leave with two men who approached him while he was seated next to President Xi Jinping. (Al Jazeera 10/22/2022)
"Reluctant to leave"? Watch the video, it's worth it. The guy had no idea what was going on, but you can see Xi knew exactly. That was, to my way of thinking, Xi's public declaration of victory over the (Chinese) Deep State.
A month later, maybe the message to the (US) Deep State is, "A new sheriff is definitely in Beijing, and if you fuck around you will find out. Oh, and we have CCP-DEWs too, bitches."
Finally, to put two and two and lots of other twos together, Xi is an enemy of the Cabal. That's why we're supposed to believe Xi is a dictator and one of The Worst Persons Ever(tm). All these officials just go missing and are even literally dragged away before our eyes, but the mainstream says nothing about it? Remember I told you They bury Their "L"s?
My guess is that it was an attack from a Directed Energy Weapon. The melted aluminum engine next to intact tires on the white vehicle seem to give it away.
Then again, maybe this was just your ordinary, everyday five vehicles burst into flames for no reason.
You'll notice that the latest fallback deception is that "everything is fake and manufactured!", including this latest conflict. I see many "conspiracy theorists" consider themselves superior thinkers by "refusing to fall into the trap" of believing something is real. It would be pathetic and laughable if it were not so damaging.
Always keep in mind that the point is to keep you from the truth.
The aspect of viruses that is never mentioned is the very simple question: "Are viruses alive?" Well, you think it's simple until you look into it for two minutes and feel like you've fallen off an intellectual cliff.
Spoiler: the answer is no, they are not. You'll see that the mainstream doesn't say yes or no, they just studiously avoid answering the question rather than giving you the answer and telling you why. Again, no, viruses are not alive. The reason that's a crucial question is that almost everything they want to ascribe to viruses depends on them being living creatures.
Specifically (and skipping over all this mRNA nonsense), traditional vaccines depend on using "killed" viruses. How can something be "killed" if it was never alive? It cannot, so immediately vaccines get pantsed and everyone will start looking around to see who's been selling them this utter bullshit snake oil for centuries.
I would say I'm amazed at how virtually no one knows this, but it's for the same sort of reason people have no idea where money comes from. It's the old, "Spot me one miracle and I can prove the rest." They can't have you knowing about that miracle, can They?
I figured there was a backstory like that.
The way I have it penciled in, They had to have a counterbalance to Christian Zionism. They can't have Antifa saying, "Well, at least we agree with the fascists on this set of points." On the other hand, They had to keep it all at a low simmer, because They also simply cannot have people saying, "Death to Israel!" where polite company can hear.
I become more convinced over time that Christian Zionism was the crucial psyop all along, particularly given that you can criticize Christians all you want, and now as we see you can openly criticize Zionists, but the subject of Christian Zionism simply does not come up.
I mean, the Scofield predates the existence of Israel itself by 40 years, and I think there are orders of magnitude more Christian Zionists than Masons. It also goes a long way towards explaining ZOG.
Everyone assumes ZOG is all about campaign donations, but I think it goes way beyond that. If that's all it was, you can just cut it off or someone can give them more money. The hard problem is that I think these people are not just True Believers, but actual Crusaders. You can't just snap your fingers and tell them their Crusade is dumb bullshit leading to great violence and suffering.
Really, I think CZ is the thorny problem Trump has been and is still dealing with. They aren't bad people, they've just been grievously misled into heresy, many tens of millions of them.
What's playing out now in the Palestine War is, in my view, not primarily military. Rather, people have got to see for themselves that these Likudists, Talmudists, and the IDF are very bad actors, brutal and pitiless mass murderers, and they should not be supported in their evil acts. If the IDF was, say, put down by Hezbollah and Iran, then they would still be the Jew victims, right?
And I would agree that that's a big part of the solution to the JQ: that people just see for themselves things as they are. A lot of the problems will take care of themselves after that.
I would say no, and I'll explain why.
I, personally, am shocked at the astounding support from leftists for Palestine. It came seemingly out of nowhere (although surely the origins could be traced). They don't appear to give a rat's ass how many times they're called anti-Semitic.
All the other "current things" came after intense, relentless, and unified media campaigns. As with all Big Lies, they're kept simple and repeated over and over (and over).
With this latest Yemen flare-up, there was no such program at all, aside from the lingering, "Houthis are terrorists", for which we are never given any reason or examples or threats. The Neo-Imperialsts are apparently under so much pressure to "do something" that... well, they just did something.
In practical terms, it was ineffective and any sort of "coalition" is falling to bits. Russia and China call it "outrageous", and domestically it's denounced as "unconstitutional". There's even a rumor that Blinken briefed all the Arab leadership, word of which would obviously get to Yemen. so the US could "do something" without having done much of anything.
All in all, I think They are at the point of wishing it would all just go away.
Everybody's also free to wear sunscreen.
But then again, do you own research because we all need that Vitamin D.