Long story how I came to these conclusions, and as much as it may sound like outlandish fantasy there's a lot of compelling evidence to back it up.
It looks like everyone was an NPC, except for kings and chief priests, up to 600 BC. As it looks now--and I have no evidence to suspect it was otherwise at any time along the line--about 80% of the population are NPCs, 15% are "in-between", and 5% are fully conscious.
I've never come across any evidence regarding differences due to geography, culture, or environment. It also does not seem to be hereditary.
There are the slightest hints it can be affected or altered technologically. Crossing over into some informed speculation, I think everyone has the capability for full consciousness inherent genetically, but it is only activated in some people. To throw some buzzwords out, I suspect it's encoded in junk DNA and is enabled epigenetically. It also clearly seems to involve the pineal gland.
But as I mentioned, it's extremely difficult to come by information regarding all this because it's like the blind men examining an elephant. And also the Big Boss comes by to give them a beating when they get too close to the elephant.
It's a really long story, but part of this differing state of consciousness--maybe the most important part--is that their moral reasoning is "inverted" from what you assume it is.
That is, in the expected mode of operation, you collect facts and reasoning, apply moral principles, then take action, hoping that you have done the morally correct thing and are thus a "good" person.
With NPCs all that is reversed. They begin with the conclusion that they are "good" people. All their actions are, of course, morally justified by definition. Moral principles, reasoning, and facts will found, interpreted, and even invented to support all this. Reality itself will give way.
This is what underlies so many confounding aspects of their behavior: total moral relativism, no fixed moral principles, inability to detect contradiction, made up "facts", hypocrisy, failure to protect even their own freedoms, etc.
This inversion leads--or perhaps defines--a complete moral certitude. Even with the religious, almost all recognize that they're liable to error and sin and will always fall short of the mark. You've got to go a long way to find a zealot that believes they are above error and sin.
To put a fine point on it, it's not a mindset but rather the structure of their minds.
One may liken it, at least on the surface, to color-blindness. Both conditions are not readily noticed, nor detectable through casual observation. Indeed, the color-blind themselves most often do not realize they're different from other people until their teens or early twenties. Specialized tests are required for positive identification. All this while they quite literally see the world entirely differently than everyone else around them.
The NPC state of human consciousness is virtually never studied scientifically. That indicates this is one of "Their" biggest secrets. Does everyone recall how vigorously it was denied when it first boiled over? "They" wanted to go back to the normal way of protecting the biggest secrets. It's not that it's denied and you are forbidden from discussing it, you're just never supposed to realize it exists.
I did see that, but normally people that are into these kinds of things are very careful to distinguish "flags" from "coats of arms". But it's weird, isn't it, in this "age of universal knowledge through the Innerwebz", that when you go looking for the answer to such a seemingly simple question you just cannot find it.
And how would that thing even relate to Judaism? Is it the "Tiger of Judah"? Strange all the way around.
A little detail on the suspected nature of the attack. Note that this was not a rumor circulating, but a comment made in a televised appearance:
Adviser to the head of Rosenergoatom: On the night of July 5, Ukraine is going to attack the Zaporizhzhya NPP using nuclear waste munitions (The Intel Drop 7/4/2023)
According to the expert, Ukraine is going to attack the ZNPP in the next few hours – on the night of July 5.Karchaa noted that this information was received by the department and he is authorized to voice it.
The adviser to the general director of Rosenergoatom specified the information, stating that an attempt to attack the station would be carried out with the help of attack drones or with the help of missile weapons.Renat Karchaa noted that Ukraine is going to drop ammunition filled with radioactive waste from the UAV in order to immediately accuse Russia of “undermining the nuclear power plant.” The backup plan of the Kyiv regime is to strike at the ZNPP using a Tochka-U missile with a warhead stuffed with nuclear waste.
IDK, 10% of your rent for a real nice steak dinner for the family doesn't seem so bad, does it?
BTW, this is almost certainly an example of what is known as native advertising.
I'll reiterate my thesis that Hunter has been dead quite a while, and that they can run this ring of the circus as long as they like.
I know that somehow this still strikes most people here as a crazy idea, but would anyone like to publicly declare the last time they saw the original Joseph R. Biden? I hope someone does so we can all laugh.
You have to sort of flip it around and look at it from the perspective of someone with certain resources who wishes to influence public opinion through this medium.
That is, would you just hire a bunch of sweaty emotionally-unstable neckbeard incels, pay them an hourly wage, and set them loose here? Maybe as a base case, but you could do a lot better.
You'd probably scrape the site by machine looking for certain flags. When found, you would assign the posts to one or more trolls then pay them per post, more for higher quality and less for simple "FU"s, although those are helpful too,
The point is, because there aren't any real, coherent personalities behind any of it, you get the sort of anomalous results you describe. Once you have this type of concept in mind, you start seeing the little pieces of it appearing in their places.
The flag was only changed in 1996, but there's no mention on the wiki of who wanted to change it and why, and what the flag was before that. Pretty big omissions for such a recent event.
Also of interest is that, in the only other officially Jewish jurisdiction in the world besides Israel, there are almost no Jews left, with less than 1% of the population.
You cite that, so matter of fact.
Indeed it is. But I have come to understand that few have the ability to keep up. It's still a bit counterintuitive to me, but there are some that wish to proclaim this fact, as they believe it somehow demonstrates their superiority. A strange thing to witness, but there we have it.
Keep researching. Or don't, but there's no need to bother me about it with lame-ass rhetoric.
I was just reading the same post and a similar one over on Reddit, and there was an incredible number of people posting how this guy was full of it and it was all bullshit and upvoting each other and slamming anyone who said anything to the contrary. That in itself should tell everyone something about the information's legitimacy (but I won't give away what I think it means!)
That being said, is there going to be some nuclear Armageddon? No.
Russia is already aware of a potential imminent false flag of exactly this nature and has an impressive capability to defeat such attack if launched.
Past that--and it's a much longer and deeper story--it seems the maniacs running the US do not have access to nuclear weapons. Their lackeys that do apparently will not provide access either, because they have no willingness to get annihilated in service to the Empire.
Nukes have already been used by Russia a number of times in the current conflict in Ukraine, so if the West wanted to point to a Russian "nuclear provocation", they could have simply done that. So whatever loony idea this guy may have come across, it's not going to start a nuclear war.
Finally, that bit about the "anti-LGBT pro-white Christian" program is totally bizarre and there's no evidence anywhere to connect it to. My thought is that some CIA maniac decided to circulate this bit of disinfo just in case They need to smoke a bunch of gays and trannies and blame it on white conservatives.
Looks like this guy just innocently accepted it, and one is reminded of Bill Cooper, who came to suspect phony UFO-related documents were being planted in front of him as disinfo.
We live in a wilderness of mirrors.
What they're hiding is that Leandro was trans. We can surmise that he was depressed and committed suicide, because transsexualism is a mental illness and people suffering from it have shocking rates of depression and suicide.
Take a look at this article from the South China Morning Post:
Robert De Niro’s grandson Leandro De Niro Rodriguez dead at 19
It mixes in mostly female pronouns throughout. None of the Western media mentions or alludes to this in the slightest. Have they ever failed to take the opportunity to mention someone is trans when it supports the narrative?
His mother wrote, "I wish that love alone could have saved you". Yeah, it turns our that love doesn't cure mental illness when it encourages and celebrates it. That's what they don't want anyone thinking realizing.
People are waking up, more every day. It's vitally important to "Them" that you never notice this. Always try to take note of this progress.
Take the example of Justin Castro, or should I say "Justine Castreau". Maybe five or six years ago, when I first heard he was Fidel's son, this was a wild claim even in conspiracy circles, and rejected by many of them. Fast-forward to the present and I can almost bring it up with normie friends and family.
Also, look for signs of "Their" desperation. Once alert, you'll see them everywhere, It's on the level of, "I think my GF is getting ready to break up with me, so I guess now's the time to ask for that three-way with her sister."
They know they're losing and running out of time.
For those new to the idea that there's a problem with viruses (as distinct from bacteria) when it comes to germ theory, I suggest you take a look at Koch's postulates. First, just read the postulates themselves and see if they make sense.
If it seems correct that satisfying these four postulates would be the necessary baseline demonstration of existence for "an infectious virus that causes a disease", then understand that no virus has ever, in 140 years, been shown to satisfy these simple requirements.
Then you can skim the rest of the Wiki page to see how they wave their hands around to distract you and give you every lame excuse in the book.
To hammer this point home, if no one felt it necessary that Koch's postulates be satisfied, then things like cooties and stab wounds could properly be classified as infectious diseases which could be diagnosed using a coin flip for testing. This is hidden from you in all the hand waving.
I would not be surprised if MSNBC replayed this clip and said, "See? How could he have possibly known this 7 years ago? The only way is that he's behind what's happening now. C'est un autre 6 Janvier!"
(Supposed to be a witticism, but I hope I didn't just give someone an idea.)
If you're interested in trying to get some insight into the "Wagner Incident", this article has the deepest insight I've come across:
A Matryoshka of Psyops – Pepe Escobar (The Intel Drop 6/30/2023)
I thought of it because it includes the "purge" element you mentioned:
Independent Russian media was already expecting some – treasonous – players, including state functionaries, to buy their one-way ticket when the going got tough (or to say they were “ill”, or refuse to answer important calls). The Duma – fed by Bortnikov’s FSB – is already working on a hefty list.
"Complex" doesn't even begin to describe the issue, and the author starts off by acknowledging that we'll only know with time what the hell it was really about in all aspects.
I would totally concur. If there are three things I've learned from the start of the SMO: Russians formulate plans and make preparations well in advance, they are very deliberate in all things, and they play their cards extremely close to the vest. Well, more like stuffed down into their underpants.
And if you compare any of this analysis to what gets flogged by the mainstream media, it's like a Venn diagram just showing two circles on a page.
Even the article gets it wrong, or perhaps we should say doesn't get it quite right. The problem has to do with mixing, not compression.
Theatrical presentations typically have a wide dynamic range, which is to say both very loud and very soft sounds. Theaters also have elaborate multichannel sound systems. The audio tracks are mixed to sound best in this setup.
TV shows typically have a low dynamic range: just some dialogue, a theme song, and some background music. Most TV shows are played through sets with two $0.50 speakers. Engineers for TV shows mix the audio to optimize for this setup.
The big problem comes when multichannel content is not properly downmixed for low end setups. The same problem has existed since multichannel content was first available for the home two decades ago. It takes time and costs money to downmix for a two-channel setup, so they usually just skip it. No one can tell they skimped and they just blame their own hearing.
The secondary problem is that back in the 90's, when convenient and relatively cheap personal audio devices first started becoming widely available, every idiot was listening to them way, way too loud in their earphones. They all succeeded in wrecking their hearing and this is one of the results. Very few are into hi-fi these days because they literally cannot appreciate hi-fi these days,.
I was just thinking today how obvious it is, yet no one sees it right in front of them. Remember when people caught AI just making facts up out of thin air, and they explained it away as simply a "hallucination"? I mean, would anyone take information and accept advice from someone that had even a single hallucination? You'd be like, "Hey, I think you should consider seeing a professional about this, brah. Good luck to you."
It's shocking to see how readily everyone accepts these things.
I think the "AI" that they're driving towards is where the party secretaries call up the name of anyone who displeases them on an app, which is then transmitted to a commissariat that proceeds to nuke your digital life. With additional features, they can also drone you.
Then all the NPCs that are going along with all this just shrug their shoulders, look at each other and say, "Hey, AI, amirite? What're you gonna do?"
I guess what I'm saying is that, in the final analysis, whatever They choose to call "artificial intelligence" is in principle irrelevant as long as it forwards their agenda.
I'e noticed we've changed to a new phase in the cognitive war on us.
First there was a "classical" phase of carefully crafted coherent narratives. Well, upon study they were full of holes, but at least coherence was what They were aiming at.
Then came the "meta" phase, where the Establishment maintained the official narrative, but other channels added in a raft of "conspiracies" of which you were free to choose, all being false and dead ends. I saw the Las Vegas Massacre as the introduction of this phase.
We are now in the "chaotic" phase. Both official narratives and phony conspiracies are distributed freely through both Establishment and alternative channels. Again, you're free to choose any of them because all are false. Why not choose them all and argue with friends about it?
This new phase has been enabled because everyone, both normies and conspiracy theorists, are completely overwhelmed at this point. The conspiracy theorists have even forgotten that they are seeking the truth, and that a good way to do that is through exchange of ideas with like-minded people. Oh no, they would much prefer to be "right".
It is now advantageous to the Elites to throw every crazy idea out there. So take this current example. If Russia is provoked into direct attacks on NATO outside Ukraine, the Elite say, "Oh, see, member when Vicky told you? Thank goddess for her!" If no such "WW3" comes, what she said slides in a week or two into oblivion, but may always be resurrected.
Another option, of course, is that They can always go off the board and retcon the timeline by saying that Nudelman said something other than what she said and the meeting was about something other than what it was about. The latest implementation of this you can now see used everywhere: "Oh, we secretly knew all about that then, but we couldn't tell you at that time. Secret! Anyway, that's proof that what I'm going to tell you now is true...."
Right, you see this on occasion. But "science" just tends to nibble around the edges and bounce off. Part of the reason is that the results are almost always disadvantageous for the Establishment.
Like in the article you linked, I have the feeling that if the results had been reversed, we would have heard a lot about how "conservatives are filthy animals who don't even get grossed out by disgusting things". I suspect it would have become yet another article of faith for the leftists, of course leading to no further research.
As I've put it together, underlying political leanings is that NPCs adhere strongly to those they accept as "authorities", which would have largely to do with their enculturation. Thus you'll find NPCs scattered around all spectra: political, religious, etc.
Given that, you end up finding strange anomalies that no one notices because no one is looking for them. A good example would be the vaxx. Leftist NPCs are commanded to get the vaxx by their authorities and they treat it like a sacrament. We've all seen that.
On the right, contrarily, even though Trump--supposedly a right-wing dictator--said to get vaxxed, I doubt a single person did it for that reason alone, or that it even affected their sentiments on the matter. What a stark contrast, eh? I would say the subtle reason is that Trump has never presented himself as an "authority" and never been accepted as such. (The alternative is that there are no NPCs on the right, but I think we all know plenty of conservatives who have a "blind faith" in their religion.)
Well, you can see it's all a pretty tangled web, and one wonders if it will ever be unsnarled.