I've posted several comments analyzing the two detonations in Khmelnytskyi on 5/13 and an earlier one in Pavlohrad on 4/30 as all being nuclear strikes, so I won't repeat that analysis here. If you simply cannot believe nukes were used or don't exist or any other such nonsense, there's no need to read further as it will just make you upset and feel compelled to tell me about it.

With that out of the way, let's look at recent developments from three articles, all from The Intel Drop, followed by my short comments on Ukrainian nukes and "cooking off", depleted uranium and gamma radiation, and TID itself:

Did Russia just obliterate depleted uranium munitions delivered by UK? (5/16/2023)

TID: IAEA says, not publicly, that this is a 10 plus kiloton tactical nuclear weapon ‘cooking off’ from fires caused by rocket fuel stored at a major black market shopping center…Nukes for All…Protected by Israel

Experts announced jumps in radiation in the east of Poland in the atmosphere (5/17/2023)

Classified and Confirmed: Russia hit a stockpile that included illegal Ukrainian tactical nukes, some recently sold to Taiwan…and one of the weapons ‘cooked off’ as confirmed by a highly qualified particle physicist at the IAEA

Ukraine Evacuating Radiation Victims from Khmelnitsky (5/17/2023)

The IAEA says depleted uranium is a cover story and that radiation levels are 10 to 20 times higher than announced and that areas of Poland can expect soaring cancer rates (TID: This is closer to the truth)

Ukrainian nukes and "cooking off"

It's a longer story, but I do not believe Ukraine has any nukes whatsoever, built or bought, tactical or strategic. But let's suppose they did for a second. Could they have "cooked off", as suggested in the articles?

I have no knowledge of any nuke anywhere going off accidentally in any situation. I put it at the extreme edge of possibility that the explosives that force together the sub-critical fissile masses could be heated enough to spontaneously detonate, and any such detonation would simply blow the device apart. So extremely unlikely, I would say.

But let's suppose that such an extremely unlikely event took place. As you can see in the Khmelnytskyi video, two virtually identical explosions took place a couple of hundred meters apart within seconds of each other. If you can believe two extremely unlikely events took place in such a relation to each other... well, what more could I say?

So did any of these "cook off"? No.

Depleted uranium and gamma radiation

If these storage facilities held depleted uranium munitions, and they were blown apart, could that explain anything to do with increased gamma radiation? Uranium is radioactive, right? In a word: no. We can study a few key characteristics right on the wiki for depleted uranium.

First, DU doesn't emit gamma radiation. In fact, it's one of the prime materials for blocking it:

Depleted uranium is the best radiation shielding by weight, due to the high atomic weight of the uranium atoms; materials are more able to block radioactivity the higher their atomic weight, and uranium is one of the heaviest natural elements.... Industrial radiography cameras include a very high activity gamma radiation source.... Depleted uranium is often used in the cameras as a shield to protect individuals from the gamma source.

Second, if anyone is suffering from "radiation poisoning" of any type, it almost certainly has nothing to do with DU:

It is only weakly radioactive because of the long radioactive half-life of U-238 (4.468 × 109 or 4,468,000,000 years) and the low amounts of U-234 (half-life about 246,000 years) and U-235 (half-life 700 million years).

Third, if you're thinking that all the horrible health problems and birth defects caused by DU shells in Iraq is proof of some sort of radiation creating genetic mutants, that was never the method of action:

The use of DU in munitions is controversial because of concerns about potential long-term health effects.Normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by exposure to uranium, a toxic metal.

That is, these effects are over the long-term, not 3 days, and are caused by toxic metal poisoning from particles inhaled or ingested, not glowing green gobs of metal.

The Intel Drop

TID is a place where you need to walk carefully. It's full of very valuable information not available elsewhere, to my knowledge. You'll also find it polluted by some amount of disinfo, like frequent rants full of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

The site is a spin-off of Veterans Today. The guy that ran VT and I would suppose runs TID, Gordon Duff, has admitted that, yes, he does publish disinfo, and that otherwise he would not be allowed to publish the other stuff. Some sort of deal in place then and still.

So are they lying or simply incorrect? If I had to choose, I'd say lying. More precisely, I'd say they are compromised and are doing what they are required to do. Well, they really say as much themselves with the comment, "TID: This is closer to the truth". Why not just the truth, right? Well, we are in very deep waters. Nukes are flying. Markers are being called in.

They used to like to say "the revolution will not be televised". All I would say is that WW3 won't be either. You'll have to piece it together yourself, just as I have done.