There is indeed a campaign to suppress the existence of Jesus, part of a larger program to destroy true Christianity (that is, any part they cannot subvert). One disinfo agent is Joseph Atwill, who goes around saying the New Testament Gospels were faked by the Romans and Josephus so they could create and control Christianity.
I recall one interview he did with Alex Tsakiris on the Skeptiko podcast. (I am currently of the opinion that Alex is honest but very gullible where he is biased.) They must have spent 20 minutes talking about what Josephus said about Jesus.
They went on and one about what a liar and a scumbag Josephus was, and how he hooked up with the Flavians, and how he was probably the main guy behind the phony New Testament.
There was one thing they didn't talk about somehow, and that was the Testamentum Falvianum itself. Because it's huge, right? No. It's just one short paragraph, well under a hundred words. So why not just read it aloud on the show if you're talking about Josephus and Jesus so long?
Please do read it yourself. As you do, ask yourself whether it seems like what a professional propagandist would write to convince you that Jesus actually existed. No, the Flavians would have wanted their money back.
It is said by some to contain certain "interpolated" sentences, ones added in later. I suspect you will also be able to easily identify these yourself.
Given this active campaign of suppression, I would suggest that you be extremely skeptical of anyone who discusses the existence of Jesus and is not conversant in what I have just told you about the Testamentum Falvianum.
For any children who still believe that Beirut was destroyed by fertilizer or that several World Trade Center buildings were turned to dust by airplanes, I suggest you return to the NYT and CNN, where such fairy tales are widely available.
I've heard this hypothesis. I do think there's an earth grid and there may even be some relation to nuclear weapons, but from all the tactical strikes I've seen they can use them anywhere they wish, in very precise locations down to a few meters. That doesn't rule out Cathee's hypothesis, but it means that there is not much apparent practical locational limitation from it.
There could still be some limitation as to timing, but all the targets I've seen have been fixed so we can;t tell the difference there. But short of an aircraft carrier, anything worth blowing up with a nuke probably doesn't move much. Since the Russians have deployed nuclear-tipped anti-ship cruise missiles since at least 1983 (see the P-700 Granit), unless they're lying about this one little aspect of it I suspect there's no practical limitation as to time either.
All in all, I personally found no anomalies that would compel me to research Cathee's hypothesis further.
One is certainly tempted to think so. But wind the clock back a few years. Did you notice them then? No, me neither. Who was talking about human NPCs? No one.
They were working jobs, driving cars, flying planes, hanging out with you on Friday nights, typing and clicking away in the next cubicle over, etc, etc. These are all complex activities. similar or even more complex than the ones you and I do every day. And we never noticed the difference.
The true picture is more subtle. You can see that the entire establishment is silent on this subject. They do not want us to know it exists, let alone understand it.
Given that they do not want us to understand, we should try to understand as fully as possible.
Think about who you mean by "everyone". There are just a bunch of spooks running around there. And if you just worked in the embassy, how far do you think you get in those circles asking, "Hey, do you know what those guys over there are doing? Just asking because I think the public might want to know."
Even in the normal course of business, sensitive documents are destroyed all the time. Remember back in July 2020 at their consulate in Houston when the Chinese were literally burning documents in a trash can out back before anyone even noticed?
I think we have to fully internalize the fact that these NPCs in reality have a very different internal thought process. "NPC" is a real property of some humans. The current counter-psyop is that it's just used as a generalized insult. It's not, and the myriad of examples like this are proof.
I mean, imagine yourself standing next to the bouncy castle. Would it even enter your mind to unplug it? Of course not. You'd think, "I wonder if I can find some beer and weed around here before I go in."
I had a totally different reading of this event. First, if they wished to destroy any and all evidence of their nefarious activities, they could have done that any time and they certainly wouldn't want anyone talking about it in the news.
I may be wrong, but I read this as quite a positive development. If the fervently wished for Russo-Ukrainian War were to commence, it would have been run out of that embassy, not the Pentagon. Easy access to the proxies and all that sweet, sweet diplomatic immunity.
Given that, my reading is that someone came along and cleaned out this nest of Neo-Imperialist serpents. The Viceroyalty closed up shop indefinitely and now the puppets will have to phone up for instructions, which can and will be monitored. They're even running out of puppets, now that Zelensky has publicly demanded proof of their hysterical claims.
Am I too optimistic?
There are incredibly bizarre plot twists to this involving the pronunciation of the name. I suspect that if you're an average American like me, you have always heard it pronouced "kee-EV".
Starting way back in the Maidan coup days with Hillbeast and Victoria Nudelman and the rest of the Legion of Rapid War-Mongering Russia-Haters, they all started pronouncing it "keev".
"Well," thought I, "they must be spending a lot of time talking with Ukrainians, and either out of respect or just osmosis, they started using the Ukrainian pronunciation." Of course, it also virtue signals that they are better people than us.
Here's the plot twist: "keev" is the Russian prounciation! Ukrainians pronounce it more like "KAI-eb". WTF does this even mean? I think one thing is that those folks secretly despise Ukrainians and hate how they talk.
Double plot twist: a couple weeks ago NPR runs a story about this very subject: Kyiv or Kiev? Why people disagree about how to pronounce the Ukrainian capital's name. Surprise! They go to great detail to tell you the Ukrainians pronounce it the way I just told you Russians do.
Strangely, they link to a tweet that has the correct Ukrainian pronunciation. So I guess NPR has retains at least enough sense not to read their own material.
If you still have trouble thinking it could all be this effed up and want to confirm for yourself, you can get the audible pronunciations with Google Translate. If there was any entity that would try to mess with our heads, it would be SkyNet. But not here and not yet, anyway.
For historical comparison, allow me to refer you to The Enabling Act of 1933, passed just a couple of months after the Reichstag Fire.
I really, really suggest you actually go to that link read the full text of the Enabling Act and compare it to what Canada's DoJ has to say about their modern counterpart in summary descriptive form: Canada’s Emergencies Act
Say what you will about the Nazis, but I think it's undeniable that they were way, way, way more upfront about what they were doing than the New Totalitarians.
I would say that the French "Deep State" was also part of staging the Grand Guignol. I couldn't possibly locate the link now, but I was convinced of this after hearing the account of a high-ranking Wehrmacht officer involved in the initial German invasion of France.
He said that they had moved so fast and so aggressively--which was what a Blitzkreig was based on--that by the time the lines had stabilized, the Germans were (as I recall) something like three days away from collapse and withdrawal. Then as if by magic, French resistance evaporated and the Germans were able to resupply and continue. There are a dozen or more such "miracles" sprinkled throughout the European Theatre (<--hmm) that belie the orchestration.
And history gets recorded when they mythologize one of those miracles like "Dunkirk" and turn it into "the feel-good hit of the summer". A hundred Leni Riefenstahls would have work these days.
Yes, these are exactly the questions for which investigation will go a long way towards revealing who was up to what in that time period. You'll also notice such issues are studiously avoided in TV programs on WW2. (But sure enough, if you turn on one of these "history" channels, within 5 minutes you'll see Nazis shooting off artillery, as if this is important for people to understand.)
One of the finer points of how this all echoes into the modern day is the explanation for why Putin very strongly denies that the Soviets were poised to invade. (This of course flies in the face of the reason why the Red Army got their asses kicked: they were deployed for offensive movement rather than defense.)
To me, it's good proof that Putin is anti-NWO. He doesn't want to weaken the still somewhat vulnerable Russians by telling them that their "Great Patriotic War where we defeated Fascism" was actually "That time when tens of millions of us got killed by the heirs of the Bolsheviks using us as pawns in their plan of global domination." Understandable of him to do that, no?
I think you're working along the right lines here. The thesis which is forming in my mind is that the National Socialists were the creation of a very small covert group (which you would call infiltrators, except they were the ones that launched the project) aimed at the eventual destruction of the German state and people as a threat to the New World Order.
I'm not very familiar with the very early history and internal dealings of what would become the Nazis, so the thesis is not well formed, but the basic idea is that the tiny cancer that the NSDAP body formed around eventually metastasized into things similar to those you mentioned. (I might except the occult, though, which I think has been purposely blown way out of proportion lately to make us think the Nazis were not just evil, but evil weirdos.)
As it if forming in my mind, Bormann was the ringmaster and Goering was a mole, and there must have been others. They had collected around them "true believers" in the betterment of the German state and people: Hitler, Goebbels, Hess, Rommel, and probably Himmler.
This is actually just a sub-thesis of the larger thesis that WW2 was a managed event, and the Nazis were just one more piece on the chessboard.
For historical comparison, I would suggest you examine the "Law Against the Founding of New Parties", passed by the National Socialists six months after the Reichstag Fire (which, for historical comparison, was a false flag attack on the building housing their legislature).
Not to bias anyone, but I believe you will find that the Nazis were way more upfront about what they were doing. Quite refreshing, in a perverse way, from a simpler time.
In the sense that They conduct a genocide and write it down in the history books as a "pandemic"? Yes.
I recall reading years ago that a research study had disproven the narrative element of "rats with fleas carrying Black Plague". (I believe they found that fleas couldn't transmit it to humans.)
Of course, no one ever picked up the thread and asked, "Well then how did all those people end up dead?" I conclude that there is no grant money to conduct research for which They don't already know the answer and want it promoted.
And yes, I suspect They already know the answer to that question.
Many more suspicious associations and intriguing connections are surfaced in this paper: San Francisco and Jonestown (21-page PDF)
In it, Miles Mathis argues that the entire event was faked, along with the assassinations of Moscone and Milk. Mathis is, IMHO, a disinfo agent, but I believe that if you seek to understand Jonestown, you should certainly be conversant with the information he brings forward.
Mathis doesn't mention it, but Dianne Feinstein claims to have been at City Hall when Moscone and Milk were (supposedly) killed. Read her account very closely and you may doubt it as much as I do. And the decades since have shown "Darth Gungrabber" to be quite a nefarious character in our American Kabuki.
I don't follow him directly, now I just casually see links to his work on truthseeker.co.uk. The reason is that for me, he's a lot like Vigilant Citizen in that once you've seen even a pretty small fraction of their work, you realize they've nailed their theses to the church door with a construction-grade compressed-air nail gun.
That is, if someone says, "Yeah, the Jews don't run..." or "Yeah, I'm supposed to believe celebrities are involved in occultistsm?", all you would have to do is point them to Briother Nathanael or VC, respectively.
It's important to clearly note that the word "Jew" has been up-armored by purposefully but silently ensuring that it does not have a single definition. (I think I originally heard this idea from Brother Nathanael Kapner or Gilad Atzmon.)
If you closely examine the political and weaponized media usage, then depending on how it is to best advantage "Jew" can have 4(+/-) meanings:
- Anyone who confesses any brand of the Judaic faith
- Anyone who is ethnically a Jew
- Anyone who is a Jew by Jewish law (matrilineal)
- Anyone who self-identifies as a Jew
The "plus" definition is interpolated, where the government of Israel is somehow understood to be the official spokesman of all Jews everywhere and everywhen from Abraham forward.
The "minus" definition is actually one of the most important. That is, anyone who is a Jew by any definition can be silently excluded at will. Thus, if you have protesting Orthodox Jews being roughed up by cops in the streets of Tel Aviv, this is not anti-Semitic. If African Jewish immigrants to Israel are attacked or deported, this is neither anti-Semitic nor racist. If Neturei Karta burns Israeli flags in the streets of Brooklyn, well, that just didn't happen.
As a thought experiment, imagine you were a teacher for a minute.
You might feel the vital undertaking of education was ignored, undervalued, misunderstood. People didn't know or care about the important, even crucial, work that went on in the classroom every day. Wouldn't you want everyone, especially the parents of schoolchildren, to know all about the triumphs and difficulties of modern education? In any case, as a professional, they should understand exactly what they are paying for.
Not these people. We see that it is quite the opposite, don't we?
There's an axis that runs from Ukraine to Canada (which I sure didn't expect). Just for starters, you can read up on Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland's antics on her wiki page in the section "Early life, education and student activism", where she managed to get the KGB on her ass. And her grandfather was Michael Chomiak, who was the top propagandist for the Nazi's in Ukraine.
One other quick note: Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, whose testimony was prominent in the attempted impeachment of DJT, seems to have recently resurfaced. It seems more than a "fun fact" that he and his twin brother were born in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. I would say he's a more important "agent" than is realized.
There's an axis that runs from Ukraine to Canada (which I sure didn't expect). Just for starters, you can read up on Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland's antics on her wiki page in the section "Early life, education and student activism", where she managed to get the KGB on her ass. And her grandfather was Michael Chomiak, who was the top propagandist for the Nazi's in Ukraine.
One other quick note: Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, whose testimony was prominent in the attempted impeachment of DJT, seems to have recently resurfaced. It seems more than a "fun fact" that he and his twin brother were born in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. I would say he's a more important "agent" than is realized.
I think this is all part of the coverup and Baldwin will never be punished.
I heard a guest on the Boiler Room podcast a few months ago talking about this shooting. Sorry I can't recall his name offhand, but he was involved in the film industry himself, primarily as a cinematographer, and had actually worked with Halyna Hutchins a couple of times.
He said a lot of things about firearms and film sets that I haven't heard elsewhere, so if you're really interested you should look up the episode (and please post a link here!)
Forgive me if I get some of the specifics wrong, but one item that stuck in my mind was that he had very recently done some filming with an ex Green Beret on a shooting range. The guy was supposed to fire (a blank of course) directly at the camera, which he said was actually very rare. As I recall, he stood 30 feet to the side of the camera and operated it remotely, and was also behind a bullet-resistant plexiglas shield. Also pertinent is that he said the use of firearms on film sets since the Brandon Lee incident is regimented (by law, unions, and professional practice) to a crazy degree.
Now that doesn't really match up with what we're seeing in the "recreation", is it?My conclusion is that we're being shown more nonsense to add to the pile. The pile was built so everyone could pick what they wanted out of it like legos to put together their own little "theory". It's all part of the plan.
I believe this "incident" was part of Bladwin's "occult" qualification for political office and he will run for Senator from NY in 2024.