I wanted to point out a couple of things about the dynamics of these situation that I haven't seen noted before. Everyone looks at something like this and thinks, "Well, they're all just pedos themselves!" That may be true but that's not even really an important point.
You see, with a pedo they have a kind of leverage, but not a kind that's illegal even if they wiretapped these people continuously. That is, they can say to this person, "We can give you power and significance in this world of such a kind that, given your situation, you would never be able to achieve on your own. Never." And it's true, of course.
The unspoken and subconscious part is: that which is given can be taken away. The classic question is: who is more powerful, the King or the kingmaker? We know the answer.
So the first point is this: they don't need kompromat and fancy blackmail schemes and ritual initiations and secret handshakes and all the rest. Everyone stays in their lane because it is directly in their interest to do so. Think Roland Bernard (up to a certain level, then yes, it's sacrifices, etc).
The second point is that it's a technique of general application. It doesn't just apply to pedos, it applies pretty much as well to drug addicts, drug enthusiasts, sexual libertines, bathhouse gays, alcoholics, immigrants, ethics of various stripes, cocktail waitresses, bubble boys, failed entrepreneurs, trannies, and given the very dim prospects for the future, even just young people. Think of a shitty, corrupt politician and you may notice they fall into one of these categories.
The functional part is rigged elections, of course. When you wonder, "How can people keep voting for this dirtbag?", just realize that they don't. Do we even need more evidence? It already explains quite a lot, does it not?
As a final note, these people are told that they would never beat these old, white men in an election without "help". If they need to, they justify it in their minds as fighting racism or sexism or anti-trannyism or whatever. The thing is, regardless of their biases, old white men were pretty decent at running things and the more of them go away, the worse things get.
Everyone will want to just bag on the freakshow pedo Brandon, but for the adventurous of mind, let's dig a little deeper....
Does this whole video just strike you as very unnatural and staged? Let's start with an article with a bit more context:
'Disturbing' Biden Video Resurfaces: What's He Doing Holding Hands with These 2 Children? (5/20/2023)
The video is from April but it only surfaced now, from a White House "Take Your Child to Work Day" event, the first since Trump in 2018 so far as I can tell.
There are all sorts of oddities you can identify. Like, there's a black guy in blue suit with a camera right behind them. A cameraman in a suit? Where's his video? And strangely, why are all these people wandering around outside in the first place? I'm pretty sure you can get wherever you need to go through hallways, like most every other building that experiences inclement weather. We could go on.
The dead giveaway, though, is this: neither the little girl nor the little boy have security credentials on a lanyard. They're not threat, right? Of course not, but what little kid wouldn't want souvenir ID from their visit? Don't believe me? Take a look at two additional linked videos, one from 2023 and the other from 2018, and all the children have them.
There's another egregious anomaly in this video from the same day:
Kid 'Secret Service agents' steal show at White House 'Take Your Child to Work Day' (ABC 4/27/2023)
First, Biden emerges from a portal to the black pit of Hell, or maybe the door to where they store the WH patio furniture. But the real thing to notice starts at 0:35. See those Marines with their hands crossed in front of them? It's happened several times before and IDK why they keep doing it. That is not a Marine posture. It's not "parade rest" or "attention" or any other US military posture. Those are not real Marines.
What I'm driving at, though, is the old rumor that Biden was not allowed in the real White House. You can see in the original video that he barely gets in the door before it ends.
To spell it out, Biden haters see the pedo at it once again, while Biden defenders simply point out that it's all entirely innocent. But all those people cement in their own minds once again that "Biden" is "working in the White House".
I mean, if you really want to study how it's possible to control "reality" without actually controlling reality, this is it.
Final note: for comparison, here's an article about the same event from 2018:
“Take Your Child to Work Day” at the White House was vintage Trump (4/26/2018)
You can see Trump interacting very naturally, smiles all around, and a big gang of children in the Oval Office (with the press pool and some of the parents, as the article notes).
Thanks for the tip. I've actually found everything I've come across "outing the Illuminati" to have little valuable information, which we could define as providing direction towards further research. It all just leads into a big cloud where you end up taking their word, and the word of their confreres doing similar "outing". In short, I think it's all written by servants of the Illuminati themselves.
As far as RFK Jr., the biggest red flag that I simply cannot get past is the fact of his father's assassination. Specifically, I am of the firm opinion that it was faked. One can tell simply by close examination of a couple of the photos, and a little comparison with "eyewitness accounts". In their years since I realized this, I also realized that their secret is completely safe because no one does it, and claims to that effect are rejected out of hand. But if we analyze that fact in the style of game theory, we can break it down into three basic cases:
One, RFH Jr. has no idea, and believes something conventional like the official narrative and that "the CIA did it". If that's the case, he's so far, far behind the curve he would be essentially powerless against the titanic forces arrayed against an honest man in DC. (In comparison, Trump has subtly tipped his hand on numerous occasions that he's what I would call a "closet truther".)
Two, RFK Jr. is aware it was fake. Without getting to the "Bloodlines" level, what does that say about the Kennedys? That puts RFK Jr. very close to a very hidden world, and I have never come across where he has given the slightest hint to us about it. (Compare with some of the research on JFK Jr., and all the little nods and winks and a purported very rude note to Joe Biden, of all people.)
Two A, he's aware it was fake and has been powerless to "drain the swamp" all these decades. The Trump Presidency gave him his best chance. He could have said, "Listen, I hate the guy, but on this particular something-or-other he's right and we should support him." Did he have the boldness to do even that? Not to my recollection.
Two B, he's aware it was fake and has willingly gone along with the deception all these decades. Well, maybe he's secretly got a heart of gold but I don't know how you distinguish this scenario from just being "one of Them". In this case, he would simply be "going along with the plan" now.
RFK declared “As president, your right to own Bitcoin shall be inviolable” – as will self-custody and running your own nodes. “The government has no right to be inside your wallet”.
You wish he would just say something like, "The government was delegated no power under the Constitution to regulate cryptocurrency, any more than trading baseball cards or shiny pebbles from the beach."
But then again, it's harder to back off from such flat statements, especially ones highlighting limitations to government power and the nature of the Constitution.
Right after I opened the PDF my eyes hit the phrase "Big Igloo Bois".
I have a hypothetical question that probably no one could really answer. I'm not talking about the FBI testifying before Congress or in the mainstream media or any other joke situation, but I wonder if any normal person has ever actually said to another normal person, "Hey, have you heard about the 'Big Igloo Bois'? It's spelled B-O-I-S. Anyway, I was reading up on them and...."
My money would say that no, no one has ever said this a single time.
But Hines seems to get a pass from you. Well, okay. I guess cryptos are only cryptos when you know they're cryptos. Which seems to be an inversion of the very concept, but, again, okay.
I like to study how people think about things. Thanks for your contribution.
What I find most interesting in this long and thoughtful comment is how it's first about bashing Trump, than about excusing Hines and RFK Jr. with the same reasoning that would apply to Trump, then just rank speculation. We see from the upvotes how many agree.
Not that I'm declaring I personally agree or disagree with anything in it, but I like to examine how people actually think. The Elite do the same. It is their key to manipulating the masses.
Now if you find reading any of this upsetting to you, like, "Just where does this jerk get off saying...", this is why the Elite succeed. They also know that for most of the people that can actually reason about things, the last thing they want examined is their own reasoning and are thus loathe to do it themselves.
Here's a funny thing, I wasn't sure which comment on that post you may have been referring to, so I click on the OP and your reply wasn't there. Just a glitch? First time I've seen that on here.
In any case, thanks, and I like your turn of phrase.
As far as the first part, yes, I believe that's exactly what happened. Russia warned and warned, and when that terrible shit finally arrived in theater, they couldn't wait until after it was dispersed to combat units, let alone fired off in the east.
They had to hit it and get it all in one go. As you may have seen no one wishes to publicly concur with my analysis of the type of weapon used, but I judge it was determined by this very consideration. One or even several cruise or theater ballistic missiles with conventional warheads fired at a bunker in hopes of starting a fire is far from a certain way to destroy perhaps thousands of separate munitions.
As far as the second part, it's not that they're retards, it's that what is driving them is different than what would be driving you or I were we in their places. What we have to do if figure out what their imperatives are.
We're beyond the valley of rationality and historical precedence, so it's almost all gut feelings and guesswork, but as I see it, "They" are in the "Thelma & Louise" mode of desperation. All They can really do at this point is hit the gas and head over the cliff.
Hey, none of us know for a fact that Thelma and Louise didn't make to the bottom and drive off laughing, now do we?
On the flip side, we have to recognize progress. I mean, ten years all this stuff you and I are writing right now, if i had been forced against my will to read it, would have made no more sense to me than the noise of a distant lawnmower, and been no more significant to me.
When I think about that radical change, I wonder what other similar changes have gone on and are going on now in the world that I just don't know about yet?
Very, very long story short, the fundamental problem--as far as I can chase it down--it that most humans do not have higher consciousness and therefore no innate moral sense, these being one and the same.
If you can't find reference to this specific observation anywhere online or in any book written anywhere at any time, well, that's how far away from any solution I think we are.
So when I see less than perfect diagnoses and solutions come along, well, it's disappointing but then again I have to be honest with myself: humanity isn't nearly fucking ready to deal with anything close to the truth.
You know, for as much talk as there is among conspiracy theorists of HAARP, weather manipulation and "owning the weather", it seems to me that we just had a prime example of weather warfare but conspiracists never noticed.
That is, the very unusually warm winter in Europe, particularly the east, both prevented the freezing of Europeans as you point out, and also prevented Russia from mounting the winter offensive they had been gearing up for all during the autumn. We see now that, as they "shape the battlespace" for offensives this spring, missiles and airstrikes are wrecking shop all across Ukraine. All this would have taken place months ago.
What should cement this as weather warfare in the mind of any alert conspiracy theorist is that, given the mainstream media soils it's pants several times a day over "global warming", they are virtually silent on this past European winter where the ground never froze. It's a howling silence when you think about it.
Wow, I didn't expect the full delusion. Makes me regret the effort I spent on a mental patient. So no, I won't be seeing you next time.
I forbid you from reading my posts in the future. (However, I fear you're now so obsessed you won't be able to help yourself. Just know that help is available to those who need it.)
Well, I left open the theoretical possibility of a nuke "cooking off" because I didn't want to hear from what the Dutch would call "ant fuckers".
That is, if you start wherever you like with a fission explosion, like with a phone call from the President, the place you end is with conventional explosives detonating to shove together sub-critical fissile masses. And in the normal functioning, it's just an electrical current that triggers them. All the safety mechanisms come before that.
So could a fire or nearby explosion cause either this necessary current or the detonation of the conventional explosives themselves in just the right manner? I really seriously doubt it, but then again IDK because I haven't set fire to any nukes or blown up any bombs next to one. I also don't know of anyone that claims publicly to have done so, or any event where that happened by accident.
It's all a miniscule point, but you know "ant fuckers".
When did I admit such a thing? Everyone can read and judge for themselves everything that I say and that I've linked. Everyone can also read your crude and clumsy strawman argumentation.
You're obviously anxious to gratify yourself by "proving me wrong", which I used to find interesting to engage in. Now it just find it disappointing, to see someone so clearly unable to raise themselves from a low-level of consciousness.
If you're wondering if I care at all what you think of what I've written or what your opinion is of me, no I do not. I'm guessing you would never admit it, even in your heart of hearts let alone publicly, but I feel certain you find that disappointing.
Well, disappointment all around, eh? But as shaming and humbling as you might find it compared to your feeble thrusts, look how much you got me to write! :)
I've always tried to incorporate into my analysis of events that Trump has had to deal with more problem than is publicly known. Of course, I'm only speaking from my own experience as President of the United States of America.
Wait, no, sorry! It was assistant manager at a GameStop. You would not BELIEVE what I had to put up with on a daily basis! Pretty much like President, though, all the same.
It may be news to you, but not everything is announced publicly. I know, it's shocking, isn't it? And to find out in a place called conspiracies.win.
What will we find out next was not on cable news? The mind reels!
LA Marzulli did the best interviews on this. These are a couple of short clips, but longer versions with several of the witnesses are floating around out there:
https://youtu.be/owUIaYObrCo
https://youtu.be/GEMrD6n9qv0