E. Jean Carroll Admits She Helped New York Dems Change Law So She Could Sue Trump (Daily Caller 5/10/2023)
Here's the key quote:
"It’s a brilliant law,” Carroll chimed in.
The old rule is: if you can't cover it up, turn it up.
If anyone is trying to evaluate the current state of affairs, what I would recommend is that you start by taking a step back and considering this hypothetical: Suppose your CIA supervisor had asked you to lead Operation RAPISTDJT.
I mean, would you have got this this obvious wingnut with a decades old lame storyline out of a very special episode of "Sen and the City" or whatever? No way. Any moderately talented scumbag could cook up a scenario that was at least plausible to all of us.
So one the one hand, the fact that the Elite are reduced to this laughable open-air community theater goes to show how weak and lame Their hand really is. On the other, some people actually but into this absurdity. Also, I guess there's some court in the land that went along with it.
Although really, if no actual courtroom or actual judge or actual jury actually existed in this case, it would hardly surprise me.
Well, it's not a very interesting place to start (which is why virtually no one does it), but the absolutely key, most crucial question you could pose to yourself is this: "Do I really believe it's possible there's another planet in the Solar System, and that the ancient Sumerians knew about it because that's where their 'gods' said they were from?"
That question was answered for me in this article, from which there was no turning back:
Planet X / Nibiru: An Analysis Of Akkadian Seal VA/243 (7/27/2013)
I simply cannot ascribe it to mere happenstance. Once we have accepted that Nibiru exists, we can then move on to the more interesting task of characterizing it.
What this helps to avoid are, on the one hand, flat denials of "Planet X", and on the other, endless tales full of nonsense about Nibiru.
The apocryphal "Book of Noah" is a key reference here. In it, Noah is described as having an extremely unusual appearance at birth, so unusual that his father, Lamech, seeks out his grandfather, Enoch, to ask him whether he thinks Noah's real father is an "angel", among whom Enoch lived and had great familiarity.
We should pause here to note that, yeah, it seems pretty clear Noah was NOT just some human conceived in the conventional way by Lamech and his wife.
Anyway, when Lamech poses this question to Enoch, he answers, "Listen, don't worry about that. He's your son and just raise him that way. He's got some very important work ahead of him." We all know what that turned out to be.
Coming at it from another direction, it's too long to explain here but the Great Flood was caused by the close passage of Nibiru. The Anunnaki would have known the precise timing and proximity, and been able to estimate the damage to Earth. Further, we can date the Flood to the onset of the Younger Dryas Period c11000 BC.
We can also fill in here that, although it was a natural occurrence, Enlil meant for it to wipe the Earth clean of the genetically polluted humans and other species. Enki, engineer of the human race, apparently wished to preserve at least part of his creation and so took steps like getting Noah set up. Also note that there is a story that can be interpreted an Enlil watching the destruction of the Flood from orbit and repenting what he had allowed to happen. The upshot was his promise to Noah after the Flood.
Given the increasing intensity of the promotion of a "catastrophe cycle" through various outlets, I have concluded it is all misdirection and obscuration to keep people from detecting and studying the real cycle: the 3600-year orbit of Nibiru.
I was just listening to Alex Christoforou's broadcast from 5/4 where he talked about this. He mentioned that Z and another Ukrainian official looked scared when they were publicly denying responsibility. His opinion was that it was organized by Ukie intel services (surely with the cooperation and perhaps at the direction of the CIA). Z, presumably, would be frightened that Russia was going to retaliate by smoking him.
His first subject, no need to FF very far: Elensky at The Hague. Politico, maybe Russia did Nord Stream. US bank crash. Biden quid pro quo. U/1 (5/4/2023)
Definitely there is one evil one. Now, you'll see it promoted by disnfo and accepted by confused people that there is more than one evil faction. Aside from minor rivalries and disagreements, you'll never see evidence of destructive conflict between factions, consistent with there being only one. Think of the pyramid they show us over and over and over: only ever one.
That there is a "good" secret society is promoted continuously by unhinged disinfo loons like Ben Fulford with the "White Dragon Society" and Corey Goode with blue avians and the "Galactic Federation of Light" (or whatever). There's never any substance. Trying to study these is like trying to get a good close look at a fog bank.
Are there powerful people working together for the good? Yes, certainly. Have they formed a secret society? I am unaware of any evidence necessitating such a conclusion.
Good people do good works in the light of day. That being said, for purposes of operation security in the current environment, even those working for the good must deceive, misdirect, fail to declare their intentions, say less than what they know, etc., etc.
When I see examples of these techniques used by people I think are on the good side, and used so consistently by the evil people in our world, I always ask myself, "Would I do the same thing in the same situation?" It's hard to accept that perhaps lies and deception are necessary at the current time, but we are where we are.
I'm personally working under the conclusion that the whole thing was fake and ghey and the guy isn't even dead. I'm always surprised to find they've never memory-holed this article:
Khashoggi's 'body double' is pictured leaving Saudi consulate wearing fake beard, murdered journalist's clothes and glasses hours after Saudi intelligence officers butchered him (Daily Mail 10/22/2018)
Before I even knew that surveillance footage existed, I thought he was still alive. A little after Khashoggi was "murdered", some high-profile Christian pastor who had been arrested (in Turkey, IIRC) was released. Someone spotted Khashoggi as--get this--one of the photographers visible as the pastor was driven away.
The other fun but now forgotten aspect was this:
Seriously, the whole affair has to be filed under, "You just can't make this shit up!"
As is sometimes mentioned, quality on r/conspiracy has flatlined. Every so often I have occasion to reference a post only 3-4 years old, and for many of them I think, "I can't believe I've forgotten how high quality many of the posts here used to be."
It has occurred to me that this is an application of the principle that, "The bad drives out the good." As far as the Elites are concerned, they'll take any strategy if it's effective. Just flood the zone with nonsense and negativity.
Could be there has been nothing new since 1972.
They just never needed anything new to shoot farmers and merchants.
I always try to imagine what these American drones flying overhead are like to the residents of the regions where they operate (aside from the terror and trauma). It would be like, "That drone overhead is worth way more than everything in this entire village put together, and each missile it fires costs more than I could pay for a lifetime."
It would be as surreal as if the Chinese invaded the US in triangular flying saucers, then went tooling up and down the streets in their hovercraft shooting "terrorists" with their disruptors.
"They" knew it's been headed this way for a long time, and that's why the motive force behind it and various other changes. MbS, had to become one of the Worst Persons in the World(tm). Not that it needed to be proven to us. It's just something that, somehow, "everybody knows".
(And if anyone is going to bring up that lame-ass phony Khashoggi stunt, is the only thing makes it Not Okay the fact that it wasn't done via drone with a US flag painted on the side? Plenty of those incidents to complain about.)
What I'm tracking, in the wider view of a WW3 that everyone likes to prognosticate on so breezily, it that Russia alone has already gone a very long way towards "demilitarizing" NATO through reduction of their combat potential. There are many similar articles, but here's one angle on the bigger picture:
Senior Officer Says British Army Has Been So Degraded by Cuts UK Is No Longer Capable of Fighting A War on Its Own (Fars News 3/12/2023)
On the one hand, one may say this is simply a tactic to get more money in to the British MIC. Well, it is undoubtedly such a tactic, but anyone who says that it's simply that declares themselves the shallowest of analysts.
First, just because they want more money does not mean the appraisal of the British military is in any way incorrect. And he's not just saying "improvements can be made", he's saying his institution and all his colleagues and friends are punk-ass bitches impotent and ncapable of getting the job done. Far stronger rhetoric than is needed.
Second, the incessantly fear-mongering West lowers the "cone of silence" over such reports. As you can see, we've got to hear about it from Iran. Why? Because in their thorough inversion, They only monger phantom menaces. Real ones that threaten Their power are carefully edited out of existence.
Third, he really gives away the game with the comment, "we have been resting on the assumption that we would not be required to fight at scale." So again, we see that for decades, the real battle plan of the Neo-Imperialists was no "battle" plan at all. Conquest was to be done in the 5th Generation-style: color revolutions, terrorism, subversion, election rigging, etc, etc. They never prepared for a clash of arms. Russia, over the last couple of decades, really did, and we see the difference manifesting now.
If RFK Jr. thinks it's "beyond a reasonable" doubt (which it most certainly is, IMHO), then one has to wonder when, in his own mind, this line was crossed given this recent event:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Says He Couldn't Be Happier for His Son to Marry Former CIA Officer Amaryllis Fox (6/26/2018)
And it's not like she's just some black sheep that he's never going to see or talk to, given this subhead:
The couple has been quietly dating for about a year and are set to wed in early July at the Kennedy family compound.
So as we're all trying to figure out if he's "legit", you have to try to walk through what he would have been thinking at different times. It's difficult to do that without encountering some troubling scenarios. I mean, have the Kennedy's ever sat down to dinner, and then RFK Jr. casually asks,
Hey Ammy, at your old work, did anyone ever talk about how they murdered my uncle? Or anything about murdering your husband's grandpa?
Oh boy, one of those crazy in-laws, always talking about who murdered who.
The whole 19th Century was an incredibly busy time for Them. And They weren't just out there deceiving, They were gittin' 'er dun: Revolutions of 1848
The Revolutions of 1848, known in some countries as the Springtime of the Peoples or the Springtime of Nations, were a series of political upheavals throughout Europe starting in 1848. It remains the most widespread revolutionary wave in European history to date.
Unless, of course, anyone is still under the impression that such revolutions are Totally Organic(tm). I suppose this could be classed under deception as well because, please, raise your hand if you'd ever heard of the Revolutions of 1848 before now.
Deception by omission.
I'm pretty certain I neither require nor requested your help. But thanks for making clear your lack of an offer, which is not the type of quality I look for in friends.
And no, not ignorant. Back when it first made the rounds years ago, it took about 2 minutes to see it was another "flat earth" level trap for retards.
So you really didn't get that was a rhetorical question? Or this is? Or this?
I don't give a fuck what ordinance you think caused this.
Sure seems like you do! But, yes, I know you're one of those "last worders", aren't you? You won't let me down now, will you?
I have a trivial reason (literally, it's trivia) to think the Anunnaki spoke Sumerian and taught it to us humans.
The Voyager space probes that were headed out of the Solar System contained golden LPs put together by Carl Sagan with various types of data. One part contained greetings in 55 languages. The very first one: Sumerian.
That should be noted as odd because the last native speaker died about 4,000 years ago. Why would Sagan include it?
In the photo section, there are only two pictures of Earth from space: one of Egypt and the other of Sumer. Why those places and not, say, the good old USA where the probes were launched?
I think Sagan was hip to the Anunnaki. In the end he chose a career as a science popularizer as a better way to get through to people. But I think he could not resist including a wink and a hat tip just in case someone out there might recognize the sights and sounds of their home away from home.
I feel like everything important that I've discovered has just been an accident, not any type of inspiration. One question that intrigues me just leads to another and to another and then it's like, "Whoa, check out this thing here!" It's the opposite of efficient but it does have a couple of benefits.
One is that it help prevent bias confirmation. I'm never looking for evidence of what I already think, I'm just looking for a good answer to my question. I find that's the opposite of what most everyone else does. They never pose questions to themselves, and they'll take as evidence anything that supports what they already think.
The other benefit is that by wandering around, you're exposed to more truths. There are no unimportant truths, just ones that are less interesting and less immediately relevant.
The idea is that truth is like a giant, smooth, flat bed sheet. There are no wrinkles, no holes, and every thread is eventually connected to every other. Knowing a variety of truths imposes a discipline which I notice others acutely lack. That is, if you come across some truth that seems to contradict some other truth you already know, one or both have to give. The result flattens that wrinkle or mends that tear.
Like, did you ever notice that someone who disagrees with you on social media calls you a dumbshit by the second post, if not right in the first? That's strong evidence of how very little truth they know. Otherwise, why not bring it forward to iron it out between the two of you? Sad commentary on how much people know about the world.
Anyway, as to the last thing you said, it's not quite what you describe but I would definitely recommend to anyone that to properly process information they're taking on board, they have to let their mind wander and not be continuously "consuming". I can't tell you the number of times I've been taking a walk listening to a boring podcast when my mind starts to wander and... bam, I come to some realization about something that had been cooking in the back of my mind.
I don't go out of my way to fast-forward or skip boring episodes of podcasts for just that reason.
Well, it's up to you, but everyone has to make a choice about their basic approach to the world, which will then determine how they act in it. There are various levels:
- Everything works the way I hope.
- Everything works in a sensible, rational way.
- Everything works according to the rules.
- Sometimes people bend or even break the rules.
- There are liars and deception everywhere, and rules are for suckers.
- There are liars and deception everywhere, so I better do my best to figure out how the world really works so I can escape it.
- There are liars and deception everywhere, so I better do my best to figure out how the world really works so I can fix it.
Few indeed even recognize the "boss" level exists, let alone try to operate in it. If anything is going to be fixed, it first has to be understood. That's unless you get really lucky, and I don't see too much of that floating around these days.
I mean, you'd think so, but then again there's no way any of it it should have even got off the ground. Can you even imagine calling up your state legislator: "Hey listen, there was this thing that happened to me, ohhh, almost 30 years ago now, and anyway..." <click>. We're just so far beyond the looking glass that any idea of rationality, reason, or even precedent is off the table, (D)epending on the circumstance, of course.
No one talked about it at the time, but during Trump's impeachment (2 of 2), although the Constitution specifies that the Chief Justice must preside over it. John Roberts refused. Even a compromised guy can have limits, it seems. So the Democrats just designated someone from the prosecution. How did they justify it? Well, Trump would no longer be President by the time time the proceeding to remove him from the Presidency convened,
One of my conclusions is that Trump is playing a deeper game (yes, 4D-chess! lol). He never talks about it because, c'mon, look around and you'll see that most people just would not get it. I think he knows that if he's successful, in the end, all this desperate penny-ante bullshit simply will not matter and be quickly forgotten.