2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's pretty hazy, but as I've put it together there was a crustal displacement and a pole shift in the not too distant past. The big anomalies that come up are:

  • There's more ice in Greenland than there should be, according to mainstream history.

  • There's too little ice in the Antarctic, according to mainstream history.

  • The Piri Reis map shows Antarctica connected to South America.

  • There's evidence of extremely rapid cooling at certain sites.

  • A collection of ancient sites are located along a great circle, which seems to have been the former Equator.

It goes on with various other strange evidence, including that "They" do not want anyone talking about any of this. It's possible that other topics like Atlantis, Gobekli Tepe, and the Great Flood were just angles on this same event.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since you're clearly "on the case", there's one other angle I'd add to it all that I heard along the way (and that no one talks about). There used to be a YT video on this from a man named Kevin Boyle posted during the "pandemic", but last time I searched for it to archive it, it had been vaporized. This is what he explained....

Many know that "flu" is short for "influenza" and refers to the illness (supposedly) caused by "influenza viruses", but few know anything beyond that. I'll assume you're already up to speed on the idea that "viruses are tiny living creatures that travel via infection and cause illness" is entirely bullshit.

Boyle explained that as far back as the 1500's, there were pandemics and scientists of the day in Italy studied them to find out WTH was happening. They soon figured out that it was no form of infectious transmission because the pandemics would outrun ships traveling between different cities that had outbreaks

They actually came up empty. Just could not figure it out. The only thing they could correlate pandemics to--as crazy as it sounds then and now--was the number of sunspots. They ended up referring to it as "influenza della stella", or "the influence of the star". That loony (?) idea is where we get the very word for it.

So what the shit is going on, and has been going on for centuries, apparently? Something big, but I've as yet to crack it.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny you mention that, because there's a phenomenon that just preceded COVID that has yet to be explained:

In about October 2019-January 2020, before anyone was talking about COVID getting out of Wuhan, you may remember that tons of people got "the flu". They all described it as the worst flu they ever had and were sick as a dog, confined to bed for a week or so. It was so prevalent that I've heard it mentioned two dozen times in podcasts from that time frame.

I heard one guy on THC saying that he was living at the time in a very rural, isolated area, and there's no way he caught a communicable disease. I've never tried to study the pattern, but it covered Maine to Texas to California. As it stands it's an enigma, and a significant one. What the hell happened?

Conspiracy theorists have forgotten all about this.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

The video doesn't delve this deep, but the Kingdom of Hawaii was infiltrated and dominated by members of a small group of families, a Hidden Elite, that have been behind and orchestrated many important events in American history. I touched on this particular incident in a post a few months ago:

It’s a (very) Small World 3x3: 3 Elite Families working together in 3 locations (and no one ever noticed) (3/31/2024)

Just to take a moment to amplify a bit on how you have to have the proper context to read the mainstream histories of these Elites, many things you read take on a new light under the framework that nefarious characters were at work. We can examine the wiki of the main (hidden) actor, Charles Coffin Harris:

Harris also was appointed a member of the Privy Council on December 7, 1863, by King Kamehameha V, the former Prince Lot. In 1864 he was appointed to the upper House of Nobles in the legislature. Kamehameha V insisted on a new 1864 Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaii, restoring some of the power to the monarchy that had been lost through the years. Harris issued his legal opinion that the king had such a right, and produced an early draft. A constitutional convention failed to reach agreement, so Harris got the cabinet to negotiate directly with Kamehameha V who accepted the result which lasted 23 years.

So Harris sidelines a new constitution and keeps Kamehameha under his thumb for over two decades. Not too bad. How about this?

On the death of Kamehameha V at the end of 1872 without naming an heir, the constitution specified an election of a new ruler by the legislature. Harris backed David Kalākaua, who lost the election. The new liberal King Lunalilo had no use for Harris in his cabinet, but died just a year later. On February 18, 1874, King Kalākaua won the next election and appointed Harris to the supreme court of the Kingdom.

Well, well, Harris FTW once more thanks to "died suddenly". Harris is supposed to come off as just a helpful servant to the people of the Kingdom, but details of his importance are glossed over:

His first wife died in March 1870; they had a son Frank Hervey Harris (1845–1875) and a daughter Nannie Roberta Harris, who married John Dominis Brewer (1845–1879) in 1872 and after his death, David Rice of Boston. Her first husband was a son of the namesake company C. Brewer & Co.

First, "David Rice of Boston" was assuredly a member of the Rice Family of the Boston Brahmins. Ever hear of Rice University? Founded by one of them: William Marsh Rice. Their mascot is "Sammy the Owl", and one may make of that what one will.

They also hotlink to C. Brewer & Co., and admit that it was part of the oligarchy known as the "Big Five", but it goes deeper. The company was taken over by Henry Augustus Pierce. I didn't bother to do the legwork on this because it gets dismaying to find out you were right, but I can guarantee that this Pierce is related to: President Franklin Pierce, Thomas Percy of the Gunpowder Psyop, and Pauline Pierce, reputed to have been knocked up by Aleister Crowley to bless us all with Barbara (Pierce) Bush.

Didn't mean to write all this, but one thing leads to another.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I personally think we're way beyond such facts having a practical impact, and it brings up a story from the long ago days of Osama's birth certificate.

There was a court case, in Maryland IIRC, where the plaintiffs were trying to get him disqualified from the ballot in that state. The counterargument from his attorney was that the birth certificate was indeed fake, but--get this--it was soooo fake that no one would have ever reasonably presented it as evidence of his qualification for the office of President. Thus, it could not be used evidence of his ineligibility.

A compelling and successful argument, obviously!

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's hope, there's hope.

I remember, probably about 15 years ago, there being many days when I'd walk down the street and there were so many that the disturbing thought wasn't, "Jesus, WTF is raining down all over us?" it was, "How in TF are people not noticing this?"

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Personally, I almost never see chemtrails any more. They slowed down tremendously under Trump then sort of bounced around off the bottom of the charts, most days without any. Now they're rare. Assuming that observation can be generalized, my point is that this promise doesn't cost anything.

Wouldn't a more meaningful promise be to track down and prosecute everyone associated with what he himself refers to as a crime? It reminds me of the report on torture that came out under Obama. "It was all in the past," he told us.

5
Primate98 5 points ago +5 / -0

The RFK assassination was faked. You can tell by an examination of the photos. Well, the photos that remain in existence, that is, because they've been trying to annihilate them.

Digging this out of the thread of stirred up mud clouding the waters, we find:

These photos you're about to see are from Scott Enyart. He took these photos on the night of the assassination. The LAPD later confiscated these photos and refused to give them back. After six months he got them back, but only got 26 out of 36 photos. He believed he didn't get the full set. Scott later learned that the LAPD destroyed 2400 pieces of evidence and his photographs before the trial.

Suspicious, right? Then you can add what we find in this article:

New Twist in Kennedy Mystery : Photo Negatives of Robert F. Kennedy’s Assassination Disappear (LA Times 1/18/1996)

The negatives of some photographs taken in the moments surrounding the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy are missing.

“Somebody, for some reason, is making sure those photos do not reach public view,” Greenwald said. Louis “Skip” Miller, an attorney for the city, conceded that the incident in Inglewood was strange, but he scoffed at Greenwald’s suggestion. “What happened here is just a petty theft,” Miller said. “A run of bad luck.”

Okay then, Skip! But I still suggest that everyone take a close look at the photos for themselves, and while doing so simply asking yourself the question, "Are these real?" A gallery of the Bill Eppridge photos are here. You'll note how incredible shitty the "forensic value" is in the first place. Great job, Bill.

I have a writeup somewhere on the flaws if anyone needs the hints. It's best, though, that anyone interested do it for themselves because otherwise it's all too easy to accept or reject the evidence of your own eyes when someone else has told you what you're seeing.

PS: Does Bobby Jr know about this? Hard to believe he doesn't, but it's possible and there is no evidence either way. There are significant negative implications in either case, though.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's just perspective, but it's more like, "The Harris-Walz campaign cares about the needs of hobbits, America's most neglected minority."

I take it as a sign anyone with a shred of talent, enough to not use a crappy photo, has been driven away from the campaign by these abusive freaks.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny, I think everything in the title is the exact and precise opposite of the truth!

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, trying to upstage California with it's "no money down houses for illegals", eh? Well, State of Oregon, Gavin will see that $30k and double it!

Socialism will surely solve all our problems.

5
Primate98 5 points ago +5 / -0

Reddit is horrible, to be sure. When he died, I couldn't post a short, pure-text post about Colin Powell and his key role in the coverup of the My Lai Massacre. That's mainstream, Wikipedia-level history, and that was three years ago.

More annoying than that--and I believe this to be absolutely purposeful--is that it has been absolutely flooded with annoying shills. It's sort of the inverse of the homeless situation: you're one of the few normal people trying to live in a town populated by loud, smelly, ignorant, aggressive, mentally-unstable people.

The bad drives out the good. The plan is simplicity itself.

5
Primate98 5 points ago +5 / -0

I hope everyone puts this in the proper overall perspective: a pedo human trafficker thought federal prosecutors were too dirty to deal with--even to help himself and screw a guy who didn't like him--and an accused quadruple murderer puts himself at risk because thinks people need to know the story about how gross these feds really are.

And I think to myself, "What a wonderful world."

7
Primate98 7 points ago +7 / -0

A psychological trick used by tech companies back in the day was the "one-time charge". They'd save up their losses then write them off all at once against a single bad earnings report, which would soon fade from memory. Then it was right back to, "Look how great everything's going!"

The technique became so refined that they would do it in advance and sell it as good news. They'd set up a grand new initiative with huge funding and much fanfare. Over the course of time, they'd shuffle losses off to that venture, which would eventually go kaput. Then in paragraph 14 of a story in the weekend financial pages, they'd say, "Can't win 'em all, but we'll keep trying!"

Worked every time.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

I feel that this is vital intel for those who like to game out potential Big Igloo scenarios. And keep in mind that this is the reaction with relatively mild political protesters are who are upset about things happening thousands of miles away to people they've never met.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

No suicide booth, though?

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if they're going to magically discover that he was posting a TikTok:

"Sup folks. Just wanted to let y'all know that I'm acting alone and certainly not in concert with the Secret Service, FBI, or any other intelligence agency. I'm thinking about posting another TikTok where I name specific individuals that definitely have no knowledge of my actions or any association with me whatsoever."

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

take the sides or the party line being pushed onto us

That hits on something that has become so clear to me lately as a fundamental mechanism of control.

Almost all of us define ourselves as a collection of attributes: Democrat, firefighter, consumer, American, Red Sox fan, Person of Color, whatever. We wear these "identifications" like little merit badges on a sash that we use to signal others. And there's no doubt we think of these as "merit" badges, because no one "shamefully confesses" they're really a minarchist.

"They" know this and the mechanism of control is attaching tiny little strings to these badges to pull us around. That is, They simply declare that as a "good" fill-in-the-blank, you "should" do-thus-and-so. If you don't or you disagree, you're bad and should ashamed of yourself. They magically bridge the is-ought distinction and no one ever seems to see any of this happening.

Every once in a while we see someone removing one of these merit badges and freeing themselves. The one we see frequently now is when a black person declares they're a Trump supporter. They're accused of being a race traitor, of course, but without that merit badge and that tiny string, that person's attitude becomes, "I couldn't give a fuck what you think."

8
Primate98 8 points ago +8 / -0

Maybe, but I know that for me it's become very much the opposite.

I mean, I recently stumbled onto this guy William H. Parker, who made the LAPD the military occupation force it is today. I just knew he had to be connected to the Parker family of generational Satanists scattered all throughout American history. I spent like an hour and a half finding that connection, and felt an acute compulsion the entire time not to stop until I did. I haven't got around to writing it up because I knew very well all along that only about six people will read it and care. I had to find out for myself.

OTOH, on the rare occasion I try to spend a little time researching an investment, after about 5 minutes I'll be like, "Good God, release me from this torture! How can this be worse than high school?"

7
Primate98 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's hard to believe that anyone could get involved in conspiracy theory to any extent and then give it up, but there you have it.

My only theory is that fear finally takes over: they get exposed to so much material that generates fear and which their subconscious judges to be potentially true that, in order to relieve that anxiety, they find a reason to quit.

We all battle against that same phenomenon. Pretty much nothing in the study of conspiracy reveals good news. It is only the love of truth in a higher consciousness that can overcome it.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

That brings up the untold story underlying the untold story, and a part of what first drew my attention to the issue....

Maybe a decade or more ago, after the "Axis of Evil" thing came out, I watched an interview with a documentarian who had made a film about it called, "The Principle". He somehow got all the big mainstream astrophysics names: Laurence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Max Tegmark, Lisa Randall, etc.

But the thing was, the new findings violated the Copernican Principle: that there were no special places in the Universe. Thus the title. It all finally dawned on these geniuses and they tried to back out, but they had signed all the paperwork.

To top it off, this guy was a Christian and took it as confirmation of, you know, whatever. So lawsuits flew and all the rest and the film virtually vanished. Last time I looked, you could still scrape up some remnants of it's existence, but it wasn't easy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›