For those interested in both crustal displacement and the Bible: surprise! It turns out there may be direct record of the one in the other. This is the oft overlooked passage known as "Joshua's Long Day" (Joshua 10:12-14 KJV):
12 Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon.
13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.
14 And there was no day like that before it or after it, that the LORD hearkened unto the voice of a man: for the LORD fought for Israel.
I find the second and third verse to be quite compelling that this account is something more than a fairy tale having to do with God smiting people he doesn't like or some such thing.
In verse 13, there are two separate and distinct words used (both in translation and the original Hebrew) to describe the Sun and the Moon. If the crust displaced in such a way that it was motionless relative to the Sun, the motion of the Moon would be slow but quite discernable, since it moves across the sky about one "Moon width" per hour. The last part of verse 12 also hints that the Moon did not stay above a single point, but rather just over a limited are.
Verse 14 is also baffling, if this passage was all to illustrate the immense power of God. The author might have written something like, "So all you sinners better just watch your asses, because if God can do this you're gonna get got." But here it' seems more consistent with the idea that crustal displacements are extremely rare, and none had occurred from Joshua's Long Day to the time of the writing.
I have to wonder if this is a 21st Century implementation of the "Night of the Long Knives". I see this as the modern alternative to actual long knives, and everybody's primed to buy the narrative. And you can't just stage a bunch of helicopter crashes--way too expensive.
I suspect there were a number of these Ukrainians, corrupt as they may be, who were feeling a little anxious about fighting to the last drop of Ukrainian blood. It's difficult for me to believe Big Z & Co. have any interest whatsoever in cleaning up corruption, especially in a country that may not exist in a few months.
Now that these weak sisters are out of the way, the real men can get back to the legendary grift--excuse me!--"big business" opportunities. Oh, and "winning the war", I guess.
I actually didn't try to figure out exactly how real it was. It's getting very difficult because we're seeing a growing stream of events that I previously would have discarded as "so far out of bounds no one would even suggest them publicly, and maybe not even privately".
Like the US wants Japan to rearm, the only possible opponent being China and the only possible casus belli being Taiwan. Is there a single ordinary person in the world who hears this and says, "Oh, well, it's about time!"? It's ludicrous, but there we have it.
I believe this is the opposite. Translated from Russian:
The outlet reports that the measure will allow Estonia to apply its laws in broader territorial waters, prosecute violations of its legal acts, and practically close off the Baltic Sea to Russian ships.
So in a very rough analogy, this is like Mexico closing off the Gulf of Mexico to American shipping. Real "act of war" stuff, in my book.
The Globalist American Empire looks like they are just not going to quit until they get their WW3. Makes me think that in their analysis it's "now or never".
This will strike many as way out on a limb, but I believe humanity is locked in battle with Satan. Like, a real entity that does real things in the real world. Given that, depopulation does not solve anything.
By way of analogy, suppose we got rid of 90% of the cattle in the world. Does the beef industry go away? Not at all. In fact, the remaining 10% of the cattle will be more tightly controlled than ever. And if the cattle decided to rise up and trample the ranchers, their chances of success are greatly diminished. Everything for them is now worse.
And if it upsets anyone that I'm likening humanity to livestock, well, that is precisely what I'm doing.
The final comment from Trump is accurate, and the most important. Over the course of time, Trump has dropped quite a number of low-key comments indicating that he's something like a "closet truther".
The whole shallow, duped, "trUmP iS cOnTrOlLeD oP!" crowd never notices these things, let alone brings any of these incidents up, let alone tries to explain them.
The obvious justification would be, "Trump is one of Them, and the Elite are so far ahead that They have him infrequently drop little clues about being a closet truther for the manipulation of the one out of million people who will ever note them. That's how far ahead of the game They are!"
Well, it seems ludicrous just seeing it typed out like that, doesn't it?
They "just got lucky" seems so asinine. That alone pretty much eliminates my respect for Adams as an intellectual. I guess that for all that other stuff he said that I thought was so insightful, he "just got lucky.,
The other very common, "go to" retcon is: "Yeah, it turned out I was incorrect, but I was correct based on information available at the time." No, MFers, there's nothing in any "science" or reasoning that ever forces you to say something incorrect. Ever.
Here's my interpretation of Adams' "won/lost" take on this: I think it adds evidence to my thesis that one of the primary manifestations of whatever makes Leftists Leftists is that they begin with the subconscious axiom that they are morally "good".
See, what one would consider a normal reaction from Scott might be something like, "It turns out that, despite what I thought were my best efforts to find the truth, I was in error. Because of that error, I supported positions and advocated actions that got people injured and even killed. And I am not excused from moral fault in this because the truth was knowable. Millions knew it, many told me about it, and I rejected it on unsound grounds. I acted immorally."
But then, that simple analysis and conclusion would contradict the axiom, would it not? Subconsciously, I'm certain, this whole line of argument is thrown out and some other plausible argument consistent with the axiom is substituted, concluding with, "You won."
And he's still "one of the good guys".
Over on r/conspiracy, there were a bunch of posts on this "incident". The OPs may or may not have been shills, but they all had hundreds of upvotes for "getting in the Man's face". There were zero posts that I saw calling out Rebel News as Zionist or the video as staged.
I had pretty much forgotten about Rebel News and their history, but when I watched the video it took only a few seconds to peg it as phony. This comment is to highlight the much larger problem: virtually no one, not even "conspiracy theorists", are critically examining what they see.
I say that's the bigger problem because, in this and many other instances, people are acting and reacting to a fake reality. TPTB lose much of that power when people simply see things for what they are. It's not that hard to do and begins with people understanding that they can be fooled. Few of us care to admit that into our worldview.
On what basis would I make such a claim? That it's happened before? Do you suggest operating on the principle that everything that's happened before is permissible?
I reject that type of thinking lunacy, retardation, or both.It's also to be condemned as enabling many of the ills of this world. But you go ahead with displaying it, if it's all you can manage.
It's surreal when you come across someone on the world stage speaking this much truth.
You start to think, "Is this fake? Is this some sort of psyop?" But no, even when They surround Their lies in a bodyguard of truth, it's never this much and it never strikes right to the heart of the matter like this.
I noticed that in the flood of anti-Elon comments here, no one bothers to explain how this public announcement fits in with him being controlled opposition or trying to muscle his way back in to the Cabal or any other similar theory.
It's difficult for me to subscribe to any such "theory" that utterly fails to address the evidence. Perhaps my standards are entirely too high.
In the final analysis, Nixon was not "in the club", as demonstrated by this: President Richard Nixon - Bohemian Grove Was "The Most Faggy God Damned Thing You Could Image"
I mean, if you're not down with faggotry, there's no way you're down with adrenochrome and ritual sacrifice and all the rest. Whatever it was that finally tipped the scales and made "Them" fake up Watergate to remove him is really somewhat arbitrary.
Just as an aside for anyone who thinks Stoltenberg and guys like him are shot-callers, take a look at his expression as he's saying this. To me, it verges on panic and carries a subtext of:
If I don't get this done, you have absolutely no idea what the supervisors are going to do to my butthole.
The arcane item about Flynn, never mentioned, that finally convinced me he was an asset concerned the judge in that big case that gave him (or appeared to give him) so much trouble, a guy named Emmett Sullivan.
It wasn't the Fylnn case itself, but actually started with the video of Ashli Babbitt getting murdered. That was taken by "Jayden X", whose real name is John (you guessed it) Sullivan.
Well, John Sullivan is eventually arrested and charged for J6, but for no apparent reason his case gets transferred to (you guessed it) Emmett Sullivan. And when you research this judge, he just keeps getting faker and faker. That includes phony pictures with his sons--phony because John is one of them and they sure can't show us that.
Anyway, the point is you spin a 180 and look back at the Flynn case and realize, as you suggest, he was just getting "sheep dipped".
I think Mark Milley got a stern talking to a couple of months ago, and was admonished to cease making any public statements resembling the truth:
Milley urges Ukraine to negotiate with Russia, saying chances of total military victory 'unlikely' (Fox News 11/16/2022)
"Mark, you've been around long enough to know that's not how we operate here, m'kay?"
There is another connection--as important as the Mark Felt/COINTELPRO association--which was (intentionally?) left out of Tucker's story, and that is through Woodward's editor at WaPo, Ben Bradlee.
Bradlee's wife was Antionette Pinchot, and her sister was Mary Pinchot Meyer. Her husband was Cord Meyer Jr., who worked for the CIA. And what did he do there? He ran Operation Mockingbird.
Bonus: Mary Pinchot Meyer was involved with JFK. They say romantically, but I doubt that because JFK was gay She also ended up murdered under mysterious circumstances.
I think you're right on the money. Yes, this is where the puppets convene to party and take their marching orders, but no policy-makers are there nor is any policy made.
From a personal view, I had heard of "Davos" being a thing many years ago. Then just about three years ago I started hearing about Klaus and the WEF. It took probably a year or more before I put together that Davos was where the WEF met. Which is really the technique: They need these things only to impinge on your consciousness enough to influence you in the required direction.
So as you suggest, They can put them up and pull them down as convenient. Remember when Bilderberg was all the rage? How often is the Trilateral Commission mentioned these days? The WEF is also getting near its expiration date. Bohemian Grove lives on only as an over-the-top cartoon.
It should be recognized that the mere fact They have to stage this ghey op shows that progress is being made against them. On the other hand, there's a lot of room to run. For example, I feel that further up the track They'll stage the assassination of some high-profile guy (perhaps someone already dead, like Moderna CEO Bancel). Seems like a stretch, but look at the low-effort "assassination" of Shinzo Abe.
PS: I think Rebel Media was exposed like 10 years ago as being controlled opposition, but it's like keeping track of rats at the dump.
I have always found one comment that Jesus made exceptionally tantalizing (John 14:12):
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
It is within our grasp to do works greater than those of Jesus? It doesn't sound like he's speaking metaphorically or spiritually, either.
Wish I knew more about what he meant. In the meantime, His moral lessons are enough to work on.
FWIW, this seemed pretty obviously staged.
Bourla has not a single person working personal security? There's that chunky guy, but he's behind everyone for most of the incident.
We heard there were 5000 cops assigned for security, but not a single one in sight? Are they outside the perimeter? Who are they keeping out, if not jokers like these?
So they're in a secured area and everyone is wearing a badge, even Bourla himself. But neither of these "reporters" has one, nor a couple of the "photographers"?
Long story short, a little psychodrama staged to let you know "something is being done".
I don't think any of the J6 protesters had been convicted of a crime two weeks later, so I would not think pardons are applicable. That is, unless one subscribes to the theory that the power granted to the President is actually the power to grant blanket immunity. Seems like a dangerous theory.
As far as Julian Assange, he's been dead or in a deep, dark hole since October 2016. Spend political capital and stir up a shitstorm over a dead guy? Doesn't seem like a productive use of resources to me.
It's hard to know how to this tips the balance between good news and bad news. On the one hand, maybe the intense brainwashing and social engineering (((they))) do is becoming increasing less effective. On the other hand, if they're not aware of this, how tuned out and ignorant are they of everything else?
I mean, I know about the purported Holocaust and I also know it's virtually all BS. That's a different thing than is described by the headline.