I'm pretty certain I neither require nor requested your help. But thanks for making clear your lack of an offer, which is not the type of quality I look for in friends.
And no, not ignorant. Back when it first made the rounds years ago, it took about 2 minutes to see it was another "flat earth" level trap for retards.
So you really didn't get that was a rhetorical question? Or this is? Or this?
I don't give a fuck what ordinance you think caused this.
Sure seems like you do! But, yes, I know you're one of those "last worders", aren't you? You won't let me down now, will you?
I have a trivial reason (literally, it's trivia) to think the Anunnaki spoke Sumerian and taught it to us humans.
The Voyager space probes that were headed out of the Solar System contained golden LPs put together by Carl Sagan with various types of data. One part contained greetings in 55 languages. The very first one: Sumerian.
That should be noted as odd because the last native speaker died about 4,000 years ago. Why would Sagan include it?
In the photo section, there are only two pictures of Earth from space: one of Egypt and the other of Sumer. Why those places and not, say, the good old USA where the probes were launched?
I think Sagan was hip to the Anunnaki. In the end he chose a career as a science popularizer as a better way to get through to people. But I think he could not resist including a wink and a hat tip just in case someone out there might recognize the sights and sounds of their home away from home.
I feel like everything important that I've discovered has just been an accident, not any type of inspiration. One question that intrigues me just leads to another and to another and then it's like, "Whoa, check out this thing here!" It's the opposite of efficient but it does have a couple of benefits.
One is that it help prevent bias confirmation. I'm never looking for evidence of what I already think, I'm just looking for a good answer to my question. I find that's the opposite of what most everyone else does. They never pose questions to themselves, and they'll take as evidence anything that supports what they already think.
The other benefit is that by wandering around, you're exposed to more truths. There are no unimportant truths, just ones that are less interesting and less immediately relevant.
The idea is that truth is like a giant, smooth, flat bed sheet. There are no wrinkles, no holes, and every thread is eventually connected to every other. Knowing a variety of truths imposes a discipline which I notice others acutely lack. That is, if you come across some truth that seems to contradict some other truth you already know, one or both have to give. The result flattens that wrinkle or mends that tear.
Like, did you ever notice that someone who disagrees with you on social media calls you a dumbshit by the second post, if not right in the first? That's strong evidence of how very little truth they know. Otherwise, why not bring it forward to iron it out between the two of you? Sad commentary on how much people know about the world.
Anyway, as to the last thing you said, it's not quite what you describe but I would definitely recommend to anyone that to properly process information they're taking on board, they have to let their mind wander and not be continuously "consuming". I can't tell you the number of times I've been taking a walk listening to a boring podcast when my mind starts to wander and... bam, I come to some realization about something that had been cooking in the back of my mind.
I don't go out of my way to fast-forward or skip boring episodes of podcasts for just that reason.
Well, it's up to you, but everyone has to make a choice about their basic approach to the world, which will then determine how they act in it. There are various levels:
- Everything works the way I hope.
- Everything works in a sensible, rational way.
- Everything works according to the rules.
- Sometimes people bend or even break the rules.
- There are liars and deception everywhere, and rules are for suckers.
- There are liars and deception everywhere, so I better do my best to figure out how the world really works so I can escape it.
- There are liars and deception everywhere, so I better do my best to figure out how the world really works so I can fix it.
Few indeed even recognize the "boss" level exists, let alone try to operate in it. If anything is going to be fixed, it first has to be understood. That's unless you get really lucky, and I don't see too much of that floating around these days.
Well, you have to look back to the beginning of the conflict in February 2022. Remember all the months of incessant war mongering by the West? Russia was continuously on the verge of invasion, invasion chatter picked up by intel, imminent invasion, the orders have already been issued, invasion, invasion, INVASION! Even Zelensky told them there was not going to be a war and to calm the fuck down. Russia even trolled the West on twitter with a Vincent Vega meme.
Then Russia invaded. Even more to the point,no one in the West said, "Oh, see, we were right after all."
The point is that what the West was doing was based on war mongering and fear mongering, not on actual war and the force of arms. They were entirely unprepared for that. Ukraine's military, along with their military-industrial complex has been mostly destroyed. Most of Europe has been bled dry of munitions.
So why not announce what they've been saying Russia was going to do for months now, that they're using nukes? All their fear-mongering would prove true and people would freak out.
Because again, the fear-mongering was the only point. Whatever escalation they might actualize, and that the people would go along with, would be met by Russia just like everything else the West has thrown at them.
The inflection point is: how bad can you get your ass kicked and still claim victory without everyone laughing at you?
You know, I actually considered ridiculing people who thought nukes are hoax, as I did near the bottom of my post to the "fake war" proponents. I declined specifically because I thought it was beneath recognition.
Silly me!
Oh hey, forgot to address the topic of "Satan's purpose".
As I mentioned before, I had concluded that there was some sort of a deal in place between Yahweh and Satan. I put that together from the tiniest of clues, and was trying to deduce the shape of it.
I stumbled across a much more explicit description of the deal. One of Satan's many names was Iblis, which is how he is known to the Muslims. I haven't researched the details, but in this article we find a summary:
Because of his arrogance, Allah banished Iblis from heaven and condemned him to hell. Iblis accepted his fate, but asked that he might be spared until Judgement Day so that he could tempt humans from the path of righteousness and lead them to the same fate that would eventually befall him. Allah granted this, but did not give Iblis power over humans. Instead, if they were to be led from the righteous path, it would have to be because of their own temptations and transgressions.
I found it quite startling. Do you see how we find parts and pieces of the story, corrupted and out of context though they may be? For example, he wasn't "banished to hell", but marooned on Earth with all of us jokers. It's difficult work to put it all back together, but I believe it's possible.
I do sometimes wish for a visitation from an "angel", who'll say, "Okay, let me just break this down for you...."
Right, "satan" is a just an adjective, but you have to flip your thinking around on the concept of "naming". These ancient aliens went by many names, but guess what? So do modern humans.
Take, for example, the modern human that ran for President against Trump in 2016. In one short human lifespan, you can probably think up two dozen different "names" by which she has been referred to: Hillary Rodham, Senator Clinton, First Lady of Arkansas, Hillbeast, HRC, Mrs. Clinton, Secretary Clinton, The Next President of the United States, Hellary, etc, etc. Think how flexible we need to be to track entities that live for millennia known by numerous cultures worldwide.
As to Satan's genealogy, think of the black hole that exists around it. We all just assumed that God created Satan for some reason, or perhaps that Satan always existed. The "authorities" just told us whatever was convenient to their argument at the the time, but mostly they ignored the evidence and were silent. How can that be considered "theology"?
The "scholars" decline to give an explanation of the evidence we have at hand. So not only do I demand such an explanation, I give one. What, then, shall we think of the "scholars" and "authorities"?
It turns out these is quite a strong, simple and precise connection between Masonry, Babylon, and Satan. To tell you, though, gives away some of the game, and your acceptance will be much stronger if you discover these things for yourself. Ask me about it later, if you're still wondering.
I still have yet to watch the Hancock/Biglino interview. I worry, though, that Biglino will be "turned". That very thing happened to Alan Alford. Better watch close to see if I start changing my tune!
Lucifer was indeed an El, but the Elohim are not human. Gen 1:1 was intentionally damaged, and put back together it reads, "The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the heavens and the Earth." (See Michal Ledwith for details.) So the Elohim Really, the function of the sentence is to establish clearly that the Elohim preexisted humans.
Later in Genesis, Man is created. With a correct understanding of "in our image", we find that that it was through genetic engineering. So properly understood, humans are some part Elohim. That explains why the Elohim can interbreed with humans. Also, it explains why the resulting Nephilim were giants. Hybrids, such as ligers, may lack the gene for regulating growth.
Well, I started with the little clues we all saw, like Biden's fake Oval Office and the rumor he was turned away from the Pentagram. If he wasn't let into the real WH or Pentagon, what were the chances he had the football?
Then Real Raw News came along and started talking about this stuff much more explicitly from inside sources. As outlandish as their claims are, I keep trying to punch holes in them and failing to.
According to them, Trump invoked the Insurrection Act and turned the football over the General David Berger. Starting this year, General Eric M. Smith took over from Berger. RRN did not make specific mention, but he would now have it.
It all sound crazy, but you turn it around and ask yourself: has Biden ever been pictured with the military attache with the football? With all this incessant talk of nuclear WW3, has anyone even mentioned the subject, even to further frighten the public? Not to my knowledge. That seems quite strange, yet it is consistent with the "wild stories".
As I noted in the writeup, the Russians used nukes to achieve specific battlefield objectives, yet they also specifically declined to "escalate" by making public announcements of that. We can also see that their public "threats" are meant to get the Western citizenry to pressure their masters to back down. Fruitlessly, thus far.
Also noted in the writeup is that this latest incident can be interpreted as more evidence that "They" no longer have control of any nukes. People like to wave their hands around on this issue, but when you get down to brass tacks evidence is thin on the ground.
Just off the top and in broad terms, I would argue that Biden(tm) does not have control of the nuclear football. In nuclear France, Rothschild butt-boy Macron--of all people--seems to be turning. Israel seems to be the most likely source of atomic munitions for "Them", but I think the Israelis now calculate that there now is a point where Iran can and would put an end to Israel with conventional missiles alone.
Also worthy of note is that unstoppable nuclear-tipped Kinzhals are or soon will be in Belarus, minutes from the European capitals. European NATO combat potential is a joke. US combat potential has to get across oceans that would be swarming with hypersonic anti-ship missiles.
What I'm saying is that when you start to put meat on the bones, it really begins to take on a different shape than what most people seem to have in mind.
Yes, you're got the genealogy right. But that brings up the issue that everyone so bizarrely steers around seemingly without thought: why does Satan even have a genealogy?
I'll have to listen to the show you linked, but I notice in the writeup they do precisely the same thing. They're talking about "lucifer" and "venus". Do you see how that's exactly the opposite direction from the one I point towards?
That is, some time long ago, some guy sat down and wrote the words "helel ben shahar". Just as we all do when we sit down to write, he had something in mind which he wished to communicate. What we're after is what he had in mind.
That's the direction we go towards, not towards what the Greeks or Romans or King James or anyone else had to say about it thousands of years later. Put that way, it seems quite ridiculous to even discuss them. The importance of what they said is only to help us unwind how we got to where we are now.
That Satan has a genealogy should catch our attention the way a discussion of the suspension system of Cinderella's carriage would. You'd say to yourself, "Hang on, is this really just a fairy tale, or was something real being described? If so, what can we learn about that real thing"
Are you actually under the impression that anyone takes any value from your "analysis"? What really is your motivation? Does that even apply or is it really just some thoughtless compulsion?
Personally, I think it's just compulsion, and you're actually only interacting with your own ego. Do these comments help with your introspection? I sincerely doubt it, and they're not supposed to.
Port Said was another nuke, unquestionably. There's quite a bit more to the complete story and when I tried to get it out through a few outlets, it ended with a Blackhawk orbiting my house at around 500'. Maybe just coincidence, though, huh?
While that story is interesting in a very "Tom Clancy-esque" way, what's actually much more informative is how virtually everyone is convinced it was a big pile of old fertilizer. It's like everyone thinking a big pile of little paper tubes for firecrackers leveled a concrete warehouse.
Lots of speculation about Geiger counters. Can you link to anyone that actually checked?
For anyone that wishes to inform themselves beyond the low-yield reasoning of "If it was real I would have already known about it!", then you may be interested in this article:
Just How Radioactive Are Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons? (The Drive 12/19/2022)
I would add that for such people that live in a reality of "If it was real I would have already known about it!", how very comforting it must be. Regrettably, it comes at the cost of learning of learning anything new.
I can't believe you thought I'd read that, but there we have it.