Just a quick note for the record: I cannot locate the original source for this Stoltenberg quote. It seems like it could be authentic, but it's either fake or it's been vaporized from the net.

Additional note: I searched using Qwant and Freespoke, and both came up with a tweet of this quote, a retweet of that, and a meme. Neither one hit the original Telegram.

The original Telegram is still there, so is Telegram just not indexed? That's news to me.

Yes, how about Alex Jones? Here's what the man himself had to say three days ago:

Alex Jones Responds to Elon Musk’s Statement That Twitter Will Not Restore His Account (VIDEO) (Gateway Pundit 11/19/2022)

My answer is that’s fine. Elon, just follow through on your promise to bring back some semblance of freedom to Twitter. Let’s see if you can actually get that done.

Hard to keep up, isn't it?

What people seem to be missing is that he took a turn some time ago.

That level of complexity to the real world seems to be beyond their comprehension. The Masons and occultists think almost everyone sees only black and white. They're correct and people loudly demonstrate this all the time.

To me, you can just smell the BS in the first headline you read on these "events" and dismiss it instantly as yet another psyop.

But for those that hope to benefit from the study of them, the mindset I suggest is that as you review the evidence, you always ask, "How hard would it be to fake this? Am I being shown actual evidence, or is someone just telling me what to believe? Who would have to be compromised and in what way?"

I think with that kind of scrutiny, you'll find that there's actually significantly less to these events than you ever thought.

This sort of slams the lid on anyone who might have held the barest glimmer of the thought that "Black Hebrew Israelites" was an authentic organization.

I'm all for it, of course, because it was hard to believe they rigged this election even more obviously than the last one.

But no one with any real interest should pass this by thinking, "Good, they're on the case." That was exactly the point and exactly what happened last time with the big controversial "Arizona audit".

Once you look at the details, you find it was a fraud. That is, a psychodrama, a presentation of sound and fury signifying nothing. A new addition to such things was the Democrats loudly screaming, "This audit is a 'fraudit' by Republicans seeking to overturn the elections!" A real vortex!

See how they've upped their game with that? The bad news is that everyone who seeks the truth now needs to work a little harder to find it. The good news is that "They" have been pushed to stay one step ahead.

I see that the anti-Elon shills are having trouble handling this post. Why don't I give it a try?:

eLoN bAd! jEw NaMe pRoLLy

Am I doing it right? Pretty compelling counter-argument, no?

IDK if it was ever a famous quote, but I heard once that, "Honorable men do honorable things, and dishonorable men do dishonorable things." From that, I realized that any sort of plan that hinges on legislating or amending or constituting our way out of our problems can be dispensed with.

It's not that those things are totally useless, but as Ten Bears points out so powerfully in "The Outlaw Josey Wales",

No signed paper can hold the iron. It must come from men.

We see this now playing out in Ukraine, where signed papers and the promises of dishonorable men came to their end. Now truth is being brought into manifestation by Russia and her allies, but it is all very unpleasant.

New papers can and will eventually be signed, of course, but for the foreseeable future they will be backed up by missiles and armor and men with rifles.

Looking at the comments here provides confirmation to Tulsi's veracity, and reaffirms that shills just get paid for shilling.

Everyone should examine his behavior. I would say to do so "carefully" but that's not required because--although screamingly obvious--it goes unnoticed.

Imagine this group of people was all up in your grille like that. The subject here is irrelevant. Don't you think that would be quite upsetting? A loud and aggressive group like that is incredibly rare in human experience. Customer service personnel only deal with irate people in ones and twos, and police generally with people that are only irate at each other.

You would very reasonably fear for your personal safety. Is one of these nuts going to take a swing? Is one of them going to pull out a gat (it's Nevada, after all)? And there's nothing you could do about it except try to separate yourself from them.

But look at how he acts. They could all be discussing which bar to go to for a drink after the meeting. He is not in the least apprehensive. How is that possible?

I would say it's because he's a psychopath. He isn't susceptible to shame or embarrassment. Further, as a predator, he has judged that none of these "normies" poses the least threat to him physically, and he's correct about that.

All this is to highlight that there are people among us very different from you and I (well, from me, anyway) and yet that stark difference is never seen.

It's all becoming so obvious for anyone with any skill to read between the lines. Greenblatt may as well have put out a press release saying:

The ADL confirms that Elon Musk, no matter what he's done in the past, is indeed now successfully reforming Twitter in the interests of free speech. This will work against Leftist and--especially--Zionist interests. We also stress that anyone still advancing the "eLoN iS cAbAl!" narrative clearly will not quit until everyone recognizes them as moronic, a shill, or both. Thank you for your attention.

I cannot find evidence that proves modern nukes are real

Argument from ignorance

You may want to quit while you're only this far behind.

I think Ukraine's participation in the Polish missile provocation was not in the script and really tore it. Now the US has to back out slowly without ever admitting they were wrong all along. Plus, it seems they're probably less than two months out from complete collapse, and best not to hang about for that.

You're going to have to do your own research and decide for yourself what is convincing. Personally, I've found in many instances that evidence I consider compelling is metaphorically invisible to others.

As for nukes, I've found that Trinity, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Bikini Atoll tests were fake, but have no reason to believe that all other purported nuclear detonations were not real. Also, there many been many dozens of tactical nukes used in hostilities that were are told were other things (WTC, Beirut, ammo dumps, etc) or simply not told about.

My point is not that you should take my word for that, or even that you will come to the same conclusions, but just that you have waded into deep waters full of shills and self-assured ignoramuses. What I told you in the last paragraph is not a simple answer, and I suggest you beware anyone trying to hand you one.

Pretty much everyone's take on this does not seem to be shared by Alex Jones himself:

Alex Jones Responds to Elon Musk’s Statement That Twitter Will Not Restore His Account (VIDEO)

The lazy part was declining to measure the time of fall in one of the "bomb drop" videos. And you'll note the 150m came from another type of video. But thanks for the link!

When did I say Hiroshima was nuked? You surely can't be going off one example. That does not demonstrate very careful thinking.

I would suggest that you keep researching the topic, but I doubt anyone who believes they have the truth about any subject cares to do more research. Thanks anyway for your comments.

Well, you know, I think the time may be coming. You'd think Israel would be all over supporting Ukraine (who are really just caretakers for the Khazars, eh?) but they've been awfully quiet. I'm of the opinion that Putin knows what's up on a great many issues.

Indeed, that demonstrates another vital aspect of the difficulty very well. How many normies do, in fact, notice what you just described? A percentage that rounds down to zero, don't you think?

Now imagine being Trump or Q or JFK Jr. or anyone else and trying to convince those people about what the real state of the world is, and what action should properly be taken in the face of that situation. Do you think just telling them straight out would be productive? Me neither.

The prospect of that alone is almost enough to make you buy in to the whole "noble lie" thing.

Try freespoke.com. Can't be worse than Brave, in any case.

I've seen quite a number of those videos. In one of them, there was some "behind the scenes" footage of a Russian serviceman preparing those little hand grenade-sized bombs. As far as I can tell, it's just a new technique in the age of drone warfare, and why wouldn't it be?

I did notice that the targets don't seem to notice the drone overhead, which seemed odd. With the zooming and unzooming, it's impossible to tell how high these drones are. Just the other day, I noticed on video from another drone (not of this type) that showed it's altitude as 150m. It doesn't seem unreasonable that a small drone would be not easily casually noticed at this altitude, especially on a battlefield where you have other things on your mind.

I took physics, but I'm way too lazy to time the freefall and calculate the actual altitude. d = 1/2 G t^2 for the not lazy.

I left that to the shills, the gullible, and the retarded. All the same people that think a pile of fertilizer can destroy much of a city.

Think so? In my estimation, certain parties do not seem to be getting the message. Like, maybe they don't want to get it so he's letting everyone else know.

As regards current events, Col. Douglas MacGregor mentioned that NATO is assembling a force of 20,000 Romanians, along with troops from the US and Poland. Oh, you know, just in case some war happens to spring up requiring NATO troops.

What I don't get is: do these 20,000 troops realize they would be fighting for a regime overflowing with Jews, starting with Z himself? As baffling as that question is, it makes me wonder if Romania has some designs other than defending their neighbor from the Eurasian hordes?

But in any case, thanks as always, NATO, for taking a horrible situation and making it much worse.

Just a quick note on Robert Schoch and Graham Hancock. Obviously both of them say many true, interesting, and compelling things, but I cannot help but conclude that, in the end, they are high-level disinformation agents.

Schoch denies flatly that a comet or meteor strike brought on the Younger Dryas, using the old "no evidence" line. There's a lot of evidence, and I can tell you there's even more than is discussed online. I can't fathom why he would deny this particular event, but there you have it.

Even more damning, Hancock denies there were giants. I trust anyone with any interest in the subjects Hancock researches has looked into giants for themself and know that the evidence is abundant. Sure. it lends a little credence to the Bible, but why would he care? He discusses the truth of ancient legends at length. In any case, he flatly denies for he reason he cares to explain .