Ted Kaczynski Dead At 81
(abcnews.go.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
"Miles Mathis" is most assuredly a disinformation project, as stated. And as I hope everyone understands but seemingly very few do, all disinformation sources must give you some truth. For the astute, even the lies and omissions are valuable, since one can deduce what They wish everyone to think or to steer everyone away from.
The water is too deep for the vast majority, even of those who fancy themselves "conspiracy theorists". Notwithstanding that, I'll still tell people that a deep end of the pool exists.
Most will never venture there for whatever reasons they care to tell themselves and others. Some will go out, but will metaphorically drown. A handful will learn to swim, just as I learned. In my opinion, we need all the swimmers we can get.
There was some former cia guy , name slips my mind, Admitting the use of some truth and some lies when operating interationally. What you are basically outlining is finding the truth in the "truth".
Right, exactly.
See, I thought what made conspiracy theorists different was that they were doing what I was doing (and which is simply what I thought everyone should be doing): using the resources of logic, judgement, and a knowledge base of facts that you had previously built up to validate new facts and feed them back in to your knowledge base. Turns out, that's pretty much not what happens.
We all criticize normies because they get their "truths" from the mainstream. like picking books off a shelf. They are allowed a limited selection, so some choose the book labeled "Fox" over the book labeled "MSNBC", but the Elites control the books on the shelf.
I was surprised and dismayed to determine--really only very recently--that almost all "conspiracy theorists" operate the same way, just with a different set of books. They pick books off the shelf labeled "Joe Rogan" or "Clif High" or "The Greek" or whatever. Some more shadowy versions of Rupert Murdoch control or influence the vast majority of what goes on this shelf. But see how it's just an enhanced version of the other thing?
To me, a real seeker with any hope of finding out what the hell is really going on must to be able to recognize admissions of truth when spoken by a known liar, reject falsehoods and errors from their own most valued sources, and accept truths even when rejected by every other person. IDK exactly what qualities it takes to do this, but it seems clear to me that it's what we should all be shooting for.
You really do need a hefty self awareness of your own thinking. Recognise what you don't know. Hold a pinch of doubt so you don't blind yourself by believing something absolutely. Critically reevaluate presumptions you hold.
Preventing discussion is really the only impediment; there is usually someone that will present things in a manner that warrants your contemplation.