... blurs lines between reality and theater...
The problem is not really AI or performance art, as these are just the smoke screens put forward to obscure the truth. The problem can once again be traced back to the true nature of human consciousness, one of Their biggest secrets. In this case, the important secret concerns the "age of reason".
Many will have heard the phrase, and perhaps have a vague idea of the concept, but none will know a clear definition or can relate a precise concept. That's by design. You aren't supposed to have a clear idea. They keep this secret not by shooting people who mention it, but by making sure it stays peripheral and out-of-focus. "Smart" people do "the smart thing" and pass on by, and the rest never notice in the first place.
There is, of course, much to be said, but the important characteristic here is that, as part of normal human development, the "age of reason" is when the human mind begins to distinguish between fantasy and reality. The big trick being played is to keep as many people as possible from making this transition.
To learn a tiny bit about this concept and to study how the secret is kept, we can look at three articles, each on it's own easily found:
Person (Catholic canon law): Age of reason
A Milestone Developmental Stage: The Age of Reason
Can Children Understand the Difference Between Fantasy and Reality?
You can pick up information on the phenomenon from each, but to see how the secret is kept one must observe in the apophatic sense, by studying what is not there but should be.
You see that the Scholastic article only mentions "first Communion", but not that the concept is established in Canon Law as we see from Wiki. Verywell Mind states plainly that, "young children have difficulty distinguishing fantasy from reality", but the word "fantasy" is not even mentioned in the Wiki. See how the game is played?
If this is news to anyone reading this, please consider the "meta" fact that you first heard about this from some rando on an obscure social media site, not an academic or a scientist or the Discovery Channel or any of those high-profile alt-media researchers all over every podcast. Let it be a demonstration of how far down They keep us in the hole.
Do you get a lot of sharing of facts from people you imply are retards? Such retarded thinking, and obvious with no inference necessary. Is it actually that you just like being publicly ridiculed? That's called something else.
... the seemingly ageless restaurateur with the Peter Pan face...
Did anyone ever think Alefantis looked like Peter Pan? No, no one ever? Wonder why they mentioned him? Wasn't Peter Pan the one that took children to an island? Wonder what could keep both Peter Pan and Alefantis "ageless", as they mention?
All questions and no answers, eh?
You know, I was going to make the point that Tucker could in no way be controlled opposition because tossing out something like child sacrifice is so radioactive that it would be like staging a fight by stabbing someone in the lung. Way more damaging than is needed to be convincing.
While I still think he's not controlled op, there's a larger, much more important point to be made. That is that child sacrifice, and many similar such topics, are no longer morally outrageous to many, many people.
Just back in the 2015 movie "Grandma" about a pregnant teen trying to get an abortion with the help of her grandmother, it was handled quite somberly when she (spoiler) finally gets it near the end. In fact, I was surprised when she did. Now? Well, fuck, you ain't got no cred unless you've had one or two abortions.
Have we all noticed how far and how fast we've fallen? I don't think so.
So weird you noticed the headache too. I saw only one other person on Reddit did also, way back when the interview came out.
I attributed it to the fact that he'd been out of the mix for like 25 years, so when they reactivated the old brainwashing his mind was fighting against it.
Sorry Bob, but Project MKDISCLOSURE is a go!
Every time Butler comes up, I like to note two little known facts:
One is that he is one of only nineteen service members twice awarded the Medal of Honor, and for separate combat actions. Previous to that, he was also awarded the Marine Corp Brevet Medal. Marines at that time were ineligible for the Medal of Honor, but it is considered an equivalent award. That would make him the one and only "three time" winner.
Also, he was eventually driven out out the military. Must have bee for something very serious indeed, right? Well, Butler recounted a story about riding in a car with Mussolini when he ran over and killed a child without even bothering to stop.
Anyway, let this be a lesson to any past, present, or future US service members: it does not matter who you are or what you've done, your government will fuck you over as hard as they like if you cross them.
The liberals always love to talk about "inherent bias", and this is a demonstration of it. But it's their own, so of course they would never recognize it, let alone acknowledge it.
You see, have you ever noticed that we know essentially nothing about what these migrants are fleeing from? If you have the liberal mindset, you're saying, "Of course we know--all those places are shitholes!"
But there's the trouble: we know that all these refugess are fleeing because all these places are shitholes, and we know that all these places are shitholes because all the refugees are fleeing. Circular reasoning, but the only way it persists and goes unnoticed is inherent bias.
Not that these are great places, mind you, but if I said there was a country with a violent, tyrannical government spying on the citizens and controlling their lives, with their fascist cronies draining their assets at every turn, blowtorched with state propaganda night and day, prisons filled with slave labor, and which more people tried to flee every day, would you be able to guess exactly which country I'm talking about?
My point, to reiterate, is that prejudice masked as virtue is the reason all the lefties go along with Project OPEN BORDERS.
As a telltale of hoaxed events, you'll very frequently find participants who have been or are likely to have been in trouble with the law. This is the true larger context of the "known wolf" phenomenon.
There are few instances in which this can be confirmed, but I believe strongly that these people are approached with the opportunity to make their legal problems "go away". I think we see now more than ever that "selective prosecution" is quite selective and quite common, and Soros DA's would be key. The beauty is that nothing need go on the record, literally.
I have to say I think analysis of this event as evidence that Tucker is "controlled opposition" is brainless. I would pose the question, "Just when and where is evidence of this 'control' manifesting?"
That is, if "They" control Tucker, why precisely would he be allowed to speak negatively about vaxxs in the first place, other than, of course, to ultimately divert or disguise the truth? I see that no one bothers to present such analysis. So many are to engaged declaring how they were "right all along" to actually carefully reason.
One could say that the real truth is that all vaxxes are phony because viruses do not exist in the way we have been told. True enough. But ask yourself if the people that are still watching Fox News are ready for the whole "viruses don't exist" presentation. Not in my opinion.
Finally, it's not that I think he says everything he knows to everyone who will listen, but there's about 0% of people who do that. I've never actually watched his show because I find his delivery very annoying.
IDK the answer, but there was one tiny detail at that event that I think conveyed an important point about how deep The Swamp really is.
The service was breaking up and people were exchanging greetings on the way out, James "Mad Dog" Mattis, standing near Trump, was eyeballing Lindsay Graham, like really giving him the staredown. As for "Lady G", I have never seen a Senator act so uncomfortable and awkward, or even seen more than a couple of ordinary children in very big trouble behave in such a way. Could not even look Mattis in the eye.
Well, Mattis turns out to another treasonous Deep State scumbag. I discount that they staged this little interaction for the one out a million people that would catch it. I conclude that neither Trump nor anyone else could see Mattis' true colors until later.
Point is, I think basically 0% of us know with any certainty what Trump was actually dealing with, and may have to deal with again.
Each researcher will make of this what they will, but I find it strong evidence against him. I think it's more or less universally agreed by those in the know that the CIA is an evil organization, was certainly involved in the assassination of RFK Jr.'s uncle, and most like that of his father also. Yet we find this:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Says He Couldn't Be Happier for His Son to Marry Former CIA Officer Amaryllis Fox (6/26/2018)
Additionally, the water gets even deeper for RFK Jr. because the assassination of his father was faked. Does he really not know--or even have his suspicions--after all these years? For me, the only way it adds up is that we're dealing with a family of many lifetime actors. JFK rejected his role, though, and paid the price.
On a positive note, RFK Jr. has certainly said many things damaging to the interests of the Cabal in their efforts to retain him as an influencer. That in itself shows how low on assets and desperate They are.
My estimation is that, as part of the larger crypto op, They have got to keep the market the market looking "alive" with price action, and let a little money slosh back and forth from the pockets of the peasants. That'll keep them "spreading the good word" and doing the work of "Them" by flogging crypto to other peasants. It also works secondarily as a smoke screen for the true market, whatever that may be.
Deception is the supreme art of war.
I have to say I pretty much reject outright any suggestion "They" are trying to provoke revolt or any other such thing. I would base that on these grounds:
-
If They want some "major event", They don't need to provoke it, They'll just manufacture it like J6. The day of, that probably required only 100 or so personnel on the ground.
-
Everything They do is based on higher degrees of predictability. That's what everything from "track and trace" to CDBC to getting rid of cars that didn't have built-in 3G cell connections is all about. They monitor so They may predict.
Unleashing any form of chaos is antithetical to that, and only to be used extremely judiciously. Most importantly, that's where it may be shut off instantly. Don't hear from the riotous BLM any more, do you? Of course not, it was shut off.
If real shooting starts with real bullets, I could not even begin to predict how it would unfold and I am certain They could not either. Frankly, I think it's the very last thing They want.
It strikes me as a reflection that we're tipping (<--haha, but it's not funny) from one type of society to another. We grew up in one where we considered ourselves participants in a larger group, that our prosperity was ultimately tied to that of everyone else, and that we were gratified by being gracious and generous to one another.
Now we're devolving to a society where other people are means, not ends. We try to "get over" on each other. The sum gets asymptotically closer to zero.
This concept of hylics was about the only thing the Gnostics were correct about. It was the truth to bait the hook for the rest of their nonsense. You'll find this three-way division of levels of consciousness in other philosophies like that of the Essenes, and manifested in various ways like hypnotizability. Gathering it all together, you find about 80% are hylics, 16% psychics, and 4% pneumatics.
I cannot caution anyone enough not to take the word of the Gnostics for anything else regarding this other than the structure. Take, for example, this line from the "Hylics" wiki page:
Somatics were deemed completely bound to matter.
"Deemed" by who, the Gnostics? And who gave them fiat power in this? No answer to that because it's nonsense.
No one studies consciousness in this way because it is one of "Their" biggest secrets. Were the truth of this to be commonly understood, and commonly understood to be commonly understood, then the psychics and pneumatics would think about the world very differently and make very different decisions. That would be the absolutely final death knell of the Cabal.
Who knows what the Russians plan to do, but I think the start of all the shooting defined the end of them trying to tell everyone what their plans were to get them to go along.
And I always figure they know a hell of a lot more about the situation than I do, but it seems that if they leave Transnistria just hanging out there, that's going to be the next target for more years of easy, murderous provocation. It doesn't even have to be Ukraine or even Poland used for the next round, because to effect that plan there are already enough psychopaths installed in positions of power and in thrall to the West in Moldova and Romania. Last I heard (and I don't keep up), there were already four US bases in Romania.
I get the feeling we're at the point now where quite a few people--everyone from these cops in the UK to Alvin Bragg in Manhattan--are mentally calculating, "What are the chances someone's going to come kick down my door if I just go along with this?" For pretty much all of them, the answer at present is, "There's not a chance of that, so I guess there's not really a problem."
Each of us can make us this what they will.
My support is for the Galactic Empire over the Alliance invasion. PERIOD.
Seriously, though, without suggesting it was planned this way, everyone should compare Die Schwarze Sonne to this: The insignia of the First Galactic Empire in the fictional Star Wars universe.
It's just that they do not not look alike.
Paid by engagement, eh? Now I shall demonstrate my control by forcing you to do it once again. Witness, all!