You know, I actually considered ridiculing people who thought nukes are hoax, as I did near the bottom of my post to the "fake war" proponents. I declined specifically because I thought it was beneath recognition.
Silly me!
Oh hey, forgot to address the topic of "Satan's purpose".
As I mentioned before, I had concluded that there was some sort of a deal in place between Yahweh and Satan. I put that together from the tiniest of clues, and was trying to deduce the shape of it.
I stumbled across a much more explicit description of the deal. One of Satan's many names was Iblis, which is how he is known to the Muslims. I haven't researched the details, but in this article we find a summary:
Because of his arrogance, Allah banished Iblis from heaven and condemned him to hell. Iblis accepted his fate, but asked that he might be spared until Judgement Day so that he could tempt humans from the path of righteousness and lead them to the same fate that would eventually befall him. Allah granted this, but did not give Iblis power over humans. Instead, if they were to be led from the righteous path, it would have to be because of their own temptations and transgressions.
I found it quite startling. Do you see how we find parts and pieces of the story, corrupted and out of context though they may be? For example, he wasn't "banished to hell", but marooned on Earth with all of us jokers. It's difficult work to put it all back together, but I believe it's possible.
I do sometimes wish for a visitation from an "angel", who'll say, "Okay, let me just break this down for you...."
Right, "satan" is a just an adjective, but you have to flip your thinking around on the concept of "naming". These ancient aliens went by many names, but guess what? So do modern humans.
Take, for example, the modern human that ran for President against Trump in 2016. In one short human lifespan, you can probably think up two dozen different "names" by which she has been referred to: Hillary Rodham, Senator Clinton, First Lady of Arkansas, Hillbeast, HRC, Mrs. Clinton, Secretary Clinton, The Next President of the United States, Hellary, etc, etc. Think how flexible we need to be to track entities that live for millennia known by numerous cultures worldwide.
As to Satan's genealogy, think of the black hole that exists around it. We all just assumed that God created Satan for some reason, or perhaps that Satan always existed. The "authorities" just told us whatever was convenient to their argument at the the time, but mostly they ignored the evidence and were silent. How can that be considered "theology"?
The "scholars" decline to give an explanation of the evidence we have at hand. So not only do I demand such an explanation, I give one. What, then, shall we think of the "scholars" and "authorities"?
It turns out these is quite a strong, simple and precise connection between Masonry, Babylon, and Satan. To tell you, though, gives away some of the game, and your acceptance will be much stronger if you discover these things for yourself. Ask me about it later, if you're still wondering.
I still have yet to watch the Hancock/Biglino interview. I worry, though, that Biglino will be "turned". That very thing happened to Alan Alford. Better watch close to see if I start changing my tune!
Lucifer was indeed an El, but the Elohim are not human. Gen 1:1 was intentionally damaged, and put back together it reads, "The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the heavens and the Earth." (See Michal Ledwith for details.) So the Elohim Really, the function of the sentence is to establish clearly that the Elohim preexisted humans.
Later in Genesis, Man is created. With a correct understanding of "in our image", we find that that it was through genetic engineering. So properly understood, humans are some part Elohim. That explains why the Elohim can interbreed with humans. Also, it explains why the resulting Nephilim were giants. Hybrids, such as ligers, may lack the gene for regulating growth.
Well, I started with the little clues we all saw, like Biden's fake Oval Office and the rumor he was turned away from the Pentagram. If he wasn't let into the real WH or Pentagon, what were the chances he had the football?
Then Real Raw News came along and started talking about this stuff much more explicitly from inside sources. As outlandish as their claims are, I keep trying to punch holes in them and failing to.
According to them, Trump invoked the Insurrection Act and turned the football over the General David Berger. Starting this year, General Eric M. Smith took over from Berger. RRN did not make specific mention, but he would now have it.
It all sound crazy, but you turn it around and ask yourself: has Biden ever been pictured with the military attache with the football? With all this incessant talk of nuclear WW3, has anyone even mentioned the subject, even to further frighten the public? Not to my knowledge. That seems quite strange, yet it is consistent with the "wild stories".
As I noted in the writeup, the Russians used nukes to achieve specific battlefield objectives, yet they also specifically declined to "escalate" by making public announcements of that. We can also see that their public "threats" are meant to get the Western citizenry to pressure their masters to back down. Fruitlessly, thus far.
Also noted in the writeup is that this latest incident can be interpreted as more evidence that "They" no longer have control of any nukes. People like to wave their hands around on this issue, but when you get down to brass tacks evidence is thin on the ground.
Just off the top and in broad terms, I would argue that Biden(tm) does not have control of the nuclear football. In nuclear France, Rothschild butt-boy Macron--of all people--seems to be turning. Israel seems to be the most likely source of atomic munitions for "Them", but I think the Israelis now calculate that there now is a point where Iran can and would put an end to Israel with conventional missiles alone.
Also worthy of note is that unstoppable nuclear-tipped Kinzhals are or soon will be in Belarus, minutes from the European capitals. European NATO combat potential is a joke. US combat potential has to get across oceans that would be swarming with hypersonic anti-ship missiles.
What I'm saying is that when you start to put meat on the bones, it really begins to take on a different shape than what most people seem to have in mind.
Yes, you're got the genealogy right. But that brings up the issue that everyone so bizarrely steers around seemingly without thought: why does Satan even have a genealogy?
I'll have to listen to the show you linked, but I notice in the writeup they do precisely the same thing. They're talking about "lucifer" and "venus". Do you see how that's exactly the opposite direction from the one I point towards?
That is, some time long ago, some guy sat down and wrote the words "helel ben shahar". Just as we all do when we sit down to write, he had something in mind which he wished to communicate. What we're after is what he had in mind.
That's the direction we go towards, not towards what the Greeks or Romans or King James or anyone else had to say about it thousands of years later. Put that way, it seems quite ridiculous to even discuss them. The importance of what they said is only to help us unwind how we got to where we are now.
That Satan has a genealogy should catch our attention the way a discussion of the suspension system of Cinderella's carriage would. You'd say to yourself, "Hang on, is this really just a fairy tale, or was something real being described? If so, what can we learn about that real thing"
Are you actually under the impression that anyone takes any value from your "analysis"? What really is your motivation? Does that even apply or is it really just some thoughtless compulsion?
Personally, I think it's just compulsion, and you're actually only interacting with your own ego. Do these comments help with your introspection? I sincerely doubt it, and they're not supposed to.
Port Said was another nuke, unquestionably. There's quite a bit more to the complete story and when I tried to get it out through a few outlets, it ended with a Blackhawk orbiting my house at around 500'. Maybe just coincidence, though, huh?
While that story is interesting in a very "Tom Clancy-esque" way, what's actually much more informative is how virtually everyone is convinced it was a big pile of old fertilizer. It's like everyone thinking a big pile of little paper tubes for firecrackers leveled a concrete warehouse.
Lots of speculation about Geiger counters. Can you link to anyone that actually checked?
For anyone that wishes to inform themselves beyond the low-yield reasoning of "If it was real I would have already known about it!", then you may be interested in this article:
Just How Radioactive Are Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons? (The Drive 12/19/2022)
I would add that for such people that live in a reality of "If it was real I would have already known about it!", how very comforting it must be. Regrettably, it comes at the cost of learning of learning anything new.
Sorry, forgot to include this link for scaling, but the crater is reported to be 60m by 10m deep:
After A Missile Strike By The Russian Armed Forces, A Crater With A Diameter Of 60 Meters Remained In Pavlograd (Eastern Herald 5/6/2023)
Pretty damn weird world just under the surface, huh?
I forgot to mention that, in connection with the Citigroup reference, Crocker was a very prominent banker. One of my in-law's mom used to work for Crocker Bank. Household name when I was a kid.
I keep noticing such an odd phenomenon, a "black hole" even for the tiny few that are aware of it.
Starting at 7:23, both the guest and the host on the "original podcast" mention "helel ben shahar". Neither one of them makes any comment about it whatsoever. The host of the "rebuttal podcast" stops to comment immediately thereafter but makes no reference to it himself.
Personally, I found that phrase to be key in my research, and there I found it laying in plain sight in the Bible. How could it's importance be missed all these centuries? Had I made a grave error in my understanding of it?
The more I see people that talk like they're so certain of their research walk right past it, the less surprised I am it has gone (publicly) disregarded.
Most likely unrelated, but for anyone who likes following rabbit holes, it just may be that the little town of Deming has some connection to the Elites. It turns out it was named for Mary Ann Deming, the wife of Charles Crocker, who was most assuredly one of the Elites.
It further turns out that Crocker and his wife were related to all kinds of people in early Hollywood, a den of both iniquity and Intelligence. You can find this and much more about all the hidden connections in this paper:
Strange Relations (11/12/2016 19-page PDF)
It was by a Miles Mathis guest author, and since Mathis is known disinfo, everyone should step carefully since you're walking through a minefield. But the connections can be validated independently, and are quite surprising.
For a taste, here's the information about Crocker and Deming:
Charles Crocker’s wiki page informs us that he was the son of Eliza (nee Wright) and Isaac Crocker, a modest family. (Modest New England old- money filthy rich family, that is). Charles Crocker was married to a woman named Mary Ann Deming and here are their strange relations: Humphrey Bogart (Samuel Wright & Margaret Stratton, Northampton MA), Buster Keaton (William Hyde & Eleanor Molyneux, New London CT), Paulette Goddard (William Browne & Jane Burgess, Long Island NY), Clara Bow (Edward Marvin & Margaret Gillyat, Essex England), Henry Fonda (Richard Warren, Plymouth MA), Henry Fonda’s wife Sherrie Mae Adams (Thomas Bryan & Frances Bowlinge, Buckingham England) and Jane Fonda’s mother Frances Ford Seymour (Samuel Huntington & Mary Clark, New London CT).
Miles: B. F. Goodrich was also a Deming, so Arbuckle was related to all these people through the Demings. Also note that Jane Fonda was a Ford and a Seymour. Above, Kevin showed you a link to one of the wives of Henry VIII. Jane Seymour was another. Also remember that Francis Ford Coppola's middle name is also Ford.
Mathis doesn't mention it and usually he's attentive to such things, but Crocker's father's name was Isaac and his mother's maiden name was Wright. It turns out there was an "investor" also born in NY and living at the same time named Isaac Wright. He was a Quaker (longer story, but very suspicious) and one of the first presidents of what would eventually become Citigroup.
I think that while Russia is fighting Ukraine, it's also fighting it's own Deep State. It's rarely mentioned, and Prigozhin is most outspoken but even he doesn't point fingers and name names. But why would anyone think there wouldn't be a Russian Deep State, just as strong or stronger than those throughout the West? In addition to whatever scum existed in the USSR, the Neo-Imperialist looters had the whole decade of the 90's to splash around money making new "friends" of the West.
What I believe is going on now is that, in the West's desperation, those moles are breaking cover to interdict munition supplies, among other things. As regrettable as it may be given the fatal consequences, allowing them to act overtly may be necessary in order to locate and root out these traitors.
So we know soldiers will always die in every battle, and I think that this example is different only in the more elaborate mechanism and the identity of the more dangerous enemy. In the words of Marcus Tullius Cicero over two millenia ago:
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.
Well, you have to look back to the beginning of the conflict in February 2022. Remember all the months of incessant war mongering by the West? Russia was continuously on the verge of invasion, invasion chatter picked up by intel, imminent invasion, the orders have already been issued, invasion, invasion, INVASION! Even Zelensky told them there was not going to be a war and to calm the fuck down. Russia even trolled the West on twitter with a Vincent Vega meme.
Then Russia invaded. Even more to the point,no one in the West said, "Oh, see, we were right after all."
The point is that what the West was doing was based on war mongering and fear mongering, not on actual war and the force of arms. They were entirely unprepared for that. Ukraine's military, along with their military-industrial complex has been mostly destroyed. Most of Europe has been bled dry of munitions.
So why not announce what they've been saying Russia was going to do for months now, that they're using nukes? All their fear-mongering would prove true and people would freak out.
Because again, the fear-mongering was the only point. Whatever escalation they might actualize, and that the people would go along with, would be met by Russia just like everything else the West has thrown at them.
The inflection point is: how bad can you get your ass kicked and still claim victory without everyone laughing at you?