This is a very, very big deal for Xi. The Chinese are extremely concerned with public appearances, particularly when it concerns losing face. I mean, just try to find a picture of Xi without a deadpan look--he gives away nothing.
Xi did this right in front of the camera, no mistake, for all to see. Also notice that he can't bring himself to make eye contact while Castro is talking, certainly because he has no respect for him at all and cannot stomach his BS.
If I was to guess, what lies behind this is a message to the Chinese people: that the New World Order is indeed here, but it's not what the Western imperialists were expecting. The Chinese are no longer a bunch of coolies, and Xi will demand that China gets the same respect everyone else does.
We may not all use the same phraseology as this gentleman, but when we're trying to figure out what we personally can do to get out of this horrible situation in which we find ourselves, we can start by taking a page out of his book:
Speak the truth, as best you know it, forthrightly and without fear.
This was a staged provocation by elements both in Poland and in Ukraine. It was "unsanctioned" and everyone is freaking out: the US, NATO, Warsaw, CNN, and even the Ukrainian military:
Ukrainians admitted firing missile near Poland blast site – CNN (RT 11/16/2022)
For anyone familiar with "ordo ab chao", the "chao" is never supposed to get beyond prescribed boundaries in any way that "They" could possibly be affected. When and If that happens, as you see in this case, the doors slam shut very quickly.
The plot definitely included Zelensky, as you can see here:
Zelensky doubles down on Poland missile claims (RT 11/16/2022)
It will be interesting to see whether they get Z back on the chain, or if in the near future he is the victim of "a savage Russian decapitation strike". Remember that since the beginning, his (real) personal security detail has been provided by his handlers.
Probably up until this last year, I would see posts on that sub from time to time saying something like, "Thank God I found this sub, because if you don't know it, this tis the only sub not overrun by Leftists and the mentally ill, the last bastion of sanity on Reddit."
But like I say, that all dried up in 2022.
The perceptive should note here that Russia is trying to calm the situation and prevent an eruption into World War III.
That was not an air defense missile of any origin, and Russia knows that well. It was a staged provocation by Ukraine and Poland to continue and expand the war which serves the interests and bank accounts of power factions in both countries, and Russia knows this too.
So why do they lie? So we can all just write this off as an unfortunate accident, flush all the Article 5 talk, and try to finish this very unpleasant business as quickly as possible.
This guy is a snake in the grass with no real principles, which explains why Trump is at odds with him. So why doesn't Trump just completely expose him? Useful idiots may yet have their uses.
I just heard a total liberal academic (who thinks he's a reasoned centrist, of course) saying how he thought Ron DeSantos (<-- repeated several times, that's actually how little he knows about the guy) was the future of the Republican Party because "the whole Trump thing is over". Hard to believe how quickly he bought this new Establishment narrative hook, link, and sinker.
Every time I see someone saying, "Q is a psyop", they never follow it up with, "Here's what I'm doing for all of us instead." Nope, just doomsaying pretending to be insight. The real doomsaying part is witnessing how many cannot see the difference and lap it right up.
I think these fragments were just planted around the site.
If you look at the tipped over trailer next to the crater, you'll see that the "explosion" somehow dug out an 8-foot deep crater and shatter concrete, yet did not manage to deflate any of the rubber tires.
On a somewhat more technical note, air defense missiles almost certainly would not leave any appreciable crater. They are not designed to penetrate or even contact anything, because that is very difficult to do with a fast-moving air target, but just to get near it and detonate, spraying the target with shrapnel.
As a fallback, they may have a contact fuse, in which case it would certainly detonate on touching the ground. Again, shrapnel would just spray around from a surface detonation of a relatively small warhead, leaving little cratering.
So what did happen? My guess would be the Ukrainians in cooperation with the Polish fired an artillery shell, staged the tractor and trailer next to the impact site, and scattered around some of these missile fragments, of which there must be many littering the territory of Ukraine by now.
UPDATE: The US is denying it was Russia, and they're going to go with something like "Ukrainian accident (but really Russia's fault they had to fire it in the first place)". That solidifies it as a UkroPolish joint initiative.
Poland has had a lot of crazy warmongering talk going on lately, and I never see it mentioned but Zbigniew Brzezinski's son is the US ambassador. These maniacs apparently have ideas that now visibly do not coincide with their US/NATO curators.
It's no wonder the Elites and their "liberal" thought-slaves are flipping out at the changes taking place at Twitter. When speech is free, we see that there are still plenty of people who can cut through the fog of deception with a chainsaw.
If you seek the truth, there are many like you out there. Many.
They really just cannot stop with this "razor-thin margin" gag, getting the gullible masses to think, "See guys, we almost got them this time. Next we can for sure get one more vote!"
The shocking part is how well that works.
The way it shapes up in my mind, the replacement is indeed a party girl, maybe someone they just scouted in the clubs who looked somewhat like the original in the dim light. They apparently cannot keep her under control, and this was the latest problem, not the first:
She supposedly got married in 2020, but I'm sure the replacement thinks, "Why should I let their BS legend cramp my lifestyle?"
Not quite on point, but here's a retweet from 10/3 made by a Ukrainian MP saying:
Musk did not understand anything. We are not afraid. It is better to die from a nuclear attack in one moment than to live under Russian occupation.
I'll admit, life was better not knowing people like this existed.
Just as another data point, if you asked anyone to name famous Native Americans, in the top three would be Crazy Horse. That wasn't always his name. Turns out the names his mother called him by his entire life translate to "curly son" and "light-hair".
Knowing that, take a look at this pic and ask yourself if you believe that's really him.
Turns out we have to read all the fine print when dealing with Z:
New law in Ukraine bans any negotiation with Putin — RT EN (translated from RT Deutsche 10/4/2022)
Ukraine says it never refused to negotiate with Russia, wants talks with Putin successor (Reuters 11/7/2022)
Why doesn't he just say that he will accept peace at any cost after receiving transmission of Russia's unconditional surrender?
The objective is to get rid of Trump, and DeSantis is an available political tool (haha) to do so. My appraisal is that Ron is a classic politician, looking for personal advancement, path of least resistance, etc., with little actual principle.
Given that, the marketing plan we see shaping up is:
For all you MAGA fans, DeSantis is the smart choice for 2024. No more mean tweets and fighting with your friends and neighbors about him. Didn't you know Trump is yesterday's news? Ron will be able to do what Trump couldn't: get things accomplished with all the RINOs--err--principled Republicans. DeSantis 2024--the smart choice of a new generation.
You'll see DeSantis start getting the love of liberal politicians and media, and that should be enough to tell you the tale.
The picture became clear for me only in hindsight. The insights EU brings came to me as startling revelations, and inevitably I was inclined to believe everything they said. Of course, that's precisely the point, isn't it?
When I learned for myself who the ancient "gods" were, I listened more intently and alertly to what the EU interpretation was. I could see that there was no mention whatsoever of any idea other than that all ancient mythology was a "novelization" of natural events. Were one to adopt this paradigm, they would never properly interpret any of the evidence I had uncovered. I came to realize, again, that's precisely the point, isn't it?
Later on, I came across this paper, raising more questions but from a completely different angle:
Is the Electric Universe Controlled Opposition? (8-page PDF 5/1/2018)
You can evaluate his objections and issues independently, but we have now waded into very deep waters: Mathis is himself disinfo! One of the highest levels of which I know.
So here, Mathis is trying to put you off EU and muddy the waters, because EU itself makes many revelations that "They" would rather not have had to give you. You can see how difficult it is to discern the truth in such an environment but, again, that's precisely the point, isn't it?
No, that's a new one on me. I couldn't say a word about it, but from a quick look I would say the approach I take is in quite the opposite direction, although not necessarily opposed as I hope you will see.
To illustrate, I found this sentence:
Above is the famous image of the theme Mundi from Macrobius' commentary on Augustine's writings on Scipios Dream. Here we find on of the most detailed accounts of ancient thought on cosmology, in the footnotes of a translation.
That seems to me to be quite a complex thing to unwind and fully understand. What I've found is that there is a wealth of quite simple and straightforward evidence lying around in plain sight, but the real problem is that it has been overlooked or misinterpreted or some thin lie has been told about it by the "experts". For me, all this "low hanging fruit" should be harvested before taking on anything more uncertain.
As a finer point touching on astrology and the planets, it looks to me as if they were simply named in honor of the most prominent "gods" (who were/are real beings present on the Earth). That is, in the data concerning these "gods", I haven't found any evidence of any type of "mystical" association.
As an analogy, the local sports stadium is named "AT&T Park". That's not because there's a divine relation between that ground and the corporate overlord, or even that it honors and reveres that entity. It's as simple as that AT&T signed a contract and gave them money.
Funny you mention that guy. The date just passed and no one has brought this up from October 2012:
Henry Kissinger Predicts 'In 10 Years, There Will Be No More Israel'
The guy has been plugged in to the main circuit his whole life, so I never wrote this off as the ranting of a senile windbag. I always thought he knew something about Israel the rest of us didn't know, and I'd let him slide a year or two on the exact date.
Fingers crossed, eh?
You're right on the money.
To me, the important aspect is that researchers don't step back a bit and realize that all these power structures are just tools. And like tools, a workman will use different tools for different purposes and use new tools if the old ones break or better ones become available.
Studying the tools is fine, to a certain extent, but we really should be studying the workman who uses them.
Yeah, I'm definitely a subscriber to the polar alignment/"purple dawn" hypothesis. I have my radar on for evidence of it as it comes by, but there's very little.
Wish I could find the link, but for me the last piece dropped into place recently. There's some sort of rare stellar structure that is basically huge blobs of gas strung out like pearls in a line. My guess is that it's rare because it's short-lived. It explains simultaneously the very weird polar alignment and also how most star systems are binary or trinary.
If Purple Dawn is correct, then it was within human memory, and for certain reasons I would put that no more than 50K years ago. That really upends a lot of what we've been told about, well, a lot.
But my point in all this is that "They" have really been pushed to tell us a lot of truth lately, and I take that as a very positive sign.
I think they didn't fully understand the scope and nature of what they were up against. Nor did I. Nor, really, do I now. So I have a deep suspicion that anyone who believes they have a full understanding, and incorporates that belief into their analysis, is almost certainly someone not worth listening to.
So if it's of any worth to you, you can incorporate that into your analysis.